Necrophiliac Lynching of Jimmy Savile Continues

Jimmy Savile's charity (Savile Trust) could change its name and give all profits to feminist lobby groups sex abuse charities. In other words, they're not only lynching a dead man's reputation, they're stealing from his corpse to line their own pockets and to fund their fake child protection lobby groups..in order to campaign for yet more legislation that will criminalize even more men - dead or alive! :

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19863322

More names of celebs from the 60's and 70's (mostly dead men) are being bandied about. Was everybody at it?? Well, probably yes, if you mean banging the odd underage groupie. This was the era of sexual liberation, and age of consent laws were considered as Victorian, puritan and unfair as the illegality of homosexuality. Nobody gave a fuck!! Live with it you old jealous femi-hags! This historical revisionism is an attempt to airbrush from the past the objective truth that moral attitudes to teenage sexuality are completely relative. In another 100 years, hopefully sooner, when human beings are enhanced to be more intelligent, more beautiful, and to never age, people will look back at the repulsive old feminist savages who lynched dead men in the name of sexual jealousy like we look back today at the sexually repressed witch-finder generals of the middle-ages who found an outlet in burning innocent women (and men) to death at the stake.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2214350/JANET-STREET-PORTER-More-men-TV-just-Jimmy-Savile-women-sex-playthings.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

I wonder how far this feminist re-writing of history, these tabloid show trials of dead celebrities for what they did decades before, will go? Is it only 'naff' celebs like Jimmy Savile, Freddie Starr, Jonathan King who are legitimate targets? Or will they dare to go for the big guns - the likes of Elvis Presley etc. After all, everybody was likely at it - it was the perk of the job. Feminist pedohysteria has probably done more to kill the music industry than even pirating. Those men who manage to find fame and success in the pop world are, after all, almost by definition 'ephebophiles', with permanently adolescent souls filled with the longings of a perpetual youth, and an unrivalled and undiminishing ability to tap into the minds and musical tastes of teenagers.

Even the Beatles sang about 17 year old 'children' and made films in which they discussed bonking schoolgirls (A Hard Days Night). The BBC is already refusing to repeat television shows featuring Jimmy Savile. What if the likes of John Lennon gets 'exposed' and destroyed?

Prepare your sick bags - unless you're a castrated mangina pedocrite of course. An old Guardinista bag informs men that 'liking young girls is not a preference it is a perversion'.

And she has control of your balls...and it's not as if any 'men's rights movement' (guffaw) is ever going to do anything on about it, is it?

28 thoughts on “Necrophiliac Lynching of Jimmy Savile Continues

  1. Anonymous

    You wrote: "Jimmy Savile’s charity (Savile Trust) could change its name and give all profits to sex abuse charities."

    That should have read "Jimmy Savile’s charity (Savile Trust) could change its name and give *some* profits to feminist lobby groups sex abuse charities."

    There is nothing in the linked BBC article to suggest the fund is considering giving _all_ its proceeds to sex abuse charities.

  2. Alan Vaughn

    Prepare your sick bags – unless you’re a castrated mangina pedocrite of course. An old Guardinista bag informs men that ‘liking young girls is not a preference it is a perversion‘.

    Un-F****** REAL!
    This paedohysteria is just snow-balling more by the minute, almost!
    When I just skimmed over that Inquistional HATE article, there were some 1420 comments by feminist's, manginas and even more from card-carrying paedocrites, such as this blatant drivel from a very worried, real manginarized paedophile:

    ItsMeSimon
    3 October 2012 6:31PM

    I've come to the conclusion that men just don't they just don't see rape as anything other than being forced to do something you don't want to do. Like being forced to stay late in the office and finish something off. I mean after all, it's just sex. That doesn't hurt. They don't feel anything else. Rationally and mentally, they can understand that it's not a nice thing for a woman or that women are not into it but at the end of the day they don’t feel the physical rape, the humiliation, the violence and so on.

    I think it's the same thing with sex with young girls. Men honestly believe that if a young girl is consenting, then where's the harm? Men do not feel what it is like to be a young girl. They may think they do but they don't feel it.

    I think that's what I think after all these years.

    I know a lot of men will disagree with this but I would ask them to ask their guts not their brains about the subject because like I say, rationally, we can say, that's not a good thing but why can such behaviour go unpunished like Jimmy Saville or Polanski, if not for the deep felt feelings

    I did find one or two 'sane' remarks (but was rather like looking for that elusive 'needle in the haystack') of paedohysterical nonsense, such as this one:

    Elephanta
    3 October 2012 6:54PM

    I find the article offensive.

    Not in its condemnation of abuse, but in its wild generalisation.

    Because when you talk about child abuse then you are given the right to make wild generalisations, apparently.

    My niece is married happily to a man much older than her. They met when she was barely 16 and he was 30. They make a fantastic couple and they have a beautiful child now and I find it very offensive and unpleasant to hear that either of them were doing anything wrong. In ten years time she will be 34 and he will be 40 something. Big deal.

    What a disgustingly prudish and protestant generalisation. The abuse of power in a relationship is evil, but the age difference itself when the power is equally distributed and the affair is consensual and legal. No.

    Clearly reactionary feminists are also prudes.

    Normal people in the UK (with a modern and realistic view of the world) should be at least, feeling very nervous to frightened after reading this story!

  3. theantifeminist

    Post author

    You wrote: “Jimmy Savile’s charity (Savile Trust) could change its name and give all profits to sex abuse charities.”

    That should have read “Jimmy Savile’s charity (Savile Trust) could change its name and give *some* profits to feminist lobby groups sex abuse charities.”

    There is nothing in the linked BBC article to suggest the fund is considering giving _all_ its proceeds to sex abuse charities.

    When I publish a story, I like to read several sources, and tend to link to just one. In other sources, it states that the Savile Trust will give all its remaining funds to sex abuse charities or sex abuse victims :

    http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/charity-to-sever-ties-with-jimmy-savile-1366872

    A CHARITY plan to cut their connection with alleged sex attacker Savile.

    The Jimmy Savile Charitable Trust are set to drop the name and may give remaining funds of £3.7million to victims of sex abusers.

    Note that Jimmy Savile devoted almost his entire life and charitable work to promoting children's charities. Thus money that would have gone to help 11 year olds dying of cancer will now go to paying the high salaries of radical feminsts such as Marriane Hester - 'professor of child sexual exploitation' at the NSPCC - who has published a book claiming that ALL sex is rape, as well as to 17 year old girls who seduced their teachers and 'regretted' being teenage sluts once they turned into aging hags.

  4. Eric

    'Liking young girls is not a preference, it is a perversion.'

    That statement sounds like something a mediaeval judge about to order a stake-burning would say.

    It's sounding more and more like Anglo-American feminist elites are starting to get a proverbial 'taste of blood' on these issues. All this recent paedohysteria and pro-femmie violence like the Vancouver incident (not to mention the steaming rhetoric coming from Fatroll, O'Reilly, and others) is building up to some kind of crescendo?

  5. theantifeminist

    Post author

    @Eric and InclinedReader I would have more respect for these femi-hags, or at least their spiteful and jealous sexual motivations would be slightly less obvious, if they admitted that teenage girls are sexy as hell, and that is normal but immoral (in their eyes) for men to be attracted to them.

    The fact that they can't even admit the obvious truth, when the multi-billion dollar cosmetics industry is premised on the idea of returning women's skin back to their youthful teenage state, then it's impossible to even give the slightest credence or respect to their 'arguments'.

    Not that they give any arguments of course. Like our men's rights champion Caroline, it's always merely along the lines of - 'busty fully developed 17 year old girls are children because I say they are, therefore any man who looks at them is a pervert paedophile, and any man who says I'm a sexually jealous fruitcake must be a hardcore paedo and an imminant threat to children everywhere!!'.

  6. Alan Vaughn

    Like our men’s rights champion Caroline, it’s always merely along the lines of – ‘busty fully developed 17 year old girls are children because I say they are, therefore any man who looks at them is a pervert paedophile, and any man who says I’m a sexually jealous fruitcake must be a hardcore paedo and an imminant threat to children everywhere!!’.

    LOL!!!!...!!
    I hope that devout 'mra' Caroline drops by here and reads that comment!!
    BTW, don't know if you saw my comment with a link in it, back to her blog where I replied to one of her 'true-blue mra' sentiments?

  7. Alan Vaughn

    Yeah, indeed. However, imagine if they refused to do something or worse: defended him? They'd probably have huge paedohysterical, pitch-fork wielding lynch-mobs burning their houses down and hanging, drawing and quartering them, the same evening...
    They're probably now trembling sleeplessly in fear of their lives, even after agreeing to do that!

    Brian Rothery was right all along.

  8. Eric

    Alan:
    I wouldn't be a bit surprised. Bill O'Reilly has been known to broadcast photographs, addresses, and other personal information against anyone who stands in the way of his paedohysteria. I would imagine that Saville's family saw serious consequences for non-compliance with the 'will of the people' as well.

  9. theantifeminist

    Post author

    Yeah, indeed. However, imagine if they refused to do something or worse: defended him? They’d probably have huge paedohysterical, pitch-fork wielding lynch-mobs burning their houses down and hanging, drawing and quartering them, the same evening…

    You're probably right Alan, and perhaps at least they just don't want to see his tombstone smashed to pieces by the righteous mob.

    BTW, do you know of any other men's rights site that has even mentioned Savile? You'd think at least the False Rape Society would. Or are unprovable and ruinous accusations of rape and abuse against men o.k. if the person is dead, perhaps?

  10. Alan Vaughn

    No... It appears this is the only MRA blog that 'dared' to mention his name, at all!
    Well, if you read my reply to Ms Caroline: Author, realtionships expert and EX-mRA Extraordinaire, I think it's just proof that there is such a thing as paedohysteria, despite her recent assertion (to mojo) that there is 'no such thing'... (LOL)!!!)

    99.999% of mRAs and even many MRAs are simply too afraid to question or offer any dissenting views against feminist 'child-sex' dogma and their Draconian laws and the Inqusitional Dominant Narrativethat elevates (their all-important) ramapant paedohysteria.

  11. theantifeminist

    Post author

    Very true Alan.

    BTW, another reason I won't comment at her site is that every time I visit that page I have to bleach my harddrive - those photos of Courtney (particularly the one where she is covering her crotch with a sponge) would be regarded as CP under feminist laws in just about every nation except the USA. I would advise anybody visiting her site to do so only after turning off images in the settings of your browser....unless you want the possibility of a year or two of ass rape in prison. Not a men's rights issue of course.

  12. Alan Vaughn

    You're right, but it's just as well I've only visited her site from my work laptop, via a mobile broadband Internet device and a disk that I will be destroyng on Friday, but not because of this or the danger of cp or anything illegal residing on the disk.
    More to do with the fact that I am changing my employer and I only borrowed their laptop to host my own 'personal' disk. When I had to do some work, I would swap to their disk and their (heavily filtered) Internet connection via the company's private network...
    As of Friday however, I will not have that laptop anymore, thus no use for my 'private disk' either.

  13. theantifeminist

    Post author

    Now it is reported that the family are going to dump the tombstone in a landfill. I take back what I wrote previously sympathising with them.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-19893373

    Reminds me of that poor chap who got hanged in the 19th century for homosexuality that I described the other day. The most poignant thing for me was that his family refused to even visit him while he awaited his death at the hands of the mob.

    Just as mothers, wives, daughters had no hesitation in abdandoning men who were accused of homosexuality in centuries past, they will feel no remorse in effectively dumping their dead men into rubbish tips, for unproven and unprovable allegations made by tabloids that hack into the phones of murdered kids.

    Sometimes I want to step off this planet.

  14. Alan Vaughn

    Especially when considering his unlimited generosity to REAL victims of truly harmful things like cancers or autism and his genuine compassion for other truly unfortunate children, who he earnestly believed and hoped would get well and he did not expect any sort of ‘pat on the back’ or any recognition for such generosity either.

    Whatever he was allegedly doing (wrong) in his personal and private life was likely, not even illegal at the time and if so: it was probably on equal parity, in terms of its seriousness, with say: driving under the influence.

    Truly disgusting!

  15. Deano

    If the 'concerned feminists' lining up to publicly display how disgusted they are at Jimmy Savile really ARE interested in the welfare of teenage girls, then I wonder how much public outrage we will see from them over this story from Afghanistan :-

    http://edition.cnn.com/2012/10/09/world/asia/pakistan-teen-activist-attack/index.html

    This poor kid sounds like she should be a feminist hero - all she wants is equal educational opportunity for girls in Afghanistan. The Taliban disagreed and tried to kill her by shooting her in the head. She's fighting for her life and I hope she makes a full recovery.

    But do we see even a tenth of the publicity and concern for her from all those well funded child protection agencies that the Savile affair has generated? Wouldn't they be concerned that a teenage girl has been shot for simply questioning Taliban policy? Well of course not. After all, this poor kids life is worthless compared to the importance of the sour-faced buzzards campaign to punish men for not finding them attractive.

    And they now seem even uglier.

  16. Alan Vaughn

    Wouldn’t they be concerned that a teenage girl has been shot for simply questioning Taliban policy? Well of course not. ...

    No they're not. However, if the gunman had KISSED her ('raped' her) rather than murdered her (at least attempted to): we'd probably still be reading about the vile and predatory pervert, this time next year and of course: see more Draconian and ridiculous child protection laws (i.e. 'Malala's Law'); introduced throughout western totalitarian states and every other counrtry, EXCEPT Pakisatn.

  17. theantifeminist

    Post author

    @Deano I read that she regards Obama as her hero. Poor kid doesn't realise that Obama and Hilary couldn't give a fuck about her.

  18. Eric

    Antifeminist:
    'Sometimes I want to step off this planet'

    What it looks like instead is that the planet is stepping away and leaving us behind.

    Has anyone else noticed that we've spent most of the last week talking about vampires attacking women, putting corpses on trial, and false accusations, and witch-hunting? It seems like the whole Anglosphere is only about two steps away from sinking into outright barbarism!

  19. Jack

    I had to post this because I've just clicked the BBC's PM news bulletin (today 11/10/2012). I sometimes listen to the BBC as a background to my porn surfing. I expected the usual PC drivel about uninteresting news except maybe the news about Syria. I couldn't believe my ears: over 50% of the program was about Jimmy Saville, complete with women telling at lenght how they had been "abused". Sickening. This is a major media called British Broadcasting Corporation. The World is going crazy. I'm glad I'm over 50. Pity those who are young and male.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01n6sjn

  20. theantifeminist

    Post author

    I had to post this because I’ve just clicked the BBC’s PM news bulletin (today 11/10/2012). I sometimes listen to the BBC as a background to my porn surfing. I expected the usual PC drivel about uninteresting news except maybe the news about Syria. I couldn’t believe my ears: over 50% of the program was about Jimmy Saville, complete with women telling at lenght how they had been “abused”. Sickening. This is a major media called British Broadcasting Corporation. The World is going crazy. I’m glad I’m over 50. Pity those who are young and male.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01n6sjn

    Yes, and it's even harder actually living in the UK when it goes through these periodic carefully manipulated bouts of extreme paedohysteria and medieval backwardness.

    Most of the men (if they are over 30) buying these rags full of lurid allegations against Savile were salivating at photographs of topless 16 year olds in those same tabloids little more than a decade ago. Yet they'd be willing to tear to pieces a celebrity like Freddie Starr - a 'paedo' - for allegedly groping a 15 year old in Savile's BBC dressing room back in 1974!!!

  21. Eric

    Antifeminist:
    If the BBC is anything like Fox News or CNN over here, they practically sell soft-core porn along with the story. Everytime they break out into a paedohysterical witch-hunt, they have 'in-depth coverage' of the case with panels of fake experts who go into the most lurid details of the 'crime' imaginable.

    I'm certain that this, in turn, leads to the paedohysterical men in the audience fantasizing about 'what could happen' to that cute little neighbor girl unless drastic action is taken at once.

    It's the same with paedocrites as it is with White Knights: it's always their own guilty consciences that they really want to punish, but sacrifice other men to keep in denial about their own motivations.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>