Comments on: Jay Hammers – resisting the rape of the male

By: evilwhitemalempire

evilwhitemalempire — Sun, 05 Dec 2010 06:58:58 +0000

Sorry for not answering sooner. I clearly overlooked the reply judging by the date. (just as well I’ve learned more since)
Maybe the elite males have a way of getting around this stuff.
Or more likely they once DID but don’t anymore.
Perhaps wimminz starts out as alpha alliance with harridans but now the alphas aren’t so alpha anymore so the harridans took over. Interesting theory about that here.
The guy’s a bit crass but looking beyond that I think he may be onto something as his ideas explain a bunch of other stuff (about politics and biology) besides feminism per se.
As far as I can tell it doesn’t conflict with the sexual trade union theory but rather focuses more broadly. STU theory explains the motivation for feminism but alpha/beta/gamma coup theory provides the means. HOW could a bunch of sexually jealous rolling pin and frying pan wielding harridans bully their way to power to begin with? Not because they had help from men on top but rather because the men on top (themselves) were weaker than they used to be.

By: Sequel

Sequel — Sat, 04 Dec 2010 02:05:06 +0000

What happened to Jay’s blog? His Youtube channel has been shut down and this Happy Misogynist is on there practically calling him a pedophile! Was there a mob stirred up against him or something?

By: The Highwayman

The Highwayman — Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:37:43 +0000

Hi Evilwhitemalempire, I agree that there is likely collaboration between sexual trade union feminists and certain men who have an interest in policing other men’s sexuality (to mantain the stability of the established dominance hierarchy) but this part of your comment confuses me:

QUOTE:”Alphas (at least subconsciously) want to monopolize access to the youngest and prettiest women so that all the offspring will be theirs. And the fuglies want to keep hubby away from those same women.
So they both have a vested interest in keeping beta males away from younger and more attractive women.”

Age of Consent laws are across the board prohibitions on male access to females under a certain arbitrary age so how do AOC laws help alpha males monopolize access to the youngest females?

By: evilwhitemalempire

evilwhitemalempire — Fri, 24 Sep 2010 07:16:49 +0000

I think their has always been an alliance between sexually jealous women (mostly older or uglier) and alpha male types.
Alphas (at least subconsciously) want to monopolize access to the youngest and prettiest women so that all the offspring will be theirs. And the fuglies want to keep hubby away from those same women.
So they both have a vested interest in keeping beta males away from younger and more attractive women.
In the past this alliance likely centered around the church with it’s ‘alpha male’ God and clergy. Perhaps today it centers around the United Nations and the European Union.

But perhaps another ‘natural alliance’ exists between beta men and the young and pretty women. Those women want to break out of the sexual trade union imposed by the majority of women. Why? Because the union does nothing but drag them down. With the union they get no more male resources than the fuglies (unless of course they are good enough to get into an alphas harem). But without the union they will get the lions share of beta male resources (at the expense of the fuglies hence the extreme sexual jealousy of this group).
The beta male, in turn, gets access to quality ass without having to break the bank as such women can simply take a little from all men rather than all from one man. (The fuglies could never do it this way since they aren’t in enough demand. So their only option is to ‘trap’ men.)

As for all this mommys baby daddys maybe stuff. Sexual fidelity is only really important to a man if he’s an alpha as only (true) alphas are powerful enough to actually be successful at imposing it. (poor men who think like alphas need an attitude adjustment)
But for betas even a 10% chance of knocking up a female of high fitness is loads better than a 100% chance of knocking up a fugly when you consider how much more that fugly costs the beta.