German Court Rules that 14 Year Old Girl’s Affair with 47 Y.O Uncle is Legal

A court in Germany has ruled that the parents of a 15 year old girl cannot stop her from continuing a sexual relationship with her 47 year old uncle that she started when she was just 14.

In common with several other European countries, the age of sexual consent in Germany is 14.

Josephine’s parents sought a court order to prevent her being in contact with her uncle, on the grounds that the relationship was endangering her welfare.

But the teenager successfully challenged the order. The court ruled that as she is over 14 her own wishes have to be taken into account.

In their ruling, the judges said that Josephine risked “serious damage in her social-emotional and mental development” if she was prevented from further contact with the uncle.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/02/german-court-rules-parents-of-15-year-old-girl-cannot-stop-her-h/

While this may seem like a rare victory for the sexual rights of post-pubescent females and their older male lovers, we can be certain that the controversy of this case will be used by femihags in Germany to further push for the age of consent to be raised to 16 or even 18. Already, after recent ‘strengthening’ of German age of consent laws, a female who had sex at 14 or 15 and regretted it has the right to pursue child abuse charges against her former partner – something no doubt likely in this case when the girl is gotten to by the pressure of the media and feminists, or if she ever breaks up with her older lover and decides to redefine her love for him as victimhood.

28 thoughts on “German Court Rules that 14 Year Old Girl’s Affair with 47 Y.O Uncle is Legal”

  1. I’m from Germany and wasn’t aware that the age of consent was 14. That’s actually great news, heh. Always wanted to fuck such a young thing. Maybe there’s still hope, heh. 🙂

  2. According to the feminist dogma (and ‘vampire’ parents who need to suck the energy and youth of their offspring, hence the “adolescence” or “teen age” to extend their years of vampirism) are vulnerable until 21 or around, so …

    What I do not understand… Why raise the age of consent to 16? They say that minors are children and sex with minors is “child sexual abuse”, so why not raise direct to 18 like in porn? The only thing that would not do is not to seem very extreme and give a false sense of freedom… but I still see the nonsense about to say the sex under 18 is abuse and you allow it to 16… Why they want to prevent of all cost sex with girls of 15 at all costs and not with 16? (Or at least it is not their maximum priority)????

  3. Not even increasing the age of Consent in the Caribbean from 12-13 to the age of 16 in Jamaica, Barbados, Trinidad& Tobago, St. Lucia, Antigua & Barbuda, Dominica, Guyana could prevent feminist cunts such as “CARIBBEAN VOICE” from influencing the Caribbean media to advocate increasing the age of consent to 18 and over.

    The issue I have with Age of Consent laws is that teenage boys tend to become criminals for consensual sex with a girl a few years younger than him, while females 16-18 who take nude selfies of themselves are placed on Sex Offender Registries in the league of dangerous pedophiles.

    Trinidad & Tobago received more complaints about Age of consent laws that it was forced to increase the age of consent from 16 to 18 for sexual penetration, but 16 is legal for sexual touching. However, feminists are still advocating that any form of sexual touching or even sexual thoughts about a 16 or 17-year-old female be criminalized like a capital offense.

    Trinidad is a country which is a popular destination for old washed up Anglohags who want to experience the Caribbean life without being robbed at gunpoint on the streets of Kingston, Jamaica.

    It was only about time that femihags are feuding with Muslims in Trinidad because under Muslim Law in Trinidad & Tobago, 12 year olds can marry. This angered feminists more than the reaction of New Yorkers when they were told that a Muslim living in a cave in Afghanistan orchestrated one of the most destructive attacks on U.S. soil.

    I really don’t know why global policy from the U.S. and Canada are focused only on age of consent when there are other issues to deal with such as Russia sending a nuke to the Western world in response to Hitlery’s aggression in the Middle East.

    Age of consent and feminism are major political programs which are infecting everywhere worldwide, but I don’t see how criminalizing high school adolescents will prevent the invented social ills like “teenage pregnancies”, “mental health sickness” and other lies perpetuated by the feminist movement.

    The Caribbean Voice is already annoying everyone in the Caribbean with the push to increase the age of consent for females in the Caribbean from 16 to 18.

    It will not be a shock if a “European Voice” organization forms in Germany which wants to increase the age of consent for the entire Europe to 18.

    Yet, female teachers are fucking 12-year-old boys in the classroom like there is no tomorrow. This is the hypocrisy of the feminist movement in the United States of America and Canada.

    Someone is funding these “Caribbean Voice” fucktards to annoy people in foreign countries to raise age of consent to 18. What next? Increase age of marriage to 21? This type of nonsense will result in a revolt if too many innocent people are sent in jail for what could be seen as victim less crimes.

    I really hope that Donald Trump becomes President of the USA. He would not benefit from Age of Consent hysteria because he is a womanizer who will have more to lose in a post-feminist society of outrageous Age of Consent laws which criminalize more consenting people than serious offenders like female teachers who fuck the entire classroom of Grade 6 students or pre-school toddlers in Nursery school.

    Feminists can’t actually believe that advocating for laws to restrict normal sexuality while they themselves suck some 12-year-old boy’s dick in the classroom would not result in some form of revolt in the long run? The USA may be the first country to revolt against the feminists because they are armed and believe in freedom. It is in their blood.

  4. 21 is the new 18 in America!

    “Let us dance.

    Three young strippers in Louisiana are fighting a new state law that will not allow the employment of exotic dancers under the age of 21, according to NOLA.com/The Times-Picayune.

    The performers, each younger than 21, claim in a lawsuit that the bill violates the First Amendment by denying them freedom of expression, and violates the Constitution’s equal protection clause by unfairly targeting women.

    The law’s definition of strip club performers as “entertainers whose breasts or buttocks are exposed to view” fails to prohibit the same conduct by men who are between the ages of 18 and 21, the women claim.

    Underground strip club operates out of Bushwick apartment

    The bill, which is slated to go into effect in one week, was part of an effort by lawmakers to combat human trafficking.
    Republican State Sen. Ronnie Johns is the bill’s author.
    Republican State Sen. Ronnie Johns is the bill’s author. (Government Handout)

    “I know in my mind in preparing the bill I got to thinking about things like our alcohol laws, we limit that to 21 years old,” Republican state Sen. Ronnie Johns, the bill’s author, told NOLA.com/The Times-Picayune. “There are other statutes on the books that limit the age of what people can and cannot do.”

    “You have to be 21 to drink in a strip club,” New Orleans Covenant House executive director James Kelly told the newspaper. “You should have to be 21 to take off your clothes in a strip club.”

    However, the strippers represented in the lawsuit claim that the law actually puts young women in more peril, not less.

    Texas mom running for office was stripper, busted for false claim

    One plaintiff says she has seen pimps and prostitutes trying to use the new law in a New Orleans strip club to “recruit entertainers who are now lawfully employed, but who will lose their jobs as a result of the Act,” according to the paper.
    Not Released (NR)
    A stripper dances for a customer in the French Quarter. (MENAHEM KAHANA/AFP/Getty Images)

    Another plaintiff, an 18-year-old LSU student, says other dancers under 21 have said they plan to switch to prostitution.

    Out of work, dancers under 21 would be “more susceptible to harm from traffickers, pimps, and prostitutes, because it eliminates a legal job with high pay and flexible hours,” according to the lawsuit obtained by the newspaper.”

    Femihags in the US State of Louisiana petitioned to increase the age for sexual dancing from 18 to 21, yet 5-year-old kids will learn from their teacher how to fuck or get fucked in the ass in the commie schools!

    Is there going to be a day when all of these Age of Consent and Raise stripper age feminists end up on a podium in the town square to be stoned when SHTF?

    SHTF is already happening in many countries worldwide, but rather than focus on solving the economic problems of child poverty, these femihags focus on raising the age for anything sexual, even to 21.

    There should be a movement to stop these feminists. It is outrageous that not even an 18-year-old “girl” is allowed to sell her body or earn money from it through dancing because a feminist and her cuck husband created laws to stifle the sexuality of young people.

    But teachers demonstrating how to fuck in the ass to 5-year-old children for “Sexual Education” isn’t condemned by the feminists who currently make up 80% of teachers in the West.

    There could be a day that people will start revolting against the anti-sex feminist hags and bitter old women. The 18, 19 and 20-year-old strippers are already starting a revolution by taking the increased stripper age law to court.

    I hope that when SHTF, the old femihags will have to account for the destruction they caused on society…

  5. I read the original article.

    The really interesting thing is that the girl held out against telling her parents where her boyfriend was, despite being banged up in a psychiatric institution for 5 months.

    The girl is incredibly strong – a 15 year old who resisted the pressure (and undoubted lies and subtle manipulations of her parents and the establishment) and held out. I have never heard of such a thing. The girl must really love him. He’s a very lucky man.

    The story also makes me want to move to Germany – not because I want a 14 year old per se – but I know that I have freedom. Unfortunately, in the UK, apparently they think their jurisdiction extends beyond their borders and you would be arrested on your return, or even extradited for breaking UK Age of Consent laws.

  6. There’s one thing I’ve always wondered and I think that is the reason of all problems (including yours), it’s a question for all:

    Why the hell all of you are always against the age of consent and devote life just to lower it (because it seems that to some a barbarous high AoC at 14 is fine, and… What happens with 13 12 even some developed 11? they are little toddlers? is too pedo for you?) and are not against the age of majority at 18? is that 15 16 17 etc. are enough developed to fuck but not to decide on all aspects of their life?

    I now explain: If they were of age, legal adults, for example in the most conservative age, the minimun aceptable by any person with reason, at 13, they could have sex and marry any men they pleased at 13, because they would be adults in the eyes of the law, for example this girl aged 14/15 if she were over 18 their parents never could have any statement or act against her. They can because that girl it is “minor” i.e a “child” and children can not decide on their life or consent to a relationship by their own means, in this case the jury only permits the things that they see ok, tomorrow may be illegal again, a teenage minor is basically an adult treated like a child, the greatest injustice of this world worse than slavery.

    The fact of the age of consent is the fact that the state is supplanting the primitive properties of parents (Those who were have the property of their children as if they were slaves, i.e Patria Potestas) as the fact decide when it is ok that your son or daughter has sex or marry, as in Islamic countries parents allow marry their daughter just aged 9, here it is the nanny state who decides when you can to marry or have sex but only at 16 18 or 21, in both cases without the slightest respect to the wishes of the boy or girl. Both are sexual abuse.

    What matters to fight to lower the age of consent? if while they are minors, teenagers are owned by the state (increasingly more) and parents (increasingly less)? now 18, tomorrow 14, past tomorrow again 18, the actual age of consent is the age of majority, then 18 or 21, period. The rest are things that they allow you only in the moment they want.

    Therefore while teenagers are minors will never be free. You remember these idiots who say “X is ok between consenting adults”? if you say “minors/children can consent too” does NOT work. “Ok. From puberty are adults.” This works.

    In addition supporting the fact that they are adults since puberty is nothing sexual per se, so Antis almost never attack violently and you can speak freely, and the final objetive is the same, really all of you never think about that?

  7. @Feldmarshell – I’m not sure if I’ve udnerstood you perfectly, but you are saying that it would be best to argue on the basis that ‘girls above the age of x are adults’, rather than ‘minors above the age of x can consent to sex’?

    If so, we have discussed this here before quite a bit. It actually comes up a lot (or did when we had an active comment section here). My position always has been a bit sceptical of this. For a start, you were saying a few days ago that we shouldn’t throw real paedophiles (and ‘hebophiles’) under the bus. But using this argument, it all comes down to what age society can be convinced that a girl is an adult. Certainly I can’t see modern, non Islamic societies awarding adulthood on the basis of the onset of puberty, which can start at 10 or younger these days. In fact, the trend is clearly to define adulthood ever later, even into the twenties now. I believe that 14 year olds can consent to dropping their panties, but I’m not sure they are really mature enough to vote on massive geo-political decisions (of course lefties believe it’s the other way around) or fight in wars etc.

    The whole ‘consenting adults’ thing arose from the gay rights movement in the 60’s (i.e. adults can do what they want, include men fucking each other up the ass, and it’s not the job of the government to interfere, but non-adults can’t even consent to normal sex and need to be protected by the government).

    So no, I disagree, and also your point about it being less inflammatory to frame the argument as – ’13 year olds are adults’ rather than ’13 year olds can consent to sex’.

  8. In fact, I think the age of consent argument has been fought on the wrong premise for decades. It’s not so much about whether a teen is ‘mature enough’, it’s about whether sex is of such great significance and moral weight (in a secular age of free contraception, abortion, welfare state, sex before marriage, tube porn etc) that teens can still not consent (as I’ve pointed out here many times, the age of consent of 16/18 was set in victorian times by religious feminists on the back of a fake hysteria over child sex slavery. Even then it was only passed in parliament due to the votes of ultra-religious catholic Irish MPs – Ireland of course not even being part of the United Kingdom anymore).

  9. BTW, I don’t ‘devote my life to lower the age of consent’ – thanks. Don’t know if you noticed but I’ve hardly posted here for the last 2 years, and if I’m reminded of why I stopped, I’ll stop again. 🙂

  10. I’m from Germany and wasn’t aware that the age of consent was 14. That’s actually great news, heh. Always wanted to fuck such a young thing. Maybe there’s still hope, heh. ?

    You’re lucky Tom. I was in Berlin for a few days recently and the hotel in which I was staying in was overrun with various German schoolgroups. Seemed every day when I was enjoying the breakfast buffet I was the only adult among over 100 juicy German jailbaits. I’d forgotten how pretty German teenage girls can be. And some of them were really eyefucking me as well. Hard to imagine how good it would feel to actually bang such girls, but alas….I’m from monkey island till the day I die.

  11. Unfortunately, in the UK, apparently they think their jurisdiction extends beyond their borders and you would be arrested on your return, or even extradited for breaking UK Age of Consent laws.

    You’re right, alas, although I can’t understand how that law (Jacquie Smith’s law) can even be legal, and why it hasn’t been challenged in court. I mean, how it does NOT break EU rules against discriminating against EU citizens based on nationality? As far as extraditing you is concerned, they had enough difficulty extraditing Jeremey Forest (the teacher who ran off to France with a 15 year old pupil) and in the end they could only apply for an EU arrest warrant because he’d been banging her in the UK (i.e. breaking the law in the UK, not France). However, the pigs in the UK could certainly make life difficult or impossible for you (raiding your home on the pretext of suspcion of being a nonce, applying for a ‘sexual restraint order’ to take away your passport etc.) so definitely not a sensible idea for any British male to regard the age of consent in EU as anything other than 16, same as in the UK. Ironic thing is, the USA has a similar law which is even more strict (age of consent is 18 for American citizens everywhere outside of the USA), and yet everybody knows it’s never applied by the American government, so you see American PUAs openly trying to bang 14 year old girls in Budapest and Belgrade (age of consent ’14’). They probably then go on to their PUA forums and call out as sick ‘pedos’ any British PUAs who mentions dating a 16 or 17 year old.

    About 15 years ago, when I was already in my 30’s, I met a German mother and her 14 year old daughter in London, and they invited me over to Germany to visit them, which I did. I was careful not to so much as kiss the girl on her cheek, even though both were making it clear that I could bang her and expected me too. The girl even started claiming it was making her depressed and I wouldn’t touch her because she was ‘fat’ (she wasn’t – and she was really pretty). Anyway, they actually fell out with me because of it. The regrettable irony is, I was unaware that it would have been entirely legal for me at the time to have had sex with the girl. It only became ‘illegal’ when Jacquie ‘pig’ Smith closed the ‘loophole’ when she was Labour Home Secretary (the same Jacqui Smith who was forced to resign because of corruption).

  12. @theantifeminist

    That’s because you have not suffered like me because of not being considered an adult since puberty, I needed to be adult, but social adults denied me it, like deny me other good things like intergenerational relationships. Even before even feminism countries had already age of consent and age of majority, as you said in another post, anti-feminist of the Victorian epoch support age of consent at 13 and age of majority at 21, so that feminism is but another enemy of my list.

    I do not know what kind of girls you have known, must have been very pretty, but like most, infantilized by society, however they are not dumb, I instead in these “adolescents” I have found the most intelligent and mature people I known, however I really believe that adults are not enough prepared to vote (not even to dropping their panties), Bush, Obama and now the vote is only between Hillary and Trump, you see those adults enough mature to make geopolitical decisions? And.. Why adults have to decide on non-adults? you have all rights and not the rest of non-adults humans? this is a type of supremacism.

    What I say this is because social adults are systematic oppressors because use their institucions, their physical an social strength to take advantage of the young, children and adolescents alike, but not sexually as they say the feminihags, but politically and socially, that’s the problem, I love adolescents, I don’t like them only because they are more sexual attractive, but in their whole concept, so I can not stand anything that goes against them.

    So you want they can take off their panties? I want to adolescents can be complete persons like me, so then I am an “aspie hebophile” and you a normal and sane heterosexual man I suppose. None problem.

    if feminism wins they enslave young, if masculinism wins they also enslave young, the more things change, the more they stay the same.

  13. @FeldMarshall – I think that’s the only way that the notion of ‘ephebophilia’ (or whatever) makes sense. I’ve also talked here before about the absurdity of society recognizing that transgenders have been born in the wrong body (ie. accepting that one can have the brain of a female yet the body of a male), and yet condemn without mercy individuals who clearly are juveniles, at least in some emotional and sexual sense, in the bodies of adults. Probably Michael Jackson was a clear example of this.
    I was convinced I was such a person myself (a ‘transgenerational’ is better than ‘ephebophile’?), but maybe it’s because I’ve ‘grown up’ or simply become hardened by life a little belatedly, but recently I fell in love twice with women in their twenties. Now I do tend to look much more at such ‘older’ females, especially in Eastern Europe. Back in the UK, nearly all the attractive females I see are teens. However, the thought of actually dating one (even if legal) is less and less conceivable. I accept, however, that teen girls can vary wildly in their individual maturity.

  14. 17 year old girl in a relationship with a male more than 3-4 years older?
    Poor exploited baby!
    17 year old girl going off to fight for ISIS?
    Hang the little bitch! Age is no excuse!!!
    Not exactly logical.

  15. You say:

    “The whole ‘consenting adults’ thing arose from the gay rights movement in the 60’s”

    But in your manifesto for male sexual rights appears:

    “The right of two adults to engage in paid for sexual transactions to be enshrined in law.”

    You are also using this excuse about “adults” to justify something…

  16. @Ron – well maybe you have a point. However, notice I didn’t use the phrase ‘consenting adults’ in my manifesto. Also, working full time as a whore is different from choosing who to have a sexual relationship with. I have no objections against child labour laws.

  17. A man who made money from running beauty contests, bragged to 14 year old girls that he would be dating them at 16, and was falsely accused of child rape is now President of the United States. And the cunt he defeated was one of the women most responsible for defining girls under 18 as children internationally and off limits for men.

    Yet, you know, I’m pretty sure that the majority of American ‘ephebophiles’ voted for Clinton and are weeping buckets right now.

  18. I seriously believe that Donald Trump believes that a man who have sex with a underage girl is a paedophile and have underage sex is a criminal act just like feminists thing.

  19. @AnotherMan – why? As far as I know, Trump hasn’t ever said anything about ‘paedophiles’. As far as I know, he hasn’t apologized for telling underage girls that they were pretty or he would be dating them soon either. Most paedocrites don’t openly (in the public eye and in front of cameras) tell jailbait that they are hot etc.

  20. Where’s my jailbait dammit? >:( Where’s my cute braces-wearing teeeeeeeeeeeeen ? :,(

    Hell, I’d be happy with a slim, age-matched 20-something at this point, but I can’t even get that. Guess I have to wait until my generation of women is in their 30’s and off the Chad carousel. Or are they waiting until their 40’s nowadays?

  21. IMHO ‘jailbait’ is probably the most aspie concept ever used and nobody noticed except me.
    I do not understand how WE have been able to assimilate that it a ‘crime’ what nature commands us, I do not want to offend anyone, but a 50’s gay would never use a such type of term nor a black in the Apartheid neither use ‘whitebait’ nor ‘whitejail’, of course Is a term of ‘doublethinking’ because the Antis admit that underage girls are an desirable bait!! but I refuse to admit that I will end up in jail for doing something that is right. At least ephebophilia is a more sympathetic concept.

  22. Well, you will go to jail if you have sex with an underage girl. Also, ‘jailbait’ is probably the only linguistic foothold on reality left after the feminist manipulation of language that has allowed them to virtually control the entire narrative on teen sex (17 year old ‘children’ who only ‘paedophiles’ find attractive etc.)

    a 50’s gay would never use a such type of term nor a black in the Apartheid neither use ‘whitebait’ nor ‘whitejail’

    Doesn’t make much sense to me as this really isn’t a fair analogy. Society never pretended that it was perverted for black men to find white women attractive. In a society that pretends that it is a perversion to find 15 or 17 year old girls attractive and criminalizes such attraction on that basis, it is absolutely essential we keep alive the term ‘jailbait’. ‘Jailbait’ means precisely that the law and nature are at odds (i.e it’s an artificial law based upon a lie).

  23. I do not know what kind of girls you have known, must have been very pretty, but like most, infantilized by society, however they are not dumb, I instead in these “adolescents” I have found the most intelligent and mature people I known, however I really believe that adults are not enough prepared to vote (not even to dropping their panties), Bush, Obama and now the vote is only between Hillary and Trump, you see those adults enough mature to make geopolitical decisions? And.. Why adults have to decide on non-adults? you have all rights and not the rest of non-adults humans? this is a type of supremacism.

    What I say this is because social adults are systematic oppressors because use their institucions, their physical an social strength to take advantage of the young, children and adolescents alike, but not sexually as they say the feminihags, but politically and socially, that’s the problem, I love adolescents, I don’t like them only because they are more sexual attractive, but in their whole concept, so I can not stand anything that goes against them.

    So you want they can take off their panties? I want to adolescents can be complete persons like me, so then I am an “aspie hebophile” and you a normal and sane heterosexual man I suppose. None problem.

    if feminism wins they enslave young, if masculinism wins they also enslave young, the more things change, the more they stay the same.

    Sorry I didn’t read this prior comment of yours properly before now. Not sure I’m following you but you’re saying that because politics is a mess that it shows that adolescents have as much right to vote as ‘adults’? I agree that most people aren’t qualified to vote. I’m not sure I believe in popular democracy and if it is justified it’s only on the basis of being the least worst system.

    Clinton was only a serious candidate because millions of blacks (ave iq 85, around the same as a 12 year old white girl) voted for her, as did millions of Latinos (average IQ 92, around the same as a 14 year old white girl).

    Why do you keep accusing me of feeling superior because I doubt the notion of ‘ephebophilia’? Seems to me you and other ‘ephebophiles’ have a need to feel different and special by embracing a term that has little sense and only justifies the ‘antis’ definition of the natural as unnatural.

    Do you think 5 year olds should be able to vote?

  24. It is a fair analogy, because at the time of the first KKK if a black man had sexual relations with a white woman it was considered that the black had raped her, since it was inconceivable for the society that a white had a voluntary relationship with a black. Exactly like a man with a girl now.

    Adolescents are adults, Adult is someone who is mature, these ‘adolescents’ have matured enough their sexual organs and their cognitive abilities, adolescence has never existed, was created by psychiatrists a century ago, in ancient Rome, ‘adolescent’ was another word For young adults even aged 30 year olds, in no society before the invention of psychiatry was considered the existence of something called ‘adolescence’ for those under 20’s.

    5 yrs old are children (an nondeveloped human), 14 yrs old are adults (a developed human, indeed young adult is the biological term, ‘adolescent’ is the false psychiatrical concept), and as an adult must have the same rights and obligations as the rest of adults

    I do not know why you all deny that adulthood is at puberty as stipulated by nature, this modern civilization, in which we live, is an aberration, it is irrelevant that nowadays they are like children an have low IQ, this is because they are infantilised and treated like children, this is not ok.

    For a correct mental and sexual development it is necessary that adults are treated as adults, children as children etc. Not adults as children. Imagine a society where adults are treated like children, the IQ would be very low and irresponsible people, just like today, you can not treat a person as a child until 18 or 21 and suddenly as an adult, no! The first thing they do is get drunk, instead of teaching them to drink with responsability from 13.

    No one should be able to vote, the idea that the majority is right only for being the majority is what has led us to this modern aberration, but if the only requirement to vote is to be ‘adult’ then all adults have to vote.

    I do not think I’m superior to you, I just do not understand how you can not consider that ‘teenagers’ are adults or think that teens are capable of drop their panties but not vote or being legal adults, I’m honest I think you’re very informed with the disease of feminism but you’ve been fooled by psychiatry and psychology, have you ever denounced this pseudoscience? Because psychiatry is what literally considers pubescents as children, adolescents as beings incapable of having a life or responsible sex, therefore they must remain ‘minors’ for ‘adults’ to be legally responsible of them, like children, exactly the same as feminism, but worse, feminism is just a leftist ideology, can be thrown down of power but psychiatry is considered (Falsely) a science! Everything they say is automatic truth. Psychiatry is not a science is an a oligarchy that meet and decide based on their prejudices and ideas that is correct and that it is a disease. They invented the concept of pedophilia, hebephilia and ephebophilia (not feminists!) They plan to stay for life in power independent of ideology, therefore which serves to us to denounce feminism if psychiatry says the same things? That’s why the antifeminists now have the same position as feminism in this matter, it’s because psychiatry, even shrinks consider those under 25 as ‘vulnerable’ as like feminists for god sake!

  25. One more thing , you say:
    “Do you think 5 year olds should be able to vote?”

    If a 5 year old can not fuck, why would they allow it with a 15? both are minors, there is no legal difference at all, there is no legal difference in one of 5 and one of 15, for law and society we are a bunch of child rapist because a minor is a legal child by definition, and although it sounds disgusting it makes sense in this weak logic.

    By the way Do you want to marry (or whatever) with a teen or just fuck her? I do not know if you noticed but everything you say sounds incredibly misogynistic and macho, wait do not get angry like Harry, I hate feminism and I do not belong to the leftist ephebophiles, but what – it seems – is that you think men have the right to Fuck what they want, even if they are vulnerable girls as if they were sexual objects, you say yes but that’s what feminists hate, their ideology will be something wrong but their hysteria is (within the meaningless of their misandric logic) a logic response in that subject, in constrast I do not seek casual sex with young girls , I want a young girl as an stable partner, feminists to some extent hate me because of people like you, I do not care, because I do not want feminism of any kind, but ‘normal heterosexual men who want to fuck loose young girls’ have Fucked up those who are ‘unnormal adult mens and womans who want exclusively adolescents as their partners’.

    Another thing, English is not my native language, it is difficult for me to write this, I do not want to insult or despise you, if I come here is to just to debate politely with you.

  26. It is a fair analogy, because at the time of the first KKK if a black man had sexual relations with a white woman it was considered that the black had raped her, since it was inconceivable for the society that a white had a voluntary relationship with a black. Exactly like a man with a girl now.

    No, it’s not a fair analogy. You’re missing the point. It wasn’t considered perverted for a black man to find a white girl attractive. It was taken for granted that black men would prefer white girls rather than black women (considered disgusting by everybody). Today age of consent laws are based on the premise not just that young girls can’t consent but that it’s perverted even for men to find them sexually attractive (i.e.the whole inflation of the term paedophile). Secondly, in the analogy, black men of the 50’s would not use the term ‘white bait’, they would use the term…well, jailbait. Also, try sprinkling the term ‘jailbait’ around a feminist forum or website, or a children’s protection charity site, and you’ll see that it’s not a term invented or acknowledged by the creators of these laws.

    Adolescents are adults, Adult is someone who is mature, these ‘adolescents’ have matured enough their sexual organs and their cognitive abilities, adolescence has never existed, was created by psychiatrists a century ago, in ancient Rome, ‘adolescent’ was another word For young adults even aged 30 year olds, in no society before the invention of psychiatry was considered the existence of something called ‘adolescence’ for those under 20’s.

    So why are you defining yourself as a victim of a pathology? (‘ephebophilia’ or ‘hebophilia’ or ‘hebobiliphilia’ or whatever quack aspie term has invented).

    I do not think I’m superior to you, I just do not understand how you can not consider that ‘teenagers’ are adults or think that teens are capable of drop their panties but not vote or being legal adults, I’m honest I think you’re very informed with the disease of feminism but you’ve been fooled by psychiatry and psychology, have you ever denounced this pseudoscience

    Hold on a moment, I think you really are a little confused in your thinking a little. You were saying earlier (justifying your identification as an ‘ephebophile’) that you can only be attracted to adolescents and their personalities. Now you’re saying that there is no such thing as adolescenece and adulthood begins at puberty and that a 12 year old is as intellectually mature as a 40 year old.

    Personally, as somebody in their 40’s who has recently dated young women in their early 20’s, I’ve found even them at that age to be almost unbearably immature. Admittedly, one of them turned out to be an aspie ( I mean a real, diagnosed aspie – how ironic is that?!). But still, although I accept society has infantalized teens to a large extent, I still find it hard to believe that the biological process of puberty suddenly turns a 12 year old or whatever into an instant geopolitcal pundit. However, dropping one’s panties in the 21st century is absolutely nothing. Voting on geopolitical affairs that affect millions or billions is something else. Giving your life as cannon fodder in a war that nobody understands is also something else. I’m not sure that 12 year olds should fight in wars, sweep chimneys 18 hours a day, or vote on history changing issues. I do believe that 12 year olds may have the ability to consent to sex in most normal circumstances. I think this is a consistant position for me to take. And, I repeat, in today’s world, I think you’re going to have a very hard time convincing society that 12 year olds or 10 year olds are adults able to vote, die in wars etc. In a 21st century society awash with porn and secularism, in which the trend started by the pill that seperated sex from reproduction (and hence morality) will only increase (leaving aside the threat of Islamism), I think there’s at least a good chance (if not certainty) that eventually society will come to see paedohysteria and the idea that 14 year olds at any rate cannot consent to sex to be akin to middle-age practices of accusing black cats of witchcraft etc.

    I do not know why you all deny that adulthood is at puberty as stipulated by nature, this modern civilization, in which we live, is an aberration, it is irrelevant that nowadays they are like children an have low IQ, this is because they are infantilised and treated like children, this is not ok.

    I largely agree and this is why I think the term ephebophilia makes no sense. What are you even defining it upon if 14 year olds are adults and 24 year olds are adults?

  27. If a 5 year old can not fuck, why would they allow it with a 15? both are minors, there is no legal difference at all, there is no legal difference in one of 5 and one of 15, for law and society we are a bunch of child rapist because a minor is a legal child by definition, and although it sounds disgusting it makes sense in this weak logic.

    Well I dont’ want to insult you either, but to be honest, you have lost me here, or at least you don’t make any consistent sense to me. There is no legal difference because the law only sees children and adults, which is what you apparently approve of (children turn into adults immediately upon the start of puberty according to you). I would prefer the German system in which 14 year olds are considered ‘Jugendleute’, not children, but not with the full rights of adults. (of course, the law has changed in Germany thanks to the United Nations. Only a decade or so ago and it was not only fully legal for 14 year olds to have sex with older men, but they could appear topless in the media, and 16 year olds could star in hardcore porn.) Probably because of it’s experience earlier in the 20th century, for a few decades the Germans had the most enlightened system. A disgust of war and violence but a liberal attitude to sex and porn, including regarding young teenagers.

Comments are closed.