French Reluctant to Become Paedohysteric Over Missing Teacher & 15 Year Old Sweetheart

megan stammers age of consent
Megan Stammers

The UK is currently engrossed in the story of a 30 year old male teacher who has fled to France with one of his underage female pupils (aged 15).  It has become clear that the two were enjoying an ‘inappropriate relationship’ for some time before their elopement, with their school being warned seven months ago of the pair’s blossoming and illicit attraction for one another. In fact, the love struck teacher admitted on Twitter recently that his lolita had ‘hit him like heroin’ and blogged of a ‘moral dilemma’ that was facing him.  Meanwhile the girl, Megan Stammers, had tweeted – ‘Age is overrated.  I’m infatuated.’

Unfortunately for the paedohysteric British press, as well as the police, who see capturing the teacher and freeing the girl from his evil mid-life crisis clutches as a national priority, something akin to America’s decade long obsession with hunting down Osama Bin Laden, the French authorities aren’t in any great hurry to interrupt any ‘ooh-la-la’ that may be going on between the pair.  The age of consent is 16 in the UK but 15 in France.

French officials last night confirmed they are not even searching for missing schoolgirl Megan Stammers – because her maths teacher Jeremy Forrest is not considered a ‘criminal suspect’.

The authorities in France also said they will make no attempt to arrest the 30-year-old, even if he is found, because he has not broken any of the country’s laws, despite eloping with his 15-year-old pupil without her parents’ permission.

The revelation will fuel fears too little is being done to find the pair – who left Britain last Thursday night after Sussex Police began investigating their relationship..

..While the schoolgirl’s disappearance has been making headlines across Britain, the coverage on the Continent has been much more muted, hindering efforts to track the pair.

..The age of consent in France is 15, meaning any intimate relationship between them would not be deemed illegal.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2209179/Megan-Stammers-We-arrest-Jeremy-Forrest-broken-laws-say-prosecutors.html

This will come as a surprise to the Sexual Trade Union and its manifold collection of fake child protection lobby groups.  For they lobbied hard and successfully for the EU to mandate that each member state’s age of consent laws apply to its citizens wherever they happen to be travelling or living in Europe.  This was signed into law by the infamous and disgraced former British Home Secretary Jacqui ‘Pig’ Smith.   In other words, the teacher is theoretically breaking British law if he is indeed bonking his teenage temptress, even if she is over the age of consent in France.

It is believed that the pair may now be in Spain, where the age of consent is an even lower 13.  The Spanish newspapers have reported on the story only to mock the puritanical paedohysteric British obsession with it.

Despite the tabloid demands that the teacher be brought home and hanged, and the slut girl to have her soul stoned to death be given therapy and victim counselling, I detect also a rather surprising degree of sympathy for both the girl and her possible ‘abuser’.  In fact, it has certain echoes of the legendary escape from the slaughterhouse of pigs ‘Butch’ and ‘Sundance’ which gripped the nation a decade and a half ago.  Just this once, we’ll admire the filthy paedo for his balls, instead of chopping them off and frying them.

http://www.amazon.com/Gregorys-Girls-John-Gordon-Sinclair/dp/B004GEB63Q/

(note the review of the film by a bitter older woman at Amazon)

56 thoughts on “French Reluctant to Become Paedohysteric Over Missing Teacher & 15 Year Old Sweetheart”

  1. Despite the tabloid demands that the teacher be brought home and hanged, and the slut girl to have her soul stoned to death be given therapy and victim counselling

    I posit that in over 85 percent of cases like this one where quite obviously the teenage girl is a willing participant, her ending up in therapy is not the result of some traumatic events between her and her older lover that actually caused her psychological problems, but those problems develop after the fact because of the barrage of slut-shaming by feminists and the imposition of feminazi victim ideology on the girl. Who will probably be counseled by a feminist “sexual violence expert” who has “experience” dealing with “statutory rape survivors”. Not a thought will be given to the possibility that just maybe the girl actually wanted to happen – perhaps even willingly instigated – whatever happened between her and her illicit lover. But she will be indoctrinated to believe told that the man just used her and exploited her innocence for his own selfish gratification, and that she was unable to consent.

    If you think I’m a pig for saying this, well, how come not even the French, an entire nation which now even has a self-confessed “feminist” president, can be bothered to care?

    And as far as the age of consent in your home country applying to you even abroad where the age of consent is lower — this was another ploy by feminists, ostensibly to combat “child sex tourism”, as they always claim it is… but even if we haven’t heard much about these laws being “misapplied” and 20-year-old Brits going to prison for getting it on with a 15-year-old French girl (or a 14-year-old German girl, for that matter), the pertaining EU law as it was written does not discriminate with any degree of sufficiency between romantic consensual relationships and down-and-dirty child sex tourism.

  2. As recently as 10 years ago, they could have eloped to a number of different countries (I don’t know if France would be one of them) and legally tied a matrimonial knot and providing the wife was above what the AOC was then, they could have lived in Britain as a legally married couple!
    This paedohysteria is really frightening when everything’s considered and it sure is heck isn’t going to become any quieter.

    And looking at the photo of the girl, she looks the real ‘innocent victim’ of a paedophile too! Her life ruined forever on the whim or perverted lust of that predatory older and deranged sexual deviant!

    (Ruined forever, because they will eventually put the man she truly loves in prison that is)!

    Two YOUNG people doing no harm to anybody, including themselves, just going about their business as a typical young couple in love…

    Total INSANITY on a societal scale…

  3. I love a story with a happy ending…

    What’s even better is knowing that the paedocritical Anglo-American media— headed by arch-paedocrite Rupert Murdoch—hate the French as much as they hate younger women acting like real women. So it’s 2 for the price of 1 in the ‘moral indignation’ camp for them today!

    Probably, too, Hillary Clinton, Michelle Obama, and Harriet Harman are holding a summit even as we speak trying to figure out how to declare war on France. And while they’re in the neighborhood, they might as well get Julian Assange, Eivand Berge, and Roman Polanski as ‘collateral damage’.

  4. Oh I just Looove France. It’s just a 15 year age difference big whoop. Some of these people’s mindsets upset me. Who says that they can’t be in love.. or at that just want to f*uck. Gawd.. get over it. *Nothing to see here folks*

  5. The British media and the parents know they can’t have the man arrested. Boo hoo, our dear daughter ran away and she hasn’t phoned us since, boo hoo. Our dear daughter, this is not at all like her, boo hoo. She should send us a message and reassure us all is well, boo hoo. We know what such hypocritical whining hides, if they had the slightest statutory grip on the man they would have him hanged, drawn and quartered.

  6. And looking at the photo of the girl, she looks the real ‘innocent victim’ of a paedophile too! Her life ruined forever on the whim or perverted lust of that predatory older and deranged sexual deviant!

    I had a couple of daytrips to Eastbourne (the seaside town where they both come from) this summer.

    The girls are the sluttiest I’ve ever encountered. Just about every single female aged from around the age of 8 to 25 wears either those micro-shorts that don’t even cover the top half of their ass cheeks, or else see through leggings with g-strings. Actually, I saw a couple of girls walking around just in their panties.

    Funny thing is, you will hardly ever see a pair of topless breasts on a British beach, no matter how hot it gets, yet in France or Spain (where they dress a lot more ‘modestly’), every other female will be showing her breasts on a sunny summer day. I lost count of the jailbait boobs I saw being displayed without a care in the world on my recent vacation in France and Spain.

    Anyway, it is a total absurdity to pretend that a teenage girl of any age in the UK in the year 2012 can be damaged or ‘corrupted’ by having consensual sex with an older man. As some of my recent posts showed, or just a little Googling would reveal, the age of consent was raised from 13 to 16 in the UK as a result of lobbying from unimaginably ugly old Suffragettes who believed that sex before marriage was a wicked sin. They also succeeded only because of a tabloid generated hysteria (sound familiar) over an undercover reporter ‘buying’ a small girl for a few shillings (which turned out to be made up). It has no relevance whatsoever to a slut walker society in which most 13 year old girls probably have more sexual experience, or at least knowledge, than those Suffragette spinsters who originally raised the age of consent.

    As Inclined Reader said, any reasonable intelligent objective person would have to conclude (and as has Angry Harry, and David Thomas in ‘Not Guilty’) that the processing of the young girl as a ‘chid abuse victim’, the forced therapy, and the forcing of her to testify against somebody she loves, will do far more damage than anything possible by the act of underage sex itself.

    But we just pretend that we’re ‘protecting the young girl from herself’, when we’re really just trying to artificially rig the free sexual market in the favour of older females – which most men are happy to participate in for fear of having their own sexual tastes questioned, or because they want to retain power over their daughter’s virginity and hence medieval economic resource value (a moral crime which shamefully, most MRAs also commit, more so even than the average man).

    I must make clear of course, I am not condoning having sex with underage females, nor the actions of this particular teacher. As I have always said, what is wrong in these cases is a mature adult involving a more vulnerable younger person in a crime, and consequently exposing a young person to the hands of the feminist child abuse industry (which will damage them).

    EDIT : take a look at the following story to see how paedohysteria is showing its inevitable results on relations between young people and adults in Eastbourne (just like the rest of the UK, and Europe next)- http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2189917/Chris-Poole-death-3-teenagers-arrested-following-death-man-attacked-gang-youths-Eastbourne.html

  7. She looks innocent in that picture but in the rest you can tell she is a conniving bitch. She will turn on that poor guy soon enough.

  8. I must make clear of course, I am not condoning having sex with underage females, nor the actions of this particular teacher. As I have always said, what is wrong in these cases is a mature adult involving a more vulnerable younger person in a crime, and consequently exposing a young person to the hands of the feminist child abuse industry (which will damage them).

    Exactly my point to and why what they’re doing should never be a crime in the first place.

    The only crime anyone’s guilty of, are the current sexual trade unionist’s, white-knighting father’s right’s mRA’s and the feminist totalitarian British government, who all uphold these ridiculous Draconian, life destroying and paedohysteria inducing laws!

  9. Not to mention that if they’re too innocent to have sex at 13, they’re too innocent to be found guilty for murder at 13. Human-Stupidity has an article about how this presumption of innocence is now totally out of control in Brazil, where underage serial killers are released after a few month’s community service. It it were up to me: if they want to be f*ucket, fuck’em, if they murder, hang’em

  10. And as far as the age of consent in your home country applying to you even abroad where the age of consent is lower — this was another ploy by feminists, ostensibly to combat “child sex tourism”, as they always claim it is… but even if we haven’t heard much about these laws being “misapplied” and 20-year-old Brits going to prison for getting it on with a 15-year-old French girl (or a 14-year-old German girl, for that matter), the pertaining EU law as it was written does not discriminate with any degree of sufficiency between romantic consensual relationships and down-and-dirty child sex tourism.

    This case just shows how likely unenforceable that law is (a law which probably breaks various of the EU’s charter on fundamental citizen’s rights anyway, particuarly discrimination based upon race or nationality). The French police couldn’t give a rat’s arse even when the girl involved is British and under the British age of consent, and they know the British police and tabloids are obsessing over it. If a British 30 year old man got involved with a 15 year old French girl in France, the British police would have to apply for not only the man to be brought back and face arrest, but for the girl to be sent to the UK (trafficked) as a ‘child sex abuse’ witness. Why the hell would the French police agree to that? The only chance would be if the girl’s parents were demanding it and also if they convinced the girl to go to the UK to testify as well (dragging a crying young girl above the age of consent against her will to another country to testify against her British lover wouldn’t be great publicity for the French police or the Sexual Trade Union).

    I’ve seen American guys in London pick up girls 16 and 17, which is technically illegal for them to do, but they know they won’t get arrested. The British police probably don’t even know what the age of consent is in the USA, neither do they probably care.

    I’ve also read that the ‘child protection’ lobby groups who pressed for this law were particularly ‘concerned’ at British men going to places like Prague and Bratislava on stag nights and ending up picking up a 15 year old in a local nightclub. As if those 15 year olds aren’t being picked up and banged by local men every weekend (perfectly legally). Does the nationality of the man’s penis really determine whether or not the girl is being ‘abused’????

    This is just another attempt by the Sexual Trade Union to bring in a universal age of consent (preferably at 18, or even 21) through the back door . For some reason, they haven’t been able to do that (although they’ve been trying for over 100 years), so they continue to attempt underhand methods like these ridiculous and illegal laws.

    BTW, must make clear again that I am not condoning the breaking of these ridiculous laws, nor am I advising it – the police will probably make sure that they get you in the end, even if they have to wait a couple of decades for the girl to turn into an embittered aging hag.

  11. “I’ve seen American guys pick up girls 16 and 17, which is technically illegal for them to do, but they know they won’t get arrested. The British police probably don’t know what the age of consent is in the USA, nor do they care.”

    Although it should be pointed out that if the American police find out, that’s another matter. One advantage we do have against the EU laws is that the US has no national AOC, but the states set their own laws. There’s been some lobbying for a national AOC, though and the FBI will pounce on an American ‘sex tourist’ under the pretense that he violated international treaty of some kind.

    Even in states here where the AOC is low, the paedocrites still circumvent the law by some of the most unbelievable legal chicaneries. In the botched FLDS raid in Texas a few years ago ( that was a religious sect that practiced polygamy and had a camp in Texas where the AOC is low); the femihag judge who orchestrated the raid actually argued that Texas’ AOC didn’t apply since some of the girls were born in states where the AOC was higher!

    That whole incident, like so many others, was entirely based on a false accusation. The whole drama collapsed when nobody could even identify the accuser.

    Yet Murdoch’s media goons whipped the whole story into a frenzy—the Texas police showed up at the FLDS camp with heavy machine-guns, flamethrowers, and armoured vehicles. They would have massacred everyone there at least sign of resistance, just like they did to the Branch Davidian Compound in Texas in 1993. That case too was based on a false accusation.

    That just shows the lengths to which the paedohysterics will go to over here.

  12. I’ve seen American guys in London pick up girls 16 and 17, which is technically illegal for them to do, but they know they won’t get arrested.

    maybe the ratchet effect of pedohysteria just hasn’t reached these cases yet. But I’ve seen on TV that in some tourist hotspots in Southeast Asia, there are now plainclothes FBI agents patrolling the seedy parts of town at night looking for U.S. nationals who are soliciting underage prostitutes, with the full backing of local governments. If the U.S. government is going through the trouble of sending FBI operatives to watch over its citizens abroad, it seems not too far-fetched to envision that one day they might deploy agents to European cities.

    And I agree that age of consent laws should ideally not be broken; that is, provided they are set at a reasonable age which takes into account a young person’s development, and also provided that those laws understand sexuality primarily as a young person’s right, and not a – more often than not grossly exaggerated – threat or danger that they must be protected from.

  13. Heard an interesting statistic the other day. It seems that while Australia has no surviving World War One soldiers, we still have over 200 of their widows. This can partially be explained by the fact that women live a bit longer than men. However, the main reason there are still so many wives left is simply because it was quite common back then then for returned soldiers in their mid twenties to marry girls in their mid teens.

    Straight away this makes them disgusting filthy perverts who’s sickening crimes churn our stomachs and they deserve castration and lynching etc. On the other hand, they fought in World War One and served their country so that makes them heroes.

    What a dilemma! If only judging people could be as simple as tabloid newspaper headlines writers would have us believe.

    Oh, and many of those teenage girls who married older soldiers went on to raise successful families and are now looked upon as pillars of strength and stability. The ‘experts’ don’t want to talk about that.

  14. He’s been caught and already tarred and feathered. I can hear the hysterical ‘burn the man burn the witch’ whispers even now while the bitches in power get the stake and log-piles ready for the flaming torches. And what did he do? Get led on by a teasing girl who has wrecked a man but will no doubt be fine and be seen as the ‘victim’ despite not looking very abducted at all but even dragging the poor bastard on to a ferry. If catching a ferry is a crime these days then we are all fucked.

    Just another glorious day for our man hating non accountable big government EU.

  15. He was caught http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2209950/Megan-Stammers-Schoolgirl-maths-teacher-Jeremy-Forrest-France.html

    Notice how they write “safe and well” like they were some kind of scumbag, Im sure when they were walking holding hands nobody turn their heads.

    Like I said before, this is the reason why the most feminist countries have the highest number of men looking for foreign brides.

    Feminists sold women the “successful career” dream, but for this they have to spend their more valuable years, post pubescent-mid 20s trying to get that dream, just a few get it, so in order to preserve their value in some way they need some sort of insurance, they forbid and punish men for not want them, shame them calling them insecure, afraid of “successful strong women” forgetting the disadvantage for men to date older women, #1 that they have kids, modern man are no in position to sustain another men’s kids, add the economy, what man in his right mind would date a 45 years old single mom with 3 kids all under 15 and a mortgage to pay?

    Just that single fact make men run away from middle age women, and I’m not counting spinster, childless cat ladies.

    Also he looks younger than he really is, he could pass for early 20s.

    Meanwhile the same media about a 21 years old male singer dating a 12 years old model.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2209802/Outrage-Chinese-popstar-24-dating-12-year-old-Canadian-model.html

    The difference and advantage here is that they and specially he is not from Western, making the creep shaming hard for MSM.

  16. From the article:

    “Throughout the last week, finding Megan has been everyone’s priority and a major focus of our thoughts and prayers in school. Clearly, much needs to be done now to support Megan, and her family, as they seek to return to some sort of normality and we will do all we can to play our part in that.”

    in other words, cue reparative therapy for the girl in which she will be brainwashed into believing her lover abused and exploited her. This does happen and is being carried out on teenage girls with illicit older lovers. There are tons of psychiatrists who have have built careers on precisely this. After all, the feminist mob needs some sort of testimony from her to convict him, and all it takes is a coerced statement that is based on false memory.

  17. Inclinedreader

    There are tons of psychiatrists who have have built careers on precisely this. After all, the feminist mob needs some sort of testimony from her to convict him, and all it takes is a coerced statement that is based on false memory.

    Which has for a number of years now, been dismissed as ‘total baloney’ (the words of Angry Harry). He has much to say about this very shameful practice you’ve mentioned and how they make huge amounts of money at the expense of MANY innocent people.
    If you havent read Harry’s article yet, you can see it here. Especially read what he has to say starting from the paragraph titled I attended a psychoanalysts conference a few years ago (Scroll down to about half way down the page).

    As is quite often stated here: Feminism is by far the worst crime against humanity ever committed in the history of civilisation, but frightengly: it is also the only crime against humanity that was ever (naively) approved of by most of its potential victims… (Paedohysteria).

  18. And I was hoping for a happy ending to this story.

    These flakes in the media who whip these stories up should be taken out and forced to run the gauntlet, Indian style.

    The thing that’s sickest of all is listening to these paedocrites spouting their psychobabble about ‘closure’ and ‘healing’ (clinical terminology that they don’t even understand). These people have destroyed more lives than all the real sex-perverts on earth have destroyed, combined.

  19. MRA:
    Even most women don’t understand how damaging feminism is to women.

    Suppose women did the opposite of what feminists tell them: marry and have children when young (when they’re in their prime for child-rearing). Say for example a girl marries at 16. By the time her kids are grown, she’ll have plenty of time to pursue a career, when her experience and maturity is at its prime for work. Feminism tells them to do everything backwards.

  20. Inclinedreader:
    You’ve touched on the very thing that the media hopes that nobody sees: the trillions of dollars raked in by big corporations for promoting feminism. How much do you think that the Medical/Pharmaceutical Cartels siphon off for birth control, abortion, sperm-banks,—and like you mentioned psychiatric drugs and therapy. Then, there’s loads of research grants and corporate/special interest donations at stake for universities which tow the corporate line, not to mention media advertising dollars.

    Besides Academia and Big Pharma, the media machines make bales of money hyping the ‘gender-wars’ and peddling soft-core porn in the form of paedohysteria. Almost all of these media giants publish millions of books annually on self-help ‘relationship advice’ invariably written by idiots who think all men are pigs and all women are princesses.

    Let’s not forget Big Brother himself, the Government. There’s billions in tax dollars ready and waiting for anybody who’ll further promote feminism. The politicans have a vested interest in playing to the emotionalism of female voters—of course, all this tax money is doled out to political courtiers whose job it is to incite even more ‘issues’ for the politicans to fix.

  21. Jonas:
    I second your sentiments totally. Hopefully, there will be a public backlash in France over this. I can well imagine Lafayette, Clemenceau, and DeGaulle are turning over in their graves right now. So much for the vaunted ‘Liberte, Equalite, Fraternite’ on which the French pride themselves.

  22. Alan:
    The French should remember from their own history just how well ‘appeasement policies’ towards these radical ideologies have worked for them in the past.

    Case in point: look how the German people were thrown into such a paroxysm of paranoia by the Nazis that they committed and condoned any and all crimes against humanity—fully convinced it was all for everyone’s own good. Paedohysteria is really no different. I can still remember Hillary Clinton’s comrade Janet Reno (Head of Clinton Justice Department), banging her fist on a table and claiming that the slaughter of the Waco Branch Davidians was justified since it was all about ‘protecting the children’.

    At the rate this is going, I wouldn’t be surprised if a future Anglosphere sees machine-gun toting paedohysterical squads with carte-blanche to gun down anyone who they suspect of ‘corrupting minors’ in cold blood, likely with Futrelle as their field-marshal.

  23. Well Eric, at the rampant rate that paedohysteria is sweeping across British society, I think the only items missing from the picture right NOW are the machine-guns. Everything else you mentioned is already there.

  24. NOW is the time to really worried for Megan.

    Can you imagine what horrors the ‘healing process’ will involve? I imagine young Megan will not be allowed to see anybody she knows or talk to anyone she trusts (in case she tells them she’s fine and wants to see Jeremy). She could be forced to sit through ‘counselling’ sessions that will go on for days with little sleep allowed. She will be told that she is in shock, that her mind has numbed itself to protect her and that it’s perfectly natural to feel OK at this stage. Next will come the brainwashing techniques where they will try their hardest to convince Megan that she has been conned by a sex predator known for targeting young girls. They may claim, for instance, that he has a string of other girls, some as young as 12, who he was seeing behind her back. In short they will use the very same confidence busting techniques used by religious cults when recruiting vulnerable new members to their kooky clans. Step one:- Fill you with doubt and fear. Step two:- Offer sympathy and reassure them that seeing things their way will solve all your problems.

    If they successfully break her down and mold her mind into what they want, she might be turned into a screwed up mess who really WILL need treatment for the rest of her life. This will be blamed on having been abducted and abused.

    I pray that Megan gets through the coming weeks or months in control of her own mind.

  25. Well, I was wrong since he was arrested. This shows that there is definitely something wrong with age-of-consent laws since it was first announced the age was OK under French law, then he still gets arrested. No law governing male sexuality is worth the paper it’s written on any more.

  26. Well, I was wrong since he was arrested. This shows that there is definitely something wrong with age-of-consent laws since it was first announced the age was OK under French law, then he still gets arrested. No law governing male sexuality is worth the paper it’s written on any more.

    From what I gather, he was arrested for child abduction under UK law. The British police issued a Europe wide arrest warrent for him. Under EU law, the French police were legally obliged to arrest him.

    What will be interesting is if the couple only had sex (assuming they have) while in France. They fled to France after the police had interviewed them about their relationship. Maybe the age of consent in 15 was a factor in their decision (let’s ‘legally’ consumate our relationship before they split us up). I doubt if the teacher was of such low IQ that he thought they could live happily ever after in France, so it makes you wonder why they went in the first place.

    If this is the case, it will be interesting to see if this new EU law regarding age of consents applying abroad is applied here.

  27. Which has for a number of years now, been dismissed as ‘total baloney’ (the words of Angry Harry). He has much to say about this very shameful practice you’ve mentioned and how they make huge amounts of money at the expense of MANY innocent people.

    We had a scandal here in Germany a few years ago, where preschool teachers received some sort of half-baked “sexual abuse awareness” training, and in the months following the training, figures of reported abuse in the kindergartens where these women worked shot up and skyrocketed. It was later concluded that the training course was based on long-debunked scientific half-truths, willful one-sided misinterpretation of child behavior, and the planting and exploiting of false memories in alleged abuse victims. But before they figured that out and a stop was put to it, countless families were ruined, some of them for good.

    But that doesn’t mean this practice isn’t still going on. I can’t find the article now, but some major German newspaper ran a piece once on this whole movement, and it is a movement — of feminist-leaning child and youth psychiatrists who have but one goal, and that is to uncover as many cases as they can and label them as sexual abuse, no matter how remote and scarce the evidence is, as long as they can put men in jail for alleged sexual abuse and destroy families. Besides their deeply engrained misandry and feminist ideology, they are truly riding the gravy train of abuse hysteria, which also in Germany is being funded generously by key feminist-controlled government institutions.

  28. I suspect those psychiatrists & social workers also pursue the sinister agenda of confiscating a precious ressource (good-looking youth) from their natural owners (parents). They would do so to satisfy their own paedo fetishes (by wanking under the table during child questioning) and make piles of money by re-pimping the precious ressource to individuals who are above the law. A possible sequence would be: teenager taken away from parents ——> teenager questioned for wanking ——-> teenage “introduced” to individual above the law (himself or herself preferably a sponsor of a major child protection organisation).

  29. Alan:
    No doubt that the manginas who troll this site are sneering over comments like ours, but consider: exactly what is preventing the scenario I described from becoming a reality?

    When you read White Knight commenters on these stories; or see the Boxcutter Boys up in Vancouver (who actually refer to themselves as the Femistasi); imagine if ‘a call to action’ were raised by the SPLC and mass media! And if the feminist government/police force agreed to look the other way ‘in the interests of the children’ ?

    Death squads, stormtroopers, inquisitors—it’s not as far-fetched as it sounds.

  30. Antifeminist:
    It could be that the couple thought they were safe in France, not counting on the British pulling the ‘abduction’ ploy. Still, despite the EU treaty, the French government had an obligation to investigate the charges themselves and make a determination before deporting or arresting anybody.

  31. When you read White Knight commenters on these stories; or see the Boxcutter Boys up in Vancouver (who actually refer to themselves as the Femistasi); imagine if ‘a call to action’ were raised by the SPLC and mass media! And if the feminist government/police force agreed to look the other way ‘in the interests of the children’ ?

    Death squads, stormtroopers, inquisitors—it’s not as far-fetched as it sounds.

    I can see it happening within a couple of decades. Things will certainly get a lot worse before they get better.

    The number of feminist laws will increase, the number of ‘sex offenders’ will continue to grow, and the punishments and dehumanization of sex offenders will increase in tandem.

    Sexual trade union theory predicts that feminists will get ever more desperate as new technology continues to open and anonymise the sexual market.

    In 10 or 20 years time you will be able to chat to a HD 3D holographic representation of a 16 year old girl on the other side of the world in real time and in the privacy of your bedroom. There will certainly be means of physical interaction as well, including of course sexual.

    What the f*** can feminists do to stop this inevitability? I guess only by introducing mandatory life sentences (or even death) for anyone caught having illicit ‘holographic sex’ etc.

    Countries like France have already started building specialist prisons to house only sex offenders. Gradually, conditions in such places will get worse and worse so that they slowly turn into concentration camps holding ever greater numbers of people (men).

    Meanwhile, it will become illegal to question feminist sex laws such as the age of consent, or laws on cp.

    Sadly, there’s nothing far fetched about this. It’s playing out in front of our eyes, and we likely only have a limited time to stop it.

  32. What happens is that the most political influential women are the old spinster, raising the AOC and the age to vote just add more power to old women, because young women would be incapable of taking political action, infantilization of women has its core in that the less political influence the younger have, the less educated about how society is, the more power old women have to control them and preserve their sexual market value.

  33. Antifeminist:
    I think it could happen fairly soon; no doubt the feminist leadership has had plans for a long time. Over here there was some serious (at least by American standards) protests against 1993 Waco Massacre and the 1995 Wenatchee Sex-Ring Scandal. In both cases, which were instigated by Hillary Clinton, the government clearly demonstrated that it considered executing and imprisoning people without a trial as a perfectly legitimate expression of paedohysteria.

    However much Americans might distrust the government, both the media and government have encouraged paedohysterical vigilanteism as much as legally permissible.

    So, theoretically if vigilantes really started a campaign of open violence and the media supported it, the government could simply pretend to look the other way while covertly orchestrating the whole pogrom. The public would hail the vigilantes as brave heroes defying the ‘degenerate’ and inactive government; meanwhile, the femihag and mangina politicians laugh up their sleeves at them.

  34. NOW is the time to really worried for Megan.

    Don’t commisserate with her too much. Women always get through by giving way to whoever is the strongest. Megan will be able to get on with her life once she’s spilled her guts. Not he.

    To celebrate this heroic arrest, I propose a Shakespeare special in Covent Garden (Romeo & Juliet) so that the Beautiful People can sit down for a couple of hours and pretend they understand Elisabethan English, then go on about how moved they were by a story of thwarted teenage love (and how lucky they are not to be living in such repressive times). Yuk!

  35. Jack:
    It may be hoping for too much, but let’s hope that this case does for paedohysteria what the Eivand Berge case did for the attempts to categorize the MRM as a hate movement and backfires on the STU.

    I don’t know what’s happened to western leaders, but they’ve gone completely downhill since about the mid-60s. Could you imagine Charles DeGaulle bowing in fear to the United Queendom and Rupert Murdoch without even considering the merits of the case? More likely he would have dared them to do something about it.

  36. A bit OT, but did you know De Gaule had his wife (she was dubbed “La colonelle”, she-cornel) breathing down his neck on issues of censorship? It was she who ordered him to censor the infamous Hara Kiri magazine (the ancestor to Charlie Hebdo, the mag who published anti Mahommet cartoons last week). Herstory indeed!

    By the way, surveys in France have shown it is the younger people who are most in favour of anti-sex legislation like the newly reinforced ban on prostitution. You would assume it should be the other way round, ie old farts supporting prohibition, but it isn’t. The fact is, French high-school students will demonstrate in strength against the ban of the Burqa (because “its everybody’s right to dress as they like” and such crap) but they’re OK with banning the P-thing.

  37. Jack:
    I didn’t know that about DeGaulle. But his American contemporary, Franklin Roosevelt, had a notoriously shrewish spouse as well. In fact, Hillary Clinton admits that Mrs. Roosevelt was a ‘role model’ to her. I think a fairly good case could be made that both Eleanor Roosevelt and Hillary Clinton are closeted lesbians who married powerful men as an avenue to promote their radicalism.

    I think Ray might have been right about the depletion of the French gene-pool. During the last 400 years, consider how many of their best men must have been lost in the Huguenot Persections, the French & Indian War, the Reign of Terror, the Napoleonic Wars, the Franco-Prussian War, WW1 & WW2—their genetic stock must be about vapor-locked by now.

  38. Jack:

    ‘Surveys in France have shown its the younger people who are mostly in favor of anti-sex legislation’

    You would likely get the same results in American high schools and colleges. The feminists and the Socons have promoted paedohysteria among the young here to an amazing degree.

  39. Jack:

    ‘Surveys in France have shown its the younger people who are mostly in favor of anti-sex legislation’

    You would likely get the same results in American high schools and colleges. The feminists and the Socons have promoted paedohysteria among the young here to an amazing degree.

    I don’t think it’s so surprising. As Highwayman has pointed out, it’s young women who are arguably in most direct competition with prostitutes, teenage girls etc.

    It will be 17 year old girls who are most in favour of an age of consent of 17, and 18 year old girls who will be most against it.

    EDIT : Come to think of it, it is a scary thought that the people in power are the children of the sexual revolution, and that in 20 or 30 years when they’ve died off, it will be leaders brainwashed from birth into paedohysteria/sex trafficking hysteria, extreme misandry etc. Very frightening thought.

  40. Jack could some of this apparent sex-negativity among french youth be due to the fact that a much higher percentage of french youth (versus older age brackets) are muslim and are thus more likely to hold sexually conservative views?

  41. The trial of Jerremy Forrest, the teacher who ran away to France with a 15 year old pupil, is currently taking place : http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10117244/Jeremy-Forrest-trial-teacher-told-me-he-loved-me-when-I-was-14.html

    As you’d expect, the girl is now seeing herself as an abused victim, primarily it seems, because she’s been told by the police that the teacher was seeing other women at the same time as her :

    “In later police interviews, recorded two months after Forrest was arrested, the teenager admitted she had always been suspicious and that their relationship was marred by frequent jealous rows.
    She said the police had since told her that he had not separated from his wife and that there was evidence he had been having affairs with other people too.
    “I trusted him,” she said. “If they hadn’t (separated) none of this would have happened because I would never even go there. I was quite angry about that because it showed he lied to me. I genuinely would not think that he would do that to me. I’m slowly piecing things together.”

  42. Hmmm… Another one for Luap Male and the gang at the mHRM to make a fuss over and justify why boys and young men need the same protection from those dreadful (HOT) female pedofiles school teachers…
    That 15 y/o child is now traumatized for life of course, thanks to that pervert.
    Mr Male will probably insist (at least where anyone can hear him or read anything he may write), that he should be locked up for life with hard labour daily sodomy.
    Nauseating to even think about him exploiting the precious little children in his care…

  43. A woman sticks with a man as long as he can protect her and provide for her. When he’s no longer able to do or indeed becomes himself a source of trouble, she drops him like a hot potatoe.

  44. A woman sticks with a man as long as he can protect her and provide for her. When he’s no longer able to do or indeed becomes himself a source of trouble, she drops him like a hot potatoe

    I recall a quote from an American pop diva, the name of whom I can’t remember : ‘If he ain’t mine, he’s nothing‘.

    Pretty much sums up the attitude of most women to men.

  45. Antifeminist & Alan:
    “she’s been told by the police that the teacher was seeing other women at the same time he was seeing her.”

    I wonder if that’s true. A typical tactic in Soviet (oops, I mean ‘feminist’) brainwashing (oops, I mean ‘deprogramming’) techniques is to separate parties and then sow distrust and lies among them through disinformation (oops, I mean ‘re-education’).

    While Forrest has been rotting away in the klink, I’m also equally sure that Meghan has been getting plenty of sleep (aside from the bright lights and loud noises) and wholesome foods (generously accommodated with narcotics) —all to help her cope after her romantic elopement to France (oops I mean ‘her horrible ordeal’).

    Since Forrest knew her intimately, I’m willing to wager she’ll look so different on the witness stand that he won’t even recognize her as the same person. And in truth, she won’t be.

  46. Good points Eric.

    There’s another issue it raises as well. I wonder why the police and courts think whether the fact that he was ‘cheating’ on her had anything to with whether she was ‘abused’. Either they are simply trying to coax her into testifying more forcibly against him, or else the idea of a man cheating on a woman as part of the ‘abuse’ narrative is gaining currency and creeping into the legal system.

    I hope IR will have some input here, but despite my German getting rustier and rustier each passing year, I still read bild.de and other German online newspapers occasionally. As IR will be able to tell us more clearly, the age of consent law in Germany is rather vague between the ages of 14 and 16 (and femihags have tried to make it even vaguer and easier to prosecute older men).

    It used to be that, although there was a legal clause stipulating that if a man had ‘taken advantage’ of a girl 14 or 15 he could be prosecuted, such prosecutions were very rare. The age of consent was effectively 14. However, since the onset of paedohysteria, prosecutions are becoming more common and I’ve read of a few. In each case, the girl only brought the prosecution when her older lover either dumped her, or was caught ‘cheating’ on her. Previously I assume, German prosecuters would not bring such cases to court, knowing that the girl was only claiming abuse because of jealousy. Now, however, that seems to be what ‘taking advantage’ (or the German equivalent expression) of a 14/15 year old girl means (where previously it meant the girl was immature or childish for her age).

    If it’s becoming accepted that male infidelity is part of the standard by which we now measure the gravity of ‘statutory rape’ cases, then what is to stop feminists actually legally defining it as rape (in cases of male infidelity with other adults), as a feminist actually called for last week?

    We should also consider that if we follow our friend Eivind in the extreme position that ‘women cannot rape men’ and that ‘sex is exclusively a female resource’ then if and when feminists do define infidelity as rape, they will have the theoretical framework ready to legitimise defining ONLY male infidelity as rape.

  47. Interesting how she was brainwashed to use all the politically correct gobbledegook.

    I could not consent, I was a child, I was under the age of consent.

    Interesting how they got him for child abduction, as age of consent was not a problem in France. A better, safer plan would have been for her to flee independently and then unite.

    Didn’t police spread some lies in order to get the media to give so much attention to the case?

    In today’s matriarchy there is an iron rule: Never anger a woman. Never offend a woman. Never hurt a woman.

    There ain’t no fury like a woman scorned. Or cheated. And nowadays, women wield enormous power.

  48. It is quite obvious that she did not want to be “saved” by police.

    When they were apprehended, she said men “jumped” on them and she had tried to fight the officers off her but he “just stood there” with a blank expression.

    The pussy pass in action. She could fight police, and could count on being gently overpowered.

    If he fought police, he would probably be tasered, maced, clubbed and abused with disproportional unnecessary violence, as if he were an extremely violent thug.
    =========
    lf he had a good lawyer he could probably have managed conditions for his extradition:

    He could demand to be only charged with child abduction and no other charge that is not a crime in France.

    In spite of my opposition to most age of consent laws, I actually understand that parents should have power of travels and other actions of their children. So, getting a runaway girl back is a legitimate endeavor. Though, in this case, there was no need to save the runaway girl.

  49. “Either they are trying to coax her into testifying more forcibly against him, or else the idea of a man cheating on a woman is part of the abuse narrative creeping into our legal system.”

    I think it’s both. As to the second point, the police announcing this publically is certain to prejudice anybody against Forrest—including potential jurors.

    We have assume too that Meghan has had no contact with Forrest since being ‘rescued from her ordeal.’ She’s not heard his side of the story, and the authorities have likely kept them separated and fed all kinds of false and prejudicial information into her mind. It’s also not out of the question that some social workers decided to speed up the process with psychiatric drugs (of course to help her cope with her trauma, they’d say).

    This is exactly what Communists used to do with POWs in Korea and Vietnam—same technique and everything.

  50. It seems even the BBC is willing to print that all is not right: The girl said she felt manipulated by the police after she was brought back to England from France. She said she felt “if I didn’t comply with what they (the police) were doing, I faced arrest”.

    Here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-sussex-22939739

    Not that there’s any hope of such statements being acted upon or causing a rethink. Still, sometimes the flame of truth doth shine, every so feebly.

  51. @Jack

    Not that there’s any hope of such statements being acted upon or causing a rethink. Still, sometimes the flame of truth doth shine, every so feebly.

    It’s surprising even, that the BBC or media actually let such a comment slip through.

Comments are closed.