Huffington Post : ‘Predatory Teenage Girls’

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/nikki-mcwatters/predatory-teenage-girls_b_2287890.html?ncid=edlinkukhpmg00000131

These men are animals. Right? Perverts with no moral sense at all. Right? Paedophiles. Right? The girls, innocent victims with no way of knowing that they were being taken advantage of. Right?

Well, that's what the media are telling us.

But - if I may be the devil's advocate for a moment. Have you met teenage girls? Have you been one? I have and I know that I was fantasizing about sex from about the age of thirteen. It was all my friends and I could talk about and we weren't fantasizing about our pimply, gangly school-boy mates.

At 14 I was dreaming of getting horizontal with Rod Stewart, Peter Frampton and Sting. Possibly all at once. These guys were more than double my age. At the age of 15 I successfully seduced my first rock-star and adopted the secret life of a groupie for the rest of my teenage years, chasing INXS and Duran Duran and just about anyone else who was top of the pops. I was predatory, 'collecting lovers like butterflies.' The truth is that back in the late seventies and early eighties the 'school-girl' thing was a big drawcard. Now, as an older, wiser woman, I find this distasteful and just plain wrong but I know some of that is driven by my ageing ego.

Straight from the horse's mouth. But even when an aging female journalist admits that thousands upon thousands of men around the world are being raped and beaten in prisons for no other 'moral' reason than to satisfy the 'ageing egos' of bitter old femi-hags, the men's Rights Movement will still never see it as an issue of any concern.

25 thoughts on “Huffington Post : ‘Predatory Teenage Girls’

  1. Zorro

    Hear, hear!!

    The patriarchy is just fine! What we need to end is the fucking ridiculous pedestalization of the human female!

  2. Deano

    At least it’s good to see a female journalist breaking away from the ‘all underage sex = baby rape’ mentality of Big Media. My guess is that she’s discovered she can make herself suddenly far more attractive to men by being a bit more understanding of us than her competitors. It’s the equivalent of a girl turning up at a party wearing the skimpiest outfit.

  3. inclinedreader

    well… my guess would be that about two thirds of the whole music and media industry derive their billion-dollar revenue from crazed hormonal teenage girls swooning over whatever mediocrely talented hunky heart throb that industry churns out any given week.

    So who’s really preying on vulnerable little teenage girls and exploiting their budding sexuality for personal gain and profit? Who is manipulating them, who is abusing their innocence?

    I wouldn’t simply point the finger at feminism though on this one… to me, it all sums up a certain kind of Protestant puritannical double-standard attitude that the U.S. and its media industry in particular have been exporting successfully around the world: Look, but don’t touch. A tidy profit, even one that is based on young girls’ sexual fantasies, is the epitome of virtuousness. Money is good. Wealth is good. While it’s pure sin to actually live out the urges that your profit-making scheme capitalizes on.

  4. Alan Vaughn

    She said,

    Now, as an older, wiser woman, I find this distasteful and just plain wrong but I know some of that is driven by my ageing ego.

    I’d suggest that rather than ‘some of that’ being driven by her aging ego, a more honest evaluation would be ‘all of that is driven by my aging ego and my envy of my younger competition’.

    However, it is great that she can admit that this witch-hunt of NORMAL men is based purely on the bitter jealousy of middle-aged, burnt-out femihags belonging to a sexual trade union.

    Show this article to Paul Elam and he’ll probably dismiss her as a female ‘creep’! It is not a men’s rights issue – she is a creep, probably been manipulated by some creepy paedophile…
    He’d say he has no time for these creeps, not even females.

  5. “when an aging female journalist admits that thousands upon thousands of men around the world are being raped and beaten in prisons for no other ‘moral’ reason than to satisfy the ‘ageing egos’ of bitter old femi-hags, the men’s Rights Movement will still never see it as an issue of any concern.”

    You lost me here. I thought this was a major concern in MRM.

  6. Alan Vaughn

    @tyciol
    No. it SHOULD be men’s rights issue No.1 but it isn’t at all!
    The vast majority of so-called ‘MRAs’ have practically joined the sexual trade union on this one and are even scapegoating men, i.e. most sexually normal men, who prefer younger, more attractive women (young women that feminists have redefined with their PC language manipulation and misandric propaganda as ‘children’) as despised paedophiles or ‘creeps’.

    The recent co-opting by the MRM with feminists on this issue and even further validation of it by demanding that female ‘child-abusers’ get treated equally by the law as men, is seen as the biggest gesture of total betrayal to most commentators on this TRUE MRA blog and 1 or 2 others.

    They even uphold the feminist baloney mantra of victimhood: claiming fallaciously, that 1 in 6 men were sexually abused when they were boys…
    (WTF is next…)?

    We are supposed to be MEN, not victims of the fucking matriarchy!!

    Equal injustice for all is not justice for anyone, but it certainly isn’t helpful in defeating feminism and the tight and destructive reign it has over our once functional society.

  7. theantifeminist

    Post author

    Well put Alan.

    Of course there was a time when men’s rights writers and anti-feminists more or less took it for granted that this was a serious issue.

  8. theantifeminist

    Post author

    So who’s really preying on vulnerable little teenage girls and exploiting their budding sexuality for personal gain and profit? Who is manipulating them, who is abusing their innocence?

    I wouldn’t simply point the finger at feminism though on this one… to me, it all sums up a certain kind of Protestant puritannical double-standard attitude that the U.S. and its media industry in particular have been exporting successfully around the world: Look, but don’t touch. A tidy profit, even one that is based on young girls’ sexual fantasies, is the epitome of virtuousness. Money is good. Wealth is good. While it’s pure sin to actually live out the urges that your profit-making scheme capitalizes on.

    Good point IR in relation to the double standards of the music industry, but this ‘confession’ by the female journalist is important in my eyes and should surely open the eyes of others to the awful possibility that the multi-billion dollar child abuse industry, that destroys so many lives of both adults and children and spreads fear and loathing throughout society, IS based primarily on simple female sexual jealousy of young girls.

    I’ve no doubt that American puritanism has played a huge role in paedohysteria, but our biggest problem is that virtually all people (and they are few and far between) who recognise the evil of paedohysteria see its cause almost entirely in terms of puritanism and anti-sex attitudes. And even when they do identify feminism as a cause, they tend to ignore the role that the primal sexual jealousy of older women plays in all of this, and rather see it in terms of Cultural Marxism or such like. Even Human-Stupidity seems loathe to criticise women, or even feminism per se, and holds out hope that there are millions of aging middle-aged women just waiting and ready to march alongside us in demanding the right to have sexual relations with nubile 17 year old girls…if only we’re nice to them (feminists).

    All the other (handful) of anti-sex hysteria blogs and sites almost completely ignore the role that feminism plays. Take a look at the following for example – somebody posted a link to my site in a thread at the forum of Jonathan King, which disucsses mainly paedohysteria and false rape accusations :

    http://www.kingofhits.co.uk/index.php?option=com_kunena&Itemid=65&func=view&catid=2&id=91630

    The idea that something so ‘progressive’ as feminism could be behind something so backward and regressive as paedohysteria literally causes painful cognitive dissonance in the mind of just about any liberal.

    This is why I rarely talk about American puritanism – we will never have a hope in hell of defeating the Sexual Trade Union until those inclined to resist repressive sex laws recognise feminism for what it is and stop blaming it all on puritanism.

    And, having said all that, I honestly think things would be hardly different in Europe if American puritanism was less powerful. For example, it was New Labour that created the sex offenders register to Europe (the Uk was the first) and also raised the age for porn to 18 and introduced virtual child porn laws. The NSPCC, alongside ECAPT, is probably the most influential ‘child protection’ lobby group in Europe, and as I described in a previous article, it is staffed almost entirely by radical, secular, left-wing feminists. It was lobbying from the NSPCC that led to the EU mandating that sex with a minor before a certain age (13 in the UK, 14 in Germany) be automatically classed as ‘rape’. The NSPCC had actually asked that the age be set at 16 throughout Europe, with a minimum 15 year prison sentence for any man having sex with a girl under 16, however willing.

  9. inclinedreader

    @Antifeminist

    Like I said, I wouldn’t point the finger just at the usual femihag suspects. In the end, certainly, feminists might be as much to blame as globalized American puritanism.

    But the role – and clout – of American puritans can also not be denied regarding the tightening of “child” porn and prostitution laws in Europe. It was the National Center of Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) in the U.S. that shoved American “model legislation” down the throats of the European Commission which then cast it into the 2004 Framework Decision which for the first time brought us here these laws. There are very strong ties between the NCMEC and the American Christian Right. In the past 20 years, next to public funding, the Christian Right has lavished financial resources on the NCMEC and since the late 1990s has effectively used it as a false-flag mouthpiece to globally push its anti-sex, anti-youth agenda.

    Of course, feminists have well and truly jumped on that bandwagon… and at least here in Europe, those feminists are pushing that agenda more heavily than religious radicals who don’t really directly have a foot in the door on our seemingly so secular continent. But it would be negligent not to mention that without American Christian Right puritans (and their abundant resources), quite likely feminists never would have got this far.

  10. Eric

    Alan:
    I tend to agree with you here. It did take above- average honesty for her to admit that her aging ego was driving this resentment; but she also stopped short of recommending things like lower AOC and advocating younger marriages as a deterrent to this kind of female behavior.

    This same tendency repeats in a lot of so-called ‘Tradcon’ (I call them Tradfems) women who appear like locusts on MRM blogs in America. They all follow the same predictable pattern: they whine endlessly about the ‘mistakes’ they made while young (although it’s not hard to notice the enthusiasm with which they detail their past thug-chasing and general sluttiness). Then, they encourage young women to chastity, moral virtue &c.

    But I’ve also seen young women on these blogs who’ve actually practiced what the Tradfems preached: remained a virgin and decided to marry young. The femihag fury bursts out without restraint on these girls.

  11. Eric

    Tyciol:
    Unfortunately, it is NOT major concern among leading MRM bloggers (at least not at the present time). Too many—especially American MRA blogs—would feel happy if just as many women ‘around the world were being raped in prison’ as there are men. What many of us want to do is end the Abuse Industry (and its American ally the Prison-Industrial Complex) altogether.

    Recently a major US blog even praised the Japanese government for succumbing to US pressure and signing a supposed child-protection treaty co-authored by Hillary Clinton! These so-called MRAs were delighted that Japanese mothers would no longer be able to flee their American husbands and return to Japan (LOL how many times a year does this happen, a half-dozen or so?) It does however handicap married American men who go to Japan to escape the repressive AOC laws here!

  12. Eric

    Inclinedreader:
    If you really want to have some nightmares tonight, do a Google-search for ‘Christian Reconstructionism’. These are the puritans whom you’re describing.

    These guys have not only taken over vigilante groups like NCMEC, they are a HUGE unseen political force over here. Not only that, they are also deeply entrenched in the military, media, and some schools.

  13. Eric

    It’s interesting to compare what this Huffington Post says to what Carolina Courtland recently said. Remember how she told us that teenage girls recoil from older men in disgust? The Huffington Post author seems to remember differently…

    LOL—now if only more teenagers looked like Sabrina Vaz the world might have hope after all!

  14. theantifeminist

    Post author

    But it would be negligent not to mention that without American Christian Right puritans (and their abundant resources), quite likely feminists never would have got this far.

    Well it wouldn’t be negligent because, as I said, virtually every other anti-sex hysteria blog that I know of devotes their time exclusively to mentioning the role that American Christian Right puritans have played.

    And despite what I said in my previous comment, I do often attack American puritanism here, even to the extent that I have been accused of being anti-American several times.

    We need to also remember the role, as Eric points out (and I have here many times), that women (i.e. feminists/femiservatives) are playing in the agenda of American puritanism. To me, somebody like Sarah Palin is as much a part of the sexual trade union as any ‘secular’ left-wing radfem.

    The point is that for some astonishing near incomprehensible reason, it seems almost impossible for 99% of males to take seriously the idea that older women might misuse their growing political power to restrict the sexual choices of younger women, and the men who pursue them, through motives of pure sexual jealousy.

    This despite the obvious fact that the pursuit of sex, and the need to gain an advantage over your sexual rivals, is probably the primary motivating factor in all or most human behaviour, and certainly that of females, and the source of the multi-billion dollar female cosmetics industry.

    As I said, even the few MRAs who do take paedohysteria seriously would rather talk about Cultural Marxism than basic female psychology, and anti-sex hysteria writers in general, would prefer not to even mention feminism, and certainly not women, as a guitly culprit, preferring to pin the blame on white male puritans and their sky god. I was actually banned from the Jonathan King forum for being anti-feminist i.e. in their eyes misogynistic.

    Anyway, the point I’m making is – in this article we have a rare admission from a middle-aged female journalist on a secular left-wing ‘liberal’ political magazine that the reason we lock thousands of men up to be beaten and raped as paedophiles for having sex with post-pubescent girls, or even looking at pictures of 20 year old women with small breasts, is female sexual jealousy. This primal human motive no doubt plays a huge part in the growing political activism (increasingly female led and inspired) of the American religous right, but for this article at least, I do not think it is negligent to ignore the role that puritanism plays and to instead focus on basic self-interested female psychology.

  15. theantifeminist

    Post author

    I would also point out that the biggest hurdle we seem to be facing in convincing the MRM that women criminalizing possibly millions of men for their sexual behaviour is indeed a men’s rights issue is the assumption that sex laws are the result of American puritanism rather than feminism, and rather than self-interested female sexual psychology. In fact, Eryemil – the paedocrite I posted an article on recently – stated that himself.

    Now I’ve checked again at Reddit, and this article has gotten 139 more upvotes than downvotes – even though I titled it : ‘Huffington Post : ‘Predatory Teenage girls’ – female journalist admits that thousands of men are being beaten and raped in prison because of ‘aging female egos’.

    I can’t recall any similar article blaming feminism for statutory rape laws and draconian punishments even being upvoted at r/mensrights.

    This is quite a staggering breakthrough in my eyes, so I’d rather not we undo some of that success by deviating along the well trodden path of blaming American puritanism (for this article at least).

  16. inclinedreader

    The point is that for some astonishing near incomprehensible reason, it seems almost impossible for 99% of males to take seriously the idea that older women might misuse their growing political power to restrict the sexual choices of younger women, and the men who pursue them, through motives of pure sexual jealousy.

    No, I for one take that idea very seriously. Because it is very much the truth. Wherever you look, whether it’s those bogus children’s charities, anti-porn movements or anti-prostitution campaign outfits, you always have middle-aged and menopausal feminists in the front rows calling the shots and defining agendas.

    But behind the scenes, Christian fundamentalists are pulling many important strings.

  17. Eric

    Inclinedreader:
    An important point to remember is the way George Santayana defined these types of social movements. A Reformation seeks to change a broken social order and make it efficient again. A Revolution seeks to overthrow the social order and supplant with another one.

    Most of the MRM is, by Santayana’s criteria, a Reformation movement. We’re seeking to change society by making it functional again: reforming AOC laws, divorce laws, &c. Both Radical Feminism and Christian Reconstructionism are Revolutionary movements. They BOTH want to destroy the entire existing order and replace it with whatever their own visions of utopia happen to look like.

    Because both have the same ultimate goal (the destruction of civilization), they will use one another for their own ends. But that co-operation will stop just as soon as one gets the upper hand. Of course, as Santayana also said, the opposite of civilization is barbarism, so we know what the REAL ends both are striving for truly are.

    One other thing I should mention about Christian Reconstructionists: many Americans, including fundamentalist Christians, don’t even know that this evil group exists, or the extent of its actual influence. A lot of fundamentalist Christians are actually fairly libertarian politically over here; and might be won over to support MRM causes if they saw the Reconstructionists’ fingers in the pies.

  18. Eric

    Speaking of female predators, I thought something about this name was familiar. From Wikipedia:

    TYPHON: “Was the last son of Gaia fathered by Tartarus and the most deadly monster of Greek mythology…Typhon attempts to destroy Zeus at the will of Gaia (the Earth Goddess). Typhon overcomes Zeus in their first battle and tears out Zeus’ sinews. However, Hermes restores Zeus to health and Zeus defeats Typhon and traps him under Mt. Etna.”

    Whoa.

    So the leading femRA is named for a monster whose father was the devil, worshipped the earth goddess, and tried to destroy the male god who created man in his own image by tearing out his muscles?

    I think we can all draw our own conclusions from this one! LOL

  19. theantifeminist

    Post author

    I haven’t looked at the comments there, we know that r/mensrights is full of feminist trolls and mRA idiots. Let’s just take heart that it got nearly 200 more upvotes than downvotes eh?

    And please don’t link to SRS.

  20. Alan Vaughn

    The author / webmaster of one of our ‘partner’ sites: Inquisition 21 has opened a
    new blog where comments are welcomed.
    Inquisition 21 has also posted some other new links (on his home page) including the video of an ABC (Australia) current affairs program ’4 Corners’, on how Julian Assange has possibly revealed to the world the totalitarian state of America and its ‘puppet nations’.
    Worth a look…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>