You really couldn’t make this up.
Once again, the Daily Mail appears to be immune to the very same ridiculous ‘child porn’ laws that it has not only fervently supported, but even expressed outraged when they do not always lead to the ‘guilty’ man being locked up to be raped.
Yesterday, the Mail published highly sexual photographs, and an even more sexually charged video, of Kendall Jenner, who will be ’18 in less than a month’ (well, that’s o.k. then), wearing only a skimpy bikini.
In the UK, under femihag legislation, ‘jailbait’ images of scantilly dressed girls under 18 (or who even look under 18) are classed as level 1 child pornography, the same as toddlers posing with their legs apart. Due to ShEU legislation, any man caught looking at such an image will face an automatic minimum of 1 year in prison. This is in some part due to the Daily Mail, which has repeatedly expressed outrage that level 1′ child pornography’ typically only results in a police caution.
On the same day as their publication of what appears to be child porn under UK and EU law, the Daily Mail published a moral panic front page story of how the sexy selfie shots of teenage girls are ending up on the websites of ‘paedophiles’.
The Daily Mail is the most popular newspaper for British females aged over 35, its key demographic, and its website is the most visited of any English language newspaper in the world. Most of its ‘FEMAIL’ section is devoted to miracle diets and expensive skin creams that promise to turn its aging female readers into nubile teenage girls again, despite the message being successfully promoted elsewhere in the newspaper that men who find teenage girls attractive are sick perverted paedophiles who must be locked up for life to be repeatedly raped and beaten.
Even an aspie ‘ephebophile’ must surely be able to see the link?