Daily Mail Calls for 16 Year Boys Having Sex With 15 Year Old Girls To Be Treated As Paedophiles

The Daily Femiservative Mail, now allied with the corrupt Men's 'Human Rights' Movement, is calling for 16 year old boys who make love to their 15 year old girlfriends to be jailed as paedophiles.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2531177/Jeremy-Kyle-paedophile-caught-five-years-ago-having-sex-15-year-old-ignored-police.html

A paedophile could have been stopped five years before he abused three young girls, it has been claimed today.

Lloyd Breach, 21, was jailed for two years after admitting 13 sexual offences against three girls - one aged just 13.

But today a mother claims she reported Breach - who once appeared on the Jeremy Kyle Show - to police in 2008, when he was just 16 years old.

She says the man, a former doorman, groomed her two young daughters.

The woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, claims she told Sussex Police that Breach had sex with her 15-year-old daughter before making online advances towards her younger sister.

But police allegedly told her it was ‘just what teenagers get up to’ and there was nothing they could do because Breach was 16 - just a year older than her daughter.

14 thoughts on “Daily Mail Calls for 16 Year Boys Having Sex With 15 Year Old Girls To Be Treated As Paedophiles

  1. inclinedreader

    But police allegedly told her it was ‘just what teenagers get up to’ and there was nothing they could do because Breach was 16 – just a year older than her daughter.

    ...and that's the way it still should be to anybody who still has any inkling of common sense at all, and two brain cells to rub together.

    Boy, am I glad that I grew up in a time when there was zip, zero, absolutely no doubt about this, and nobody, not police, not politicians, and especially no "children's" charities had any kind of foot in the door to say otherwise.

    If we had applied those standards twenty years ago, I am quite sure some of my best friends would still be in prison, serving multiple consecutive terms for consensually shagging whatever 14- to 15-year-old girlfriends they had that week, at a time when they themselves were barely a year or two older. It should perhaps be noted that the minimum age of consent in Germany where I grew up has been 14 since 1973 (when it was lowered from 16), but still, I doubt that German teenagers were really ever any different from their British peers. Perhaps the only real difference is that British parents, or the respective parent generation as a whole, seems to be infinitely more hung up about their offspring's sexuality. As is evidenced by the absurdly high teen pregnancy rates in the UK, which I see as a failure of British parents to talk naturally to their teens about sex. But I digress.

  2. Eric

    Inclinedreader:
    It's becoming more and more clear that the femihags, femiservatives, and MHRM bozos are really against all sex in general. Has anyone ever considered the long-term social effects of suppressing and demonizing sexuality in young people? They can't turn out as anything but dysfunctional human beings. Even if they come out of it normal, they'll be ostracized by a dysfunctional society.

    But Nature is always going to take its course: and that repressed sexuality is going to have to find an outlet somewhere. Usually it does in some kind of mob violence---which is easily aimed at whatever's shamed sexually. We're already seeing that in the Anglosphere lynch-mobs and American demonization of foreign leaders as sex perverts. It turns into a vicious cycle in the end.

  3. bob

    Eric, I'm not sure how the MHRM gets blame here? They're against the idea that a male should be prosecuted for having sex with a female whose age is so close to him they'd be in the same grade in school. Surely a 16 year old girl and 15 year old guy would never see charges attempted against her (which is only sensible).

    The fault here is with those who are attempting to criminalize normal male sexuality. Is that particular guy fucked up for raping a 13 year old later in his life? Of course, and he deserves severe punishment. But that doesn't mean his normal behavior prior to that is also a crime.

  4. theantifeminist

    Post author

    @BOB. You are indeed missing the point here.

    Paul Elam thinks he can stop feminists treating teenage boys as paedophiles by getting into bed with the feminst child abuse industry and validating most of their arguments and statistics.

    Good luck with that.

    About as realistic as Paul Elams belief that he can stop rape hysteria by promoting the idea that 1 in 6 boys and men are raped. (while 1 in 1000 women are raped - according to him).

    I doubt if Paul Elam would even be unhappy at a 16 year old boy being treated as a criminal, so long as his 15 year old girlfriend was as well, or so long as 16 year old girls who have sex with 15 year old boys are as well.

    Is that particular guy fucked up for raping a 13 year old later in his life?

    Sorry, that's the feminist/daily mail abuse of language for you, which the MHRM is validating.

    The 21 year old had sex with a 13 year old (or merely 'touched' a 13 year old). I see no evidence that he 'raped' her.

    It's outrageous that society wants to treat 16 year old boys as paedophiles for having 15 year old girlfriends. It's not much less outrageous that society has no mercy for the same boy a few years older having sex with 15 year old girls. And finding post-pubescent females sexually attractive (as most 13 year olds are and virtually all 15 year olds are) is normal male sexuality, however much you don't want to admit it.

    But what's really criminal is that the MHRM wants to raise the age of consent to 18 and call all sex with even 16 and 17 year olds as 'abuse' and 'rape'. This goes beyond what even feminists have achieved thus far bar a handful of countries. How exactly does massively increasing the number of men put in prison as paedophiles to be REALLY raped (anally) help men's human rights?

  5. theantifeminist

    Post author

    Slightly off topic, but I just read about the October suicide bombing in Volgograd, which has been hit by two similar bombings in the last couple of days :

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_2013_Volgograd_bus_bombing

    The bomber was a muslim female, 3o years old from Dagestan.
    http://www.everyjoe.com/wp-content/gallery/naida-asiyalova/naida-asiyalova-photos-2.jpg

    The victims were nearly all teenage girls. 8 died on a crowded bus of 50. The bomber must have intentionally positioned herself next to the prettiest teenage Russian girls on the bus.

  6. bob

    antifeminist: I am not an expert on Paul Elam's views and I don't see how this one person is particularly relevant to this story.

    As for "abuse of language", is it not statutory rape if a 21 year old has sex with a child who isn't mature enough to make informed decisions about having sex with an older person who she likely sees as something of an authority figure? Rape is sex without consent, and 13 year olds can't give consent to sex with 21 year olds.

    He also was charged with offenses against other underaged girls, and while there's no evidence he was forceful, you don't know that they were willing participants either. This guy was knowingly up to no good, and it is not wrong to use "rape" here.

    I have never heard of anyone in the MHRM calling for a higher age of consent, or calling all teenage sex "abuse" and "rape". In fact I've heard precisely the opposite of that, they're sick of teenage guys being arrested for having sex with their girlfriends (especially since the girlfriends are never charged), it's perfectly normal human behavior and not a crime.

    You must have come across the crazy male equivalent of some "all sex is rape, and all men are rapists" feminist on a forum or something.

  7. theantifeminist

    Post author

    antifeminist: I am not an expert on Paul Elam’s views and I don’t see how this one person is particularly relevant to this story.

    He is the self-proclaimed leader of the men's rights movement - hell, he's even taken it upon himself to re-name the entire movement, even referring to mras of the late 19th century as 'mhras'. He's also the editor of Avoice for men and accepting (allegedly) over $100,000 donations in the last year alone made out to him personally. He is also a firm believer of the 1 in 6 statistic, a ridiculous figure based on the absurd feminist definition of child abuse.

    As for “abuse of language”, is it not statutory rape if a 21 year old has sex with a child who isn’t mature enough to make informed decisions about having sex with an older person who she likely sees as something of an authority figure? Rape is sex without consent, and 13 year olds can’t give consent to sex with 21 year olds.

    First of all, whether or not you are correct, the legal definition you are claiming was created by feminists. I don't know about AVoiceforManginas, but this site is an anti-feminist site that reserves the right to question all feminist laws that lead to men being raped in prison.

    In the UK (and this Daily Mail story took place in the UK) we do not have 'statutory rape'. The age of consent is 16. Recently, radical feminists succeeded in convincing the EU to force member states to legally define sex with children at a certain age 'rape' (rather than just unlawful sex with a child). In the UK, this has been set at 13. So the young man did not rape anyone. He was convicted of 'sexual assault' on the 13 year old, which likely means he fondled her with her consent.

    Again, this is a genuine men's rights site, not a men's human rights site. I will not assume that the boy raped anyone, when even the Daily Mail doesn't even claim that.

    The age of consent in the UK was raised from 13 to 16 by feminists in the UK in 1885 in the same legal bill that criminalized homosexuality (and which Alan Turing, recently pardoned, was convicted under).

    Rape is sex without consent, and 13 year olds can’t give consent to sex with 21 year olds.

    Again, this is an anti-feminist men's rights site. I don't recieve donations, so there is nothing in it for me to compromise my principles and pretend that 21 year old men having willing sex with highly sexuallised and sexually aware post pubescent females is 'rape'.

    I have never heard of anyone in the MHRM calling for a higher age of consent, or calling all teenage sex “abuse” and “rape”. In fact I’ve heard precisely the opposite of that, they’re sick of teenage guys being arrested for having sex with their girlfriends (especially since the girlfriends are never charged), it’s perfectly normal human behavior and not a crime.

    AVoiceforManginas constantly calls for a higher age of consent - every time they promote the 1 in 6 statisitic which is based upon a feminist definition of abuse of 'sex by a person 5 years older than a person under 18'. The age of consent is only 18 in a handful of theocratic nations, and only 18 in less than half the states of the USA. If you are claiming that sex with a 17 year old is child abuse, and also claiming that any 17 year old who refuses to accept that is 'in denial', then you are calling for the age of consent to br raised worldwide. The average age of consent in Europe is 15. The average age of consent in Asia is 14. The average age of consent in South America is 14/15.

    BTW, I very much doubt if there is a single 13 year old British or American girl alive who sees 21 year old men as 'authority figures'. Also, science and common sense tells us that teenage boys mature later than teenage girls, so a 21 year old isn't very much more mature than a 13 year old girl, and certainly not the average 15 year old girl. Leaving aside the power that ALL females have over ALL males in a gynocratic society.

    You must have come across the crazy male equivalent of some “all sex is rape, and all men are rapists” feminist on a forum or something.

    No, it's just that I'm not a fraudulent 'men's human rights' imbecile, and I can recognise that furthering feminist paedohysteria, and demanding that thousands more men be raped and beaten in prison as 'nonces', under extensions of existing feminist laws, and thousand or even millions of teenagers, boys and girls, be forced to accept the traumatising 'victim' label, is inconsistant with the rights of both boys and men.

    Now I'm going to take a cue from the editorial policy of AVfM, and ban you. You're not harming our donations drive by talking your shit here, because we don't accept donations here, but you are upsetting those of us who don't want to see more men imprisoned by feminists.

  8. Alan Vaughn

    Now I’m going to take a cue from the editorial policy of AVfM, and ban you. You’re not harming our donations drive by talking your shit here, because we don’t accept donations here, but you are upsetting those of us who don’t want to see more men imprisoned by feminists.

    Thank you.
    We don't appreciate manginas like you bob, coming over from A Voice for manginas, spewing their feminist victim-hood hokum and validating their abuse industry, by advocating their equal INjustice for all laws here.
    Yes, locking people up (be they male or female), as despised 'creeps' or 'pedos' and destroying their lives forever, for the feminist defined 'crime' of engaging in a fully consensual act of innocently (and privately), expressing their love, is NOT justice; for men, boys or women or girls. That is INJUSTICE. It IS however, feminist hate expressed and enabled through draconian legislation.
    If you support that, you are not even a MAN, let alone an MRA.

    If you really think that the feminist abuse industry method of forced labeling LUCKY young men / boys as victims of 'child sexual abuse' against their will, (they don't see themselves as victims), so that the odd one or two women out of many thousands of men, might be equally charged as paedophiles (or in UK slang: 'nonce's'), then you are a TRUE supporter of feminist HATE! As your hero: malE is. (That's his last name in reverse, which is his sex, also in REVERSE).
    All it does is validates or reinforces their existing anti-male sexuality laws. They will then have strong cases to argue for even more laws with even tougher penalties! Can't you idiots over at the mHRM see that?

    Now bob, go away and continue to lick the world's biggest mangina's boots, while you and your fellow manginas and feminists give him more money to support and propagate feminism and no doubt; make them and their society destroying anti-male laws, even more draconian, destructive and irreversible..

  9. Eric

    Bob:
    "Rape is sex without consent and a 13 year old can't give consent to sex with a 21 year old."

    Let me ask this question: most religions have a 'Confirmation' ceremony at age 12, meaning that the persons confirmed accept moral responsibility for their actions and become a member of the religious community. Would you say that it's a form of 'child abuse' since---according to you---a 12 year old can't give 'consent' as to what religious tradition they are being brought into?

  10. Anon

    >2014
    >still spouting statutory rape bullshit
    Bob, get your feminazi crap back to Reddit and/or tumblr, you fucking piece of shit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>