How to Spot a femRA (EvilWhiteMale)

(theantifeminist) : FemRAs (female men's Rights Activists, or more commonly, 'female men's human rights activists') are a cancer that is eating away at our movement and killing OUR cause.  It's certainly far from impossible that a female can be a genuine supporter of men, and such women are decidedly useful allies.  But it's equally evident,  in our haste to avoid accusations of misogyny, and of being a group of angry white men with victim envy, that certain segments of the movement have rather uncritically let in anyone with a vagina who claims to speak for men and our rights.  And these femRAs do claim to speak for men.  In fact they appear to have no inhibition whatsoever in claiming to know what is best for a man, what a man is and should be, and above all, in telling us what a man's sexuality and sexual behaviour is and ought to be.  The fact that their answers invariably co-incide with the selfish sexual interests of these golden hearted 'lovely looking sheilas' is, I'm sure, entirely co-incidental.

Loyal and esteemed reader 'EvilWhiteMale' originally posted the following as a comment, with the suggestion that it might serve as the basis for an article on how to spot such femRAs. Here it is unaltered as the basis for further discussion in the comments section below :

-insists that men can be raped by women (or that the act is just as traumatic for men as when men do it to women)

-attempts to deny or to diminish the FACT of females being more sexually valuable than males

-frequently uses boilerplate feminist terminology like ‘deconstruction’ or ‘gender binary’

-puts forth views about male and female sexuality that are highly un-intuitive or that seem to have no basis in common sense

-attempts to refute well established trends and patterns with anecdote and outliers (common of feminists in general really)

-show leftward political leanings: ‘both sides of the fence are just as bad for men’ is a common argument to conceal this

-subtle implication that emasculation or the swallowing of pride (you men and your ‘BIG’, ‘ENORMOUS’ egos!) is the only path to men’s rights

-excessive emphasis on the problems of male disposablity and male on male misandry [we were supposed to storm the castle and behead the ice princess but instead we're doing the work of the red cross!?]

-excessively critical of ‘game’ and the pua crowd (has anyone else noticed how guys like that clarence are like this?)

36 thoughts on “How to Spot a femRA (EvilWhiteMale)

  1. Eric

    "Shows leftward political leanings...&c."

    This is something that a lot of MRAs are beginning to notice about the 'new' AVfM. All of their talk about 'mens human rights', male victimology, &c. are completely based on feminist/leftist definitions of these concepts. To show how far it's gone, today an article by the 'sheila' Kristina Hansen called for male reproductive rights, including the right to abortion!

    The whole notion behind so-called 'reproductive rights' is feminist to the core anyway.

    "Puts forth views of male and female sexuality that are highly counter-intuitive, or have no basis in common sense."

    Another noticeable element to their arguments is that there no fundamental sexual difference between men and women, like the Typhon Blue video this week which claimed men who tried to win desirable women were fixated on their mothers.

    Did anybody ever dream that these things would actually be debatable among MRAs?

  2. Eric

    "...has anybody noticed that guys like Clarence are like this?"

    Yes, and the troll is still trying to undermine both Antifeminist and Eivind, in the comment section here:

    http://www.men-factor.blogspot.com/2013/02/black-history-month-interruption-sex.html

    Though he's not meeting much success.

    I clicked on his icon and found that Clarence had a blog a couple of years ago where he was promoting the lowest forms of PUA. It looks like EvilWhite guessed correctly that Clarence is a disgruntled Gamer, who now hates all sexuality!

  3. This is a little OT, but I forgot to mention that fleshbot is censored on Australia, in its "internet censorship blacklist" revealed by Wikileaks,not surprising most of the censored websites are teenagers girls look alike:

    The words related to youth appears on the list are:

    Young-51 times
    Teen-172 times

    In contrast words related to old women:

    Mature-3 times
    Granny-1 times

    One of the most commons words for old women in porn, MILF, does not make it into the list, this proves once again the that feminist are trying to preserve their sexual market value among their younger counterparts by keeping old women porn avalible, they don't have problem with old-women-porn, what they are against is teen/young porn look alike, they remove the young and let the old in a attempt once again to try to keep engineering men to like middle age women over younger ones, that, of course, is against basic biology and nature it self.

    http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Australian_government_secret_ACMA_internet_censorship_blacklist,_18_Mar_2009

  4. The Highwayman

    QUOTE: "frequently uses boilerplate feminist terminology like ‘deconstruction’ or ‘gender binary’"

    Someoen using feminist-type terminology may indeed be a feminist BUT its also possible that they are misguided MRAs who think that the best way to advance mens rights is to imitate feminist tactics. It could also be that people have been so heavily influenced by cultural marxism that they have no idea how to advocate on behalf of men outside of a PC type framework.

    QUOTE: "show leftward political leanings: ‘both sides of the fence are just as bad for men’ is a common argument to conceal this"

    This is a weak point. Is the right less harmful to men than the left? that debatable to say the least. I am sure that some very notable and respectable MRAs such as Bernard Chapin and Angry Harry might subscribe to that theory but there are plenty of fully legit MRAs who believe that both sides are fence are equally harmful to men (if in different ways). Certainly when it comes to male sexual rights it seems like we are under a pincer attack from the feminist and Feminist-contaminated left and the femiservative and victorian/puritanical right. While PC facism did indeed originate on the left the excessive chivalry on the right can make for lots of misandry as well. F.A. Hayek in his classic essay "Why I am NOT a Conservative" argued that conservatism is a movement taht does not really want to go anywhere...all it really does is resist change and often all conservatives end up doing is at best slowing the pace of change. The only value that conservatism could have for men rights is if it were to resist the feminist/PC onslaght...it has done a lousy job at this and in fact many conservatives are themselves becoming infected with PC memes...and then add that on top of the femiservatism that infects much of the right as well. There are pockets on the right and left that might be in favour of policies that ma be beneficial to men (some types of libertarians on the right and old school hippie liberals on the left would be more favourable to sexual freedom for example) but neither the mainstream left nor teh mainstream right have mens best interests at heart if someone believes that one is somewhat less harmful than the other I would love to hear your reasons why. Either way the subject is a very debatable one and arguing that the right is just as harmful as the left in NO WAY makes you a feminist.

  5. Thank you for writing this up. I am really getting sick of reading many FEMra blogs now.

    Good grief. Many writing I encounter now are just rehashings of old school feminism.

  6. "To show how far it’s gone, today an article by the ‘sheila’ Kristina Hansen called for male reproductive rights, including the right to abortion!"

    Official Feminism(TM)is funded by people who want to drastically reduce world population, so abortion rights for men are indeed a powerful wedge issue.

    I think a major reason why white men are in a tight spot is their unwillingness to consider children with non-white mothers to be white. White Nationalists and Roman Law have a lot to answer for.

    The Rules for human interactions have always been kill the men and eff the women. White Nationalists rabidly oppose the latter part, but Cultural "Marxists" enthousiastically endorse this. They consider white women better for black men than black women. That is why Cultural "Marxists" have the upper hand over White Nationalists.

    Lastly, sexual freedom to non-reproductive sex is only possible when euthanasia is legalized, for powerful demographic reasons. Is it coincidence that the Netherlands have both legal prostitution and legal euthanasia.

  7. Alan Vaughn

    Someoen using feminist-type terminology may indeed be a feminist BUT its also possible that they are misguided MRAs who think that the best way to advance mens rights is to imitate feminist tactics. It could also be that people have been so heavily influenced by cultural marxism that they have no idea how to advocate on behalf of men outside of a PC type framework.

    In either case, such misguided mRAs or just people so heavily influenced by cultural Marxism, would still be a problem to 'deprogram' their thinking and re-program to a more 'MRA positive' mindset.
    Either way they are still for all intents and purposes: femRAs as evilwhite suggests, thus still 'undesirables' as far as we're concerned?

  8. theantifeminist

    Post author

    Someone using feminist-type terminology may indeed be a feminist BUT its also possible that they are misguided MRAs who think that the best way to advance mens rights is to imitate feminist tactics

    I agree to a certain extent Highwayman, but I'm not sure it's important. I'm not necessarily saying that even TyphonBlue is a cold and manipulative infiltrator in the sense that she knows exactly what she's doing, then chuckling at herself for Paul Elam being her dupe. But she is a damaging infiltrator nonetheless, and it does seem suspicious that it is women who seem more readily able to use feminist terminology, theories, and frameworks.

    I'm sure a lot of the femi-hags running the sexual trade union have convinced themselves that they are 'protecting children' or 'protecting trafficking victims' rather than raising their own sexual value and limiting competition. Again, it doesn't really matter.

    But regarding TyphonBlue, I do find it hard to believe that when she has evidently researched these feminist junk science studies claiming that 1 in 6 boys have been abused, she is unaware that they are and were explicitly feminist studies with an equally explicit feminist goal of proving some misandric point (for example, in the most famous '1 in 6' study, that men were inherently more violent and evil than women, and that this was part of masculinity).

    I discovered those things within 10 minutes of Googling her studies. She appears to have taken a Master's degree in them.

    Regarding EvilWhite's list, I'm sure it's intended to be taken as a whole.

    You make a good point regarding the left/right distinction, and one being no worse than the other - but the fact is, for a majority of mras at this time, the persecution of male sexuaity is not such a prominant issue (if one at all) as we regard it. If you took away this issue, then perhaps it seems more evident that the left is more of a danger to men than the right.

  9. theantifeminist

    Post author

    Either way they are still for all intents and purposes: femRAs as evilwhite suggests, thus still ‘undesirables’ as far as we’re concerned?

    Exactly Alan.

  10. theantifeminist

    Post author

    One of the most commons words for old women in porn, MILF, does not make it into the list, this proves once again the that feminist are trying to preserve their sexual market value among their younger counterparts by keeping old women porn avalible, they don’t have problem with old-women-porn, what they are against is teen/young porn look alike, they remove the young and let the old in a attempt once again to try to keep engineering men to like middle age women over younger ones, that, of course, is against basic biology and nature it self.

    And this is particularly striking in that a lof of MILF sites feature the 'older woman initiating teenage boys' fantasy - in other words, probably skirting virtual child porn laws to a greater extent than the 'teen girl' and 'barely legal' sites that are instantly put on censorship lists.

  11. inclinedreader

    in our haste to avoid accusations of misogyny

    I don't really think that should even be our concern at all.

    With the barrage of unapologetic misandry that men incur from radical feminists (and increasingly, from society in general) day in and day out, who cares if now and then men's rights standpoints are misconstrued as being misogynist... which they without exception really aren't.

    My understanding of men's rights is still not that it is a hate club that is directed against women in general; but that it is a countermovement that seeks to curb the anti-male social and political violence and the short-changing of the male gender which are rife in this day and age.

    And that's another feminist mind trick that has worked pretty well; if you're against feminism, they will have others, and women in particular, believe that you are a misogynist pig who hates all women. Feminism itself has unlawfully usurped a role of (faux) advocacy for all women. Which is also where much of sexual trade union theory comes back into the picture, but that's another story...

  12. theantifeminist

    Post author

    "in our haste to avoid accusations of misogyny"

    I don’t really think that should even be our concern at all.

    I agree, and whatever we say or do, those accusations will be made (and in particular by fat paedophiles).

    Furthermore, I do not even believe we should worry about seperating feminists from 'women' (unless we're worried about frightening away the plague of femRAs like Typhon Blue and GrapeBan). At the end of the day, women are human beings, neither madonnas nor whores (in themselves), but fallible human beings and moral agents who can be held accountable for their actions, which when given zero accountability, tend to be bad (just as men's are in similar situations). Granted feminists are well funded and supported by governments, and by self-feeding abuse industry mechanics etc, but at the end of the day, they would have little power if they were not supported by the majority of women, even if those women do not declare themselves or think of themselves as 'feminists'. The vagina vote, unfortunately, is very real.

  13. inclinedreader

    Furthermore, I do not even believe we should worry about seperating feminists from ‘women’

    well, either way, we won't... in the foreseeable future. It is just too much ingrained in society in today's world that feminism equals women and women's rights, and therefore to attack feminism means to attack women.

    It is very rare to meet women who do make a distinction. Thankfully I have one female friend who thinks feminism can shove it... who believes that she is a strong enough woman that she can speak for herself and doesn't need feminists doing it for her.

    But again, women like her are a rare find these days...

  14. Jack

    Thankfully I have one female friend who thinks feminism can shove it

    I also have such a GF. Being a "sex worker" she's very critical eg of feminists for wanting to ban prostitution. She thinks for example the charges against DSK for his having taken part in sex-parties in Lille are bogus. "The girls who took part in such parties", says she, "were responsible adults and weren't victims of anyone". So far so good.

    But when I told this very same GF about how old my fucklets in Jakarta were in my Indonesian days, she grew bitchy and came close to calling me a paedophile. And the day I wanted to show her 10 y.o. daughter the youtube video of a woman punching her man in the face, thinking the child would find it funny, mother threw a tantrum. "I was not", she said "to fuck up her daughter's mind with such scenes".

    It seems even the most sex-positive of women have notions they simply will not entertain (like men looking down the age pyramid and females being capable of brutality). Men - especially those who rightly think themselves lucky to have landed such a "different" girl-friend - do well to keep this in mind. She is only that much different but she hasn't crossed the red line.

  15. inclinedreader

    @Jack:

    A woman's worst enemy is always a younger woman. No matter what age a woman is, younger, more attractive women are their nemesis.

    I have another female friend who began an affair with a man 15 years her senior, and he ditched his wife and son for her... life was good for the five-odd years that their relationship lasted, and she would always say that "that old hag can go to hell, he's mine now". Well, my friend is approaching her mid-30s now and her boyfriend has dumped her for a 25-year-old. So now she calls him the "child molester". For dating a 25-year-old grown woman who is not even eight or nine years younger than my female friend.

    And it does start very early on. I remember at 18, when I was in 12th grade, my best friend and I were friends with a bunch of 10th grade girls. They adored us... naturally we were "cool" (we had cars and could get them into clubs) and we were older, if just by one and a half to two years; and I guess we liked them because they were a tad less difficult than girls our own age. Much to the dismay of two of our close female friends from our class, who enjoyed our company as well, but were furious every time our attention was taken up by "those children".

  16. Alan Vaughn

    @Jack

    Well, my friend is approaching her mid-30s now and her boyfriend has dumped her for a 25-year-old. So now she calls him the “child molester”. For dating a 25-year-old grown woman who is not even eight or nine years younger than my female friend.

    Ironically I only tried to explain to our new friend 'ScareCrow' under a recent post on his 'MEN-FACTOR' blog, how it is simple JEALOUSY that motivates them and consequently, all of these laws against normal sexuality; and that it may be sooner than later that we'll be classified as 'paedophiles' if caught having sex even with 25 year old women.

  17. Eric

    He might have been wrong about the Savile Scandal, but when Rookh is on target, he really hits it. Someone asked him to comment on the 'Wise Misogynist' article at AVfM and Rookh's analysis is well worth repeating here:

    "It's interesting that the video seemed to harbor a general dislike of any kind of natural differentiation at all: ugliness and beauty, the sea and skies, the rocks and trees. In my view, Anglo-feminists would like to erase reality completely, in favor of their own whims and prejudices.

    "Men have evolved to find certain physical traits attractive: youth, symmetry, large breasts, a certain waist-to-hip ratio, but modern feminists want to deny that fact. This is why the feminist-oriented press constantantly extols the physical virtues of fat, old women in the face of all rational evidence.

    "Ugly, obese women in the Anglosphere are desperate to maintain their control of sex since it's their only bargaining chip in dealing with men. However, their commodity can easily be undercut by porn, hookers, and young, attractive foreign women. This is why feminists reflexively oppose all these things.

    "I think that Anglo-feminist attachment to ugliness has the same basic origins---if there is no differentiation between females; if beauty doesn't exist, then fat, ugly women instantly have the same status as young, attractive ones.

    "And THAT is their deepest desire."

  18. Eric

    Columnist:
    That's another interesting point. Feminism is also about controlling the female 'monopoly' on reproduction. By getting men to accept 'reproductive rights' as the norm, the feminists will be able to control reproduction even more than they do now.

  19. inclinedreader

    Ironically I only tried to explain to our new friend ‘ScareCrow’ under a recent post on his ‘MEN-FACTOR’ blog, how it is simple JEALOUSY that motivates them and consequently, all of these laws against normal sexuality; and that it may be sooner than later that we’ll be classified as ‘paedophiles’ if caught having sex even with 25 year old women.

    well then wait until you read the following... this weekend, the new Miss Germany was crowned here... she is 21 but looks about a decade older... to me she almost looks like Stifler's mom from American Pie...

    http://www.thelocal.de/society/20130224-48167.html

    It is probably safe to assume that three to four years ago at age 17, she would have looked early 20s to 25ish. Yet still a child in the eyes of the law, nude pictures of her would have been illegal ("child porn"), as would have been paying to have sex with her ("child prostitution").

    It once again goes to show that feminists don't care about "child protection", but want to strike fear in the hearts of any men who entertain the idea of chatting up a woman who is in her physical prime. How are you gonna know with any degree of certainty if a 23ish-looking woman is really 16 or 17? And the drink or the dinner or the movie ticket you are buying her could well be interpreted under new pending EU law as a proposition to have sex with a "child" for "remuneration".

  20. theantifeminist

    Post author

    ironically I only tried to explain to our new friend ‘ScareCrow’ under a recent post on his ‘MEN-FACTOR’ blog, how it is simple JEALOUSY that motivates them and consequently, all of these laws against normal sexuality; and that it may be sooner than later that we’ll be classified as ‘paedophiles’ if caught having sex even with 25 year old women.

    @Alan - I saw that comment, and thankyou for spreading STU theory at other sites (in other words, stating the blindingly obvious, which for some bizarre reason, is still like blowing in the wind, or banging your head against the wall). That some of my readers understand the truth gives me a reason not to despair and feel I'm completely wasting my time with this site. Thankyou (and to loyal and esteemed readers MRA Front and Deano who also made clear they understand).

  21. Alan Vaughn

    @theantifeminist
    You're welcome, but I also can't thank you enough for giving me the same hope and for the same reasons - I've always believed since I was only a teenager (when feminism was starting to make some disturbing progress), that they're all just a pack of bitter / jealous and frustrated old bags. When I found your site a couple pf years ago, it was such a relief to know that there are others who see things my way!

    Anyway, another one who sums it up really well is one of your most loyal and esteemed of all readers and commentators, evilwhitemalempire.
    I'm with evilwhite and don't understand why others cannot see the obvious jealousy that all feminists are cursed with, they simply cannot or maybe WILL not, see the elephant in the room.

    ScareCrow quite correctly points out that they hate sex, or they are crazy, but he seems to have a problem, almost like a mental block, that prevents him even querying WHY they are crazy, or WHY they hate sex.
    Even after I gave him what we believe to be the only plausible explanation for their apparent 'aversion to sex', he (like nearly all others) still cannot seem to accept it...

  22. Eric

    Alan & Antifeminist:

    It's not that people don't want to understand, feminism is so illogical that it's often hard to connect two points. Like feminism is both sexually puritanical and sexually libertine: it doesn't make logical sense on the surface, but nonetheless is true.

    Misandry and sexual jealousy also appear superficially in contradiction. But feminists both hate men and want to control them sexually---that's a fact.

  23. theantifeminist

    Post author

    It’s not that people don’t want to understand, feminism is so illogical that it’s often hard to connect two points. Like feminism is both sexually puritanical and sexually libertine: it doesn’t make logical sense on the surface, but nonetheless is true.

    Misandry and sexual jealousy also appear superficially in contradiction. But feminists both hate men and want to control them sexually—that’s a fact.

    Good point Eric, and I agree feminism is illogical and even self-defeating in numerous ways. Perhaps this isn't so suprising if we consider the feminist movement as a largely blind and subconscious reaction to changes in the basic primal circumstances of women (i.e, their value in a sexual market) and that those circumstances are dictated by forces that neither feminists nor women in general (or anyone) have any control over. As opposed I guess to seeing feminism as a directed and rational conspiracy movement, led by a cabal of lesbian femi-nazis who possess a clear and deliberate agenda to cause harm.

  24. Pingback:

  25. theantifeminist

    Post author

    This might make you angry. '11 signs you might be an mra' - read number 4 as it is critiqued by a 'feminist critic' :
    http://www.feministcritics.org/blog/2013/02/26/‘11-signs-you-might-be-an-mra’-t-shirt-noh/

    "3. You believe that the age of consent is unfair and that there’s nothing wrong with having sex with teenage girls. But when you find out that a teenage girl enjoys sex, you believe she’s the biggest slut in the world.

    As I’ve noted here on occasion, I’m not an MRA, and in all honesty I don’t read many MRA sites. I don’t recall ever seeing any MRA blogger complain that the age of consent is unfair. My limited experience suggests it’s not a particularly important MRA ‘plank.’ That doesn’t mean there aren’t a few derelicts wearing the MRA banner, but AFAICT the notion that this is an important part of the MRM movement seems to me to be more ‘smear campaign’ bullshit.

    Moreover, there is a linguistic problem with the notion that there’s ‘something wrong with having sex with teenage girls.’ Women who are 18 and 19 years old are adults, but are also technically “teenagers.” There’s nothing immoral with consenting adults having sex.

    I personally am opposed to gender-based slut-shaming. Though I’m not a ‘sex only in marriage’ kind of guy, I do think there are societal downsides to sexual promiscuity and it should probably be discouraged, though I couldn’t tell you exactly how that should be done.

    Now, I have seen commentary disparaging female sexual promiscuity, but it’s not at all clear to me if this is something particularly common among MRAs, or if it’s more accurately just a common attitude in the culture generally that the t-shirt writer wants to scapegoat the MRM for."

    BTW, as you all know, I think the age of consent is now a serious men's rights issue, especially in the light of the Jimmy Savile hysteria and the way it is being used to even destroy dead men for (likely) minor long past infractions. I do not think that sexually active 15 year old girls are 'sluts', or at least, I have no morally negative judgement towards such behaviour at all. In fact, I would love the age of consent to be fair AND for teenage girls to be sexually active and horny as hell.

  26. Eric

    Antifeminist:
    Feminism, too, is also very similar to Communism, in that it is always in a state of perpetual revolution. Because of its inherent irrationality and unnaturalness, it has to keep re-inventing itself without ever achieving a final purpose.

  27. Eric

    OT, but speaking of femRAs, has anybody besides me noticed that if Clarence wore a wig, he'd look like Typhon Blue? LOL

  28. Alan Vaughn

    @theantifeminist
    LOL! That's one of 'Clarence's' favorite blogs...
    I read your comment underneath on how to spot a feminist and a femRA too, but the others still don't understand. There was one supporting you, but also advocating the equal injustice for all theory, that the MHRM is pushing for.

    No wonder men are slaves to feminism... Sigh...

  29. theantifeminist

    Post author

    OT, but speaking of femRAs, has anybody besides me noticed that if Clarence wore a wig, he’d look like Typhon Blue? LOL

    Any man in a wig would look like TyphonBlue, LOL. Has anyone noticed the marked discrepency between TyphonBlue's AVfM avatar image of herself and the reality - i.e., how she looks in her videos? In her videos she looks like the 40 year old masculine skank that she is. In her avatar, with clever use of digital editing and lighting (and probably a very old photo), she's managed to look not only reasonably attractive and feminine but almost like a teenager. In fact, you could say she's trying to look about 14.

    On a similar theme - is anyone here good with photoshop? If we could put David Fraudtrelle's wig and spectacles on that photo of the sontaron, it would be a mirror image of him.

  30. theantifeminist

    Post author

    LOL! That’s one of ‘Clarence’s’ favorite blogs…
    I read your comment underneath on how to spot a feminist and a femRA too, but the others still don’t understand. There was one supporting you, but also advocating the equal injustice for all theory, that the MHRM is pushing for.

    And that of TyphonBlue - I think Clarence fell in love with her there. Clarence is also using the opportunity to attack me again. He seems to have gotten it into his head that I hate him for being 'anti-game'. I don't know what the hell he's talking about.

  31. Alan Vaughn

    He seems to have gotten it into his head that I hate him for being ‘anti-game’. I don’t know what the hell he’s talking about.

    I just read it and now I'm even more confused! I too have no idea what he's on about now. I always thought it was HIM who didn't like gamers and PUAs etc.
    He just agrees or disagrees as appropriate. Now I can see why Eric insists that he's a troll and uses the so-called 'Delphi Technique'.
    One thing I do know for sure, he's not an MRA and certainly not someone you'd be wanting to place too much trust in... LOL!

  32. Eric

    "he's gotten into his head that I'm anti-Game"

    That must be why there's a link to Krauser's site here! LOL

    Clarence's only game seems to be to incite as many internal conflicts within the MRM as possible.

  33. Eric

    Antifeminist & Alan:

    Did you also notice the way that Clarence referred to Angry Harry and those of us here rather condescendingly as 'foreigners?' Not once but several times.

    Does make all his toadying at Eivind's sound somewhat transparent. I wonder why he's so concerned about Norwegian law in one place and trashing foreigners in another? Hmmmm....

  34. Alan Vaughn

    I loved this (excerpt from a) comment by 'DruidV':

    Irony: More MGTOWs will be created because of this video. Good work wooly mammoth! You get a gold star!

    Meanwhile, over at a womyn's voice for manginas, the fire has begun to spread from the basement to the first floor now and, soon Mr. male spelled backwards will need to plan his escape from the rooftop. Maybe attention whore scribbles drivel will be there to use her huge clenis and piss all over the flames for him, putting them out and thus saving the day. Once again.

    Did I mention fucking blah?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>