***WARNING (SERIOUS) - The links contained in this article, and even some of the descriptions I reprint, are truly horrific. If you have never witnessed 'gore' on the internet (and if you haven't you appear to be in a minority) then you need to be warned that a little bit of your soul and your humanity will be taken away, and a lot of your innocence. If you do not want to be desensitised to human savagery, you would be advised to skip this article. I do feel that writing it, together with the links, is necessary.
The film lasts seven minutes, in which a group of masked men in military style clothing have hung a man by his feet.
This person was clearly still alive when the assailants castrated him. Music can be heard playing in the background as one of the men step in and strategically peels back the face and skin of the victims before decapitating him.
After it is over, the people standing around joke and laugh while they take cell pictures of this gruesome act.
The video ends with the body being hacked up into pieces, and put into black plastic trash bags.
It's actually worse than that. The description above doesn't mention that in between the castration and the skinning of his head, they disembowel the poor chap.
Mexican drug gangs are engaged in a war of ever increasing barbarity. In a kind of 'grown up' game of schoolyard 'you hit me, I'll hit you back harder' tit for tat, the rival narco gangs have gone from beheading each other to skinning their enemies alive whilst ripping their still beating hearts from their bodies (WARNING). All to gain control of the multi-billion dollar drug route into America.
It might be slightly 're-assuring' to think that the victims are ruthless psychopaths themselves, simply getting a bitter taste of karma, but many appear to be random men, often taxi-drivers, taken from the street and posed as captured rivals for publicity effect, and in order that the assassins can claim their $500 for each kill. And there is little doubt that the narco gangs now increasingly look at members of the general population as potential enemies who need to be ruthlessly taught a lesson. Recently, a Professor of Social Science was beheaded whilst his wife was forced to watch (although she was physically unharmed, the white knight commentators underneath the piece claim that she had it worse than her husband!).
As a British citizen, I sometimes ruefully thought that America had a better deal than Europe in terms of its brown-skinned, but still Christian, demographic future. It appears that I was wrong. Hell, I'll take the worst horrors that a Eurabian religous civil war can throw at me any day, than face what's probably coming shortly to an American town near you.
But one clear fact in the barbarity of 21st century Mexico, is that the vast majority of the 36,000 victims of the drug war are men. And probably only a fraction of this number are actually ruthless Drug Cartel killers. In fact, even an increasing percentage of the gangs themselves have been violently forced to become members, often before they are even in their teens. The horror story currently gripping Mexico is the discovery of mass graves containing the bodies of hundreds of immigrants crossing over from South America, hoping to gain a new life in the USA when their buses were stopped by 'Los Zetas' and then all executed when they refused to join the most feared and bloodthirsty narco gang in Mexico.
Female victims of the drug wars are extremely rare, and when they do occur, they stand out because of their very rarity. This week, five sex workers were tragically found killed. The uncommoness of this was such that it's still a matter of dispute as to whether the killings were directly drugs related.
I had been meaning to write an article on the Mexican drug wars, discussing what lessons could be drawn from the unparalleld savagery resulting from it. For example, does it mean that mangina trans-humanists such as Hank Pellissier and David Pearce might have a point regarding male violence? Certainly, such violent tendancies would be better out of the human gene pool, but only if the disgusting DNA flaws in the female animal were removed as well (and that might be all that is required) - the female attraction to 'bad boys' that results in these drug gangstas having pussy dripping all around them, and which feeds the gang culture world-wide, which teenage boys are particularly prey too, and which the Mexican drug cartels are only the most extreme example of.
And what should be the proper punishments for drug users in America, the people who are the DEMAND that feeds the SUPPLY which CAUSES THIS HORRIFFIC VIOLENCE? After all, in the European Union, a man caught looking at a cartoon picture of a 25 year old fictional character in pigtails and a school uniform will soon face a minimum 2 years in prison. In America, men can be sentanced to decades in prison, and now even told they must remain in prison after they have served their sentance. All on the basis of spurious unproven 'supply and demand' arguments. As mentioned above, teenagers and children are increasingly becoming the victims of the drug violence. A 15 year old boy was recently found dismembered by the gangs. Still want to get high in the club tonight? To my mind, 15 year old Mexican boys being dismembered as a result of American dudes snorting coke, is far worse, and far more of a direct supply and demand, than is a man looking at a picture of a 17 year old girl (real or a cartoon) in a bikini. Especially when it has been confirmed that 'child porn' actually reduces the incidence of real abuse. And what of the people who watch these videos? I'm supposed to feel that I abused a child if I accidently clicked on a picture of a manga girl in a short skirt, but watching a man being castrated and beheaded has no causal relationship to the act filmed itself ??
I don't know, I'm not a feminist. In other words, I'm not a mentally diseased child abusing animal. Despite sexual trade union theory, I still can't really get to grips with their twisted brood mare animal psychologies.
Thirdly, my original article was going to draw comparisons between violence over control of the multi-billion dollar drug trade, with the almost complete non-violence involved in control over the supposed multi-billion dollar sex trafficking or child porn industries. These Mexican savages obviously have no moral regard whatsoever for any human life, even butchering teenagers. Anything that gets in the way of the billions of dollars profit available from importing drugs into America will be destroyed. As the Professor of Sociology above, who apparently made some remarks about a drug gang to his class, and then promptly had his head sawn off in front of his wife, discovered.
Would such barbaric and utterly ruthless monsters really allow a relative handful of feminists stop a 'multi-billion dollar sex trafficking industry' if such beasts were in control of it (and of course, if such an industry really existed, they would be)?
Of course, if there really was an industry as profitable as sex trafficking, then you can be sure that any feminist in Mexico, and probably the USA too, would need 24 hour protection by a team of armed personal bodyguards. And, equally obviously, they don't.
However, even though this fact itself proves that sex trafficking as a multi-billion dollar industry is an evil feminist myth, it hasn't stopped Mexican feminists from trying to pursuade us that women, non-existant sex trafficking victims et al, are the real victims of the Mexican drug war.
Marcela Lagarde, a Mexican academic who is considered one of Latin America’s leading feminist activists, said in an interview with Efe that the war on drugs being waged by President Felipe Calderon has led to more violence against women in Mexico.
“Everything that is happening favors violence against women,” Lagarde told Efe Thursday in Madrid, adding that the Mexican leader’s strategy “cultivates a very violent culture” and “establishes an ideology of violence, of defeat, of war.”
“That’s a very macho culture, very misogynist, and we women are left defenseless,” Lagarde said.
The activist, who has been calling for the inclusion of femicide in Mexico’s Criminal Code, has published numerous articles about gender identity, feminism, human development and deomocracy.
The BorderlandBeat article makes reference to Ciudad Juarez, the 'capital' of the Mexican drug wars :
Ciudad Juarez, Mexico’s murder capital, first gained notoriety in the early 1990s when young women began to disappear in the area.
In most of the slayings, the victims were young women from poor families who came to the border city from all over Mexico to work in the many assembly plants, known as “maquiladoras,” built there to take advantage of the North American Free Trade Agreement.
Investigators have not determined who is behind the killings, although there has been speculation that serial killers, organized crime groups, people traffickers, drug smugglers and child pornographers, among others, may be involved.
Over 500 women have been killed in Juarez since 1993, with the majority of the cases going unsolved.
500 women being killed in the most violent city on Earth over the last 18 years is a tragedy for every one of them and their families, but a 'Femicide' it certainly is not. Not when 3,000 people, the vast majority of them men, have been killed in the same city in the last year alone, many of them brutally beheaded and dismembered, and increasingly, skinned alive, and even their hearts ripped out.
Of course, when I read this disgusting feminist beast today, I got very angry, and had to rattle off this post. But really, I shouldn't be, and nor should you. Tragically, it appears that feminist fantasy and profitable sexual trade union 'victim ideology' is on a collision course with the unreconstituted reality of Azteca male violence in Mexico. The ending is unlikely to be pretty.