The End of the Pretty ‘Mademoiselle’?

Bridget Bardot‘Mademoiselle’, that beautiful French word meaning ‘young (unmarried) woman’, and that evokes immediately in English speakers the archetypal image of the pretty french girl, is set to be consigned to the history books.

The terms ‘Madame’ and ‘Mademoiselle’ were formerly used to distinguish between a married and an unmarried woman respectively, in times when such a difference had enormous social and legal importance.  Just like Spanish and German equivalents of ‘senora/senorita’ and ‘Fraulein/Frau’.

Now of course, with women marrying much later in life, the terms simply denote the difference between a sexually desirable young female, and a woman past peak fertility (or rather past peak ‘attractiveness’).

It’s hardly surprising that the sexual trade union are no longer going to tolerate the use of this word.  It is not enough for middle-aged feminists to create law after law that criminlises men who pursue their healthy genetically hard-wired preference for younger females.  Like the totalitarian government of Orwell’s ’1984′, they believe they can eliminate such thought crimes alltogether by altering the language itself – they want to create their own feminist ‘Newspeak’.  The erasing of words such as ‘Mademoiselle’ is merely the start.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 9 Comments

Shame – The Pathologization of Male Sexuality Continues

A new film is released in the UK this week that was notable enough for the BBC to devote an article to it linked to prominently on its main news page.  Called ‘Shame’ it stars Steve McQueen, and deals with the ‘problem’ of male sex addiction.

This week sees the release of Steve McQueen’s film Shame, which focuses on sex addiction, but what is it really like to be a sex addict? At the age of 27, comedian Jeff Leach has slept with more than 300 women and wants to confront his problem.

I am a ladies’ man and to be honest a pretty successful one, sometimes sleeping with women at a rate of more than 10 a week, but now I am on a mission to change.

I want to see if I can handle a committed relationship. I need to find out where I have been going wrong.

Seeing every single woman as a potential sexual adventure makes me miserable, tires me out and leaves me feeling vacuous and shallow, and ultimately very lonely.

Genghis KhanYea right, sleeping with up to 10 women a week would leave any Alpha Male feeling vacuous and lonely.  Makes you wonder about someone like Genghis Khan, who must have fucked at least 10 premium nubile teenage girls daily for ‘1 in 200 men alive today‘ to be descended from him.  Why the hell did he not end up killing himself after a couple of weeks though the sheer insufferable ennui of it all?  Perhaps the ‘problem’ is that Jeff was banging worn out desperate old ‘cougars’?

And if the shaming words of the BBC article themselves are not enough, the article also comes complete with a photograph of the disgraced sex addict, looking suitably vacuous, with a caption underneath informing us that ‘Jeff Leach regularly looks at porn’ (like 99% of the male population).

The message from the BBC (and presumably the film) is that any male sexual behaviour that does not match the reproductive needs of the 9 month gestating female simian is now, by definition, devient and immoral.

Recall that the BBC is so proud of its ‘neutrality’ and ‘objectivity’ that it infamously refused to describe the London tube bombers (who blew up children) as terrorists.

Posted in Male Sexuality, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Joan Bakewell on the ‘Raunch Culture’

Joan Bakewell 1968

Sex is Good!

Joan Bakwell used to be a ‘sex positive’ feminist back in the day – when she was young and mildly attractive (and earned the tag – ‘the thinking man’s crumpet’).  Now a wizened old hag, she spends most of her time trying to justify becoming a fully paid up member of the sexual trade union, slut shaming British tweens at every opportunity.

So what is there to complain about? It is the availability – indeed, the marketing – of such raunchy videos to the young and impressionable that disturbs me. Something has shifted in our culture to bring sub-teens within the orbit of suggestive sexual activity. T-shirts with cheeky, even lewd slogans – jokes that only adults can understand – are designed and sold to the under-10s. Children can hunt on a multitude of television channels for something that looks vaguely adult and vaguely transgressive. Can it be good for them? I for one would not be prepared to take the risk.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/8998434/Sex-in-society-too-much-raunch-too-young.html

Now, there’s nothing particularly wrong with arguing that under 10′s are exposed to too much sexual imagery.  The problem with the ‘sexualisation of children’ debate is twofold.   Firstly, the way feminists ignore the distinction between the sexualisation of pre-pubescent children and the ‘de-sexualisation’ of post-pubescent teenagers (which is what most feminists are really after).  Secondly, the infringement of liberties and sexual freedoms that any measures to end the supposed sexualisation of children inevitably entail.

joan bakewell 2012

Sex is Bad!

But what occurred to me whilst thinking about this today is that there seems to be something amiss here with the very notion that ‘children’ can be sexualised at all.  At least, it appears to me, that it is inconsistent with the idea of ‘informed consent’ that lies behind feminist statutory rape laws.  The reason why feminists hold that 15 or even 17 year old girls are unable to consent to sex is that they do not know what they are doing when they get into bed, at least with an older partner.  They do not understand what sex is – they do not have ‘informed consent’, this mysterious thing that a 15 or a 17 year old girl doesn’t have, but an 18 year old or a 21 year old does.  This thing that is so mysterious and esoteric, that it could not possibly be written down and taught to an underage child, in order to give them the capability of informed consent.  And even if it could, presumably a child’s brain is either so innocent or immature, that they simply couldn’t understand this knowledge.

Yet the viewing of a raunchy MTV video can somehow turn an innocent child into a sexually experienced whore.  A 10 year old girl who sees Lady Gaga opening her legs on screen will suddenly turn into an 18 year old slut walker, eight years too early.  According to Joan Bakewell, a pre-teen who overhears a comedian telling a sexy joke will have her sexual innocence corrupted.

But doesn’t a child’s supposed lack of ‘informed consent’ regarding sexual matters mean that she simply can’t understand what the joke is about, or why it is that all the men are looking at Lady Gaga when she opens her legs or wears a skimpy outfit?  If that’s the case, why the fuss over the ‘sexualisation of children’?  If the feminist theory of ‘informed consent’ is correct, a ‘sexualised child’ is a contradiction.  If little girls are dancing ‘sexily’ in their bedrooms across the land after watching Lady Gaga, they are merely imitating their favourite pop star like parrotts.  But they don’t and can’t understand what they are doing, or what Lady Gaga is doing, because they are incapable of sexual knowledge.  So what exactly are feminists worried about?

Posted in Feminism and Islam, Pornography, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 16 Comments

Women Can Stop Rape

Some genius at Reddit Men’s Rights has created several rather splendid replies to the latest nauseating set of ‘Men Can Stop Rape’ posters.

Here’s the original posters :

men can stop rape ad

And here are his replies :

women can stop rape

women can stop child abuse

women can stop domestic violence

Posted in Men's Rights, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 9 Comments

That Rare Thing – A Pro Male Sexuality Anti-Feminist Blog

When I posted my hopes for 2012 a few days ago, I forgot to mention that one of my hopes was that more men’s rights blogs would start appearing that placed the feminist war upon male sexuality at the center of their perspective.  At the moment it still feels pretty lonely being a men’s rights activist speaking out unreservedly against ALL sexually self-interested feminist laws that criminalise male sexuality. But the same day I came across the following excellent blog from a Norwegian MRA called Eivind Berge (he posts under his real name) that you should all bookmark :

http://eivindberge.blogspot.com/

You might not agree with everything he says, as I’m sure not many of you agree with everything I say here.  For example, his latest post is actually an attack on feminist laws that criminalise female teachers who end up sleeping with their male students.  I don’t agree with the idea that there are less moral issues involved in female teachers sleeping with teenage boys than the other way around (in fact there are arguments to the contrary – for example that boys mature later than girls).  But I do agree that it’s an absurdity that such ‘lucky’ boys are being damaged by having the child abuse victim label forced upon them, and I think that the way forward for MRAs is to highlight the double standards whilst taking care not to victimise boys ourselves in the name of ‘equality’.

Here’s a paragraph from another post entitlted : ‘The Trafficking Trade Groweth

Suppose you hire an au pair while making it clear that she is expected to provide sex as part of the deal, which the woman accepts. A perfectly fair exchange, right? I would naturally expect sex from an au pair myself or I wouldn’t hire her, and if she agrees, no reasonable person could object. Unfortunately, we live in a sick society with unbridled feminist power. In the feminist police state of Norway, this is now criminalized as “trafficking.” A man and his wife are now on trial for this exact scenario, and it really makes my blood boil with renewed hatred. Just when you thought we had reached the high-water mark, feminism keeps escalating and inventing new ways of persecuting male sexuality. The feminist police state is on a relentless march towards criminalizing ever greater areas of male sexuality — or in this case, applying existing laws in innovative ways in order to imprison more men. To feminist prosecutor Anne Cathrine Aga I have the following message: The Men’s Movement is watching you, bitch, and we are seething with hatred against you personally and the police state you represent. Actions have consequences. Trials are still (mostly) public and they sink into our collective minds, where they form the basis of future activism. Hate breeds hate — that is a fact of life too smugly ignored by feminists.

Posted in Male Sexuality, Men's Rights, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 11 Comments

RIP Ronald Searle St Trinians Creator and Virtual Child Pornographer

Ronald Searle, creator of that much loved British institution – the naughty schoolgirls of ‘St Trinians’ – has died today.

The BBC and other bastions of left-wing British media have taken a break from supporting the feminist crusade to protect fictional children from abuse, and been generous in their condolences.

Odd, given that he was chiefly famous for producing drawings of sexy schoolgirls – all ‘sexy’ images of schoolgirls having long since been deemed under feminist law to be level 1 (virtual) child pornography – and requiring a minimum 1 year in jail if caught viewing under forthcoming EU legislation to be applied across Europe.

Almost as odd as bestowing sainthood upon Alan Turing, the father of the computer, for being convicted of buggering a 19 year old teenager and at the same time locking up homosexual men who simply look at sexy pictures of young looking 19 year old boys on their computers.

No accounting for the wonderful complexities of the ‘progressive’ left’s hive mind.  A little bit of cognitive dissonance never did anybody any harm, I guess.

Posted in Paedohysteria, Pornography, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

2012 and Beyond

It’s an appropriate time to look at the future of the anti-feminist movement, and what we should strive for in the coming year and beyond.

Our basic goals could be usefully separated into simply continuing to grow the men’s rights/anti-feminist/pro-male sexuality movements, and having some concrete activist results that demonstrate the reality and effectiveness of that growth.

In terms of effective activism, the MRM has been derided in a number of quarters as having not yet actually achieved anything of substance.  I disagree.  Given that we are still a very small movement (the main thing is we are unequivocally now growing), the fact that we have already demonstrated the ability to become a nuisance, at least to certain feminists, shows that we are probably punching above our present weight, thanks largely to a handful of unusually dynamic individuals (such as Paul Elam, obviously).  This is a very hopeful sign for what we could be achieving in a few years time, when we are many times our present size and level of experience and organisation.

There remains a feeling amongst many MRAs that we won’t be a true political movement until online activism spills over into ‘the real world’, with street protests and the like.  I don’t entirely subscribe to that position either.  As Angry Harry often points out, the internet is the most useful tool for political activism and change that has ever been put into the hands of ordinary men (but, somewhat bizarrely, it has to be admitted that feminists themselves have exploited the internet rather well).

Online and offline activism can go hand in hand, and ultimately both will be needed for substantive results.

Another mainstream Men’s Rights assumption that I disagree with is that feminism can only be defeated when ‘we’ outnumber the enemy.  Hence the insistance of many MRA’s that we simply have to embrace women into our movement, often pointing to the fact that the success of feminism has relied upon the support of men.

I believe that political activism should be more than a simple numbers game, and in terms of voting blocs and the like, I think it’s a futile hope anyway that the sexual trade union can ever be defeated through the ballot box.  It’s not impossible that sufficient numbers of disenchanted women (and voters) could be drawn to a sexually conservative ‘men’s rights movement’ – enough to meaningfully sway the policies of politicians facing re-election.  Likewise, we could ‘reach out’ and seek alliances with the Islamic hordes. But as my readers are aware – this is an anti-feminist, pro-male sexuality men’s rights site, not a conservative father’s rights blog.  So I have nothing much to say on those possible strategies.  Readers will also be aware of my position that large numbers of ‘sympathetic’ women entering the movement will inevitably dilute the cause and lead to sexually conservative policies that will be as much in the selfish interests of women as they are of men in general, and justice in particular.

Next week I’ll post an article on what type of demographics a pro-male sexuality men’s rights movement could and should hope to attract.

Suffice to say at this point that the results that the MRM have achieved thus far with the simple but effective online activism involved in Register-Her, demonstrates to my mind that the success of the MRM is not dependent on a crude ‘numbers game’.

Concrete Goals

Apart from maintaining the growth of the men’s rights movement, spreading the word, waking up men, and ensuring that the MRM stays true to its pro-male sexuality roots, there is one over-riding goal that we should aim to achieve as early as possible :

That the feminists who are launching wave after wave of draconian anti-male legislation wake up to the fact that if they continue in their actions, being held accountable for their crimes against humanity within their life-times is a realistic possibility – sufficiently so to put a check on their legislative ambitions within the next 5 – 10 years or so.

To achieve this overarching goal, it should be a primary aim within the next 5 – 10 years to have established a pro male sexuality lobby group that has the funds and means to actively pressure, and even to seek prosecutions against certain key members of the sexual trade union.

Establishing such an effective lobby group will not be easy.  It would require an individual (or individuals) who possess the dynamism and commitment of a Paul Elam type figure, who is unremittingly pro-male sexuality, and who will have the strength to withstand the inevitable merciless scrutiny and character assassinations that both the sexual trade union and the media will throw at him.

We could get lucky, and a high-profile figure – a Dominique Strauss Kahn or a Silvio Berlusconi – somebody who has had their life and mainstream career destroyed by the sexual trade union, and who has nothing much left to lose, join our fight.  Perhaps if I’m being realistic, that would be the best chance for achieving the goal I set out above in any near future time frame.

Personal Goals

2012 will personally be a big year for me, as I’ll probably finally join the quarter of a million White Flight Brits escaping annually from the utterly destroyed society that a decade of FemiLabour rule has left our formerly great land in.  Unfortunately, the clueless and cowardly ‘Conservative’ Party are likewise far too much obligated to the Vagina Vote to even begin to repair the damage.

Of course, there aren’t many places left in the world to ‘escape’ to these days.  All I want is a place in the sun, where being white and having muscles doesn’t subject me to racist physical intimidation and challenge, or even assault, every time I pop out to my local grocery store. I want to be able to walk down the street and not see row after row of boarded up shops that have been torched and looted by ‘disaffected yoof’ – the first generation of ‘children’ (and last) in human history to be taught that not only is hating older males an act of youthful rebellion, but actually one of the only true and absolute values and civic duties that exist in the (feminist Cultural Marxist) moral relativerse.

Oh, and perhaps where I can walk down the street and smile at a pretty and fully developed 17 year old girl and be reasonably sure I won’t be spat on as a ‘paedophile’ in return. Especially as I slowly turn into that most detested and unforgivable creature in 21st century progressive society – an old white guy with a dick that still functions.  Not much to ask is it?

I’ll try to devote as much time as I have in the past to maintaining this site.  I even have ideas for some new projects, but perhaps I shouldn’t bite off more than I can chew.

I want to spend more time researching the history of early feminism, explore the philosophical ideas behind the notion of ‘consent’, and also to develop a trans-humanist men’s rights position.  I also want to get more organised and industrious in regards to posting pro-male comments on news sites and such like.

Let’s hope 2012 is another good year for the men’s rights movement.

Posted in Men's Rights, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 29 Comments

Excellent Article on Statutory Rape Laws at InMalaFide

Excellent article at InMalaFide on statutory rape laws by a ‘Giovanni Dannato’ that everyone here should read :

Statutory Rape Laws are a Subsidy on Female Sexual Market Value

Statutory rape laws as we know them are a product of the Victorian period. These laws were originally made to protect the economically valuable virginity of unmarried young women. It was also a reaction of working class men to the force of hypergamy — the female instinct to select men of higher status. It was a way to prevent wealthier, more powerful men from monopolizing young working class women in rapidly growing urban areas.

As the 20th century progressed, virginity was no longer a prerequisite for marriage. The original justifications for expanded statutory rape laws became obsolete and forgotten… but they remained for a reason.

Female power in society was growing rapidly as the industrial world matured. The old laws very much benefited women of reproductive age. Females 18-35 found themselves miraculously protected from the depredations of their fiercest competitors — the up and coming ones. The temporal conveyor belt that ruthlessly cycled women out of the market was effectively slowed down by 3-4 years.

One unfortunate thing to note is that the article was posted at Reddit Men’s Rights and recieved more downvotes than up (I’m not even going to read the reddit comments – it’s Christmas).  Still a lot of work to do there, unfortunately, but it’s another sign that the ideas argued for here are becoming accepted in the REAL men’s rights sphere.

Posted in Paedohysteria | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments