DAVID FUTRELLE – Child Abuse Apologist

david-futrelle-torture
*EXTREME TRIGGER WARNINGS - This article describes David Futrelle and his sickening history of defending child abuse. Multiple child abuse trigger warnings are in place. You have been trigger warned.

**UPDATED - DAVID FUTRELLE THINKS A MOVIE DEPICTING NAKED 14 YEAR OLD BOYS EATING SHIT AND BEING TORTURED IS 'CLASSIC' AND CAN BE RENTED OUT IN GAY SEX SHOPS http://theantifeminist.com/monsterboobz-david-futrelle-disturbing-defence-film-sexual-abuse-torture-children/

david futrelle
Any Ladies Fancy A ManBoobz Meet Up With This?

Summary - The Worst of David Futrelle

  • Spent much of his early career as af child sex abuse denier and apologist.
  • Continues to maintain that naked 14 year old boys eating shit on film can be 'classic' art.
  • Argues that the innocence of female victims of abuse is 'exaggerated'.
  • Discussed whether adults who rape and impregnate kids should marry their victims instead of being sent to prison.
  • Repeatedly denied the reality of the wide-scale sexual abuse of children.
  • Claimed that child welfare should not be a political issue.
  • Thinks pederasts fantasising about violently assaulting boys is 'tender' and 'erotic'.
  • Thinks films depicting naked children being violently abused can be sold in gay sex shops
  • Claims no sexual difference between a 5 year old and a 17 year old - boy or girl.
  • Discussed whether criticisim of abortion should be criminalized as hate speech.
  • Uses pro-abortion logic on toddlers and small children.
  • Successor of Kyle Payne, the male feminist blogger jailed for rape and child porn offences.
  • Boasts of handing out condoms and lube to teenagers and offering to teach them good sex.
  • Organizes 'Meet-Ups' with female readers of his blog - at least one of whom is a child.
  • Admitted to fantasising about an adult celebrity dressed up as a small child
  • Pleaded for an end to the regulation of internet pornography newsgroups, fearing mass arrests...in the late 1990's, when such groups were infamous and the internet was known as the 'Wild West'
  • Implied that the raising of the age of consent from 12 to 16 and the criminalization of child prostitution was motivated merely by the prudish desire of Victorian suffragettes to 'control the sexual behaviour of young girls'.
  • Claimed that we all secretly get a thrill out of the desire to torture and even murder others - in the same year that he vented his fury at the police for removing a film depicting child torture and murder from a gay sex shop
  • Worked alongside notorious statutory rape apologist Judith Levine - one of his articles is even referenced in her most infamous work which demands that the age of consent be abolished ('Harmful to Minors')
  • In a chilling act of cold-blooded manipulation, Futrelle quickly linked the tragic murders of young men and women by the psychopath Elliot Rodger to the men's rights movement, knowing it would boost his hit count, and then took advantage of the increased traffic to launch his 'ManBoobz donation drive'.

See also 'David Futrelle and his disturbing defence of the renting in a gay sex shop of a notorious film depicting the graphic sexual abuse, torture, and murder of naked children' :

http://theantifeminist.com/monsterboobz-david-futrelle-disturbing-defence-film-sexual-abuse-torture-children/

David Futrelle
A collection of cells

David Futrelle Mangina 2

58 thoughts on “DAVID FUTRELLE – Child Abuse Apologist

  1. I'm not even going to get into all the errors and distortions here, but ...

    the "boy" in the book review is some guy hanging out in a BAR, you know, a place that serves booze; he's not a child.

    And in what article exactly did I suggest that discussing the ethics of abortion was hate speech? URL please.

  2. theantifeminist

    Post author

    So you're saying that underage boys are fair meat for biting and rape, so long as they are being served alcohol illegally?

    We all know what age group 'boy' refers to.

    You can look your own essay up, but to help it was in the one on the Unabomber.

  3. evilwhitemalempire

    "I’m not even going to get into all the ERRORS AND DISTORTIONS here, but …

    the “GIRL” in the book review is some WOMAN hanging out in a BAR, you know, a place that serves booze; SHE'S not a child."

    I wonder how far a line like that might help Mr. Futrelle if he's arrested someday for unknowingly picking up an underage girl?

  4. theantifeminist

    Post author

    “I’m not even going to get into all the ERRORS AND DISTORTIONS here, but …

    the “GIRL” in the book review is some WOMAN hanging out in a BAR, you know, a place that serves booze; SHE’S not a child.”

    I wonder how far a line like that might help Mr. Futrelle if he’s arrested someday for unknowingly picking up an underage girl?

    Probably zero, but if he ever gets his teeth into an underage boy, I'm sure his feminist white knighting and paedohysterics will keep him out of jail - just as it did for Mark Foley.

  5. theantifeminist

    Post author

    I'm not going to quote the same passage again, but it seems we're reading it completely different ways. To me 'therefore no surprise' means b follows from a. And the passage you quoted appears to me to be ambiguous. I'm not exactly sure what he's saying.

    I'll agree, though, that Futrelle was a much better writer back in the 90's. What the hell has happened to him? I would quite enjoy debating the issues here with him, why does he use the shaming language of a 9 year old? Perhaps he's old and senile, and that's why he hasn't written much for the last 15 years and decided now to spend his retirement mocking the men's rights movement as a full time hobby?

  6. theantifeminist

    Post author

    Haha, agreed.

    Funny how the Daily Mail thinks men who admit that teenagers are sexy are perverts, yet claiming that Vorderman looks like a teenager is clearly a huge compliment.

  7. Snark

    The Daily Mail also provides plenty of 16 and 17-year old eye candy for its readers' entertainment, so it can shut the fuck up.

  8. Tina

    Sex actually is a decision that can cause life changing effects like a child or and std that can kill you. Those under 18 cannot rent and apartment or sign legal contracts, those under 16 cannot work a job that pays bills for a household. I wonder if those that think the age of consent should be lowered also believe other rights given to those older should be lowered as well, like the right to vote, drinking, signing up for the armed services, or if the age of consent is lowered and those things are not changed, what responsibilities should be put legally on a much older person having sex with one much younger if pregnancy or std's happen?

  9. theantifeminist

    Post author

    Well if you read my blog I've repeatedly stated that as far as sex with teenagers is concerned, age of consent/statutory rape laws should largely be replaced with age of impregnation laws.

    A sensible, experienced older partner is more likely to know how to use proper contraception that reduce the chances of stds or pregnancy to near zero. If these were the reason you and/or feminists objected to younger females having sex, you would be encouraging older men to seek sex (with precautions) with teenage girls (who will have sex regardless) instead of creating inhumane and draconian laws.

    Is it merely co-incidence that America has the highest age of consent in the world and also the highest teen pregnancy rate in the world? Japan has one of the lowest age of consents and the lowest teen pregnancy rate (8 times lower than America's). This correlation between age of consent and teen pregnancy/std rates is found throughout the world.

    Furthermore, thanks to feminism, a 16 year old girl who gets pregnant can have an abortion at the drop of a hat. So really, your argument is completely invalid as regards 'having a child'.

    However, I do agree that older men should face legal consequences if they recklessly impregnate or give stds to a young teenage girl. I've stated that belief many times.

    I find it quite offensive your absurd attempt to equate a girl having sex to a boy being put on the frontline and being asked to sacrifice his life for his country.

    I assume that if and when (likely very soon) that teenage girls can have sex with effectively zero risk of std's or pregnancy (which is already the case if a guy simply wears a condom) your objections to a lower age of consent would vanish? Actually, I assume that they wouldn't. But I hope you can accept that these objections do not apply to cyber sex?

    Your analogies are completely invalid. The reason under 16's cannont rent apartments is because they are deemed to be too immature to live independently from their parents. Actually, as many 15 year olds probably could live independently, the reason is probably more as a safeguard to stop parents ejecting their teenage children out into the street. It doesn't particularly have anything to do with teenagers being unable to understand the implications of a legal contract.

    Sounds like you would like adults to sign contracts every time they went to bed with somebody? Actually, you'd probably be furious if a government ordered that you personally had to sign a contract every time you had sex. What is your view on casual sex, btw?

    Choosing which university to go to and which subject to study is a life defining decision. A thousand times more so than the decision whether to have sex with somebody. Yet teenagers have to make that choice usually at 16 or 17.

    Personally I think the voting age should be higher than the age of consent. The idea that going to bed with somebody is more complex than the experience, wisdom and education required to understand global and national politics is entirely consistant with brood mare psychology but quite offensive and absurd. And are you really suggesting that a 16 year old girl is more at risk of dying from having sex than a 16 year old boy is from volunteering to fight the taliban in Afghanistan???

    However, giving the vote to 16 or 14 year olds would make it more difficult for older feminists to exploit younger girls and restrict their sexuality for their own selfish ends. For that reason, I would support lowering the voting age, or at least give young teenagers the chance to vote on sexual leglislation that effects them - as a way of preventing feminist child exploitation and abuse.

    Do you accept that Austrian 16 year olds should have the right to do whatever they want with their bodies, given that they can vote in national elections from that age?

  10. eks

    "Furthermore, thanks to feminism, a 16 year old girl who gets pregnant can have an abortion at the drop of a hat."

    What is wrong with being able to get an abortion when needed? Once a girl or woman finds out she is pregnant, and does not want to have (I mean carry and give birth to, not raise) that baby, having an abortion sooner than later is of the utmost importance if you ask me. If the woman/girl wanted an abortion, wouldn't you be in favor of aborting a cluster of cells, an embryo (or as close as you could get to that stage) instead of waiting until later when the embryo was closer to being a fetus? I believe it is good that we can react so quickly, and do believe there should be a shorter time in which a woman can have an abortion.

    However, whoever compared having an abortion to buying a couch is insane. I do not agree with them. The decision to have an abortion is NOT made at "the drop of a hat," and IS FAR FROM EASY. A friend of mine had to make that decision, and I saw what the debate did to her, emotionally. She did NOT decide at the drop of a hat. However, I believe that having that decision, regardless of what she chose, was important to her. I do not think it should be a political debate, I do not think that extreme feminists (there are feminists who are pro-life, you know) OR anyone on the other side of the spectrum who will not give a woman that option should shut up. It is THE WOMAN'S CHOICE, it is her womb (the man should have a say in it too, unless he raped her or left her after impregnating her) and no one should determine that for her, regardless of moral or religious opinions. They make it sound like she just "felt like" getting an abortion, or that she played eenie-meenie-miney-moe with her two options and didn't give abortion a second thought. Let the woman who is pregnant have that choice. It is not an easy one, but it IS her choice.

    "A sensible, experienced older partner is more likely to know how to use proper contraception that reduce the chances of stds or pregnancy to near zero. If these were the reason you and/or feminists objected to younger females having sex, you would be encouraging older men to seek sex (with precautions) with teenage girls (who will have sex regardless) instead of creating inhumane and draconian laws."

    Yes, perhaps a "sensible, experienced" older partner is more likely to know how to use contraception, but that does not mean that feminists would be encouraging older men to have sex with teenage girls. And how dare you say that teenage girls will have sex regardless of proper precautions! All teenage girls do NOT have sex whenever they feel like it, with whoever comes their way. You are generalizing far too much, and I think if you want to write about pressing issues like these, you should think more about how you sound and the assumptions you are making.

  11. eks

    I also have to say that I'm really appalled by your ignorance. There are different types of Feminism, and there are Feminists who have different views on different subjects. You made another bogus assumption about teenage girls having sex regardless of precautions or who they are having sex with. Seriously, stop making assumptions, it is offensive.

    "The rancid interior of some Feminist pussy"? Again, offensive. It's not a pussy. It is a vagina, and mine smells like daffodils.

  12. theantifeminist

    Post author

    What is wrong with being able to get an abortion when needed?

    A lot of things, given that the greatest moral philospher of the last century debunked every single feminist argument for abortion and can only justify it on the basis of allowing infantacide as well. Anyway, the point made was in response to your claim that a teenage girl having sex was a life and death decision because she might become pregnant. Please try to stay relevant if you want to debate with me.

    And isn't the decision to kill your unborn child a life defining descision for a young girl? You agree it's a greater moral matter than buying a couch at IKEA but apparently less than the decision to drop your panties.

    Yes, perhaps a “sensible, experienced” older partner is more likely to know how to use contraception, but that does not mean that feminists would be encouraging older men to have sex with teenage girls

    Yes it does if your objection to men having sex with girls is the possibility that they might become pregnant or catch an STD. But of course, your objection is that allowing men to have sex with young females is that it would put older women such as yourself at a huge disadvantage in a free sexual market. And that argument does not have any logical or objective moral justification. Allowing white women to have sex with black men puts me (as a white man) at a huge disadvantage in a multi-cultural city. That fact has NO BEARING WHATSOEVER on the morality of white women having sex with black men.

    It's also funny that you claim that teenage girls should 'have the choice' to kill their unborn child, and who the hell am I to tell them otherwise, but you see no inconsistancy in telling those same girls what they can't do with their own bodies, and are happy to restrict their choice of sexual partner.

  13. evilwhitemalempire

    "It is THE WOMAN’S CHOICE, it is her womb"
    It's also the man's sperm and the child's life.
    Funny that a woman can kill her child if she wants to while the guy who knocked her up pays child support whether he wants to or not.

    "You are generalizing far too much, and I think if you want to write about pressing issues like these, you should think more about how you sound and the assumptions you are making."
    Is this a threat?

  14. evilwhitemalempire

    "There are different types of Feminism, and there are Feminists who have different views on different subjects."
    I get it!
    Sort of like the way the KKK and neonazis don't always agree with one another.

  15. Snark

    eks, if women are so easily "offended" in conversation, why do you think they are capable of debate at the same level as men?

  16. eks

    Women easily offended? There are men who read things like this who are offended by this. And just because one woman is offended by this does not make every single woman offended by the points brought up. Also, being offended does not make me cry and go into a corner, it only gets me more fired up and ready to debate. Again, generalizations...

  17. eks

    If you read a little further, evilwhitemaleempire, you will see that I said "(the man should have a say in it too, unless he raped her or left her after impregnating her)."

    And of course it's not a threat. I simply said that the author should think before writing assumptions as if they were facts. I'm not sure where you read that as a "threat."

  18. eks

    "Older women" like me? I am 19 years old. You are really proving to be bad at this whole assumption game.

    I really don't care what the greatest moral philosopher said about abortion. I don't care what feminists have to say about abortion. I don't see why anyone but the woman (and her husband) have to decide what to do about abortion.

    Also, your response to my argument about feminists being ok with sensible, responsible older men is confusing. Could you explain it a bit further?

  19. eks

    wow, comparing me to neonazis and the KKK? that's how you "debate?"

    and no, of course we don't need laws against this. There are men who read things like this who are offended by this. And just because one woman is offended by this does not make every single woman offended by the points brought up. Also, being offended does not make me cry and go into a corner, it only gets me more fired up and ready to debate. Again, generalizations…

  20. evilwhitemalempire

    "that’s how you “debate?”"
    No.
    There is no debate.
    Feminism is selfish and wrong.
    It's that simple.

  21. Snark

    It is a generalisation because feminist women ALWAYS pull the 'offended' card when they see something contrary to their (misandrist, predatory, sexual) interests.

    This has been observed by myself and others.

    We have observed it happening many times.

    We also observe that they are not really 'offended', it is all about control. Oh, the princesses might be shocked that somebody actually has the gall to disagree with Her Objective Righteousness. But it is entirely about controlling the situation.

    We have observed all this, and have observed that it happens like clockwork.

    Hence, yes, it is a generalisation - because generally speaking, it happens.

    I will ask you to explain why this is necessarily a bad thing.

  22. namae nanka

    "What is wrong with being able to get an abortion when needed? "

    Indeed, you should be asking what is wrong with abortion?

    "Once a girl or woman finds out she is pregnant, and does not want to have (I mean carry and give birth to, not raise) that baby, having an abortion sooner than later is of the utmost importance if you ask me"

    And no one's asking you.

    " If the woman/girl wanted an abortion, wouldn’t you be in favor of aborting a cluster of cells, an embryo (or as close as you could get to that stage) instead of waiting until later when the embryo was closer to being a fetus? "

    Of course killing a cockroach is less messy than killing a lizard.
    Also dumping an infant's body is much easier than an adult's.

    "The decision to have an abortion is NOT made at “the drop of a hat,” and IS FAR FROM EASY."

    You probably haven't seen women haggling in shops.
    Even murderers don't make the decision to kill someone at the drop of a hat, should we care for their internal monologues outside of hollywood?

    " Let the woman who is pregnant have that choice. It is not an easy one, but it IS her choice."

    It ISN'T.

  23. eks

    "Even murderers don’t make the decision to kill someone at the drop of a hat"
    Stop generalizing. There are different types of murders, there's the crime committed within seconds (someone flew into rage, went too far, and killed someone), and then there's pre-meditated murder, which you are talking about when you say "even murderers" don't make that decision quickly.

    And if you are angry about women comparing abortions to making decisions on furniture at Ikea (which I am also angry about), then I'm not sure why you're comparing it to haggling in shops. It's beginning to sound like you are anti-woman, not only anti-feminist, and I don't think that's what you're trying to convey.

    If we are all debating about abortion, and none of us can seem to find something that we all agree on, then what is the use for this debate? It seems like it's not so much a debate as it is an argument... I'm sure we could find some common ground.

  24. theantifeminist

    Post author

    what are you talking about? What assumption did I make about 'about teenage girls having sex regardless of precautions or who they are having sex with'. The point I made was that teenage girls will always have sex in a society like ours, so if STDs and pregnancy are your concern, they should be encouraged to choose older, more sensible sexual partners. Look at the results of the abstinance movement. Even in Islamic shitholes where young girls are stoned to death or murdered for having sex it still doesn't stop them from screwing.

    And where the hell are all of these feminists who are pro-male sexuality? If there are any they are clearly insignificant.

    I'll make offensive remarks regarding dispicable manginas who make a full time occupation of mocking the men's rights movement. If you don't like it you can fuck off.

  25. eks

    t is necessarily a bad thing because I am not a feminist, but you are making me out to be one. I understand that there are some extreme feminists, and that they have bad ideas and act very selfishly, but just because I am a woman and playing devil's-advocate on this blog (because it seems pretty one-sided to me), you decide to label me as a feminist? And more than that, you attack me as if I were what you consider all feminists to be: old, angry women who don't enjoy sex, who hate pornography and revel in forcing teenage girls to get abortions they don't want? I am a 19 year old woman, I don't agree with what those Feminists think, I don't agree with what most feminists say, but because I am here debating this issue and because I am a woman, you label me.

    That's why it's a bad thing.

  26. eks

    “A sensible, experienced older partner... you would be encouraging older men to seek sex (with precautions) with teenage girls (who will have sex regardless) instead of creating inhumane and draconian laws.”

    Right there, in the second parentheses.

    Again, I will say that I am not a Feminist, but it seems that because I am playing devil's advocate in these debates, and because I am a woman, that you are labeling me as one. I am not mocking the men's rights movement, and never agreed with anyone who is or was. So I will not fuck off.

  27. theantifeminist

    Post author

    Teenage girls will have sex regardless, for the empirically supported reasons I just gave.

    I don't care if you define yourself as a feminist or not, not many women do these days. If your support abortion on demand and the restriction of teenage girl's sexuality, then those are core feminist beliefs - anything in the reproductive interests of ordinary women. You are a feminist.

  28. eks

    No, I am not. I think I know better than anyone what I am, and you are in no place to tell me so. I am an "ordinary woman," why should I have to be a Feminist to be concerned about my reproductive interests?

    It also doesn't matter how many "empirically supported" reasons you give, you are not a teenage girl and never have been. No matter what believe, you can't pull stuff out of your ass and tell people they are facts. That is not true, and you have to shut up and stop pretending like everything you say is fact. Yes, you do have many valid points and are able to eloquently defend your points and I will acknowledge that, but this is just not one of them. I study Sociology, and minor in Women and Gender Studies. I am also a young woman, and I think I know better than you what the majority of my age/sex group do with their bodies.

  29. eks

    I also never advocated the restriction of teenage girls' sexuality. Please find the quote where I said that.

  30. namae nanka

    "Stop generalizing. There are different types of murders, there’s the crime committed within seconds (someone flew into rage, went too far, and killed someone), and then there’s pre-meditated murder, which you are talking about when you say “even murderers” don’t make that decision quickly."

    haha are you seriously dumb? You think that I didn't think of that? "Stop generalizing" - what were you doing extrapolating your friend's mental gymnastics to millions of abortions that have taken place?

    "And if you are angry about women comparing abortions to making decisions on furniture at Ikea (which I am also angry about), then I’m not sure why you’re comparing it to haggling in shops."

    Different cultures.

    "It’s beginning to sound like you are anti-woman, not only anti-feminist, and I don’t think that’s what you’re trying to convey."

    I am anti-woman, but not for the whole society. I am anti-feminist, for the whole society. Let's leave your assumptions at that.

    "If we are all debating about abortion, and none of us can seem to find something that we all agree on, then what is the use for this debate? It seems like it’s not so much a debate as it is an argument… I’m sure we could find some common ground."

    Hegelian dialect is wonderful, isn't it? I hope that someday you see the futility of it. Like when someone starts to justify rape and tells you that you can find common ground with him or her(see ma no sexist).

  31. Eric

    When it comes to motherhood, the typical response of an American female is: 'Choose to abort, or sue for support!'. If they do the latter, of course, that also means dumping the kid in daycare centers. In America today, most preganancies end in abortion and most children are born out of wedlock or living in single-parent homes.

    The real issue here is that American women are simply unfit for motherhood; and the best way for men to address the issue is stop getting them pregnant in the first place. It's a main reason why I dropped out of the American relationship scene altogether, as an increasing number of men are doing.

  32. The Highwayman

    This is old news but it still might interest you:

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/caitlin_moran/article1072677.ece

    Here we have feminist Caitlin Moran ADVOCATING sex selective abortions on the grounds that the abortion of baby girls will increase women's sexual market value. Consider this quote from the article here:

    QUOTE: "Consider, now, if there were a two-year waiting list for Indian women. Those 1000 men would soon be duking it out for those 793 ladies. Indeed, it may well be that, in order to get married, dowries would have to be paid to the bride’s family, just to interest her in a man.

    On finally getting his $80,000 woman, the man would then be doing the marital equivalent of polishing his wife every night with protective dubbin, and putting her on a special peg in the hallway." END QUOTE

    If this is not a blatant case of sexual trade unionism I don't know what one is. She then goes on to describe Britain as a hellhole for women due to the fact that there are slightly more women than men in the UK (DUH! women have longer life expectancies what is the gender break down in the 16 to 34 age bracket?) while peddling standard feminst BS about the pay gap etc... The man-drought that she describes is likely caused by a very rational fear that many British (and other Western men) men have of getting married in the present legal climate and not demographics.

  33. evilwhitemalempire

    That feminists consider it a war crime to take advantage of a drunk woman but not to kill unborn children is, I think, their most seldomly exploited achilles heel.
    When presented with graphic imagery like this it's a hypocrisy that only the most callous and indoctrinated can possibly ignore.
    Small wonder that feminists are outraged at such pictures. For they know darn well how powerful they are.

  34. Alan Vaughn

    @theantifeminist

    So it’s a sign of madness to question the ethics of any homosexual behaviour, a sexual behaviour criminilized for most of human history. Even if you had constructed the most exhaustive, complex, and evidence based argument against homosexuality, your efforts would be in vain. You would still be a..homophobe. A thought criminal. Discussion closed. (btw, I personally have no objection to others practicing homosexuality).

    Just to help emphasize your point, thought you might find this little gem of 'homophobia' and how it was dealt with by an Australian sexual trade union department: The Queensland Anti-Discrimination Tribunal.
    Read about it here (if you haven't already heard or read about it):
    http://www.news.com.au/news/anti-gay-bumper-sticker-is-beyond-a-joke/story-fna7dq6e-1111117565851

  35. Alan Vaughn

    And just to put an interesting twist into the same story, imagine the public approval and praise and even the small fortune he might have made (from sales of the stickers) had he produced the same bumper sticker with only ONE of it's few words changed: If the word "Gay" which appears only twice on the sticker was substituted with "Paedophile"...

  36. theantifeminist

    Post author

    Well, as you said earlier Alan, the world is starting to resemble a second rate dystopian sci-fi movie...

  37. Pingback:

  38. John Rambo

    Manginas should go fucking jump off a bridge and rid themselves from this world. The world will be a much better place without them!

  39. Dr. Pell

    Is that the boob's real pic because it's just as I imagined he would be like.And no, fat Davie is not meeting up with anyone or getting laid with anyone from his boob site. If you've actually read those comments you'd see that the "females" there are lesbians, confused shemales and lower class loser females who don't have 2 nickels in their pocket and are so stupid that they don't even know they're stupid, anymore than a skunk knows it stinks. Not one of these fem losers would even have the bus fare for any "meetup".3/4 of them are living off someone else or trying to suck the government into paying for their upkeep and filing fake disability claims. Apparently obesity is now a disability along with being depressed about being a lardarse lol One hag over on the boobsite even thinks that the government should supply her with an SUV (motorised wheelchair) so she can get to the store and ride the fatmobile to buy junkfood with her foodstamps. She also thinks that someone else should pay for her shoes and entertain her brat at themovies haha

  40. Advocating abortion rights for men would be a great way to drive a wedge between feminism and the population control agenda.

  41. Zorro

    Fuetrelle is a carbuncle on the ass of the world. May his fat eunuch corpse litter the East River ASAP.

  42. Joe Saponic

    So western civilization was built 'almost entirely' by pederasts and Jews was it? I find this baffling, but you like to parade your liberal credentials. I know, I know - you're not a racist either [thus proving you know even less about human biology than you do about western civilization].

    I'm reminded how long it took someone with 'no feelings one or the other about immigration' to grasp the injustice it was doing to the English - that's English, not 'British'. I also you note that you prefer cod-transatlanticisms - 'ass', 'Brit' - to English, which makes you seem immature and silly.

    Some interesting points, but you're a guardian-reader at heart still I suspect, so I'll cut and run if you don't mind.

  43. jay

    David Futrelle is an asshole, but a "boy" playing pool **in a bar** is a man and clearly not underage.

  44. theantifeminist

    Post author

    To be fair, there's plenty of men being anally raped in prison for pulling underage girls who were drinking in bars.

    Also to be very fair, to grant me about 1,000 times the fairness as the monster Fraudtrelle gives the men's rights bloggers he routinely quotes out of context, including myself, the fucking quote of his that I'm using specifically describes the "boy" as a fucking "boy". i.e. Futrelle himself describes him as a BOY.

    watching a Chicano boy play pool in a waterfront bar, Wojnarowicz feels lust rising like a "humming" from his stomach.

    BTW, TO BE FAIR, ASPIES ARE NOT FUCKING WELCOME HERE> FUCK OFF"!!!

  45. theantifeminist

    Post author

    I recall David Futrelle taking a quote from Angry Harry concerning the injustice of a man being jailed for unwittingly having sex with an underage girl he had pulled in a bar or nightclub, and implying that he (Harry) was a paedophile.

    But I'm being unfair to Fraudtrelle for attacking him over a comment in which he describes the fantasy of violently sexually assaulting a random BOY playing pool in a bar as being 'tender' and 'erotic'???

    It's aspies like Jay who make the men's rights movement an exercise in futility.

  46. Alan Vaughn

    BTW, TO BE FAIR, ASPIES ARE NOT FUCKING WELCOME HERE> FUCK OFF"!!!

    My sentiments exactly too.
    Tell you a little secret 'Jay'. You're wrong: I used to frequent bars when I was only 16 years old and most people still regard 16 year old males as 'boys'.
    When I was that "boy" playing pool **in a bar**, I was even propositioned by a pederast, albeit a much better looking one than Futrelle and probably a better man than you'll ever be!

  47. theantifeminist

    Post author

    Indeed.

    And regarding his reference to 'boys' - most people don't describe adult males as boys (although they will describe adult females as girls). David Futrelle was describing an adult male's fantasy of violently sexually assaulting a boy in a bar as 'tender' and 'erotic'.

    Although all this is relatively trivial given what we've just discovered in his other writings from the 90's....

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>