Paedohysteria UK Updates 01-10-2012
Nephew of Sir Jimmy Savile disgusted at paedophile allegations
The nephew of the late broadcaster Sir Jimmy Savile has said his family is ”disgusted and disappointed” that allegations his uncle sexually abused school girls have been made when he is no longer around to defend himself.
Teacher fled to France with girl because of age of consent of 15
The 30-year-old, currently being held in a remand prison, will not contest formal proceedings for his return to Britain when he appears in court on Tuesday, according to Daniel Lalanne.
The French lawyer added: ‘This is primarily because going home will take him back closer to the person he loves. What these two people have been through is a story of intense love and passion.
‘His only crime is to have fallen in love with a 15-year-old, without any recourse to violence or manipulation.’
Forrest has already admitted that he took Megan to France because the age of sexual consent is 15 and people were likely to be ‘more understanding’ about their affair.
And he said they planned to ‘lie low’ in Bordeaux for another six months, when she turns 16, and they could have legally returned as a couple.
School bans parents watching sports days without criminal record check
A school has banned parents from watching their children take part in sports events – unless they pass a criminal records check.
The Isambard Community School in Swindon, Wilts., insists all parents must clear a Criminal Records Bureau check to weed out potential paedophiles.
Neil Park, 54, was furious when he was turned away from watching his son George, 12, play rugby.
The father-of-five said: “I was turned away from the school because I had not been CRB checked.
“I couldn’t believe it. Government guidelines state that parents are allowed to watch games.
“But any strangers can be questioned and requested to show the appropriate paperwork, which is fair enough.
“George was really upset by it all. What are they going to stop you going to next? Parents’ evening? The school play?
**Note – I need to make clear to r/mensrights that I accept that the only men’s rights issue here is whether or not mothers are turned away as potential paedos as well.
Why can we no longer think of the British Isles without the word PEDO in front of them?
Poor Forrest is seriously deluded if he imagines that the British Courts are going to show him any mercy or sympathy. He’s going to be lucky if he doesn’t wind up in the Tower of London. The French lawyer sounds like he doesn’t really understand Anglo psychology either—he’s thinking far too logically.
Parental Background Checks: anybody still doubt that paedohysteria will turn into an inquistion?
‘But strangers can be questioned and allowed to show the appropriate paperwork.’
Which I will bet that guys like Futrelle, Aiorthoir, and Goldweg would easily qualify for; while some poor boob who had a false accusation levelled against him 30 years ago can’t.
Eric
2 Oct 12 at 1:49 am
No, I have never doubted it Eric, in fact I think we are already there.
However, this paedo-criminal record check for parents that watch their own children on school sports day is not only patently absurd, it’s also totally ridiculous, because all they would need to do is take their children (daughters as well) out of that stupid school!
They’re total dick-heads simply for allowing ANYONE to do that to them.
The whole lot of them could easily make quite a side-show out of it too, simply by waiting for the next major sporting event and all of them publicly and rowdily, remove their kids from there (ensuring the local press and TV are there with cameras clicking / rolling), the moment the first parent is asked to produce his ‘paedophile clearance papers’.
It wouldn’t last long…
Alan Vaughn
2 Oct 12 at 2:13 am
The metropolitan police are now going to investigate a woman’s claim that she was ‘raped’ by Jimmy Savile :
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/oct/02/jimmy-savile-rape-claim
Investigating claims against a dead man. Valuable use of police resources.
Maybe they will dig him up and put him on trial. Nothing surprises me in this God forsaken country anymore.
BTW, if you want to follow an interesting forum discussion about this :
http://www.kingofhits.co.uk/index.php?option=com_kunena&Itemid=65&func=view&catid=2&id=88062
The site owner – Jonathan King – was a fellow disc jockey and tv presenter from the 70′s who was convicted of much the same thing as Savile is being accused of.
theantifeminist
2 Oct 12 at 2:30 pm
Presumably the reason for “investigating” Savile despite his being deceased is that they’ll be hoping to uncover a “ring” of people still alive for sensational exposure.
It’s commonly known that back in the brief liberal period centred around the 70s, most of the rock’n'roll pantheon had girls of all ages in their tour buses, hotel rooms, etc. The possibilities for the Child Savers are boundless.
I haven’t looked in here for a while and browsed around a bit having a refresher of the site. One thing that caught my eye was where you describe Second Wave Feminism as a consequence of the Pill. I think that’s only part of it, and the emphasis is not quite right. Historically as you have said many times, “FIrst Wave Feminism” was the birth of the “Womens Trade Union”. Their purpose was to impose, basically succcessfully, the puritanical “moral state” that characterised Victorian Values, which culminated in the Progressive Era, as they prohibited or tightly controlled everything perceived sinful- sex, drink, drugs, gambling, etc. FWF thus petered out, because they had basically won. Politically active women went off, like the men, into Marxism and so forth.
I think Second Wave Feminism arose simply as a reaction to the Progressive Puritan consensus breaking down in the return to social liberalism of the 1960s. The Pill was a part of that, because it allowed women to have sex without fear of pregnancy, but ultimately the Second Wavers arose just out of horror that Puritanism had collapsed. As such, it was as much a war against Womens’ freedom as that of men. In my view, this isn’t a Men Vs Women class war; if there’s a class war at all, it’s between Puritans and Liberals.
So anyway, the Second Wavers arose an ultra-conservative (cloaked in the misdirective label of “radical”) reaction against, effectively, the zeitgeist of the 1970s. And now it’s payback time; they want as many people who benefitted from that liberalism to be dragged through the courts and made examples of as possible, to discourage anyone from daring to act that way again.
In the long run, I think they will ultimately fail; but only in the same way as Drug Prohibition has failed, with all the devastation and no benefits of that policy. The Puritans are a remorseless and vicious bunch, and I’d imagine there are a few aged celebrities seeing this and wondering how far the fire will spread. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if this turns into another Operation Ore.
Ian B
2 Oct 12 at 6:54 pm
Welcome back Ian, you’ve been missed.
theantifeminist
2 Oct 12 at 7:03 pm
Thanks AF, it’s rather nice to be remembered!
Ian B
2 Oct 12 at 7:12 pm
In any remotely sane or rational society, the only people who would be facing court would be those metropolitan police who decided to conduct such in investigation…
Why is it that only ‘sex offences’ that allegedly occurred many decades before being reported are even taken seriously, but worse is that no evidence or even (un)reliable witness testimony is required to corroborate such allegations?
The ACCUSERS of such ‘crimes’ should be the ones being investigated, simply because to any normal and rational thinking person, it is somewhat ‘odd’ or even slightly suspicious that such a serious crime wasn’t reported at the time it was allegedly committed.
However, to accuse a DECEASED person of the same sort of offending, also which supposedly occurred more than 40 years ago is just utterly ridiculous and anyone who seriously believes such accusations are worthy of a ANY police investigation should be charged for wasting police time.
However, we are obviously no longer living in a sane or rational society…
This type of witch-hunting to appease the paedohysterical public is much worse by contrast, than the infamous Nazi war criminal trials which have been conducted recently, because at least with those: real crimes, where many people really were murdered did actually occur and although the alleged ‘war criminals’ involved were all very old, at least they were still alive and in most cases still capable of defending themselves against any accusations.
Also, in quite a number of those Nazi war criminal trials, the accused were effectively granted clemency on account of their advanced age and / or poor health.
Yet for ‘cases’ involving some feminist defined and revisionist ‘sex offences’ where some supposed ‘victims’ had FULLY CONSENSUAL sex with an older man and where nobody even complained, or was injured let alone murdered and the alleged ‘sex-offender’ is now DEAD, thus unable to contest any of the accusations against him: no mercy or any sort of clemency, dignity, decency or even compassion is to be shown or considered!
This is just totally absurd: there really isn’t even a ‘case’ to be made or answered (especially not by a dead defendant)! Nobody complained, nobody was hurt, no harm was done, no victim, no offender, no crime and therefore (there should be): no case…
Yet it is not only a case, but has now rapidly progressed to a very serious crime, demanding full police and media investigation and followed religiously and relentlessly by the paedohysterical British public and it’s insatiable appetite for paedo-sleaze and lust for creep-naming and shaming; even if the creep is now DEAD!
These 21st century Inquisitors are even more ghoulish than their medieval ancestors – at least they limited their witch-hunts to witches and heretics that were still alive!
Welcome to the 21st Century Paedophilia Inquisition!
God forsaken country indeed, in fact: a truly Satan worshiping country!
Alan Vaughn
2 Oct 12 at 9:29 pm
BTW, if you notice in that classic Brass Eye Paedogeddon special, the ‘empowered’ female presenter of the spoof show is called ‘SwanChita Haze’. (Swan…Cheater…)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZDGWICVQ3w&t=1m59s
Chris Morris, God like genius that he is, understands full well what paedohysteria is about. I wonder why it is so difficult for mRAs?
theantifeminist
4 Oct 12 at 8:47 pm
DUhh.. Ummm.. Hmmmm.. Tough one….
Because mRA’s are ‘empowered’ perhaps? (With a lot of Girrrrrl Power) while also being paedocrites, which they must be because the current definition of ‘paedophile’ means all men are paedo-perverted sickos, 16 &17 y/o kiddy-fiddlers and are thus rightly: gallows fodder.
Most men don’t like being labelled as such, so pretend to HATE (other) ‘paedos’ and thus are obliged to persecute and kill them all as a cover?
They are also obliged to appease their mothers, big sisters and aunts from the gynocracy.
Alan Vaughn
4 Oct 12 at 9:44 pm
Feminists sail into international waters in order to proudly kill their unborn children, or even try to travel to Islamic countries for a bit of abortion tourism – all done to demonstrate that ‘men do not have control over women’s bodies’. Meanwhile, feminists and women have such control over men’s bodies that one illicit twitch of your finger on a mouse in order to stimulate your cock by looking at a picture of a 25 year old in school uniform will soon get you a minimum 1 – 2 years of ass rape in prison according to the latest EU directive. And men’s rights supporters can’t even discuss it as an issue.
The contrast is indeed stark.
theantifeminist
5 Oct 12 at 7:17 am
You nailed it Alan. Now a trickier question..what do we do about it?
theantifeminist
6 Oct 12 at 8:30 am
Read ONLY the first line of my first answer… That’s all I can offer right now, sorry…
Alan Vaughn
6 Oct 12 at 1:51 pm
Also stark is the contrast how Moroccans react to the abortionists. Not a cake walk like in Christian countries.
Also stark is the contrast how Moroccans vote for Leftist parties in the Netherlands.
Columnist
6 Oct 12 at 1:59 pm