Dr Kathleen Richardson is the winner of the Femihag of the Year Award for 2015.
The self-styled ‘anti-sexbot campaigner’ is lobbying governments to pass laws to put men in prison to be raped and beaten as sex offenders if they purchase robots for sexual purposes.
Disturbingly, her explicit motivation for doing so appears to be that if men have the option of sexbots, they will be less likely to pursue sexual relations with women and that this amounts to ‘exploiting women’.
In most cultures, attempting to obtain sex through force is regarded as attempted rape. Of course, when feminists do it, rather than attempted mass rape, it becomes magically transformed into ‘protecting women and children from exploitation’.
She explained to El Reg that it was in investigating the manufacture of sex-robots that she initially became concerned about the philosophy going into the creation of robo-whores.
“The relationship that is being imported,” by the sex-bot developers is one that has come directly from that between “prostitutes and johns” according to Richardson, who finds it “very disturbing”.
In a paper titled “The Asymmetrical ‘Relationship’: Parallels Between Prostitution and the Development of Sex Robots”, Richardson proposes “that prostitution is no ordinary activity and relies on the ability to use a person as a thing and this is why parallels between sex robots and prostitution are so frequently found by their advocates.”
Asked whether it it might be more appropriate to consider robo-whores as sex toys, which would most typically be considered a private and solitary part of human sexual activity, Richardson stressed the opposite.
“To call them toys is to understate the issue,” she said. “It’s not as if it’s a Barbie.” Dr Richardson also surprisingly offered the idea that there may be some form of exploitation involved in the manufacture of My Little Pony dolls.
“The better term is ‘sex object’,” said Dr Richardson, who emphasised that the objectification of prostitutes in the prostitute/john relationship is one that’s mimicked in the relationship between sex-robots and their owners.
Questioned whether objectification was worthy of concern when actual objects were involved, rather than people who were treated like objects, Richardson turned away from the actual issue of banning robots – stating again that sex toys, and sex robots, exist because of prostitution.
“We must abolish prostitution,” she said.
“80 per cent of women are prostitutes,” she added, but confirmed that actually she had meant that the other way round. The remaining 20 per cent she suggested were made up of children and transgendered men.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/09/15/anti_robot_prostitution_campaign/
Of course we know something here that most people don’t: What this repugnant piece of excrement really means and is in fact very concerned about, is that if men have the option of sexbots, they will be far less likely than they already are, to ‘pursue sexual relations’ with horribly unattractive frumps such as herself!
If she seriously believed that we exploit women, surely she would welcome the sexbot technology, because we’ll be leaving the poor little ‘exploited’ and objectified princesses alone. Her reasoning is totally illogical – a paradox and equally as ridiculous as their voodoo magic theory of perverts repeatedly harming 17 year old children by looking at photos of them smiling provocatively while wearing short skirts.
Dr Richardson is a text-book example of a bitterly jealous femihag sexual trade unionist.
BTW: what is her doctorate? My guess would be ‘women’s studies’ or something equally as meaningless and useless.
LOL! This is the best laugh I’ve had this year.
What a double-bind!
Wretched men could reluctantly but logically resort to the horror of sexbots just to escape the grip of ugly spiteful monsters like her.
But, knowing that the scary frump wants to jail them for using sex bots, men might have to seem enthusiastic and campaign for sexbots just in case…
Listening to feminist reasoning is like looking at a Medusa. Only instead of turning to stone, my eyes go crossed, and my head hurts.
I’m off to find my Motrin.
As Arnie might say, that’s one ugly motherfucker.
Femihags in the UK want to criminalize criticism of women as ‘hate speech’ in response to Roosh V :
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/02/02/mps-call-for-anti-feminist-violent-speech-to-be-made-illegal-as-controversial-pick-up-artist-plans-uk-visit/
Lol, good job I’ve been slowly winding this site down!
And we’ve just imported over a million sex starved single muslim men into Europe and witnessed the results already in Cologne. It’s obscene to be trying to ban sexbots, porn and prostitution whilst these same leftie feminist cunts support open borders and ‘refugees welcome’.
If we dropped a million sexbots on to the middle-east we would probably destroy the whole motivation behind the retarded religion of Islam, never mind defeat ISIS.
Probably – she’s currently ‘professor of robot ethics’ at some shitty third rate English ‘university’, yet the media keep referring her to as an ‘expert’.
I hope Eric is o.k. I’m getting worried about him now – I don’t think he’s commented here since you returned Alan.
‘Sex offenders’ in the USA to have their status branded onto their passports : https://www.themarshallproject.org/2016/02/02/congress-acts-to-mark-passports-of-sex-offenders
Meanwhile, court rules that lifelong GPS tracking of ‘sex offenders’ is legal : http://www.newser.com/story/219943/court-lifelong-gps-tracking-of-sex-offenders-is-ok.html
I just had a quick look at the anti-robot prostitution campaign story again via the link, http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/09/15/anti_robot_prostitution_campaign/ where you can cast your vote – for or against them on a vote widget they’ve included on the page: Robowhores: An Ethical Poll
So far, her campaign is clearly perceived as the joke it derseves to be seen as with the following results:
Q: Do you, for one, welcome our new robowhore overlords?
(You vote by choosing 1 of 4 answers to a series of 4 questions), but the end result was clearly overwhelmingly in favour of what the bitterly jealous Dr Richardson refers to as ‘robowhores’:
Q 1: Yes, and I would like to remind them that as a trusted Reg commentard, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground sex caves.
543
Q 2: Yes, they’re just going to be like any other machine. They’re either a benefit or a hazard. If they’re a benefit, what’s your problem?
713
Q 3: No, it’s vulgar. There they are, brain the size of a planet, and we ask them to fondle our bits. We must prioritise what we use precious robots for.
75
Q 4:No, look at the sex doll models being built at the moment, breasts the size of planets. They reinforce the worst sexual stereotypes. Men must be controlled.
47
The one that scored the highest was Q 2 which is more-or-less the point I made in my initial comment the other day.
I don’t think it has much to do with me returning really. I have just spent the last couple of hours quickly skimming over recent posts on blogs I know of, where he regularly comments and the most recent one I could find was this one here which he posted at Emma the Emo’s blog on 26 December.
I certainly share your concern though, because not only do I miss his humour and witty comments, you also mentioned he had some health issues.
He is a very rare, TRUE-BLUE antifeminist!
I wasn’t suggesting he’d boycotted this site because you were back, I meant just the opposite – that he must surely be either ill or unaware that you’re back otherwise he would have commented here.
I think that was around the last time he left a comment here too.
This will just be the start. In 20 years time they’ll sentence ‘sex offenders’ to have a femihag robot accompany their every move, keeping their little beady eyes on everything the ‘offender’ does. Just imagine in the year 2040, downloading a 16 year old Russian girl sexbot to be printed out on your home 3d printer. A few nights later the pigs come crashing through your door at 4am, take away the Russian sex bot for…ahem… examination at the station, and charge you with ‘possession of a sexbot’. You serve 5 years in prison and get anal raped multiple times, and then from the moment you come out until the day that you die, you have a femihag bot identical to Kathleen Richardson follow you about like a shadow, scolding you if you so much as glance in the direction of a 17 year old cutie in the street and threatening to take you back to prison to be raped some more.
This is rather funny :
And the uploader’s first comment below the video :
“its female rape forcing us to fuck vagina when theres a choice not to and they ban it.?”
Sounds like I have more non-aspie readers than I thought!
Oops, sorry I forgot to add a 😉 after that comment – I was kidding and know you meant the opposite.
The ‘edited’ video of Dr Femihag Cunt Richardson is hilarious and you’re right: you do have at least one more non-aspie reader than you might have thought!
🙂 LOL!
@Alan – Is that where you’ve been the last year – making MGTOW YouTube videos? LOL!
I see that A Voice for Mangina’s traffic has been plummetting lately : http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/avoiceformen.com
They’ve been calling Roosh V a ‘confessed rapist’ over there for the last week. Compare with how softly they’ve treated the gay snuff child porn advocate David Futrelle. What a piece of shit Mr Male is.
FYI – I heard from Eric on Tuesday (2-2-16). I am worried too – about his health.
Sorry to hear that ScareCrow – myself and a lot of people reading this are wishing him all the best. I really hope he’ll be o.k.
Interesting :
https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=roosh%20v%2C%20paul%20elam%2C%20eivind%20berge&cmpt=q&tz=Etc%2FGMT
If you type ‘Roosh V’ into Google News at this point, you get over 200,000 results!
And to think the person who started accusing Roosh V of being a rapist and a rape advocate was David Futrelle. I wonder how many of these media outlets reporting on the ‘rape advocate Roosh V’ are aware that the their ultimate source is a ‘man’ who advocates for snuff torture child porn videos to be legally on sale in gay sex shops. Not to mention him refusing to ban a reader (RalMCG) who runs a forum dedicated to fellow pervs sharing stories of torturing, crucifying, raping, and murdering women and girls?
All Anti-Feminist Talk Would Be Criminal ‘Hate Speech’ If U.K. Activists Get Their Way
http://reason.com/blog/2016/02/03/pickup-artist-roosh-v-causes-moral-panic
Meanwhile, the real abuse of girls and women continues..
And the same femihag leftie cunts who would want criticism of feminism criminalized would like to see critcism of muslim immigration also criminalized.