Legal Action Against David Futrelle the Child Torture Porn Apologist

David Futrelle
David Futrelle
Over the last couple of days, David Futrelle, the Chicago child torture porn apologist, has made what amounts to a public incitement of violence against my person. He has also publicly declared support for a woman who has been making violent threats against myself and my readers here – criminal threats which Futrelle must have been aware of. I have to take these threats seriously and will be seeking criminal charges against Futrelle in the coming months, as well as legal action over his repeated defamatory writings stretching back at least 5 years. Not only is this necessary for my protection, it means that at last, in a court of law, we can get to the bottom of why David Futrelle continues to refuse to even acknowledge the fact that he mocked American police officers for thinking it was inappropriate for a video depicting naked children being anally raped, made to eat shit, disemboweled, and tortured to death, to be rented out in a seedy gay sex shop.

To the handful of men’s human rights activists who occasionally attack Futrelle over his child torture porn apologia – please note the last sentence of the previous paragraph. It does not matter that in the sick minds of ‘left-wing’ social justice warriors, a film made by a left-wing homosexual gratuitously depicting naked 14 year old boys eating shit and then being slowly tortured to death is considered by them ‘classic’ art.

The fact is, David Futrelle attacked the police for removing it from sale in a gay sex shop.

David Futrelle is going to have to explain why he defended its sale in a sex shop. The prosecuters are not going to go gently on him on this. When he comes out with his lazy rehearsed defence of ‘it’s classic art…it shows how bad fascism is’..the prosecution are not going to let him off the hook and just fall silent like the tweets of an MHRA. They’re going to ask

all very well Mr Futrelle, but why did you mock the police for removing a video depicting the torture and abuse of real, naked, and underage children, from a gay sex shop – ‘classic’ or not?

In court, Futrelle is also going to face questions over the following :

In the same year as his sickening defence of ‘Salo’, he wrote an article lambasting a feminist for refusing to admit that we all harbor secret fantasies to torture and abuse other people. He also claimed that the primary means of expressing these fantasies was through watching them being played out on film and in news reports of serial killers and other monsters.

This was also the same year that John Wayne Gacy, another Chicago resident, was arrested for the sadistic murders of young boys.

Several of the male feminist (or ‘transgender’) readers at his site MammothBoobz appear to be sadistic psychopaths and hardcore paedophiles – one of them is ‘assistant executioner’ at a BDSM forum catering for men who fantasize about crucifying women and girls. Since I reported this here, Futrelle has not publicly condemned his reader and it is not clear if he has even been banned, but instead it appears to have motivated him to make a public incitement of violence against me.

David Futrelle also wrote an article claiming that the ‘innocence’ of female victims of abuse is ‘exaggerated’ and that abusers are unfairly demonized.

He also regularly wrote articles denouncing child sex abuse hysteria, accusing leading child protection charities of lying about the extent of ritual sexual abuse. In another article, he discussed sympathetically whether statutory rapists should often be encouraged to marry their victims, even using the term ‘we can’t send them all to jail’. Today, he regularly libels men’s rights activists and even the likes of Richard Dawkins as ‘paedophiles’ and ‘child abuse apologists’ for discussing the same topics. He even wrote an article mocking the idea of child welfare being a subject of political concern – even appearing to mock the ‘innocence’ of child victims of AIDS.

David Futrelle has repeatedly libeled Warren Farrell over a disputed word in one interview made nearly half a century ago. Not only clearly insinuating that he is a paedophile in the tone of his articles attacking Farrell, but by his use of the tag ‘paedophiles…oh sorry ephebophiles’ underneath every article he writes about him. He has used this tag when attacking myself or any other MRA who even mentions feminist laws on ‘child protection’ as well as in stories relating to real paedophiles. If either Warren Farrell or Richard Dawkins chooses to sue him for defamation, he would not have a legal leg to stand on. Similarly, he is no legal position to seek defamation charges against others for suggesting that he, in fact, is a paedophile, by his own logic, for having regularly in his past career as a ‘sex positive’ journalist discussed critically the feminist narrative on child sex abuse and teenage sexuality.

David Futrelle clearly incited violence against Warren Farrell at the recent men’s rights conference in Detroit, using that same disputed interview given nearly half-a-century ago. Farrell is obviously now an old man, subjected to intimidation and attempted violence at previous speaking engagements on men’s rights. Futrelle clearly tried to incite similar and greater violence against him and other attendees at the conference using insinuations that Farrell was a paedophile and a ‘paedophile apologist’. Again, if Farrell chooses to take legal action against Futrelle over this, he will have an extremely strong case.

Fraudtrelle even recently boasted that it was not illegal to slander somebody as a rapist even if they are found innocent in the eyes of the law by a court :

David Futrelle exists in a psychopathic fantasy world in which he can make a living from constantly slandering hundreds if not thousands of men and yet when one of his victims highlights past quotes that he has made, he threatens to sue for defamation because it might harm his chosen ‘career’ of making money out of trying to criminalize the very idea that men and boys have rights. He publicly promises to ‘assist’ a woman who has been screencapped making death threats against myself and my readers for simply highlighting a quote of hers made in a public space (erm..sound familiar David?).

The other day he exploited the latest tragic school shooting in America to slander the entire manosphere as potential murderers- which must number at least 100,000 individuals now, on the basis that…err…I’m not sure but something about the shooter having a penis and most of the manosphere having penises. No doubt he will be launching an early donation drive if he gets a spike in traffic from the mainstream media, just as he did when he took advantage of the Elliot Rodgers killings to spuriously link them to the MRM.

Unfortunately David Futrelle has crossed the line with me and he will be facing the consequences.

17 Comments on "Legal Action Against David Futrelle the Child Torture Porn Apologist"



  1. This looks promising. Not only would Fraudtrelle be forced to explain his defense of Salo (and maybe a few other things yet to come to light); he’s going to have a hard time explaining incitement to violence. Especially since it’s fairly clear that his followers have a disproportionate number of mentally unbalanced people among them.

    Unlike Inclinedreader, I’m not going to run for the nearest exit over a few threats. I’ll try to help get this story out and if it goes forward to Court, try to get some media exposure for it too.


  2. Unlike Inclinedreader, I’m not going to run for the nearest exit over a few threats. I’ll try to help get this story out and if it goes forward to Court, try to get some media exposure for it too.

    Thanks Eric, and I appreciate very much that you are the one reader who never fails to show support whenever I (and we) get death threats here.


  3. I can imagine the ‘conversation’ he had with ‘his lawyers’.

    Futrelle : ‘ I need your advice. There’s a blogger attacking me on his site, and now Al Jazeera won’t pay me to speak on their channel denouncing the idea that boys and men have basic rights. Do you know how many billions of dollars those Quatar Sheiks who run Al Jazeera are worth? They literally shit black gold through their asses from the oil wealth extracted by the Pakastani child slave labour they exploit, I mean own, err I mean employ. Not to mention the live televised floggings of homosexuals. I was getting paid $5k just for sitting in a studio with feminazis claiming that anyone who argues that men face discrimination are paedophile apologists and potential mass murderers’.

    Lawyer : ‘So you’re saying that this blogger has injured your reputation? In what other ways has it proven harmful to you aside from hindering your employment as an expert on the non-rights of boys at a channel owned by an autocratic royal dynasty with one of the worst human rights records in the world?’

    Futrelle : ‘Well…I was going to get laid with some of my readers through my clever ‘Manboobz Meetups’ scheme. That was half the point of setting up my website and inviting and putting myself through the inevitable personal ridicule. But now I can’t even bang any of my obese transgender groupies..at least not publicly.’

    Lawyer : ‘I see…so how exactly is this blogger defaming you?’

    Futrelle : ‘He laughs at me and mocks me. He accuses me of being a paedophile apologist’.

    Lawyer : ‘But isn’t that what you do to hundreds of others on your own blog every day, including the anti-feminist?’

    Futrelle : ‘Yes, but I’m a feminist, so he shouldn’t be allowed to mock me. It’s different for me.’

    Lawyer : ‘Well, I’m not sure if that is legally valid, but tell me…can you be more specific in how he is defaming you?’

    Futrelle : ‘He claims I’m a child torture porn apologist just for mocking the police for thinking a classic gay porno…I mean classic art film was obscene.’

    Lawyer : ‘And what does this classic porno…oh I’m sorry..classic art film, consist of?’.

    Futrelle : ‘Lots of naked underage innocent teenage bums being spanked, both boys and girls, and then the kids are made to eat shit with nails mixed in, then we see them being slowly tortured to death. But it’s NOT porno. It’s classic art. It must be because it’s on sale in Amazon and the Chicago film critics association voted it the best ever. It tells us that fascism is wrong. If it wasn’t for SALO, the men’s rights movement would likely have established a fascist patriarchal dictatorship all over the globe by now!!’

    Lawyer : ‘Well sorry Mr Futrelle, but I took the liberty of undertaking some background research, and it does appear that you mocked the police for arresting the owners of a gay sex shop for renting out the porno…oh I’m sorry classic art film…with all the other pornos.’

    Futrelle : ‘It’s classic art. It’s on sale at Amazon!!’

    Lawyer : ‘I’m just giving you honest legal advice Mr Futrelle. You mocked the police for considering a video featuring naked children eating shit before being disemboweled as obscene in the context of the gay sex shop it was being rented out for profit in’.

    Futrelle : ‘It’s classic art. It’s on sale at Amazon!!’

    Lawyer : ‘God help me. I’m just stating a legal fact Mr Futrelle that you have no grounds for complaint whatsoever. You make a living out of using carefully selected quotes to mock, slander, and incite violence against hundreds of men’s rights supporters, pick up artists, and just about anyone who disclaims the title of feminist, and yet you want to sue for defamation a man who quotes your published defence of an obscene child torture porn video being rented out in a gay sex shop. You also accused the readers of a reddit devoted to pictures of fully clothed teenagers of being child porn consumers because of the context in which they viewed those pictures. You simply have no grounds for complaint. You are a child torture porn apologist.’

    Futrelle : ‘It’s classic art..It’s on sale at Amazon!’

    Lawyer : ‘Goodbye Mr Futrelle. I advise you not to waste your time or mine any longer’.

    Futrelle : ‘ But the anti-feminist is an annoying shit. I can’t get laid or invited on Al Jazeera anymore. He needs to be doxxed and killed now! I won’t get life for it. It’s different for me because I’m a feminist. The rules don’t apply. Go Gawker Go!! You have the resources – you made thousands from advertising revenge child porn on Fleshbot!!!’


  4. Well I would like to support you too, but I don’t know what I can do. I don’t have much money, but just tell me what you need and I will try to help.


  5. Thanks Jon. I don’t need money – I have the resources to take Fraudtrelle to court no problem. I would rather wait until I have moved from my present location, which is facing a pretty rough housing estate. My life truly would be in danger thanks to Futrelle’s history of defamation against me.

    Supportive comments are enough.


  6. well consider me a supportive commenter then. Granted, we are at odds sometimes simply because I selfishly want this blog to only be about age of consent issues, and I am glad you don’t cater to me or others on what they want.


  7. If you need any help – please feel free to contact me.

    I have actually spoken with lawyers twice – on account of my blog. Of course – that is in America – it is probably a different routine in the UK.


  8. @theantifeminist
    Sorry I only caught up with this one today – been away for a while and was only able to get a few short glimpses of the latest stories, via my smart phone and didn’t have time to post a comment.

    The biggest problem we face with this of course is that he – the despicable excuse for a human being that it is, has the entire (totalitarian) feminist state on his side: As things stand at the moment, the feminist drafted LAW itself would find some loophole that might literally excuse him from murder. (Especially if his victim was male and even more so an MRA).
    However, if this goes ‘viral’ (I don’t like using that meme normally), it should expose a lot more of the TRUTH about feminism, via the MSM, so whatever you do PLEASE carry out your threat. Right now I’d say he thinks you’re bluffing and hopes it’ll soon ‘blow over’…

    We have to bear in mind too that the people who follow him and feminism generally are pretty damn stupid and that’s putting it mildly:
    They believed all the baloney about Satanic Ritual Abuse and suppressed childhood memories of being (sexually) abused being recovered and exposed by feminist ‘expert therapists’ during the 1980’s and 90’s, and STILL DO to this day believe it, despite overwhelming evidence that totally contradicted and dismissed all claims they made. Thus the same brain-dead tabloid educated, lynch-mob are still just as eager to swallow even more ridiculous stories, especially if the word paedophile is simply mentioned and mentioned only once…


  9. Thanks for the support guys, I really appreciate it.

    This isn’t something I’m bluffing over – I’ve been thinking of ‘coming out’ for a while now, and what better way than through taking Futrelle to court? I do need to be in a safer location though.


  10. I hope everybody enjoyed my Futrelle Halloween treat btw. I’m going to take down his picture from the side bar because non-regular readers are obviously assuming that I am him….ugggghhh!!!

    And Fraudtrelle the child torture porn apologist has no grounds for complaint over ‘mocking his image’ or some other crap because he regularly does the same to MRAs, such as our old friend Matt Forney just a few days ago :


  11. An update on the legal situation with Fraudtrelle – I’ve taken some professional legal advice and it appears that I do have a very strong case for having the beast prosecuted for incitement to murder either in the UK or the USA. This is because of the context of 6+ years of defamation against myself on the part of Fraudtrelle, and the fact he has publicly incited others to attempt to doxx me, including a woman which he must have been aware had left death threats in the comments section here.

    I’m in the process of buying an apartment outside of the UK, and once that goes through (in a matter of weeks) we’ll take the child torture porn apologist to court.


  12. He’s also several times published death threats against me from readers in the comments section at his site, all of which I have screencaps of.


  13. antifeminist:
    I don’t know much about British law (hopefully Opus will comment, he’s quite knowledgeable about it) but I think that the British take these matters more seriously than American courts. It’s pretty clear what the paedocrite is doing by inciting his mentally-unbalanced followers to commit acts. Not unlike the other incitements he likely does (for a different reason) with his Manboobz meetups.


  14. Antifeminist:
    Just when we thought Fat-Troll would be laying low, he couldn’t resist being a paedocrite again. He posted an article complaining that Mr. malE had once tweeted that Futrelle should ‘just kill himself’ and now he’s howling about all the ‘threats’ he’s been subjected to and how MRAs are encouraging online violence, etc….

    This guy’s shamelessness is almost impressive, in a perverse sort of way LOL


  15. On that subject, look out for a post today announcing the Paedocrite of the Year 2014 contest – nominations required! As I’m currently in consultation with lawyers over putting Futrelle behind bars for incitement to murder, this might be the last year that the MonsterBoobz will be eligible.

Comments are closed.