David Futrelle’s Groupies and their Child Torture Porn Apologia..Oh Sorry..Ephebophile Torture Porn Apologia

David Futrelle and his readers regularly make fun of the distinction, sometimes made in the manosphere, regarding paedophilia (the attraction to pre-pubescents) and ‘ephebophilia’ (the attraction to adolescent minors). It’s all the same to them. Finding a 5 year old sexy is no more perverse than finding a 17 year old attractive. Hmmm. It’s one thing a woman making such an obviously false claim, but when it comes from a ‘man’ like Futrelle, or one of his many male fake transexual fans..

Indeed, it appears that Futrelle’s groupies believe finding any minor attractive is paedophilia, including thefore a 19 or 20 year old in those countries with an age of majority of 21. David Futrelle and his wig wearing fans therefore belong to the minority of people who still regard Alan Turing as a paedophile pervert (he was caught banging a 19 year old boy in the bum when the age of majority in the UK, for both males and females, was 21).

While I agree that the notion of ephebophilia is aspie junk science nonsense (all men, apart from real paedophiles and other perverts, are attracted to adolescents), the insistance that there is no important difference between the attraction to pre-pubescents and post-pubescents is extremely dangerous. Of course, what is ‘natural’ is not always right, but to criminlize something natural under the pretence that it is perverted, is clearly a recipe for injustice. Furthermore, if you maintain the lie that it is unnatural and perverted, even sick, to find post-pubescent females attractive, then you risk turning healthy men into perverts who have internalized that slanderous paedophile label and then ran with it. Indeed, this appears to be what has happened with many of Futrelle’s child torture porn apologist ring members. Whilst publicly shaming men as ‘paeodphiles’ for admitting that 17 year olds can be sexy, many openly sport avatars of pre-pubescent anime characters. Others freely declare their unabashed love for extreme manga torture porn…and at least one or two actually create it. All of them, however, appear to defend the renting out in an adult sex shop of a disgusting ‘art’ film depicting nothing but the torture and murder of (real) naked children.

When concern for child welfare is simply a means to demonize men, financially enrich yourself, and regulate the free sexual market in your favour, and consequently you lie to men that to find the most desirable females attractive is paedophilia, equally as bad as the abuse of toddlers, then you open the door to an increase in real paedophilia and perversion. It’s hardly surprising, therefore, to find that so many of the mentally disturbed individuals and wig wearers amongst David Futrelle’s readership appear to be defending and even cultivating sick torture fantasies regarding children whilst libelling as paedophiles those who argue that giving consenting 17 year olds orgasms is neither child abuse nor paedophilia.

Currently, David Futrelle’s schizophrenic readers are simultaneously defending child torture porn as art to be sold in sex shops, on the grounds that the naked actors were sixteen, not six (the actors were actually as young as 14), and therefore ‘not really underage’, whilst mocking as paedophiles those of us who simply argue that teenage ‘minors’ are capable of consenting to sex.

scarlettpipstrelle-extreme-child-porn-apologist

Note that nobody, to my knowledge, has provided a link proving that ‘it won a court challenge’. Presumably Scarlettpipstrelle is referring to the arrest on obscenity charges of the gay sex shop owners who were renting it out on their premises. O.K, we have to accept the disgusting fact that, because Pasolini (the director) was a leftie and an ‘artist’, his films that involve non-stop gratuitous torture of naked 14 year old boys get a free pass to be viewed on YouTube and Netflix. However, even granting the hypocrisy and fake child welfare concern of the left, any civilised society draws the line at images of naked 14 year olds being tortured being rented out in adult sex shops. That includes the USA. These same readers were denouncing the ‘jailbait’ subreddit for displaying pictures of fully clothed teenage girls as ‘child porn’, and not only the men who viewed it, but MRAs who defended it, as ‘paedophiles’.

Maybe somebody should pop into that gay sex shop in Cincinnati and check whether they are still renting out a film containing naked children eating shit and being disembowelled, alongside all the other gay pornos, sex toys, and jack off material? I assume not, and only David Futrelle and his fellow child torture porn apologists are sick enough to ask ‘why not’?

26 thoughts on “David Futrelle’s Groupies and their Child Torture Porn Apologia..Oh Sorry..Ephebophile Torture Porn Apologia”

  1. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-28740348

    “A nude sculpture by British artists Jake and Dinos Chapman has been removed from a Rome gallery after complaints from a children’s rights group.

    The sculpture, called Piggyback, had been on display at contemporary art gallery Maxxi since December.

    But the Italian Observatory on the Rights of the Child labelled the piece “paedo-pornographic” and lobbied for its removal.

    The piece depicts two girls, one with a penis sticking out of her mouth.

    The fibreglass sculpture was created in 1997 by the Chapman brothers, who are known for their explicit and provocative works.

    In a statement on the Observatory’s website, the organisation’s president, Antonio Marziale, denied attacking artistic expression, insisting it wanted the sculpture removed “to avoid promoting depictions with a clear paedo-pornographic context behind the art”.”

    Lol, I wonder what that children’s rights group thinks of Salo, not to mention David Futrelle’s defence of it being rented out in a sex shop?

  2. Look at the photo on his recent ‘creepy ex-pat’ article : http://www.donotlink.com/gMu

    Whether or not he has a point in the article itself, the photo he chooses to illustrate it with is nothing but the shaming of an older man for having a younger, foreign partner.

    No doubt being the progressive that he is, he thinks that it’s right that you could go to jail if you published a similar photo shaming a white woman for being with a black man, or two gay men for being with each other.

    And all the while he’s arranging ‘meet-ups’ with his groupies, as well as worming his way into college classes posing as an expert on ‘better sex’ in order to get near 18 year olds.

    What a subhuman piece of shit that ‘man’ is.

  3. Thinking back to Fat-Troll’s glorification of homosexual torture and rape—back when Dahmer and Gacy were in the news—I wonder what the Aspie MRAs would have to say now about how films like ‘Salo’ prevent these types of crimes? Dahmer and Gacy could had access to the film and it didn’t seem to curb their violent instincts much.

    And who knows what kinds ideas Fat-Troll himself got from these kinds of movies?

  4. Antifeminist:
    Yeah, I saw that pic. Pretty disgusting, but these kinds of images turn up a lot in the US media. All in all, they remind me of old Nazi propaganda films like ‘The Sweet Jew’ which depicted stereotypical-looking lecherous older Jewish men preying on innocent Aryan girls.

  5. “I wonder what the Aspie MRAs would have to say now about how films like ‘Salo’ prevent these types of crimes? Dahmer and Gacy could had access to the film and it didn’t seem to curb their violent instincts much.”

    David Futrelle was regarded in the 90’s as a kind of expert on the pornography debate. A couple of his articles are still quoted in discussions today. He was a strong proponent of the view that porn does prevent sex crime.

    And of course, myself and most of us here do agree with that position which is backed by virtually all non-feminist research directed into the subject.

    However, I wonder if it does apply to the extreme sadist type of porn that Salo represents and which Futrelle and his groupies appear to be connisseurs of?

    I doubt if a sadist can satisfy his lusts simply by watching torture and violence on screen. Other porn can simply serve as visual stimulation to satisfy the sex impulse. However, I doubt if the sadistic desire to control another person, and to cause suffering in other people, can simply be satisfied by watching such movies.

    Rather, such sickening movies are simply going to pervert the minds of those watching them and lead them on to the desire to satisfy those lusts in the real world.

    There’s also the fact that every time this movie is rented out, watched on NetFlix etc, money goes to some of the people involved in making it (not Pasolini, of course, who is thankfully dead). People are still recieving financial gain from the production of this movie, which involved the sexual abuse of children, and Futrelle and his sick groupies are defending this (yet at the same time believe that a man should be raped in prison for viewing a naked selfie uploaded to the net by a 17 year old girl).

  6. Also the fact that this film is legal, and yet images of smiling teenagers posing in their underwear is illegal, surely leads to perversion in itself.

    If you want to legally look at naked teenagers, then Salo is pretty much your only option.

    The gay sex shop owners who rented this out on their premises would have faced years in prison if they had been renting out movies of 17 year old’s having orgasms or even simply posing in the nude. They would have no case to answer for. Yet they were able to mount a challenge in court over their ‘obscenity charges’ for renting this depraved film out, simply because freaks like Futrelle claim it is ‘art’.

    As David Futrelle proudly boasts, this film is even viewable on YouTube.

  7. And here’s an MHRA paedocrite – Christopher Banksi – who appears to be arguing that the age of consent should be at least 20 :

    https://twitter.com/CBBloch/with_replies

    Describes himself as a libertarian and as an anarchist.

    Claims that people are children unti the age of 20 and that sex with children is always wrong.

    Appears also to have the emotional age of a pre-pubescent and an extremely disturbing twitter pic.

  8. Hate these “phile” terms that people came up with because there should be only one. You are a real pedophile who may or may not act on his urges with PRE-pubescent children, or you are a normal sexual male of no particular interest to anybody.

    I know you brought up the age 17 on many occasions, but everyone is thrown under the bus whether the age is 13 or even 18 in some instances (position of power or trust, blah blah)

  9. You’ll love this,

    The company American Apparel launched a new campaign ad called “School Days” featuring adult teen look alike young women

    In the summer of 2014, American Apparel launched the “School Days” ad campaign, which featured photographs of young women posed in a variety of school settings. A particular set of photographs for a mini skirt drew criticism for being “sexist” and “fueling Lolita fantasies” (shown below). On August 8th, The daily Beast published an op-ed piece by senior editor Tim Teeman, who defended the company against the “Lolita” criticisms.

    Like expected fe feminists are up in arms

    http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/aug/10/american-apparel-advert-schoolgirl-fantasies-lolita-inappropriate

  10. And notice Christopher Banski is a big fan of Dizzy Dean’s. I’m not sure, but I think he’s one of those ‘A Voice for Male Students’ freaks.

  11. Antifeminist:
    I think that if anybody is already as already as mentally warped as Futrelle and Pasolini, these kinds of sexually violent films will only give them inspiration for further crimes. Normal men of course don’t react that way.

    It’s the same thing that comes up with violent films in general; every so often some nutjob will commit a mass murder and blame it on some film he saw. Usually he was already planning on a killing spree and the film just gave him an idea on how to go about it.

  12. And notice Christopher Banski is a big fan of Dizzy Dean’s. I’m not sure, but I think he’s one of those ‘A Voice for Male Students’ freaks.

    He was even trying to excuse Futrelle on the grounds that he must have been abused himself as a child (i.e. had sex with a big breasted cougar at 15).

    Don’t worry Christopher, I think it’s obvious to everybody that Futrelle is still a virgin.

  13. The sad part about it is you can’t tell the difference between the Futrelle groupie’s article and what you read on MHRM articles.

  14. That’s some weird stuff. I hate to sound like one of those SRA advocates, but it does make one wonder what kind of twisted stuff they’re doing off-line.

  15. It’s hard to believe that Fat-Troll could stoop to even lower levels of paedocrisy. but he had a post yesterday expressing pious outrage over the murder of two sex workers in Tampa.

    Notice that the victims were 18 and 19; implying they’d been involved in the sex industry prior to their ‘age of majority.’

    Of course, it’s sad that these two girls were murdered, and the paedohysterical media reaction has been appalling. But for Fraudtrelle: who defended depictions of such things in the movie ‘Salo’ and who would gleefully have the clients who patronized these girls arrested, to pompously use the murders as a backhanded way of attacking the Men’s Movement is another new low for him.

    And that goes for his wig-wearing groupies too—who’ve been leaving comments about these girls’ ‘rights to their own bodies’ while wanting to imprison men who would employ them in the exercise of that right.

  16. That’s some weird stuff. I hate to sound like one of those SRA advocates, but it does make one wonder what kind of twisted stuff they’re doing off-line

    I’ll post an article on Fraudtrelle’s groupie shortly, I want to observe how Monsterboobz interacts with him/she/it first.

    For now I’ll just state that this creature is a regular commentator at manboobz.com and whose favourite reading appears to be the likes of stories with titles such as ‘An Interrogation Camp for Girls’.

  17. Moorhead’s a notorious male feminist troll. He sounds like the male feminist version of JeremiahMRA; marathon sessions on the Xbox; jacking off, and then trolling the Manosphere posting about his violent sexual fantasies.

  18. Well, most of you are wrong abut SALO. It’s a great film, a classic of world cinema. It’s difficult stuff, not very enjoyable, and yes, it’s extreme, but in no way is it porn. The “poop” those kids were “literally” forced to eat was chocolate dough. No laws were broken in the making of that film. I realize Futrelle is a piece of crap, but don’t get swept up in a tide of bullshit just because you want to make him look as bad as possible.

  19. @Jerky – what is it with you aspie MHRA child snuff porn apologists? Whatever the merits of the film itself (produced by a convicted paedophile) the point is that Futrelle thinks it should be allowed on sale in gay sex shops. Can you grasp that simple point? In the context of a gay sex shop, it is a gay child porn scat snuff movie, and the perverts renting it out from a sex shop would be fapping away to it in that context. Futrelle was instrumental in getting the reddits ‘jailbait’ and ‘creepshot’ closed down as ‘child porn’ because they shared pictures of fully clothed young teenagers. In his view, such perfectly legal photos become ‘child porn’ when in the context of a ‘sexy’ reddit. Yet images of real naked children being cut open, anally raped, forced to eat shit, remains ‘art’ even when sold in a porn shop.
    Go back to AVfM and do your human rights thing campaigning for women to be locked up for having sex with lucky 17 year old boys, whilst you ban any MRA who questions men being locked up for downloading pics of young looking elves and fairies or for having sex with equally lucky 17 year old sluts.

  20. 😀 LOL…
    Is this guy Jerky LeBoeuf an actual MHRA, or AVFm commentator, or did you just add that because maybe he should be, if he’s not?

Comments are closed.