A ‘man of 21 with learning disabilities has been granted taxpayers’ money to fly to Amsterdam and have sex with a prostitute.
His social worker says sex is a ‘human right’ for the unnamed individual – described as a frustrated virgin.
His trip to a brothel in the Dutch capital’s red light district next month is being funded through a £520million scheme introduced by the last government to empower those with disabilities.
They are given a personal budget and can choose what services this is spent on.
Source : Councils pay for disabled to have sex with prostitutes
Good! This is the most heartwarming story I’ve read in a long time, save for the predictable outrage from the sexual trade union’s conservative mouth piece – the Daily Mail.
I spoke in my last post about the effects of the free sexual market in producing grotesquely varied outcomes in terms of ‘winners and losers’. Feminism, and the overturning of ‘patriarchy’, has been the response of the mass of unattractive female losers. The ‘Mystery Method’ and Game has been the response of male ‘losers’ (high IQ white betas).
In his novels, the French writer Michel Houellebecq discusses various solutions to the unfair outcomes produced by the free sexual market. In Platform, an economic solution is proposed, consisting of a heretical defence of western sexual tourism to Asia. Why shouldn’t wealthy, but obese or old westerners, trade their own sought after goods with the poor, yet sexually attractive members of Asian societies? In the earlier and more popular Atomised, a more radical, femi-nazi type solution is presented – the abolition of sexual desire altogether, brought about through genetic intervention. Even more inflammatory, he playfully suggests at times that teenage girls should ‘justify their spoilt existance’ by being encouraged to trade their sexual beauty for the gifts of the older men whose taxes already support their extended adolescent lifestyles.
Now, I wish to make clear I am speaking as an ‘anti-feminist’ and all round agent provocateur, rather than as a ‘men’s rights supporter’. But I agree wholeheartedly that the state should have no more or less right to redress the imbalances of a free sexual market than it does presently to correct those of the economic free market.
Why shouldn’t those with beauty and youth be encouraged to enter into mutually advantageous relationships with the less attractive, but wealthier (an example of this is ‘compensation dating’ in Japan)? After a year of working 40 hour weeks, I’m now earning close to $2,000 a week. Why should my hard earned work go towards supporting the family of 5 on welfare down the road through the taxes that I pay, and yet if I offered to take the 17 year old daughter out to an expensive dinner, with an understanding that my sexual needs would be catered for afterwards, I would face prosecution as a sex offender (payment for sex with a minor – even though above the age of consent)?
Of course, as I have always argued, the law that would prosecute me is itself a state attempt at redressing the imbalances produced by the free sexual market. But it is one that ONLY addresses the sexual disadvantages of older, unattractive women. Because I cannot use my modest wealth to ‘buy’ sexual favours from the young and attractive, I am more likely to end up in a relationship with an older, unattractive woman who will herself profit from my income.
The actions of those English councils might appear to indicate the birth of a more enlightened and caring sexual age. But the disabled young men with learning difficulties are actually being put at risk of being prosecuted for ‘paying for sex’ if it turns out that those Amsterdam prostitutes were trafficked (or more likely if they claim to have been trafficked to avoid deportation as illegal immigrants).
This world, created by the feminists and their allies, both conservative and cultural marxist, is full of Orwellian contradictions. We hold the highest value to be the reduction of human misery and inequality. Few object to disabled people having financial compensation, privilages, and other support from the state, even the right to ‘compete’ at Olympic Games. Yet the idea that sex is a human right, rather than something that must be arduously won in the free sexual jungle, is something that strikes most as absurd. Even the feminists have to pretend that their sexual trade union laws are attempts to save ‘victims’ rather than honestly admitting that they are nothing more than attempts to preserve the sexual ‘rights’ of older, unattractive women in that cruel and ruthless sexual market.
Michel Houellebecq points out the contradictions inherent in a social democratic society where sex has become a commoddity. In such a world, we ought to encourage classes of 16 year old schoolgirls to visit retirement homes and to give the lonely old men there one last blowjob before the dying of the light. In my view, such a world would be fairer, more beautiful, and definitely more consistent than our present one.
Hmmm…I am just thinking aloud again but I wonder if it might be feasible to train “sex care nurses” to care for the sexual needs of the disabled. These would be regular nurses selected from a pool of attractive candidates to undergo training and certification in order to give erotic massages and hand jobs to the disabled (including the mentally ill I am sure a good hand job would calm some of them down). These nurses would spend most of their time doing regular nursing duties but would be oncall to perform their sex care duties when the need would arise. They would enjoy premium pay when they perform their duties as sex care nurses but would recieve regular pay when performing regular nursing duties.
I have no problem with Sex Tourism as long as the Third World sex workers that western tourists patron have some reasonable say in the bargaining process and can insist on safety precautions and decent working conditions. Of course it is also true that the alternative for many of the women/girls (that work in tough conditions) is often worse than working as street prostitutes as was pointed out by Steve Moxon in The Woman Racket. Personally I will pass at sex tourism to Asia due to the fact that there are many established quality Massage Parlours and Escort Services in Canada that can offer quality GFE.
Compensation Dating is a cool concept, it allows men the ability to enjoy the company of young women and it allows young girls to make their own money and become more independent (some of them might be able to pay off their university tuition). It is a shame that Japan has cracked down on compensation dating with young girls, it still goes on with older women though. It appears though that compensation dating is now becoming popular with school girls in Hong Kong, see here: http://www.thefrisky.com/post/246-compensated-dating-gains-popularity-with-hong-kong-schoolgirls/
and here: http://www.orientexpat.com/forum/19082-compensated-dating-hits-hong-kong/
QUOTE: ” In such a world, we ought to encourage classes of 16 year old schoolgirls to visit retirement homes and to give the lonely old men there one last blowjob before the dying of the light. In my view, such a world would be fairer, more beautiful, and definitely more consistent than our present one.”
A beautiful world it would be and I like the idea of girls taking care of men who made it possible for them to enjoy the benefits of the society they live in. The girls who would do this should be recognized for performing good community service work. And not only could they give blow jobs or hand jobs but they could also spend time holding, hugging and cuddling the old men too…comforting them before they give up the ghost.
An excellent suggestion Highwayman, and if moral progression in humans is not an illusion, it will probably happen eventually – sadly, unlikely in our lifetimes (unless we live to be 300..but here’s hoping that we do!). Wouldn’t it be nice, if you’re feeling depressed and unloved and you pop down to your doctors and instead of prescribing some prozac, he arranges an appointment for you with a 16 year old trainee sex worker!
BTW highwayman, I don’t know if you caught my comment to HS about starting your own blog? I’d obviously link to it and help promote it. Otherwise, you’re welcome to write a guest article here whenever you want.
Pingback: You now have the right to get laid
Thank you I tend to suffer from too much writer’s block to start my own blog and I am not the most computer literate person either. If I come up with an idea for an article I will let you know though.
Thank you,
The Highwayman
Fantastic. Amazing facts. And great article! This is needed: going past timid attempts to stop feminist encroachment, to actual bold suggestions and demands that are politically very incorrect.
Feminist’s outrageous preposterous demands became reality. Like dismantling of constitutional due process in rape and child abuse accusations. So let us get out of the defensive, into offensive.
I always suggested, in talks to friends, that in the UN declarations of human rights there should the unalienable right to offer and seek sexual services for free or for money. Maybe even access to sexual services for the poor. But I did not dare to demand this publicly.
Highwayman, get in contact with me, maybe you can write articles for my blog. Start with comments, suggest articles.
Hi Human Stupidity I have already left several comments on your blog. I will leave more as I find the time.
“-if it turns out that those Amsterdam prostitutes were trafficked (or more likely if they claim to have been trafficked to avoid deportation as illegal immigrants-”
Then that’s how the feminists are running the show.
They threaten the prostitute with deportation unless she ‘confesses’ to being trafficked. Once she does that the guy can be prosecuted for exploiting a ‘poor miserable slave girl’.
This must be what all the latest bull dung about ‘human trafficking’ is really all about.
“Few object to disabled people having financial compensation, privilages, and other support from the state, even the right to ‘compete’ at Olympic Games. Yet the idea that sex is a human right, rather than something that must be arduously won in the free sexual jungle, is something that strikes most as absurd.”
Indeed! The liberals appear to have liberated just about everyone except the lonely frustrated guy.
Male sexual agency MUST NOT be entrusted to women (feminist or no) in any shape or form.
I unfortunately bear some depressing news regarding prostitution in the Netherlands, I am not sure if you want to do an article on this…
The sexual trade union seems to be well at work in the Netherlands unfortunately. Here is an interesting link regarding attacks on Amsterdam’s Red Light District:
http://www.melonfarmers.co.uk/storymf00018.htm
Among these attacks is a proposal by (mangina) Amsterdam Councillor Lodewijk Asscher that the age for prostitution be raised to 23! Let’s hope that day never comes but there ARE proposals by the Dutch government to raise the age for prostitution to 21, read here: http://pillsbottlesneedles.blogspot.com/ (you have to scroll down a bit) and here: http://www.rnw.nl/english/article/minimum-age-dutch-prostitutes-raised-21
The reasons being given are that ” “People at the age of 21 can make a better judgment about working as a prostitute than 18 year olds; also they are better equipped to deal and negotiate with clients,” 18 to 20 year olds of course are allowed to join the army in many countries around the world and are thus judged to be able to handle the consequences of killing people and blowing things up but apparently some people feel that people in this age group cannot…deal with having sex for money. An obvious effect of this law if it passes will be to place yet more restrictions on the availability of young females for older males…and to increase business for older prostitutes.
Unfortunately I am not that familiar with Dutch politics so I am not sure exactly what is the driving force here (Conservatives, Feminists, “Child Welfare Advocates” or all of the above).
“Yet the idea that sex is a human right, rather than something that must be arduously won in the free sexual jungle, is something that strikes most as absurd.”
I don’t believe sex is a human right. Eating,in my opinion,is also not a human right. These are privileges to be won by the worthy. That’s how Nature set it up.You’ll also never get women to agree to become nurses to jerk old guys off all day. If you wanted them to become prison guards to fuck rapists now, that would be a different story.
“I don’t believe sex is a human right. Eating,in my opinion,is also not a human right. These are privileges to be won by the worthy. That’s how Nature set it up.”
Our anonymous Nazi friend here clearly illustrates the pitfall of teaching evolution or naturalistic world views to low functioning people. The naturalistic fallacy is almost as predictable as plain women finding pornography ‘degrading’ .
Speaking of porn. I just found out that feminism (or at least what some call ‘proto feminism’) and photography both got started in the 1830′s. Coincidence? Maybe.
Supposedly feminism spun off of abolitionism. But what if abolitionism actually spun off of feminism? After all how could they justify freeing themselves from the ‘slavery’ of patriarchy while actual slaves remained in bondage?
Some interesting points there Ewm. I was actually planning to do an article sometime about the racism of the early feminist movement. I know that a lot of early feminists were openly racist and often claimed that the white race could only be saved if white women were given the vote (in the light of black men being given rights).
There is also an assumption that second wave feminism followed from the black civil rights movement. I suspect it was as much the other way around, and for similar reasons that you suggested.