Comments on: Female porn – the horrible reality of talent shows

By: Alan Vaughn

Alan Vaughn — Wed, 04 Apr 2012 05:53:47 +0000

EXACTLY Jack! The only victims in such ‘crimes’ (non-events to me) are those so defined by this NONSENSICAL and PSYCHOTIC law. The couples involved were probably the happiest they’ve both been in their lives until the state found out about them… As I mentioned above: many of the ‘victims’ end up taking their own lives.
It’s just beyond comprehension really how our society has allowed these psychotically envious trollops to pass any kinds of legislative change, let alone these sorts of society destroying changes.
In a way we (MRA’s that comment on these forums) are a fairly select group – we are not brainless sheep: we can SEE what’s going on and I conjecture that most are like me – noticed this years and years ago, when it all started to get serious…

By: jack

jack — Wed, 04 Apr 2012 05:27:23 +0000

That’s it. There is a real issue with adults seducing young people, but it is not one of female vs. female offender. It is one of victimless crime:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victimless_crime

Consensual acts that harm no-one should not be criminalised.

By: MRA

MRA — Wed, 04 Apr 2012 03:56:37 +0000

And…..the women can give birth to his child and he, the raped boy is forced to pay child support BY LAW, yeah the law forces raped boys to pay child support to the female rapist, just imagine forcing women to give birth and rise children product of rape BY LAW, and one of the many excuse feminists use in abortion debates is to women who have been rape abort if they get pregnant, but forget the men and boys who are raped and are force to pay the rapist.

By: Alan Vaughn

Alan Vaughn — Tue, 03 Apr 2012 21:05:57 +0000

Jack, yes I see your point when you state notwithstanding the type of crime and I agree. I think I may have lost the point somewhere when discussing a specific ‘crime’ (although I don’t even think it is an ‘event’ let alone crime) relating to consenting sex between 2 people, where one or both are according to the sexual trade union enforced law: a ‘child’ (under the legal age of consent).
My point was and still is, that I don’t believe that a boy or man can be ‘raped’ or coerced into having sex.
However, considering that when the girl is a ‘child’ (with a much older man) it is also truly consensual, yet the adult man is automatically branded a predator – or paedophile child rapist, so an older woman must also be viewed in the same way in the eyes of this ridiculous, draconian law. (Because a relationship or sexual liaison between an older woman with a boy ‘child’ must be and can only be truly consensual also). And must therefore: also face the same draconian treatment under these nonsense laws at least in terms of time in prison and being branded a child sex offender by way of the publicly accessible registries.
Such a woman offender of course, would never have to suffer daily beatings and homosexual assaults whilst in prison, among other atrocities reserved only for men…

By: Jack

Jack — Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:39:47 +0000

Why it matters to insist on equal punishment for females and males notwithstanding the type of crime becomes clearer if you keep in mind men’s innate instinct to protect (= spare) women. Consider the public’s reaction in the two following cases:

1) Man gets sent to jail (or to the electric chair) ————–> women AND men cheer
2) Woman gets sent to jail (or to the electric chair) ———–> women don’t mind or care BUT men think “poor girl, she should be spared”

Result: jail or death row = men only

By: Alan Vaughn

Alan Vaughn — Tue, 03 Apr 2012 14:34:07 +0000

Yep, for sure! Many of those girls are indeed lucky to have older partners too, because they probably do a far betterr job in terms of moral support and show them a quality of love that their dysfunctional families couldn’t possibly give them.
I’ve read of such young girls even committing suicide when their ‘paedophile’ lover was sent to prison for a few years of arse rape, because that support is suddenly taken away and she just falls down in a manner of speaking, with a loud and disturbing thud!
Why TF can’t people (not just the sexual trade union) just live and let live? I would never do anything like that to my daughter at any age – everyone (regardless of what age they are) should surely be allowed the basic right to choose who they like or love…

By: theantifeminist

theantifeminist — Tue, 03 Apr 2012 13:22:11 +0000

Well said Alan. I would point out that I agree with Jack that, sadly, we should push for women to recieve the same (cruel and unjust) punishments that men currently recieve. Not as an end in itself, but to possibly stop women supporting paedohysteria laws.

Having said that, I can’t help thinking that these women caught with teenage boys probably thought that such laws only apply to men, and may even have supported the double standard. Furthermore, a 14 year old girl is no more likely to suffer, and is just as ‘lucky’ as a 14 year old boy with an older partner. In fact, both gender teens are just as likely as each other to be left traumatised by the child abuse industry forced victim labelling and ‘therapy’ (the real harm in such relationships).

By: Alan Vaughn

Alan Vaughn — Tue, 03 Apr 2012 12:59:07 +0000

I think you and me (and we’re part of 1% of the population) that does see a gross contradiction in watching for entertainment a 9 year old girl breaking down in tears through the pressure on a reality show, and cheering when they read of a lonely old man being sent to prison to be raped for browsing pictures of smiling 17 year old ‘children’ on the internet.
We therefore would also agree that women being put in prison for life for giving a horny (and lucky) 14 y.o. boy is almost an abomination of justice.
Eivind Berge makes quite a long-winded yet logical argument about that ridiculous administration of ‘equal’ or fair justice, purely and simply on the basis that if a boy or man has sex, he can ONLY be willing and consenting and as he insists all the way through: bloody LUCKY little boy!
But those manginas and other so-called MRA’s, i.e Reddiit mangina’s rights blog commentators, insist on this BS ‘equality’ nonsense!
Anyone with even a basic insight into the sexual trade union, knows that feminism is not about and has NEVER been about: gender equality!

By: theantifeminist

theantifeminist — Tue, 03 Apr 2012 12:19:41 +0000

Why is it that only you and me and maybe one or two other blokes seem to understand this?…

Because women’s needs define the goals and values of society. Although most men’s rights supporters would claim to understand this, even they don’t seem to be able to apply that understanding when it comes to defining men’s rights values i.e. believing that putting women in jail for life for sucking off a lucky 14 year old boy is an end in itself, even if 40 year old men still get the same punishments for having relationships with 14 year old girls.

99% of the population see no contradiction in watching for entertainment a 9 year old girl breaking down in tears through the pressure on a reality show, and cheering when they read of a lonely old man being sent to prison to be raped for browsing pictures of smiling 17 year old ‘children’ on the internet.

By: Alan Vaughn

Alan Vaughn — Sun, 01 Apr 2012 23:29:29 +0000

@theantifeminist,
Why is it that only you and me and maybe one or two other blokes seem to understand this?…

No, most women are too busy watching 10 year olds being exploited and psychologically traumatised for life on talent shows to be looking at porn. Or else, watching some dysfunctional 14 year old having her emotional problems dissected and exploited for tea-time entertainment on the Oprah Winfrey show or Jeremy Kyle.

It’s not just about equal treatment. It’s about who decides the treatment and why.

It’s not just about equality before the law. It’s about who sets the law and why.

I think what those bitches do is far, far WORSE than blokes looking at ‘child abuse’ images!
Of all those images I’ve seen (or 17+ year old children) being sexually ‘abused’ or ‘exploited’, they ALL appear happy about what they are doing: I have not seen even ONE single image of so-called ‘child-porn’ or ‘child abuse’ that depicts the model in a state of distress or of being abused or exploited, that they claim as the reason any man caught looking at such images must be sent to prison for years and years. Conversely: nearly every time I see one of those talent shows for children, I see blatant child abuse, where the REAL victims are clearly very distressed and would most likely be more emotionally damaged than what they might be if they were actually raped!! In the US they are seriously discussing the possiblity of executing men caught in possession of child-pornography!
If the real issue was indeed child-abuse prevention and the reason men must have their lives destroyed for merely looking at imgaes of that ‘abuse’, because the need to look at them maintains the demand for them, well those women surely need to be sentenced to life in prison, NO PAROLE!
It just makes me so mad!!!