We’re barely into the last week of the month, but when one man has given yet another typically unrivalled masterclass in the fine art of paedocrisy, there is simply no point in waiting any longer to announce the award.
There can only be one winner of the David Fraudtrelle Paedocrite of the Month for February – David Futrelle.
>>Child abuse, Paedophilia, and Ugly Fat Fuck Trigger Warnings<<
This is what a paedocrite looks like
Futrelle has been suffering from his monthly period pains over the last few days, and it showed when he lost all semblance of sanity and self-respect by once again inciting criminal violence against an old man for an interview he had given on incest nearly half-a-century ago – when Warren Farrell was a feminist, and when the questioning of such taboos hardly raised an eyebrow. This, despite it now being well known in both feminist and men’s rights circles that Fraudtrelle has a history, much more recent, of the most disturbing child abuse and paedophilia apologies that it is possible to imagine.
Although David Futrelle would prefer his past defence of paedophilia and child rape to disappear down an internet memory hole, all his writings defending child sex abuse are still online, archived, and there for the whole world to see. Let’s remind ourselves of some of the shocking things David Futrelle said during his early career in the 1990′s and early part of this century whilst writing for liberal online publications, when you could produce such articles and hope to get into the pants of feminist statutory rape apologist colleagues such as Judith Levine, and before his ‘ManBoobz MeetUps’ incarnation :
- Spent much of early career as a radical statutory rape apologist.
- Suggested adults who rape and impregnate kids not only shouldn’t go to prison, but should be encouraged to marry their victims (Sex and the Single Girls).
- Repeatedly denied the reality of the wide-scale sexual abuse of children at a time when the leading child protection charities such as the NSPCC were promoting such claims (example)
- Thinks pederasts fantasising about violently raping boys is ‘tender’ and ‘erotic’. (David Futrelle)
- Boasted (last year!) of handing out condoms and lube to teenagers and offering to teach them good sex
- Pleaded for an end to the regulation of internet pornography newsgroups, fearing mass arrests…in the late 1990′s, when such groups were infamous for the distribution and consumption of child pornography.
- Claimed that the raising of the age of consent from 12 to 16 was motivated merely by the prudish desire of Victorian suffragettes to ‘control the sexuality of young girls’.
- Worked alongside the most famous ‘statutory rape apologist’ in the world – Judith Levine – and one liberal article of his (‘Shameful Pleasures’) was actually listed in the references at the end of her most infamous work, ‘Harmful to Minors‘.
When reading what Futrelle has written in the past regarding paedophilia and child sexual abuse, bear in mind that he has stated numerous times to his mentally disturbed, young and vulnerable, would be ‘meet-ups’ at his site that any man who questions laws or definitions relating to paedophilia, child abuse, and child pornography, must be a paedophile himself.
You do the maths….if you have the stomach for it….
Yess… Judith Levine. Does she still have her old views?
http://theantifeminist.com/3d-printers-already-producing-justin-bieber-vibrators/comment-page-1/#comment-47497
Shopenbecq you are soiling the good nature of the Sontarans by using that picture
Haha, very true. Looks like quite a few of us here are Doctor Who fans.
I have a feeling that issuing a public apology to Futrelle is quite low on Warren Farrell’s to-do list.
Futrelle reminds me of another loudmouthed American media paedocrite, Bill O’Reilly. During the height of the so-called Catholic priest scandal here, O’Reilly was actually publically fuming that Pope Benedict refused to come on his show and answer all his trumped-up charges.
There seems to be a direct correlation between the degree of paedocrisy and the size of one’s ego! LOL
Antifeminist:
I always dreamed of having a companion like this when I am Dr. Who’s age:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDSixQCY8qw&feature
A future without paedocrites…we can dream can’t we? LOL
@Eric
Jo Grant was one of my favourites too.
When Karen Gillian became the new Doctor Who companion (age 21, looked about 18 or 19) there was something of an uproar, with many saying she was ‘too sexy’ and that the show was ‘sexualising’ children. I haven’t found a link but I’m sure I remember reading that the usual femi-hags at a ‘child protection’ charity were complaining too.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlIt7A-i7LE
QUOTE: “Looks like quite a few of us here are Doctor Who fans”
Indeed especially Tom Baker and Peter Davison (whom i met in rael life)eras I also like david Tennant as well though Matt Smith Era Doctor Who is unwatchable in my opinion. I fyou liek Science Fiction there is a canadian/german science fiction show called LEXX that might interest you. Several of the episodes actually have antifeminist themes:
WOZ (parts 1 to 4 linked below)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFQtRnRR-I0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cY1DZvwPUo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bymok6l-_qk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uh-uxxsqOvk
In WOZ the crew of teh LEXX encounter a planet where a bunch of evil ugly feminists (lead by a despicable mangina) with a hatred for female beauty and male sexuality launch an all out war against “The Dark Lady” a woman who uses berakthrough technlogy to improve the lives of women by making them more beautiful.
GIRLTOWN (parts 1 to 4 linked)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0gLxLhESjs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzjizcK38dU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jq9Ztlujk_M
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9Eg8RpDaWo
In Girltown the crew help group of male slaves rise up against a feminist dictatorship.
The show ran for 4 seasons and was very creative I highly recommend it.
Thanks Highwayman, that sounds like it will be interesting – I’ll watch it with my dinner tonight.
Speaking of rising up against feminist dictatorships, does anyone know about the Two Ronnies doing a story appearing as segments within several episodes of their show, about Britain under a feminist dictatorship in 2012?
I believe the series of The Two Ronnies in which this appeared dated from 1977.
@Dog Meat
Yes I remember it well, they did things like renamed ‘Big Ben’ to ‘Big Bertha’ etc. It wasn’t really all that funny, it more or less played up to feminism in a positive-humorous way, but of course at the expense of men.
I thought it was rather ‘wishy-washy’ or weak for comedians of their calibre, but of course even in 1977 they were only allowed to denigrate MEN (even in humour) and dared not make women or feminism look bad.
Essentially, men were portrayed as the underdog (even with a bit of 1984 type totalitarianism – thought police etc.) with all men living in fear of the gynocracy (they weren’t referred to as the ‘gynocracy’, but they did have a similar title for the ‘top-bitches’, that I can’t remember), however, the feminist leaders were characterized by middle-aged, overweight and unattractive femihags. That being the only realistic part of the series, which was supposed to be funny.
It didn’t address any of the real issues associated with today’s feminism, i.e. paedohysteria or false rape and any of the realities. It was more along the lines of political correctness in the workplace etc., but even ‘sexual harassment’ wasn’t depicted the way it would be now – as a serious threat to a woman’s state of mind or as a form of statutory rape.
All-in-all: nothing too relevant to what we’re up against now and if you didn’t see the series, you haven’t missed much…
@Alan & DogMeat I remember it too – not very distinctly as I was a child when it was screened (probably a repeat).
Haven’t been able to find it on YouTube, but I did laugh at this : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXvimk0E1lc
I wonder if they’ll ever dig Benny Hill up to be given the Jimmy Savile treatment?
I wonder if they’ll ever dig Benny Hill up to be given the Jimmy Savile treatment?
If I remember right Benny Hill was infamous for regularly retiring with one of his girls for a blowjob behind the scenes during rehearsals. He’s a logical candidate for receiving the digging up treatment. I suppose famous people by now are rewriting their wills to have their ashes scattered in the North Sea rather than be buried anywhere in the British Isles.
The lynch mobs aren’t done with Savile yet:
http://www.hangthebankers.com/cardinal-keith-obrien-friend-of-pedophile-jimmy-savile-resigns-after-sexual-allegations-by-four-priests/
I’m not sure how Savile’s being involved with the Catholic priest scandal is supposed to square with the allegations that he was involved in Satanic ritual abuse, but oh well. I guess that ‘Hang the Bankers’ and ‘Vigilant Citizen’ will somehow sort it all out. Then the stake-burning starts!
@ Alan Vaughn, thanks for the info. I only had a very vague idea about it. I suppose it might appear on youtube or some such some day.
What might be really effective would be for a person or persons who can do that sort of thing, to write and put together some skits about femihags.
At times, there is nothing like humour to get one’s point across. It could by-pass the usual cognitive brick wall when it comes to awareness of femihag jealousy.
I don’t really have the gift of writing comedy but if someone here COULD put something together…
And if it went viral…
Anyone who did it has my permission-nay blessing-to use my plethysmograph idea if they think that would make an effective idea for a sketch.
One measure of the success of such an effort would be how angry it would make certain people.
@Dog Meat
Yes and we all know the ‘certain people’ you’re talking about too – the total manginas and paedocrites currently demanding women rapists get locked up as paedophiles for having sex with lucky 17 year old boys and the ones always writing letters to newspapers demanding that paedos be burnt at the stake, or hanged, or both…
Or, in other words: all the normal men out there who thanks to feminist brainwashing and paedohysteria are simply ashamed of being normal and feel compelled to hide behind the charade of hating and scapegoating other men who (like themselves) ARE ALSO attracted to attractive young adult women that feminist pc language dictates are ‘children’.
And the femihags themselves will of course be even more furious, because it simply mocks them and their lies…
Wasn’t quite sure where to post this but here is a Fox News report about a 14 year old boy who was sent a message from the PETA animal rights group which featured some very modest bikinis made of lettuce leaves after the kid wanted to raffle off a cow (presumably to be eaten). Watch the clip the whole way through and witness hypocrisy writ large. You may also notice that the rather ordinary girls in quite large bikinis are described as “near naked” by Fox.
http://video.foxnews.com/v/2253855065001/holy-cow-peta-protests-14-year-olds-raffle/?intcmp=obnetwork
@Deano
And when his paedocritical father’s not in the room that ‘innocent little 14 year old boy’ is probably busily looking at 89.com and other numerous free porn sites.
Don’t know about ‘Paedocrite of the Year’ for the father, or Fox News, but both should qualify for something like ‘Paedohysteric of the Year’ or ‘Over-reactor to non-event of the Year’.
Have these buffoons never been to a beach or a public swimming pool during the summer??
Go to any such place like that and they’d see hundreds, possibly thousands of bikinis being worn that would make those ‘lettuce leaf’ modest outfits look like ‘Muslim approved’ swimwear by comparison.
Unbelievable…
It seems that the American media are now able to see a sex scandal in ANYTHING and if one cannot be found they’ll twist the story around so there is, or just ‘invent’ one!
ANYTHING to drum up more paedohysteria. “So inappropriate for a 14 year old boy”. He’s now ruined for life by this trauma!
Just PATHETIC…
Australia is quite a paedohysterical place, but this one just defies common sense, let alone belief.
I’ve never been to the USA in my life and the more stories like this I read or hear about, the more determined I am to ensure I NEVER will go there.
Alan – I certainly remember being 14 and totally obsessed with girls well and truly by then. If a bunch of even half attractive ‘older women’ had sent me a picture of themselves in bikinis I would have been stoked and my self confidence would have been boosted.
I was amused at how Fox went ape-shit over the very modest bikinis, yet said nothing about the seductively posed girl in the ad for the barbecue sauce supplier. I guess they represent the ‘correct side’ of the debate.
Yes I picked up on that too – thought she looked considerably more ‘provocative’ or as they would say: ‘was posing more lasciviously’, purely by her body language and facial expression – smiling provocatively.
In fact, if she was under 18 years old (or if in Australia, even LOOKED LIKE she maybe under 18), the photo would have been deemed by the gynocracy’s Chief Censor as ‘child pornography’, or I think they call them ‘child abuse images’, these days (so that many more otherwise innocent pictures can be criminalized).
Fox News wouldn’t have been allowed to show the image at all on TV and of course the traumatized 14 year old boy and his paedocritical father, would have been facing 15 years in prison and life-long enrollment on the public sex-offender registry as ‘dangerous paedophiles’, for ‘accessing child-abuse material via a carriage service’…
(Or whatever it is they call that ridiculous charge, written into law for no useful reason, other than to instantly and irreversibly destroy any good man’s life).
They opened the image from an e-mail, they therefore downloaded it, or ‘accessed’ it from the Internet. They (the femihags and their gutless white-knights in government, that pass the laws they demand), always call it a ‘carriage service’ not the Internet for some unknown, but no doubt good reason, that probably has a much broader meaning, making successful prosecutions much easier.
@Deano
That’s what is so sickening about the pedocrites and their laws.
They can and did charge sexually obsessed 14 year old as “child molesters” and have them register on the sex offender registry.
(In their words, anyone under 18 is considered a child)
so what, do we have “child molesting child”?
And almost everyone in high school is a “pedophile” then since they’re attracted to people their own age.
@Alan
I don’t know what will that father say if he finds out his son got the sports illustrated swimsuit edition? Inappropriate?
Had they sent him a copy of GTA or Modern Warfare 2 where you can shoot up a bunch of realistically looking people, would the father go on Fox News along with his son…
They sent me a copy of MW2, it’s offensive
@Larner,
No!
Killing, murder and mayhem and lots of violence and cruelty isn’t ‘offensive’! How can anything so ‘nice’ be offensive? The only thing that offends anyone in today’s ‘sexually liberated’ and progressive society (in other words: our feminist brainwashed, sex-obsessed, paedohysterical world), is anything that threatens (i.e. invokes enraged ENVY), in middle-aged, sexually bitter & JEALOUS femihags.
No amount of violence would make such a feminist as much as ‘bat an eyelid’, because such violence doesn’t threaten her sexually. So it’s okay by her, even for little children to enjoy that as good, wholesome ‘entertainment’. In fact if such movies or games depict MEN being violently tortured and killed, all the better! (They must teach children that men are BAD and that’s how they deserve to be treated).
The best, or at least simplest, illustration of that psychology at work can be found in the fairy-tale of ‘Snow White’:
‘Mirror, mirror on the wall…’
Or even ‘Cinderella’ probably illustrates their classic feminist envy (of attractive younger girls) equally as well.
The reason they have all these Draconian laws against the sexualisation of YOUNG, and attractive women and have redefined them under those laws as ‘children’ and any NORMAL men showing a sexual interest in them as ‘paedophiles’ or ‘creeps’: is to simply make them ‘out of bounds’, ‘untouchable’ to us.
Effectively trying to FORCE us to take an interest in their burnt out, ugly middle-aged old carcasses…
That is really what feminism is all about.
To see how effective their strategy can work, again: read (or watch the movie) Snow White…