8 thoughts on “Pippa Middleton Goes Without Makeup”

  1. wow… I hope this is really just a bad picture of her… she looks 35 and beyond.

    Personally, I have a feeling that age will not be kind on that face.

  2. Mind you, she doesn’t look much better with makeup on either. Without knowing that the Anglosphere is a “princess culture”, it would be utterly baffling as to why people fawn over the looks of this plain looking woman. Kate’s somewhat better looking, but neither would so much as catch your eye if they were on a Tesco checkout.

  3. This is really a good illustration of why you get a Sexual Trade Union, IMV. Middleton is not beautiful. Some women are; they have a close to ideal arrangement of facial features. For them, beauty can last quite a long time in their life.

    But all that most females have as an attractant is youth; their actual facial construction is not beautiful, but in the golden decade after puberty completes they have that youthful “glow” and with a bit of help from makeup can look moderately good. But of course, that fades extremely rapidly, and by the end of their twenties they look like this. And in modern society, they’re walking around looking like this expecting to attract high quality males. As I said before, she doesn’t look much better with her slap on. In terms of attractiveness, it’s all over for her.

    No wonder there’s so much jealousy driving Feminism.

  4. Beautiful? 29? She looks both plain, bordering ugly, and 40 to me…

    As do 99.9% of 29 year old women without their make-up on.

    Here’s an even worse photo of her without make-up, as well as some other celebs. The article compares a number of famous women as to how they look without make-up – claiming that some look good, and some look awful.

    http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/stars-with-no-make-up-rihanna-773585

    Katherine Jenkins is one of the women that they claim looks good. This is how the Daily Mirror, one of the most paedohysteric newspapers on Earth, compliments her on how good she looks without make-up :

    Katherine could be mistaken for a school pupil on the way home from swimming lessons

    Of course, female sexual jealousy has nothing to do with paedohysteria – don’t even consider that misogynist suggestion until I’ve provided experimentally replicable scientific proof of a connection between the multi-billion dollar cosmetics industry (women trying to look 15) and the multi-billion dollar abuse industry (women telling men they are paedophiles if they look at 15 year olds).

  5. Jenkins does actually look good IMV, which sort of comes back to what I said below about the difference between beauty and “merely youthful”.

  6. Here’s an even worse photo of her without make-up, as well as some other celebs. The article compares a number of famous women as to how they look without make-up – claiming that some look good, and some look awful.

    Kate Moss’s face as you can see in that article is also a cautionary tale as to what smoking will do to your face. She has been an avid smoker at least since the beginning of her modeling career 20 years ago, and it definitely shows now. That damage can not be undone no matter how much makeup she puts on.

    On the other hand, by age 40 something’s got to give either way, especially as women’s skin is so dependent on good proper estrogen supply to stay youthful looking. Estrogen levels in women start dropping considerably after 30 and then just drop off a cliff by age 40, which affects collagen and elastin contents in the skin, both of which are structural proteins needed for the skin to stay plump, smooth and soft. Smoking not only further reduces estrogen production (which is also why early menopause is a common side effect of prolonged heavy smoking in women), but it also overstimulates the production of certain liver enzymes like collagenase that break down said proteins in the skin and age it prematurely.

Comments are closed.