20 thoughts on “It’s Not Rocket Science – Krauser PUA (Don’t Judge Women for their Beauty)

  1. Alan Vaughn

    Someone (i.e MRAs) should walk up to those femihags peacefully protesting as they appear to be, carrying placards:

    'YOU ARE UGLY,
    YOU'RE NOT BEAUTIFUL
    NO MAN wants to OBJECTIFY YOU
    YOU ARE INDEED ANGRY..
    BECAUSE YOU ARE JEALOUS!!

  2. theantifeminist

    Post author

    Someone (i.e MRAs) should walk up to those femihags peacefully protesting as they appear to be, carrying placards:

    ‘YOU ARE UGLY,
    YOU’RE NOT BEAUTIFUL
    NO MAN wants to OBJECTIFY YOU
    YOU ARE INDEED ANGRY..
    BECAUSE YOU ARE JEALOUS!!

    They would probably run back home with red shame filled faces. But I don't think many MRAs would be capable of that kind of activim Alan. They would prefer to stand there delivering a treatise on Cultural Marxism while the femihags continue to drown them out by shouting at the top of their voices.

    Actually, as Eric pointed out, most MRAs would prefer to do a deal with those lovely looking sheilas - agree that the objectification of women is terrible and beauty contests should be banned, so long as they mention that the objectification of men is too...and that fathers have rights...

  3. Alan Vaughn

    @theantifeminist
    LOL...!!!
    Yes I totally agree and with what Eric said about it, but I said, i.e. MRAsshould walk up to the femihags... Not mRAs...

    PS you may find this post and a note about it disappearing into the SPAM FOLDER - pls just ignore both: I forgot that I cleared out all my cache and cookies earlier, (so my name and e-mail weren't in the fields when I submitted them)

  4. evilwhitemalempire

    YOU ARE INDEED ANGRY..
    BECAUSE YOU ARE JEALOUS!!
    ---------------

    congratulations alan!

    you may well be the third guy (the first being our host, the second myself) in the ENTIRE manosphere who can actually get this basic stuff!

    whenever a feminist says "porn/prostitution degrades women, turns men into raving sex lunatics, yadda, yadda, yadda" the response from the mrm is ALWAYS the same [true] but utterly mind numbing "look at all this money that these hookers have and look at these stats showing how rape goes down when men jerk off to more porn, yadda, yadda, yadda"

    not ONE of those guys EVER just cuts to the chase and uses the J-word. NEVER!

    and you'd think that surely one of them would just to say something original for once. BUT NOOOOOOOOOO! they can't even act like they have an IQ over 80

    they HAVE to embarrass themselves (and me by extension) by showing the rest of the world how they cannot get this simple stuff all the time!

    oh, they're experts on women! they know all about hypergamy, the rationalization hamster, female solipsism, projection, herd instincts, you name it

    ... duh, jealousy? what's that?

    your post is music to my eyes!

  5. evilwhitemalempire

    Actually, as Eric pointed out, most MRAs would prefer to do a deal with those lovely looking sheilas – agree that the objectification of women is terrible and beauty contests should be banned, so long as they mention that the objectification of men is too…and that fathers have rights…
    ----------------------
    yes, for the majority of mras the pinnacle of men's rights is, evidently, a classroom free of predatory milf teachers (oh, what unspeakable acts!) and being a pack mule for a whiny parasite minus divorce capability

  6. inclinedreader

    It's the old problem. Ugly women hating attractive women for their looks because they know that's always guaranteed to get male attention, even if nothing else does, and that that kind of physical attractiveness is something they will never ever attain, try as they might. So they bitch about sexism and exploitation of women and this, that, and the other.

    At the end of the day, we all, every single one of us, just wants to get laid... even those ugly women. It must indeed be sad for them that other women have a much greater chance at getting in the sack with a man than them, but that's just life... looks, brains, wealth, power... all those things are distributed unevenly amongst people.

    The only thing that's worse than jealous women who have been ugly since birth is women whose youthful sexy looks have faded or are fading. Some of the menopausal hags who are nowadays at the forefront of punishing and outlawing male sexuality were in their prime quite attractive themselves. But now that that has passed, they are joining forces with the other bitter ugly women, and you even hear stories about former porn starlets, groupies, prostitutes, and fashion models who for 10 or 20 years loved every bit of attention (and certainly the financial wealth) their physique earned them, but now it somehow dawns on them that they were "exploited" all along.

    Like I've said before - from about their mid-30s, many women more and more adopt grassroots feminism as their new spiritual home, because it allows them to believe that it's all men's fault that they no longer measure up.

  7. evilwhitemalempire

    The only thing that’s worse than jealous women who have been ugly since birth is women whose youthful sexy looks have faded or are fading.
    --------------------------

    i too have noticed this

    i think they're the worst because, unlike the born wallflowers, these women have had a taste of the power

    they're like a person born with a silver spoon in their mouth who now lives in abject poverty. they utterly cannot stand it!

    also explains why so many feminists seem to have a level of superficiality to them that is not typical for women [that] ugly

    and how minor social injustices that most folks (both male and female) simply shrug off and carry on with life are major affronts to them

    they think and act exactly like you'd expect some of the worlds hottest women to act if you could transplant their brains into wallflower bodies

  8. Alan Vaughn

    @evilwhitemalempire

    congratulations alan!

    you may well be the third guy (the first being our host, the second myself) in the ENTIRE manosphere who can actually get this basic stuff!

    Yes to me it's a 'no-brainer'. I believe that big J emotion is the driving force behind everything they do and all of their ridiculous claims: from being objectified at beauty pageants to the entire child-sexual abuse industry they founded, own and operate, to the paedophile bogey-men that spawned from their abuse industry; and EVERYTHING else in between.
    All have the same common denominator: JEALOUSY, thus their ideology is based on nothing but bitter, psychotic sexual JEALOUSY and their inability to contain or control that jealousy.
    Just beats me why other men, especially those calling themselves 'MRAs' can't see timber for the tress, or even the big bold letters painted on the enormous wall!
    Maybe they are just too close to the wall to be able to decipher what the big bold letters are spelling out?
    I.e. FEMINISM = FEMALE SEXUAL JEALOUSY

    BTW evilwhite, I borrowed your metaphor about those with 'room temperature IQ's', here, (but did acknowledge it as yours - hence 'borrowed' it from you).. :)

  9. Alan Vaughn

    @inclinedreader

    and you even hear stories about former porn starlets, groupies, prostitutes, and fashion models who for 10 or 20 years loved every bit of attention (and certainly the financial wealth) their physique earned them, but now it somehow dawns on them that they were “exploited” all along.

    Or if not exploited: they'll claim (20, 30 or even 50 years later): how they were 'molested' as 'children' (when they were about 15, 16 or 17) by some high-status alpha - i.e. Jimmy Savile, or raped; but even better: How they were chosen, then became, the child offerings of some occult fairy-tale like 'satanic ritual', performed by a congregation of hood-clad paedophiles all belonging to a satanic 'paedophile ring'...
    They were so frightened by their experiences that the memories of them were 'repressed', but thanks to highly trained and extremely clever feminist EXPERT psycho-therapists, who were able to not only 'recover' those repressed memories of their dreadful and shocking experiences, they were even able to identify the hood covered faces of the key members or 'ring leaders' of the satanic paedophile rings! Including those key members or ring-leaders who couldn't possibly have been there at the time the satanic rituals allegedly occurred...
    WOW! Impressive work! (If we can't find any proof that someone's a paedophile, just invent some phony science that proves they are, because the paedohysterical lynching public will accept it as UNDENIABLE evidence. Even when they are shown it's in fact a pack of LIES)!

    However, the retarded, indoctrinated lynch mob public (including the feminist programmed thought police) believes every word of their stories (that they read mainly in trashy, sleazy tabloids) without question...

    Welcome to the 21st century:
    Western Society's Paedophile open-season

  10. Eric

    Evilwhitemaleempire:
    It's interesting that the only two manosphere bloggers who ever banned me did so after I used the 'J' word. One was a Socon who did so not long after I suggested that his female groupies were jealous of younger women. The other was Manboobz, who did so after suggesting his groupies were jealous of blow-up rubber love dolls.

    Pretty clearly, female jealousy is a topic that many mRAs would rather sweep under the rug. It's also noteworthy that blogs which do bring it up regularly have the least support from 'pro-MRA' women.

    It also shouldn't be overlooked that you almost never hear 'pro-MRA' women advocating male interest in young or foreign girls. That's hardly an accidental oversight, either. These femiservative Cougars don't want the competition either!

  11. Alan Vaughn

    Eric

    These femiservative Cougars don’t want the competition either!

    And that's also the reason why there is absolutely no place for them, or any use for them in the MRM and why they simply cannot be part of it.
    In the mRM: yes, they belong like fish belong in the ocean, but not here. PLEASE..

  12. inclinedreader

    @Alan Vaughn:

    feminist EXPERT psycho-therapists

    Therapists have quite a bit of responsibility when it comes to working with patients of this sort. Often, psychotherapy is about putting dramatic events in a person's life in perspective, "integrating" them and "reframing" them so they become easier for the patient to accept as part of their life story.

    This can potentially open the door to a whole host of false and implanted memories. When you hear that sometimes supposedly patients didn't even realize that they were abused until they turned to a therapist for help, this should be taken with more than just a grain of salt.

  13. Alan Vaughn

    @Inclinedreader

    Therapists have quite a bit of responsibility when it comes to working with patients of this sort. Often, psychotherapy is about putting dramatic events in a person’s life in perspective, “integrating” them and “reframing” them so they become easier for the patient to accept as part of their life story.

    I'm not too sure but it seems you thought I was serious about these 'Therapists'. Serious, as in that I may actually respect what they do, i.e. that they really do help 'child-sexual abuse victims'. I believe that if they do anything at all it's more like they create such 'victims' out of perfectly emotionally healthy people, then of course a demon sexual abuser or paedophile is spawned from the same fake or phony 'psycho-therapy'!

    I was actually being as condescending, (via sarcasm) as I could be, without having to resort to saying something more direct, i.e. 'what total charlatans or quacks these rad-fem, misandrists and 'paedophile fabricators', they really are'.

    These totally obsessed and SICK, man-hating femihags don't give a fuck about destroying a child by 'implanting' these beliefs about being the victim of what is essentially a fairy-tale: a complete fabrication; just so they can create and scapegoat another man (even the child's own father will do sometimes) as a 'predator' that preys on 'children' blah-blah-blah... Total lies that the paedohysterical judiciary and public [want to and do] believe every word of!

    To my way of thinking they are REAL CHILD ABUSERS!
    Yet our even sicker society STILL ACCEPTS their 'analyses' even when it is widely publicised and well known to everyone, that these 'Therapists' are total phonies, fakes and charlatans!!
    That's why I linked her name here: Dr Valerie Charlatan Sinason, to that webpage, dedicated to exposing the SCANDAL of 'Satanic Ritual Abuse' and the vile proponents and believers of it..
    They are the ones who should be persecuted and scapegoated, but NO... Our crazed society thinks more like: 'It's the sick paedos and perverts that we want to exterminate and we don't care how they are identified as such, even if it is a total lie'!

    I did actually say a lot more about the same man-hating bitch (Dr Valerie Sinason) and the branch of mind-fiddling she specializes in: the scandalous 'satanic ritual abuse' baloneyphenomenon, in a few comments under this post: http://theantifeminist.com/steve-moxon-jimmy-savile-report/comment-page-1/#comment-41573

    BTW, I don't accept ANY part of the 'practice' or medicine of 'Psychiatry' at all and believe that the Psychiatrists are probably more mentally unstable or abnormal than their patients, for simply desiring to be Psychiatrists.
    I think they have made a lot of very unhappy people and have driven millions to their demise - i.e suicides.
    They are similar to feminists: they are parasites we'd be a lot better off without!

  14. Eric

    Speaking of Ms. Erin Prizzey, I saw an AVfM article up today featuring an interview with Ms. Erin and Warren Farrell. I didn't listen to the whole thing, but Ms. Erin stated several times that she disapproved of so-called '2nd wave femininism' and longed for the feminism the original Suffragettes wanted. Basically, she proved that she's nothing but a social-purity feminist and that looks like where the femRAs are going in general.

  15. Eric

    Inclinedreader:
    Part of the problem with 'repressed memories' is that the mind, under hypnosis, can recall ANYTHING it has ever processed. For example, if a girl dreamt about having sex with a celebrity when she was 12, a hypnotherapist could recall that memory and she would recite it as though it were a real event. If she made up a story and lied to her friends about it, she could remember the lie and repeat it as truth.

    This is why repressed memory syndrome is totally worthless as ANY kind of testimony. In the absence of scientific controls, there's no way to distinguish which memories are false and which aren't.

    As an example of how detailed these memories are, I once read of a man who'd been hypnotised to recall a past life, to prove reincarnation. He spoke of himself as an American Indian and even stated words in the Cheyenne Indian language, which he never learned. Some researcher though found his story---down to the Indian words---were from a movie produced during the 1950s about a Cheyenne Indian expedition. The guy evidently saw the movie years ago and remembered it clearly as an actual event under hypnosis.

  16. Alan Vaughn

    @Eric

    This is why repressed memory syndrome is totally worthless as ANY kind of testimony. In the absence of scientific controls, there’s no way to distinguish which memories are false and which aren’t.

    Yes that's my point and it infuriates me like NOTHING ELSE does related to feminist demonization of, false claims and worse: ACCEPTED BELIEFS on male sexuality!
    What makes it even more infuriating is the way the sheeple of our society of paedo-obsessed witch-hunters still eagerly swallows the whole scandolous JUNK science - hook, line and fucking sinker; despite almost unlimited, widely available, evidence and information that its is nothing less than false science, founded on total quackery and invented by a gaggle of LOONY, man-hating RAD-fems in the early 1980's for no other reason than to scapegoat more men as sub-human paedophiles. (Mainly fathers or close family members of their fabricated and manipulated child 'victims').

    As for hypnotism, I regard that as similar snake-oil, 'class' of baloney psychiatric medicine, as what 'reincarnation' (that you mentioned) is, simply because I have even paid so-called 'Hypnotists' myself, to help with beating certain bad habits, such as smoking and NONE of them could even put me into a 'trance' or 'hypnotised state'; let alone convince my subconscious mind, to change my behaviour.
    The fourth and final one had me laughing at him - he was speaking in some weird language that I was supposed to understand if I really was in the trance state I should have been in, but of course I was wide awake and in a normal, conscious state of mind. He was making a fool of himself and of me, I thought!

    I felt I'd been conned by them and still do, however I do accept what one of them suggested, could be true too: That some people (such as myself) simply cannot be hypnotised...

    Anyway, whether there is any truth in hypnosis or not, your story certainly makes clear that this repressed memory NONSENSE is just that and nothing else; yet the paedohysterics still want to believe it, while it 'PROVES' that some poor, innocent man is a despised, filthy paedo-predator, that they can lynch and burn at the stake! (It doesn't matter much to them even if the filthy pervert's already dead either)!

    Our 'father' - The Original online MRA and Expert in his own right, on these issues, Angry Harry, also has plenty to say about the disgrace it really is!

  17. PUAalphaMaleSuperior

    Men r better looking, they age much better.look at Clint Eastwood, yummy!
    then look at queen Elizabeth. yUCK!
    I am so happy 2 be a man. I spend every day mocking womanzees because day by day they l0se sex appeal
    until 1 day they turn int2 some dawg lookin old crone

  18. Anonymous

    40 years old is the natural life expectancy of a human being. I think them lovely looking sheilas are past their expiration date

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>