Daily Mail Publishes Erotic Images of Underage Kendall Jenner, While Reporting that ‘Teen Selfies’ are Ending Up on Websites of ‘Paedophiles’

You really couldn’t make this up.

Once again, the Daily Mail appears to be immune to the very same ridiculous ‘child porn’ laws that it has not only fervently supported, but even expressed outraged when they do not always lead to the ‘guilty’ man being locked up to be raped.

Yesterday, the Mail published highly sexual photographs, and an even more sexually charged video, of Kendall Jenner, who will be ’18 in less than a month’ (well, that’s o.k. then), wearing only a skimpy bikini.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2457331/Kendall-Jenner-frolics-poolside-array-swimwear-flirty-new-campaign.html

In the UK, under femihag legislation, ‘jailbait’ images of scantilly dressed girls under 18 (or who even look under 18) are classed as level 1 child pornography, the same as toddlers posing with their legs apart.  Due to ShEU legislation, any man caught looking at such an image will face an automatic minimum of 1 year in prison.  This is in some part due to the Daily Mail, which has repeatedly expressed outrage that level 1′ child pornography’ typically only results in a police caution.

On the same day as their publication of what appears to be child porn under UK and EU law, the Daily Mail published a moral panic front page story of how the sexy selfie shots of teenage girls are ending up on the websites of ‘paedophiles’.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2458252/How-teens-sexting-photos-end-paedophile-websites.html

The Daily Mail is the most popular newspaper for British females aged over 35,  its key demographic, and its website is the most visited of any English language newspaper in the world.  Most of its ‘FEMAIL’ section is devoted to miracle diets and expensive skin creams that promise to turn its aging female readers into nubile teenage girls again, despite the message being successfully promoted elsewhere in the newspaper that men who find teenage girls attractive are sick perverted paedophiles who must be locked up for life to be repeatedly raped and beaten.

Even an aspie ‘ephebophile’ must surely be able to see the link?

15 thoughts on “Daily Mail Publishes Erotic Images of Underage Kendall Jenner, While Reporting that ‘Teen Selfies’ are Ending Up on Websites of ‘Paedophiles’”

  1. http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/celebrities/9281737/Butt-naked-Liam-vulnerable

    “the One Direction singer was bewildered after performing in Sydney, when he awoke to discover a female admirer had scaled the wall to his second floor room.

    The 20-year-old had left his boxer shorts on the balcony to dry after a surfing trip and was lying naked in his bed during the incident.

    He’s stunned no legal action has been taken against the young woman who was pictured wearing the underwear the very next morning.

    “When you’re butt naked and there’s a stranger looking through the window, it’s scary,” Liam told UK newspaper The Sun.

    “If you flip it the other way round and it was me looking through the window, I’d have been straight off to jail.””

  2. “When you’re butt naked and there’s a stranger looking through the window, it’s scary,” Liam told UK newspaper The Sun.

    “If you flip it the other way round and it was me looking through the window, I’d have been straight off to jail.””

    He’s not wrong of course – we’ve even discussed the ‘peeping Tom’ laws exposing this blatant hypocrisy here occasionally. However, unlike Mr male and friends would insist: most of us here don/t believe young Liam’s going to be traumatized for life over this experience and even if he was: the equal injustice for all meme, currently being strongly advocated by the same branch of the feminist abuse industry (the mHRM): won’t have any effect on dampening the current feminist sex hysteria that’s all but totally ruined our society already….

  3. Quite right Alan. However, as you say, it’s right also to point out the double standard, and I’d go as far as saying that accepting the double standard – for example, Eivind might interpret this as saying that the boy has no ‘resource’ for the girl to ‘steal’ through voyeurism – is almost as wrongheaded. I don’t see how that will end sexy hysteria either, although it might end the pursuit of ‘female sex offenders’, which Eivind seems to care passionately about as an end in itself, but obviously has nothing much to do with men’s rights.

  4. I was walking through the center of London a couple of months ago – 3 days before One Direction were due to show up for the premier of their movie. There were dozens of teenage girls already camping out, or rather just sitting on their sleeping bags at the side of the street, making sure they would get the best view of their sex idols. Can you imagine teenage boys exhibiting that kind of stalking behaviour?

    I’m not bragging, but one of the girls wolf-whistled at me, hehe. I’m 43 as well. Maybe I should report it to ‘EverydaySexism’, lol.

  5. I suppose one way to look at the “equal justice” idea is that if it were implemented, and girls and women were then persecuted as much as boys and men, maybe that would call a halt to the hysteria. But of course, that isn’t going to happen anyway. The double standard is just too ingrained at the moment.

    But I think it is meritous to point out the double standard, while (IMV) demanding that men be treated as leniently as women, not women treated as harshly as men.

  6. Anti-feminist,

    Thanks. I keep up a “campaign” at the Telegraph for want of something better to do, and I like to think I’ve noticed a small shift in the comment threads since I started towards people posting against the hysteria. Not much, but a little.

    The Tele comment section is better than the Mail’s and one can get more of a point across in it; also since the Fail is Femiservative Central, I think the Tele readership might be a little more open minded. I think part of what I wish I could do was highlighted by a comment here by one regular- sorry I forget whcih one- a short while ago, about how people “our age” grew up thinking of the 50s and early 60s as horribly repressed, and I think as anti-feminists we must try to reawaken that “liberal” worldview as the repression descends once more all around us, reminding people how they viewed the world just a couple of decades ago before the neo-feminist State took hold. I like to believe that commenting is a tiny step in that direction.

  7. I suppose one way to look at the “equal justice” idea is that if it were implemented, and girls and women were then persecuted as much as boys and men, maybe that would call a halt to the hysteria.

    No, because the idea that all women find teenage boys sexually attractive in the same way that all men find teenage girls sexually attractive is quite ridiculous. We could persecute individual women but their numbers would always be less than the number of men persecuted (and even less when ‘cougars’ who fuck teen boys realise they no longer will recieve the pussy pass).

    Secondly, because of that fact, and because women are generally evil and do not give a shit about other females unless doing so raises their own sexual market value, they would quite happily see thousands of women put to the sword rather than accept something (an end to paedohysteria) that would significantly lower their sexual market value.

    Thirdly, all the men’s rights movement/anti-feminist movement can do at present is NOT validate the feminist sex abuse industry. We have no real prospect for doing anything positive (such as slowing legislation) for the next decade or two until our numbers are greatly increased. So at this stage, validating child abuse hysteria through the female sex offender charade is the worst possible thing we can do (and the men’s human rights movement under Mr Male are doing it with gusto).

    Of course, as I said yesterday, it’s still important to intelligently point out the double standard, but we must always draw the right conclusion. The double standard does not show (in this case) that ‘the suffering of boys is treated less seriously than girls’. What it shows is that the suffering of men (putting ‘paedophiles’ i.e. men who have sex with willing post-pubescent girls into prison for years for no good reason other than raising the smv of women) is treated less seriously than women, girls, and boys. Locking up women for having sex with boys does not raise the sexual market value of men (and even if it did, men are not sufficiently evil to lock up women for that reason), but locking up men for having sex with girls does raise the smv of women, and that’s why we have the double standard. It comes down to again that society does not give a shit about men (men, not boys).

    However, if we broadened our definitions of child sexual abuse to take into account the differences between male and female psychology, the argument for persecuting women to stop hysteria might be valid – for example, including as ‘child porn’ reality shows and daytime chat shows aimed at women that emotionally exploit the sex lives and problems of vulnerable teenage girls.

  8. Even an aspie ‘ephebophile’ must surely be able to see the link?

    Is that directed at me? Yes, I saw the link.(Thanks to you, I don’t read newspapers beyond sports and sci-tech these days as I find it too depressing)
    But did you see what message she is wearing around her neck? It says ” I LOVE AB”! I knew it!

    She is pretty in the video, but to be honest it doesn’t fully satisfy me. A nude video of her would have been better. But that will be illegal isn’t it? And what paedophile websites are they talking about? I would love to know. Are they talking about deepnet or darknet ? Because I never came across any sexting images in the normal web. Apart from one or two odd nudist/naturist websites and possibly one or two more odd exceptions, I don’t think there is any website that allows real naked under-aged girls. Very few people will have the guts to challenge the law.

    And these people that actually looked and searched for 40 straight hours and found 12k+ such photos? They are probably ‘paedocrites’ themselves.

    Anyway, you have made tons of absurd accusations(both direct and indirect) against me over the past weeks and your behavior has left me confused and hurt at times. I had lots of questions to ask and I wanted to defend myself against absurd accusations, but I am not even going to try, at least not without your permit, in case you ban me again.

    However, I do need this website. Not because it is my only hope(my only hope will be technology), but because this is probably the best place at the moment where I can vent my daily frustrations with the world. I even, on your advice, stopped visiting that other website I newly found called antifeministech.info. But in return for such loyalty I got banned soon after. So until I can find a better place to vent my frustrations, please don’t ban me and bear with me. You really don’t want me to die of depression, do you?
    Even now I think that most people here think in a similar way to me. And this is one of the very few places which discusses anti-feminism and technology together.

    And sorry if I don’t fit your newly invented criteria of angry young man. I will admit I am a little bit nerdy, but I can’t help it. I have been posting here for over at least 2 years now, even if not regularly, I did expect a little better treatment just because of that fact. And I think our movement needs nerds too. My own understanding is that our movement needs technological companies that are run by antifeminists and anticensorshipists. Because how technology effects our society might depend on who has control over it.

    One last piece of advice. I think you should not promote words such as ephebophile unless you are a psychologist. I think we all agreed here that it is just another negative word for healthy male sexuality? While I do often find teens attractive, on some occasions I might even find a 40+ lady attractive. So I don’t think the word strictly applies to anyone. The reason I support teen sexuality is not because of my immediate personal needs, but more out of a sense of fairness or justice and keeping the future and bigger picture in mind.

  9. One last piece of advice.

    Don’t ever give me any kind of advice you asshat.

    I think you should not promote words such as ephebophile unless you are a psychologist.

    Look, this is what is driving me insane. You read my article, and your misfiring nerd brain has actually come to the conclusion that I’m ‘promoting the term ephebophile’. I fucking give up.

    this is probably the best place at the moment where I can vent my daily frustrations with the world.

    Well this is the thing you, and to be honest, on occasion one or two other readers fail to grasp. The last reason why I run the tremendous risks to my self of running this site is to give people like you a place to let off steam anonymously with little risk to yourself while ignoring completely the points and tactics I’m trying to pursue here in order to avoid crimes against humanity that are transparently around the corner now. The reason why I run this website is because for some bizarre reason, I’m one of a handful of men out of 4 billion who is prepared to consistantly speak out and tell the truth, to call a spade a spade, to point out the emperor with no clothes, to call feminists out on being bitter jealous old hags who are exploiting ‘paedophilia’ and the sacred ideal of ‘child protection’ to inflate their own sexual market value and in effect rape men.
    If anyone thinks I’m a ‘dictator’ in the comments section here, because I don’t want people leeching off of my sacrifice simply to promote their own idiotic theories or tactics, that will lead nowhere, or even get us killed, when they would never have the balls (or sacrifice the time) to run a website like this themselves, then kindly f*** off to somewhere like http://kingofhits.co.uk

    If you want to continue commentating here, please keep your points brief, relevant, and to the point. And read my articles or posts properly before you comment.

  10. BTW, I don’t mean to say that every or even most theories put forward here has been idiotic, but some have been in my eyes, and if I make clear that I don’t agree with that theory, then it means you’re wasting my time and effort here in continuing to propound it.

    I’m also happy if this site provides solace and a link to sanity for some of you. I’ve felt the same way in the past when reading sites like Angry Harry, and Chris Brand etc.

    However, AB doesn’t come across as being very grateful for that, in fact he’s demanding gratitude from me to him.

    And I would also say, as I have in the past, that some of the commentators here have helped me preserve my sanity – it’s been a big help to wake up in the morning and get a guarenteed laugh reading the overnight comments of the likes of Eric, Deano and Alan.

    But some commentators, such as AB, simply drive me closer to the edge..

  11. “In the UK, under femihag legislation, ‘jailbait’ images of scantilly dressed girls under 18 (or who even look under 18) are classed as level 1 child pornography, the same as toddlers posing with their legs apart.  ”

    Now this is seriously crazy.
    It really makes their SMV agenda transparent as hell when they do things like this.
    It’s like having marijuana on the same level as meth.
    And that’s also a political move, not based on real science or any common sense.

  12. Many people find Kendall Jenner beautiful

    All pedophiles, that victimize the poor girl

    /sarcasm

    too bad the readers at r/mensrights did not get it.

    I see that 67 more readers of r/mensrights upvoted that article than downvoted it.

Comments are closed.