David Fraudtrelle Paedocrite of the Year 2017

Paedocrite – A person (usually male) who accuses other men of being paedophiles in order to deflect attention away from their own sexual attraction to ‘minors’, whether adolescents (attraction to whom is normal), or actual pre-pubescent children (a real paedophile). (shortened version – paedoc)

What a fu***ng paedocrite!!!

4 thoughts on “David Fraudtrelle Paedocrite of the Year 2017”

  1. In all of his incoherent rants trying to validate his identification of an ‘ephebophile’, the only slither of ‘argument’ or ‘evidence’ I’ve manged to pick out from ‘Feldmarshal’ is the claim that Charlie Chaplin was ostracized from Hollywood for his relationships with barely legal teenage girls. That claim does interest me, and I’ve spent a bit of time researching it and found absolutely nothing to suggest it caused him any problems whatsoever. Chaplin was effectively exiled from the USA for 20 years solely on account of the Mccarthy witchhunts, with Chaplin being accused of having pro-communist sympathies. In fact, the both the FBI and MI5 tried every way they could to dig up dirt on him, but never accused him of ‘paedophilia’ or child rape, which they surely would have if dating or marrying teenage girls was so scandalous back then (and throughout human history according to our autistic friend). https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/feb/17/mi5-spied-on-charlie-chaplin

  2. Is Mr Feldmarshal still posting his autistic unfounded and biased rants or is he banned?

  3. Hi Alan – no, Feldmarshal hasn’t posted anything for a while. It’s gone a bit quiet around here to be honest. 😀

  4. More here:

    http://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/a-current-affair-reporter-ben-mccormack-named-in-pedophile-ring/ar-BBBbpr4

    ‘His lawyer Sam Macedone said the charges against him have “nothing to do with the usual child pornography”.

    “None of the charges that have been levelled against him involves pictures or explicit details of young kids,” he said.

    “It’s got nothing to do with the usual child pornography where you’ve got young children being photographed or in a video or anything like that. It’s nothing more than a discussion and that’s all there is.”‘

    Exactly the kind of distinction that the lamestream media fail to make when smearing the reputation of others.

Comments are closed.