Pissing On A Dead Man’s Grave – SIr Jimmy Savile Accused of ‘Paedophilia’
Even dead men aren’t safe now from the sexual trade union’s historical revisionism. The recently departed Sir Jimmy Savile is to be the subject of documentary which claims that the famous disc jockey and television presenter was a paedophile who sexually abused girls ‘as young as 13′ back in the 1970′s.
Back in the sexual anarchy of the 1970′s, stars having sex with adoring and underage teenage groupies was about as wicked as smoking pot. Or maybe taking your library books back a few weeks late. It was reasonable to believe in those heady days at the dawn of the sexual revolution that the age of consent was a Victorian throw back which was destined shortly to be lowered. This is why it is important for the sexual trade union to crucify certain celebrities from that period. Paedohysteria rests upon the lie that moral attitudes to teenage sex are set in stone – the one moral certainty in an amoral and relativistic world. In fact, the age at which a girl is considered ready to have sex is one of the most arbitrary and transitory of moral rules known to man (in the modern world – previously the age was always set at the onset of puberty). Feminists also need to present their ever more draconian and irrational ‘child protection’ laws as part of the general trend of ‘liberal progress’. The 60′s and 70′s give the lie to that.
But because just about everybody famous was likely at it back then, the paedohysteric feminist media has to select its targets carefully. Jimmy Saville is perfect because :
- He was famously ‘odd and eccentric’
- He was single and never married (note that the DM article even states this)
- He was a good man who did notable charity work, especially for children
- He’s dead and can’t answer back
In the 21st century gynocracy, to be a middle-aged man who has never married now provokes greater social hostility than was previously ever reserved for spinsters. A middle-aged woman who has no interest in marriage is now re-defined either as a sexually independent cougar or as a woman who doesn’t want to be hurt by men. A man who lives alone and shows a similar lack of interest in marriage or in dating women is simply an obvious paedo.
The shaming of spinsters served an essential historical purpose, given that the continuation of society and civilisation depends on the fertility and child bearing of women. The present social shaming of unmarried men as possible paedophiles is simply the sexual trade union regulating the free sexual market in favour of the middle-aged vagina. In other words, the usual rape of the male by feminists with power.
The last point on your list: ? He’s dead and can’t answer back, is of course the reason why it’s even being targeted at all and clearly shows what moral cowards the sexual trade union members really are.
It’s much like that other disgusting lesbian femi-hag who planned for months, including learning the procedure for, then manufacturing her own napalm in order to burn her ‘abusive husband’ to death whilst he was sound asleep. She was sentenced to a pathetic few weeks in prison then the Prime Misister at the time: Tony Blair’s wife or ‘partner’: Cherie Booth presents her with a fucking barvery award!!
Again: because the man is dead and cannot answer back!
Of course The Daily
MisandristMail are really gloating over this latest paedohysteric scoop and is like a mega-dose of paedo-sleaze its huge readership of jealous, fat, ugly, middle aged femiserves and hags had waited so long for, they were frothing from their hagged mouths from the effects of accute withdrwal syndrome…Alan Vaughn
7 Aug 12 at 10:27 am
never heard of this guy, but i’ve little doubt he sexed “underage” females, the vast majority of whom greatly wanted to sex and be sexed (as females everywhere do)
the matriarchal West has been pimping girls to men for decades — gymnastie nymphets, miley cyrus, etc etc — and in the late sixties and seventies this was standard, take a look at (just one example) the film “Little Darlings” which is no more than an excuse to parade adolescent girls before males while pretending it’s all about a “summer camp” (heh)
or e.g. check scorcese’s bio-pic of dylan, where pubescent girls climb all over bob’s limo, DESPERATELY wishing to be, uh, brutally molested and, er, horribly horribly abused
as always with the gynocracy, they pick on a guy who cant fight back — not on the hundreds of pop-stars (jagger, richards, clapton, beatles, and on and on) who also fought-off (and often didn’t fight off) the endless adolescent/teenage girls wanting even five minutes with them
the newsreels of, say, the beatles and hitler are instructive — there also, we see hordes of 10 -15 y.o. females in frothing sexual-ecstasia before their celebrity-of-the-day…. just waiting their chance, as it were
as the pop-stars have been Queen-knighted and mainstreamed, they arent attacked and accused of THEIR many escapades with v young females — that would rather upset the cashflow ma-sheen, eh?
instead the monstresses and their predatory “investigator” target an “unmarried male” who, (w)horrors, didnt want to marry used-up, diseased, middle-aged feminist skanks, and now he’s dead he’s v useful for ratcheting-up the skreeching hatred of disgusting western women, ever-intent on “punishing” males but never-intent upon their own “crimes”
what cowards and hypocrites; i despise them and their matriarchies
for various reasons i advise against ANY contact with females, ESPECIALLY any who even appear “underage” — it’s a form of enslavement, then after theyve enslaved you, theyll use you like this Savile guy, then count themselves “moral”
almost everyone will hate you for writing this piece, thats usually a good sign youre on the right track and seeking truth
if the truth were easy and comfy to express, everyone would be doing it, and they aint
cheers
ray
7 Aug 12 at 6:29 pm
They get a star from time to time. They got Gary Glitter:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/517604.stm
But it’s rare. They prefer to blackmail the star into going on a pro-fem propaganda tour in exchange for leniency.
Off topic, @ theantifeminist: you may want to add an edit function to this site? Comparable sites often offer the possibility of editing one’s post within a few minutes of posting.
@Ray: did someone steal the caps key on your computer?
Jack
7 Aug 12 at 7:45 pm
Back in the sexual anarchy of the 1970?s, stars having sex with adoring and underage teenage groupies was about as wicked as smoking pot.
http://www.elvis.com/!userfiles/editor/images/elvisfanclubs.jpg
http://www.elvispresleymusic.com.au/pictures/img/elvis/50s/56/1956_march.jpg
http://photos.elvispresleymusic.com.au/images/50s/1957_march_st_louis_elvis_with_fans_408.jpg
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_KSUmgbF9LXA/S9VmIhYqYAI/AAAAAAAAAC8/wLeWK0hnVpU/s1600/almostfamous.jpg
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-YBA9We0M6pA/T6ApUu9NYiI/AAAAAAAABe0/EQklwriA1qQ/s1600/groupies-pictures-i3.jpg
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lcqpxbAEjX1qzezj5o1_500.jpg
This is still common but due to chances in “rape” definition what we have today is many male celebrities, singers, actors, producers, directors, athletes etc being falsely accused of rape.
MRA
7 Aug 12 at 8:11 pm
gary glitter. . . they did up townshend too — but only to send a message, to ratchet up the Fear- machine,while still peddlin’ the goods…. 30 cops or whatever came to get townshend, it was quite well publicized heh
yeah a skinny old guitar player he’s arful dangerous :O)
course not imprisoned but, cant recall, he probably “recanted” onne way or tother
ray
8 Aug 12 at 4:34 am
MRA has provided some interesting links to point out how times have changed so much over the past decades. Here’s a link to Wikipedia regarding a Sydney radio DJ popular in the 60′s.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ward_%22Pally%22_Austin
You will note mention of his quite public relationship with a 14 year old girl when he was 31.
In 1990 I remember seeing a documentary about the Aussie radio scene in the 60′s and 70′s. One startling image was of the 31 year old Pally Austin with his 14 year old girlfriend in a super short school uniform perched on his knee. This was described as “an old publicity shot”. Can the modern feminists explain why such a picture would have been used as a publicity shot for a major radio station back then if social standards weren’t vastly different?
I also remember that quite a few movies made from the late 60′s to the mid 70′s frequently contained scenes where girls in their mid-teens would run off with older men. And the storyline would emphasis the unfaithfulness to his wife rather than the age of his new girlfriend.
Just to finish on…check out this link to a 1970 movie staring Charles Bronson – Twinky.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0064598/
Deano
8 Aug 12 at 6:28 am
Deano:
Another film I remembered after our recent discussions about early actresses was one of Clara Bow’s only talking pictures ‘The Wild Party’ (1929). It was a ‘romantic comedy’ typical of the period. She played a schoolgirl and her and a male teacher fell in love. During their affair, some of her jealous school-mates found out and made a false accusation. Clara discovered the accusation and told the teacher, who decided to resign and elope with her.
There was a line in this scene that was priceless: the teacher was writing out his resignation letter when Clara asked him if he saw any chance of fighting the false accusation. He looked at her sternly and said: ‘You have no idea what depths of depravity that jealous and sex-starved imaginations like theirs would stoop to.’
Any director or producer in Hollywood today who actually the balls to suggest a story-line like that, in a film targeted to young women, would be on a blacklist so deep he probably couldn’t even post amateur videos on Youtube LOL
Eric
8 Aug 12 at 7:42 am
I’ll try experimenting with a new comment plugin when I get back from the beach in a few weeks time Jack.
BTW, with regard to your recent question about reddit – the subreddit is http://reddit.com/r/mensrights I would reccommend viewing it as a tremendous source of up to the minute men’s rights news and links. Of course, many important and valid articles get downvoted into oblivion so it’s always useful to take a glance at http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/new?sort=new
I would also avoid spending too much time in the comments section. Half of the people there are feminist trolls, most of the other half (the ‘mras’) haven’t even read Warren Farrell or Steve Moxon and are ‘pro-feminist’.
theantifeminist
8 Aug 12 at 9:22 am
lookit Savile’s photo
i mean, are you bullshitting me? that face wouldnt just stop a clock, it’d make it run sideways and speek greek
why did the teenies lust after him? b/c females of all ages are attracted to power and celebrity (yeah they like good looks too, but theyre willing to overlook the Ug in the male if he raises their personal social-status (before other females) sufficiently
“sexual trade union” is a good term, dont be fooled — most of feminism, especially its most heinous, vicious, and pathological aspects, is driven by aging females taking vengeance on the male population for the sin of maleness. . . and fourth-rate males are only too happy to profit from that
cultural, legal, political, and social supremacy for females also plays a big role, of course, as females are selfish and materially addicted creatures . . . but the heart of the beest is jealously and rage at getting aged
ray
8 Aug 12 at 7:54 pm
Ray:
On the other hand, Roman Polanski and Jerry Lee Lewis went for ‘underage’ types and they weren’t too bad looking. The issue really has to do with what sexually attracts (normal) females.
The sexual development is different in both genders during childhood. Boys tend to follow a fairly linear path; girls mature earlier but more completely. Girls internalize a male image that is more objective (what the man represents) moreso than the case of boys (what the girl looks like). IOW, ‘objectification’ is natural to women. The man’s looks aren’t as important as the values or standards he represents or projects. There are biological reasons for this difference.
On the other hand, girls raised under feminism internalize representations of men that are wholly negative; hence at sexual maturity they instinctively seek out thugs, losers, bums and degenerates because that’s how ‘manhood’ has been represented to them by society. You can see how this benefits both sexual trade-unionists and lower-class males.
It hardly needs to be added that feminist academics are fully aware of these scientific truths and causing these social problems intentionally.
Eric
9 Aug 12 at 2:38 am
On the other hand, girls raised under feminism internalize representations of men that are wholly negative; hence at sexual maturity they instinctively seek out thugs, losers, bums and degenerates because that’s how ‘manhood’ has been represented to them by society
lotta truth in that eric, their matriarchal kulture disallows marriage at the proper time psychologically and genetically (what was taken for granted previously is now child molestation, a crime much worse than murder etc)
sane cultures understood it’s in everyone’s benefit — except unmarried, again females — to get girls OFF the s.m.p. as soon as possible, into lifelong marriages, so that chaos wouldnt ensue
now the west is ruled by unmarried, aging females, desperately holding onto age 15 forever, and it’s a horror and a disaster, but they buy lotsa useless stuff as psychosexual compensation for their undesirability and rage
as for roman, he is persecuted not for the sex (half of show biz in sixties and seventies would be criminals in that case) but b/c of rosemary’s baby, a film that did not thrill those really in power (and i dont mean suckers like senators and presidents)
that film was made in 1968, concerning the practice of sorcery/witchcraft by “extremely normal and everyday” next-door neighbors
consider the u.s. in the intervening forty-plus years — incredibly massive abortions, lockdown feminism, police state, all kinds of occult practices and pseudo-religions . . . including mainstream christianity, which is now essentially a front for female-supremacy and paganism — and feminism is the oldest form of paganism or idolatry
to appreciate roman’s warning fully, one must have lived in the fifties and sixties, when the u.s. was still quite christian, wholesome, reasonably masculine, and sane
roman is in trouble b/c of the implied warnings in that film, not for the hysterically convenient excuse the matriarchy employs
cheers
ray
9 Aug 12 at 3:43 am
Eric,
yes great comment there:
Alan Vaughn
9 Aug 12 at 4:57 am
Oops! (did it again!)
Eric,
Yes great comment:
While at the same time those feminist lesbihags are also fully aware of the same negative internalizations of men are also true of BOYS who are indoctrinated, also from very early in their lives, with the same misandric dogma and mantra, thus the result is very low academic performance and corresponding self-esteem; which is why they then BECOME the thugs, losers, bums and degenerates that the feminized girls are attracted to.
Social Engineering at its best – sexual trade union lies and feminist man HATRED …
Alan Vaughn
9 Aug 12 at 5:07 am
Ray:
Excellent points. The Ancient Greeks had a story that the goddess Athena made the institution of monogamy a condition for the founding of Athens. According to the story, prior to that, there was social anarchy because women followed their own inclinations without any civilizing force restraining them. Athena was also a goddess of wisdom and depicted as a perpetual virgin; the Greek commentators believed the story was a metaphor depicted the fact that enlightened civilization could not advance with unbridled female ‘liberation’ and that it was also in women’s best interest to adhere to the patriarchal system.
It’s amazing how many of the ancient Greek and Roman goddesses were also early anti-feminists LOL.
That perspective on women not only made the Greeks and Romans more civilized than their neighbors, it also gave them a far better and more elevated theology than the hideous earth-goddess religions practiced in other cultures. Feminism is really fundamentally a throwback to those pre-civilized cults. One can draw direct parallels between abortion, free-love, male-hatred, and vagina-worship of today and the revolting practices of those ancient earth-goddess religions.
P.S. Excellent points, too, about Polanski. That’s a whole story in itself.
Eric
9 Aug 12 at 8:51 pm
Alan:
Add into that these degenerated males also—correctly—discern that there is no social incentive for male self-improvement, self-respect, responsibility, or productivity. Men are faced with a social disincentive for ‘playing by the rules’ and ‘doing the right thing.’
That this is social-engineered misandry should be obvious; except that mangina media bosses are totally in denial about it. Feminism is about gender supremacy; all men are considered subhumans, so that the most degraded and degenerate men are the ones society rewards. That’s been the case in every society where a group has been marginalized or persecuted. It’s always the collaborators and sell-outs who get the benefits.
Eric
9 Aug 12 at 9:12 pm
the matriarchal West has been pimping girls to men for decades — gymnastie nymphets, miley cyrus, etc etc — and in the late sixties and seventies this was standard, take a look at (just one example) the film “Little Darlings” which is no more than an excuse to parade adolescent girls before males while pretending it’s all about a “summer camp” (heh)
All movies in the past about school girls, or school girls camping was not more than what you say here, excuse to parade adolescent girls before males, have you notice how today movies about high schoolers and teenagers the actors are never real teenagers? they are usually in their 20s or early 30s , and many times look older than the characters they are suppose to portray, but that does not stop pedocritics and feminists to try to shame and forbid it.
GQ Magazine made a photo shoot for 3 actors from the TV show Glee, the shoot was attacked because it portrayed the actors as teenagers and the 2 girls wearing school out fit.
http://www.deadline.com/2010/10/racy-glee-gq-shoot-creates-controversy/
You can watch all the pictures here
http://www.gq.com/entertainment/movies-and-tv/201011/glee-photos-rachel-quinn-finn#slide=1
MRA
9 Aug 12 at 11:10 pm
it also gave them a far better and more elevated theology than the hideous earth-goddess religions practiced in other cultures. Feminism is really fundamentally a throwback to those pre-civilized cults.
yep a full-on restoration of paleolithic and early-neolithic functional matriarchies — in those times, fatherhood as a social/spiritual element didnt exist, and the female/mother was “naturally” viewed as omnipotent as basis of all life
the swiss philologist j.j. bachofen wrote a great book about primitive matriarchal cultures, using roman funerary monuments as an investigatinve jumping-off place
speaking of romans…..
That’s a whole story in itself.
it really is, eric — a “story” with many nuances the sheeple dont understand, and are not allowed to hear
roman’s a pretty good guy, by this planet’s standards enyway, and he did a v dangerous job writing and making Rosemary’s Baby — it cost him inside, plenty
so he gets cut a lot of slack
he danced along the line by using his position as celebrity to seduce the girl, which is bad enough . . . it’s not like they met at a cafe or something, and then lust just overwhelmed
certain “hidden interests” protected polanski until this particular incident — he couldnt have just been satisfied with sex,, he had to sodomize her too, and that cost him most of his “silent allies”
if he’d been content to just give her a loving and gentle experience, it still would have been a breach, but not so grievous — what’s the girl supposed to think about sex after being sodomized at 12 or 13 as an “introduction”?
roman not only ruined her for a future husband, but injured her psychologically by indulging himself w/o any restraint
of course the police-state/matriarchy would have pursued him regardless, even w/o the sodomy — but they wouldnt have ever caught him ;O)
but after that little demonstration of selfishness, the interests that looked after roman b/c of Rosemary’s Baby, and b/c roman is basically a good guy . . . well, they figgered . . . uh just what exactly am i protecting here?
tellingly, it’s the matriarchy, Medea, and police state that continue to persecute polanski, but the girl largely shrugged the experience off, and went on with her life
the woman’s only regret, looking back, was the sodomy stuff — roman was famous, and she in no way resisted, she was v flattered of course. . . but sodomy isntt the kind of thing a girl would be thinking about or desiring in 1968, you know?
the Official Story about roman has little to do (as usual) with what actually happened, and why
cheers
ray
10 Aug 12 at 5:43 pm
Yahoo celebrity news today ran a photo of Madonna (now age 54) in a short black dress and boots that would probably look good on someone say, 30-40 years younger.
I don’t know who these would-be ‘cougars’ think they’re fooling with this stuff. If this is the ‘new normal’ I need to think about expatting in a hurry!
Eric
11 Aug 12 at 8:28 am
Ray;
Futrelle and Schwyzer would do well to take heed from Polanski’s example. In the media cartels it’s an unwritten rule that nobody’s indispensible (except for the guys at the very top). The reason the bigwigs overlook questionable behavior from these guys is only so they can use it as a weapon against them later on when they become either expendable or a liability.
Polanski was smart enough to know this and made a bee-line for the nearest border in the nick of time.
Eric
11 Aug 12 at 8:34 am
The reason the bigwigs overlook questionable behavior from these guys is only so they can use it as a weapon against them later on when they become either expendable or a liability.
hi eric yes, i’m sorry to say i agree
the blackmailing etc is increbibly extensive, and v much includes people in positions of power and influence (except as you note, at the v v top) — everyone’s “available” b/c everyone makes mistakes, was young, has skeletons etc — this is Earth after all
since almost everything one does is now “recorded” in one form or another, this technique is simple to employ, and The People are already well-conditioned to respond as desired . . . fucktrelle imagines himself a wielder of black mail hisself, but his threats (typically for a coward) are always indirect
his self-loathing is truly monumental, but he just cant face himself and so must project his jealousy and insecurity outward
but as w him and schliezer, such info would only be made public in the extremely unlikely event that either turned against the gynogulag and began speaking truth
the technique is a sort of ace-of-spades in the hole for use by our pathological “authorities”
you guys, dont let them get you down, or skeered, it’s exactly what they want
the strange reality is that THEY are actaully afraid of YOU — a few doods chatting on the internet!
it just tickles the heck outta me
cheers
ray
11 Aug 12 at 8:02 pm
Ray:
Very true. Sometimes men do turn against their masters (like Polanski) but usually those types are fundamentally decent guys who come to realize over time that they’re being used. Polanski exposed them in his film and, knowing the consequences, escaped from their clutches just in time. The vindictive elites over here are STILL after him, even several years later.
Most often, the Futrelle & Schwyzer-types make themselves expendable by getting big heads and thinking that they’re more important than the guys above them and start acting with too much independence. They don’t always realize that that whole circle of blackmail and extortion in the system observes a very strict ‘pecking order’ and mere mouthpieces like Futrelle can be replaced, just like he replaced Kyle Payne when Payne became too much of a liability.
Eric
12 Aug 12 at 2:10 am
LOL, on the bus today I saw an advertisement by some ‘concerned womens group’ about a project to raise awareness about so-called exploitation of minors. I was sitting too far away to read much more than the banner headline, which said: ‘THERE ARE 60 MILLION CHILD BRIDES IN THE WORLD TODAY. SOME OF THEM AS YOUNG AS 12.’
Interesting. Apparently the goal of these new sufferagettes is to liberate these millions of women from the horrors of marriage to the liberation of sluttiness and singlehood.
But I found the last part of the headline particularly concerning: ‘some as young as 12′. Granted, it’s debatable whether or not 12 is an appropriate age for a lady to be married. But the statement implies—not children YOUNGER than 12, but OLDER than that age. Now, we come into some grey areas. If 12 is a debatable age for defining the end of childhood, increasing ages become even more difficult. IOW, ‘children’ are defined by whatever criterion the sexual trade unionists behind this ad campaign determine.
Given the broadening definition of childhood in the US, from Obamacare’s age 26; to the sexual codes in colleges; to statuatory laws on tobacco and alcohol, I think it’s fairly obvious that many Anglosphere paedohysterics would like to define marriage to a 20 y/o as exploitation of a minor.
Eric
12 Aug 12 at 2:28 am
The problem is that they try to sell women her age as desirable, because is the only legal and social acceptable women men can look and desire, is like pretend a 40 years old man watching Madonna or any other old hags would have an erection, is no biological to do that, the reason many men are having troubles getting an erection rest in that the women they are trapped/married with, are usually bad looking, fat A/O old.
Many middle age women believe that men their own age have erectile dysfunction or just can’t get it up, but the same men don’t have troubles getting their buddy hard as rock with a 18-19 or early 20s baby in good shape.
Middle age women prefer to lie to themselves and believe is men’s problem than admit that they are not longer as desirable as women half their age.
The cougar thing wont last forever in a man life, cougar forget that young men want to have sex with them NOT be with them, as the same time their sexual market value goes dawn the opportunity to fuck them is in its upper spot, a middle age cougar has the same sexual market value that a nerd fat boy with his face full of pimples in high school,cougars are easy to fuck for one reason, male attention is not a hassle as used to be, men not longer look at them as they are undresses them with their sight, men their age are married or dating young women, so they don’t have any other option than goes and OFFER their vagina in the Cougar Convention.
MRA
12 Aug 12 at 3:47 am
‘THERE ARE 60 MILLION CHILD BRIDES IN THE WORLD TODAY. SOME OF THEM AS YOUNG AS 12.’
lol yeah SOME OF THE CHILD BRIDES ARE NINETEEN! WHY THEY’RE ONLY TEENAGERS? YOU’RE NOT IN FAVOR OF SEXUALLY ABUSING LITTLE TEENAGERS ARE YOU?
OH BAMA! OH BAMA! WHATEVER SHALL WE PORE, HELPLESS, VICTIMIZED WIMMMENZ DO?
WE BETTER PASS SOME MORE LAWS AGAINST MALENESS FAST BEFORE ONE OF THE CHILD BRIDES GETS BRIDED BEFORE MY AGING, SKANKY, DISEASED, USED-UP OLD ASS DOES!
the matriarchy’s agit-prop is everywhere, u cant go into a doctor’s office or grocery store or govt building w/o seeing their hate-messages. . . . . manufactured consent for their evil, disguised as do-goodism
cheers!
ray
12 Aug 12 at 4:51 pm
Marriage to a 20 y/o? Just asking one out on a date will probably earn a man 20 years of ass rape for exploitation of a minor (grooming laws, ref. Chris Hansen) and downloading pictures of any such 20 y/o children dressed provocatively and smiling will of cousre be ‘obtaining child prnography via a carriage service’. 10 years prison (per image), sentences to be served consecutively – no parole.
Let’s rid the world of these disgusting paedophiles…
Alan Vaughn
12 Aug 12 at 10:26 pm
MRA:
‘Middle age women prefer to lie to themselves and believe that it is the men’s problem than to admit they are not as desirable as women half their age.’
Exactly. Part of the problem is that women in feminist-dominated cultures believe that men are only concerned with sex, and therefore have nothing other than sex to offer as valuable to men. This is one reason why they want to prevent younger women from participating in the sexual marketplace for as long as possible.
Women in non-feminist cultures understand reality a lot better. They marry young and bond emotionally with a man, also they have sex with him exclusively. This situation forms an extremely strong insurance policy for woman who is approaching or into middle age. She actually has a psychological leverage over her man than younger women do not have. To draw a parallel, a 40 y/o NFL quarterback may not have the physical qualities of a 20 y/o player, but the coach is going to go with the man who’s proven himself every time.
When it comes to women, a middle-aged or older man with a decent-looking, pleasant, sexually experienced wife of a few years, who may have raised children and gone through hardships with him, is likely NOT going to go for a uncertain deal with a younger model.
But feminist dunces don’t understand this: they fantasize that they can put off serious relations well into their 40s and still have these same options.
Eric
12 Aug 12 at 11:38 pm
Ray & Alan:
My first thought when I saw the ad was: there are 60 million women over the age of 12 who’ve gotten married? Where are these places?
Next time I see this ad, I should find the link and see if they describe where these eligible brides actually live. I’m sure they have sisters, cousins, friends who are also looking for husbands.
Now, that’s a public-service ad the way it’s supposed to be done! LOL
Eric
13 Aug 12 at 12:02 am
As promised, I found the femihags responsible for putting up these abominable ads:
http://www.becauseiamagirl.org
It seems to be centered in the feminist cesspool of Great Britain, though represented by branches throughout the Anglosphere. They loosely ‘focus’ on women under the age of 18; but there’s a lot of insinuation throughout their propaganda that marriage should be put off awhile longer than that age.
Eric
15 Aug 12 at 9:00 am
I.e. 35 years or above (but only if they have achieved ugly hag status, or at least BBW), or better still: NEVER, if marriage refers to any such union with a MALE!
The minimum age of 35 years will be easily implemented by proxy (back-door) age of consent legislation upgrades, that should effectively imprison almost all
paedophilesmales, via stealth laws, such as the present ‘Obamacare’ scam…God, don’t you just HATE these MEN?
LOL…
Alan Vaughn
15 Aug 12 at 10:42 am
Alan:
I got the distinct impression reading through their literature (which was mostly just a tissue of lies and misandry) that they picked the age of 18 for political reasons. They were going into a lot of discriptions about how early marriage robbed ‘girls’ of future opportunities like college, career (as if marriage and those things are somehow mutually exclusive). IOW, enjoy your grrrl power as long as possible—i.e., until the onset of menopause.
The underlying message was, of course, that having a husband is an unnecessary burden and young women have better things to do.
What was really telling was that while this femihag organization was discouraging marriage and children, part of their platform was to make abortion available freely. Things like that really show what they’re all about.
Eric
16 Aug 12 at 4:16 am
If it could not be proved when he was alive, then leave it alone.
sweetthing
21 Sep 12 at 2:17 pm