David Futrelle Humiliated On Al Jazeera
God what a laugh! I watched the momentous live stream debut of David Futrelle on Al Jazeera last night. He’d been invited to participate in a debate on ‘online misogyny’. I spent half an hour watching the ‘debate’ – which so far as I could make out consisted of four feminists bitching about men trying to ‘silence’ women’s voices on the internet, to which the obvious liberal progressive solution was to…well, of course, to silence men’s voices on the internet through yet more hate speech legislation. Four femi-fascists constantly regurgitating the message that women haven’t striven for hundreds of years to win their freedom only for them not to be able to lock up any man who dares to criticise them online. While young girls are beaten or even stoned to death throughout the Arab world for being sexually promiscuous, it’s good to see that western feminists have convinced Al Jazeera that combatting the men’s rights movement is the number 1 priority for the global sisterhood.
And then the Manboobz was finally allowed to stop twiddling his thumbs and make his contribution from the webcam in his basement.
He looked down at his script and delivered one carefully rehearsed line. The presenter stared at his visage for several seconds apparently in a combination of bafflement and revulsion. She didn’t appear to know what to make of him. Perhaps the words ‘Manboobz Meetups’ were hammering away inside of her skull and she was furiously telling herself ‘not going there, not going there, not going there’.
One of the other commentators later unconvincingly remarked that ‘David made an excellent point’, but it was clear that, like myself and probably everybody else, nobody actually knew what that point was.
Al Jazeera then switched to the news headlines. I thought I heard the presenter mention something about continuing the discussion, but I wasn’t sure if she mean’t in their Al Jazeera chatroom or in the studio. Anyway, after another half an hour of waiting I decided that 5 privileged bitches vagina farting at each other wasn’t worth staying up for and I went to bed.
Antifeminist:
I saw the announcement on Manboob’s site this morning—wasn’t sure if it was serious! LOL You know, he actually polled his gaggle of airhead groupies for suggestions on what to lecture the Moslems about concerning ‘misogony’.
This was a train wreck waiting to happen.
I guess the Islamic media is not quite as accomodating to feminist blowhards as ours. It would have been funny though if some interviewer had asked about his past advocacy of child-rape. I’m sure that would have gone over big in Saudi Arabia.
If anything, I’m sure this interview convinced the Islamic leadership more than ever about the decadence of the west. It should give them plenty of propaganda to work with for awhile LOL
Eric
8 Aug 12 at 7:24 am
Interestingly he promises to give us a link to the show yet he has not yet done so. I wonder if he will?
ghostnation
8 Aug 12 at 7:58 am
I think David doesn’t realise that he’s massively out of his depth here. He seems to have lost sight of the obvious fact that he’s been handed his job at Time Magazine as a reward for his campaign to supress the human rights of men, not because of the ‘quality’ of his writing.
I mean look at the quality of this article : http://business.time.com/2012/08/01/is-it-time-for-facebooks-mark-zuckerberg-to-step-aside-as-ceo/
There must be literally thousands of journalism or English literature graduates who could write better than that. Hell, there are writers in the tiny MRM that are far superior to Futrelle (john the other, Paul Elam, W.F. Price, the sadly missed Ferdinand Bardemu). Though at least his finely tuned quote mining skills are being put to good use for Time magazine.
I’ve noticed a spike in traffic from Googlers searching for ‘David Futrelle’ in the last few days, especially from the Middle-East. Yea, I think most muslims would be shocked at Al Jazeera inviting somebody who has pleaded for paedophiles who rape and impregnate underage kids to be spared jail (“we can’t send them all to jail”). The other guests certainly looked uncomfortable in his ‘virtual’ presence.
theantifeminist
8 Aug 12 at 9:06 am
Well put it this way. If he thinks even mentally disturbed Jezebels are going to go with him on a ManBooobz MeetUp on the basis of that performance, he’s deluded.
theantifeminist
8 Aug 12 at 9:08 am
No surprises here. Feminists love censorship. Just think of all the anti-”child pornography” legislation which, instead of actually protecting children below whatever age of sexual maturity from abuse, makes it a crime to jerk off online to pictures of 20-year-old women who just maybe vaguely could be misconstrued as being under the age of 18 (but aren’t). That’s not protection from abuse, it’s plain old censorship. Because dried up middle aged femihags can’t stand the fact that they have lost their physical sexual appeal.
Also, the branding of men’s rights web sites as “hate speech” by pressure groups and “gender equality” NGO’s. The minute somebody comes forward and dispels feminist lies and myths and fights them with fact and reason, all hell breaks loose and feminazis start firebombing. Whereas when you read feminist blogs and web sites, you are in complete disbelief at all the hate speech against men that they feel entitled to.
And that is a theme with feminist extremism, and perhaps “modern” feminism itself. Censorship is their most formidable weapon against anything they see as not being in line with feminazi dogma. Free speech and sexual liberation are only allowed if they don’t violate feminist ideology.
Just how exactly they are going to make the world a better place by keeping men from pleasuring themselves to online porn, and more gravely, denying them their rights to online freedom of speech even if it goes explicitly against feminism and women (again, feminists themselves have no qualms denigrating men online to the utmost) — all these are questions that feminists will never be able to answer in all honesty and based on actual fact.
inclinedreader
8 Aug 12 at 10:25 am
Man, Futrelle really look like a Michael Moor 2.0, even worse, Futrelle’s ego is bigger than Moors’s, this single picture shows why his pictures on internet are from years ago, when he did not have gray hair and was not so fat, you can see the deference in his chin,http://msmagazine.com/blog/wp-content/themes/news_10/images/team/368.jpg
http://money.cnn.com/2002/04/30/technology/techinvestor/futrelle/david_futrelle.01.jpg
The amazing about this is that all MRAs that are not anonymous look pretty good in their age, Bernard Chapin for example looks like he work out and make weightlifting.
MRA
8 Aug 12 at 2:18 pm
Antifeminist:
A lot of the foreign media isn’t as geared to political correctness and cronyism as the US media is. True, they spin things too, but they have a much more discerning and critical audience than Americans, so a level of literary ability actually counts. For example, Price is pretty much dependent on reader contributions and self-publishing even though his writing quality is much higher than Futrelle’s. But it’s doubtful someone like Price could be hired for a magazine like ‘Time’ even to write on topics as harmless as gardening or sports. The media over here maintains unofficial ‘blacklists’ on certain writers (even though they’ll deny this) but anyone who’s ever had any media experience knows it.
Also, guys like Futrelle and Goldweg have connections who can elevate them into ‘expert’ statuses that they don’t deserve. The SPLC is openly considered a ‘resource’ by US federal law enforcement and quoted by the media, even though they’re simply a private group funded by special interests. It’s those interests that make them what they are, nothing else.
Eric
8 Aug 12 at 6:43 pm
But it’s doubtful someone like Price could be hired for a magazine like ‘Time’ even to write on topics as harmless as gardening or sports
time, newsweek, ny times, etc etc have been intelligence-fronts for decades now — no content gets published, and no person hired, who doesnt espouse the goose-stepping hate-platforms of feminism and p.c.
that doesnt mean every employee works for the cia, it means the key postions are spooked, and thus lower (staff) positions are controlled — v carefully indeed
i’m sure not gonna listen to this bulbous coward’s spiel, but the mere image of his horrid mug doubtless left an “impression” on the minds of any viewers not already in lockstep with The Gynogroup
as for al-jazeera, i was unaware they were also feminist mouthpieces, but it illustrates that the gynogulag is by no means an amerikan, nor even western, phenomena, and that the “progressive improvement” is scheduled for global hegemony
ray
8 Aug 12 at 8:25 pm
Antifeminist:
There does seem to be a definite disconnect from reality around Futrelle. The fact that he actually polled his dunderheaded groupies for presentation material illustrates that. I think he’s reached the point that a lot of these frauds do: he’s start to believe his own BS.
‘The interviewers looked uncomfortable is his virtual presence.’
Another example of that dissociation from reality. It’s amazing how non-feminist women instinctively sense— and are repelled by— creepy, dysfunctional males. Just the opposite is true in feminist cultures.
I’m certain that quite a few Middle Eastern women watched the interview and were presented with a specimen of what feminist women end up with for males. That should help stop the spread of feminism in the Middle East, which is mostly being imposed by Hillary Clinton at the point of a bayonet, anyway.
Eric
8 Aug 12 at 10:38 pm
Eric,
You know speaking of ol’ Hillary, I have this theory about her and her feminazism: In this part of the world at least (outside the US), we didn’t hear much about her until the huge controversy and continuing (up to this day still) saga of husband Bill’s infidelity with the most infamous slut of all time: Monica Lewinski (sp?).
I think her misandry is simply an unrelenting act of revenge against not only poor old Billy, but she ‘knows’ that ALL men are the same Alpha males and ALL of us want to have extra-marital sex; therefore ALL men must pay!
So she applies full throttle to the paedohysteria fan, pulls all the strings to give men 50 to 500 years in prison for looking at pictures of sexy, fully clothed 17 year old children posing, introduces IMBRA, gives family courts ruthless rights to take everything from men including their kids (forever), inflates the definition of words such as rape, DV, child abuse etc. ad infinitum..
If we could somehow silence her or remove her influential powers within the US goverment and for that matter the UN, but do it very publicly and humiliatingly, they might lose a lot of their kick.
When you analyse it all properly, you find that there are relatively speaking, only a small few that are doing all of the damage.
Forget about all of their mono-cell brained half-wits (typically found commenting on Fattroll’s bog, oops blog); that worship her and the handfull of other leading feminazi gendercide advocates; topple the big trees first and all the little ones will just dry up and disappear after being fully exposed and unshielded due to the absence of the shade the big trees were for so long, casting over them…
We’re wasting our time trying to talk any sense into any of the 99% of the indoctrinated sheeple – that’s akin to talking sense into one of Fattrolls (many) inflatable love-dolls anyway, so concentrate on publicly exposing and embarrassing the likes of Hillary, the grotesque Jessica Valenti, Harriet Harman (UK) and (the late) Dworkin types at the very top of the pyramid…
Alan Vaughn
9 Aug 12 at 1:20 am
Alan:
Leaving aside the foreign-policy issues involved, Hillary’s attitude towards Mubarak, Qaddafi, and Assad seems to be something on the level of a personal vendetta. I tend to think she’s projecting some of her vengeance against Willie on to these Arab chieftains, because she doesn’t seem concerned about what happens to those countries after the leaders are dead.
American social engineers have been trying to impose feminism in Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt, and Libya and are meeting with considerable resistance from both genders.
Actually most of the feminists who come from the Middle East (and also Latin America and Asia) were educated in the Anglosphere and do most of their speaking here, because they find no support among women in their own countries.
Eric
9 Aug 12 at 2:28 am
Antifeminist:
On the subject of Google searches for Futrelle, it might be interesting to see what the Middle Eastern media has to say over the next few days, once they start looking into some of his past statements and activities LOL.
Eric
9 Aug 12 at 3:04 am
Yes I know enough about Asia and the women there to know that any of theose ideologues trying to drum the feminist mantra would often be about as popular as a pork chop in a sinagogue…
They are very traditional family oriented people and see no reason why anything that has worked so well for 100′s or even 1000′s of years needs to be changed.
And they LOVE men, especially foreign men and even criticising them, let alone stigmatizing and demonizing them is something totally abhorent to them!
They would see that as an affront to their culture!
Alan Vaughn
9 Aug 12 at 4:10 am
And given that studies suggest the obvious – that legalizing the viewing of child porn would actually prevent real abuse – those feminists should be arrested for child endangerment or for causing the sexual abuse of children. Especially with regard to their criminalization of ‘virtual’ child porn which has no possible victims outside of the diseased psychopathically jealous minds of the sexual trade union.
http://blog.chron.com/momhouston/2010/12/researchers-find-legalizing-child-porn-may-lead-to-fewer-rates-of-child-sex-abuse/
theantifeminist
9 Aug 12 at 6:22 am
Notice that ManBoobz appears to have backtracked on his promise to upload a YouTube video of the debate. He’s also admitted that his appearance was ‘very brief’.
You can say that again Fraudtrelle. You may as well have just waved at your webcam during your 5 seconds of fame screaming ‘look mom, I’m on TV!’
theantifeminist
9 Aug 12 at 6:25 am
Have you read the book “Harmful to Minors”? It’s said to be a good read, I’ve been wanting to read it some time but haven’t had the time to order it:
http://www.amazon.com/Harmful-Minors-Perils-Protecting-Children/dp/B005UVULC6/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1344508942&sr=8-1&keywords=harmful+to+minors
It deals with the perils of overprotecting young people from normal sexual behavior, and is a scathing indictment of neo-puritannical attitudes. It seems to focus more on the Christian Right’s war on teen sex, but as we all know, where the Christian Right robs citizens of their basic sexual rights, feminists often aren’t far behind.
What’s ironic (or maybe that’s the wrong word) is that this book caused a stir in the U.S. in the early 2000s, but its message is just now gaining importance in Europe as young people are increasingly being hit with draconian anti-sex legislation modeled directly on American law.
inclinedreader
9 Aug 12 at 10:49 am
Antifeminist:
LOL, Futrelle rather sheepishly finally posted his Youtube video. His article on Manboobz is noticably short on his usual self-promotion. ‘I’m only in it for a brief clip…’ and ‘the production equiptment wasn’t that good…’ LOL What a loser.
To deflect attention from his abysmal performance, he’s quotemined some of the Youtube comments and has his groupies laughing over those instead.
Eric
9 Aug 12 at 8:35 pm
“Have you read the book “Harmful to Minors”? It’s said to be a good read, I’ve been wanting to read it some time but haven’t had the time to order it:”
Yea, I read it a couple of months ago for the first time. The first half of the book is excellent, the second half is mostly feminism.
She does acknowledge the role that a ‘rump’ of sex negative feminists have played in the generation of paedohysteria.
This is actually quite an admission, as most ‘sex positive’ liberal American writers seem to ignore completely the role that feminists are playing – for example, Marty Klein.
The widespread belief that the ‘Christian right’ are behind paedohysteria, and the war on male sexuality in general, in America, explains the lack of sympathy for this site and its message amongst most American MRAs.
Of course, the real situation is not so simple. Feminists are very busy working in lobby groups to promote ever more ‘child protection’ laws (and more obviously, anti-prostitution/anti-porn legislation).
I think what happens is that when it comes to passing the legislation, American politicians need to trumpet the religious and family values angle (and remember also that there is far less actual female representation in American elected office than compared with Europe) .
Secondly, because of the religious right in the US, there is less need for feminists to shore up the free sexual market (I consider right-wing femiservatives to be just as much part of the sexual trade union as are left-wing feminists).
Back to Judith Levine – it goes without saying that only a woman could have written such a book as that in America.
It’s also rather out of date now, illustrative of how Europe has ‘caught up’ with America in attitudes to teen sex and paedohysteira. For example, she praises the Netherlands for having an age of consent of 12 (with sensible safe guards). SInce the publication of the book, in the space of just a decade, the Netherlands has become one of the most paedohysteric nations on Earth. The age of consent is now 16 and it is a serious criminal offence to fail to report suspicions of an adult having sex with a 15 year old. There are a number of Dutch websites devoted to publishing the names of registered sex offenders (always men who had sex with willing teenage girls) and openly encouraging vigilante violence against them.
http://www.rnw.nl/english/article/dutch-vigilantes-follow-american-way
They recently outlawed an organization that simply wanted to restore the laws as they were just 10 years ago.
And they are in the process of raising the minimum age of prositution to 21.
The Netherlands proves that you don’t need religion to turn an educated ‘liberal’ 21st century society insane – just feminism.
theantifeminist
10 Aug 12 at 9:10 pm
Here’s the clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LDK09vhtfI
The Great David Boobs
11 Aug 12 at 6:30 am
Antifeminist:
I think a part of the problem in America is that people here tend to think in simplistic terms. For example, many Socon women don’t believe themselves feminists because they oppose things like abortion. But most Socon women hate men just as much as feminists do (although they’re more patronizing than hostile to men) and fully support the sexual trade union’s basic principles. Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton are really not that far apart as they might seem on the surface.
The same is true with the MRM over here. A lot of American MRAs seem to see Social Conservatism as a compromise position in the gender conflict. If they think that this is a viable strategy, they are deluding themselves. Feminists are all about gender supremacy and they don’t care what political, social, or religious movements they employ to achieve their ends.
The Socon movement itself, politically, is top-heavy with White Knights and paedohysteria. In a lot of ways, I think Socon feminism is actually worse, because it presents a counterfeit femininity to men as an alternative to the openly hostile Radfems.
Eric
11 Aug 12 at 8:48 am
‘The widespread belief that the Christian right is behind the paedohysteria and the war on male sexuality in general in America explains the lack of sympathy for this site and the message it contains.’
I’ve been giving this issue a lot of thought lately. Besides the wider issue that you mentioned, I think there are two other tendencies involved:
1. As Alan pointed out earlier, the more ‘mainstream’ MRA sites are mostly divorced fathers who’ve been victimized (or still involved with) the draconian system. Probably a lot of these guys are scared out their wits about really hitting the issues like paedohysteria head-on for fear that such public statements could be used against them in court in custody or visitation disputes, &c.
2. Also, for the same reasons as point 1, I think that the Eivand Berge Case caused a lot of them to have ‘nightmares’ of themselves in Eivand’s shoes.
Regardless, these guys are not going to win any favors from the gender supremacists by trying to appease and act nice to them.
I think that right now the MRM is going through another transitional phase. The mainstreaming tendencies in America are going to drive away a lot of MRAs and new sites will pick up the slack again.
Eric
12 Aug 12 at 2:54 am
Antifeminist:
LOL, I see our friend Manboob is at it again. After his humiliation in front of the entire Islamic world, he’s jumped on some commenter at Reddit who’d dared complain about Futrelle’s SPLC ties. Futrelle points out that there are plenty of racists who do post at Reddit.
I wonder why it never dawned on this dickhead that Al-Jazeera itself isn’t exactly known for its ethnic tolerance either. In fact, the Arab media has a long history of holding up people like Futrelle as examples of western decadence. They frequently broadcast US television programs with exactly that spin on what’s being portrayed.
Eric
14 Aug 12 at 5:13 am
I doubt if Futrelle has much of a conscience, but perhaps it’s dawning on him that his roping in of the SLPC in his campaigin against the MRM is only going to serve to discredit that formerly proud human rights organization.
I guess everybody has seen this : http://www.the-spearhead.com/2012/08/10/manboobz-david-futrelle-appears-on-tv/
Looks like W.F.Price is also turning up the heat on Fraudtrelle!
Actually, the photo is probably a slight improvement on the real Manboobz!
Did anyone else notice the carefully positioned ‘props’ that Fraudtrelle had on his wall behind his webcam?
http://theantifeminist.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/david-futrelle-aj-1.jpg
I wonder if they’ve led to any ‘meet ups’ for him after a webcam chat session?
theantifeminist
14 Aug 12 at 6:13 am
The ‘props’ were interesting LOL. Welmer also noted that Futrelle was complaining about ‘hate speech’ on the Internet a lot. This seems to be a crusade for him now.
I haven’t been able to find out much about his henchman at SPLC, Arthur Goldweg. AVfM ran an article about him a few months ago. He seems to be some pipsqueak writer who’s using Futrelle to gain ‘access’ to the higher circles. He published a book on Jewish mysticism once and somehow has become some ‘authority’ on conspiracy theories, or at least that’s how he portrays himself.
The SPLC once did really good work as a watchdog agency. They’re mostly known for focusing on white supremacist and neo-nazi groups, but they also went after militant blacks and radical Islamic groups. Their failure to recognize radical feminism as gender supremacy and a hate group, and demonizing is going to bring them into discredit.
Eric
14 Aug 12 at 8:14 am
The founder, Morris Dees, is also an alledged paedophile who interfered with his own underage daughter.
http://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2009/06/23/morris-dees-pathological-narcissist-and-ultra-creep/
I would normally discount allegations from bitter ex-wives, but it does seem incredible that the SLPC would put ‘the false rape society’ on their hate list if it was indeed a false allegation. Plus the fact that it is becoming obvious that most manginas/male feminists are clearly paedophiles.
theantifeminist
14 Aug 12 at 8:33 am
Antifeminist:
I suspect there’s a psychosexual component to a lot of these male feminists. It would be a perfect disguise for a male pervert to associate and sympathise with women who don’t like men—if that particular male was trying to divert suspicion away from his own lack of healthy sexual inclinations.
Eric
14 Aug 12 at 8:52 am
He published a book on Jewish mysticism once and somehow has become some ‘authority’ on conspiracy theories, or at least that’s how he portrays himself.
he’s a kabbalist
kabbala is intimately connected to feminism/matriarchy, both ancient and modern — it’s concerned with antipodal magick, ie, the manipulation of the male and female as the primary carriers of the opposites (duality) on the planet . . . and of course, the inversion of femininity and masculinty (ie modern feminism)
in the past century kabbala played a HUGE role in the destruction of masculinity and the supremacy of the feminine (eg Madonna is a recent celebrity convert, so, that tells ya)
kabbala is a perversion of the original hebrew scriptures (the torah, the first few books of the bible)… and it’s all Downhill from there, into mysticism and demonism and humanism
it’s too complex a subject to deal with here, but goldwag’s involvement in kabbala is not coincidental, be certain of that
The SPLC once did really good work as a watchdog agency.
not that i’ve ever seen via research
they started up in, as i recall, about 1971 or 1972 — i was in the military then, and the REAL “civil rights movement” was already OVER by that time . . . except, of course, for the “add-ons” of the succeeding 40 years. . . the full PC gynogulag
after the actual work was done, the SPLC formed to rake in the (millions of dollars) of donations from limosine lefties and their cowardly white-male guilt-a-thon
the SPLC is a government-front for the american LE complex, that identifies “dissidents” for the PC-matriarchy, so that when the dissidents are later taken down, everyone will clap and feel good about themselves
cheers
ray
14 Aug 12 at 6:38 pm
Antifeminst;
Here’s another blogger who’s been turning up the heat on Futrelle:
http://www.counterfem.blogspot.com
His article a few days ago on ‘Girl-Writes-What’ exposed some of Futrelle’s shenanigans on pro-MRA Youtube sites. Futrelle actually posted three outraged comments on that thread.
The blog is operated by Fidelbogen: he’s the same who had the ‘Gynocentrism Theory’ blog a couple of years ago.
Eric
22 Aug 12 at 2:35 am
[...] If they really want to get young people on board, I think Futrelle should start posting YouTube videos of himself talking about how he’s a sex-positive male [...]
What Does Feminism Look Like on YouTube? - The Spearhead
11 Dec 12 at 7:40 pm