Comments for Anti-Feminist Theory of Feminism, Male Sexuality, Men's Rights

Comment on RIP Ronald Searle St Trinians Creator and Virtual Child Pornographer by theantifeminist

theantifeminist — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 21:45:51 +0000

Also the Tempest in which the ship wrecked daughter is 13 or 14 and captivates the charming prince who rescues her and her father.

Measure for Measure is actually my favourite Shakespeare play – or at least the one most relevant to the current hysteria. You read that and you have to accept the conclusion (either disturbing or consoling) that the late medieval/early renaissance European mind was far more civilised and tolerant than our 21st century ‘progressive’ civilisation.

Comment on How Frumpy Women Trick Men Into Thinking They Are Attractive Girls by theantifeminist

theantifeminist — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 21:37:20 +0000

LOL, me too, but feminists are already banning sexbots that look under 18 – this is the best that they will ever allow us to have :

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/10/roxxxy-sex-robot-photo-wo_n_417976.html

Comment on The NSPCC as an Evil Feminist Organization. by theantifeminist

theantifeminist — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 21:36:02 +0000

I don’t think anyone here thinks the NSPCC does any good to anyone but themselves and their inflated salaries. It’s been exposed as a hotbed of radical feminism posing as a children’s protection charity. I hope AVoiceforMen has them in their sights.

Comment on The NSPCC as an Evil Feminist Organization. by Johnny Baker

Johnny Baker — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:43:07 +0000

It’s not only in this area that the NSPCC is a disgrace. In the dying days of the Labour government, the unlamented Ed Balls advanced legislation to effectively monitor Home Educating families as if they were all automatically at risk and needed government monitoring. Because you didn’t believe state education was wonderful, you were obviously a child abuser.

The awful NSPCC weighed in, in a disgraceful fashion, being given unbelievable weight and quoted in the consultation document. Whatever you think of any good they might do, they know diddly squat about home education, and were pontificating as rent-a-quote toadies for the government. I’d not donate a bad penny to the blighters.

Comment on How Frumpy Women Trick Men Into Thinking They Are Attractive Girls by MRA

MRA — Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:08:39 +0000

When the fembot get more advance I have to order one model of Brooke Shields at 15, God she is stunning.

Comment on RIP Ronald Searle St Trinians Creator and Virtual Child Pornographer by Deano

Deano — Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:54:18 +0000

St Trinians films are an easy target for the spiky-haired paedohysteria desk-thumpers because these works are considered ‘low-brow’. You would think however, that Shakespeare would be out of reach. But no, just check out this rather arty looking yet totally sexless poster for an Australian production of Romeo and Juliet which features two 26 year old actors posed as the title characters:

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/arts/sexualised-romeo-and-juliet-ad-removed-from-print/story-e6frg8n6-1226261274442

Because the girl in the poster looks much younger than 26 it contravenes one of my country’s ever expanding flood of lunatic laws and must be withdrawn. As we know, Juliet is 14 in the Bards story and I’m betting it won’t long until anyone possessing a copy of this classic tale will be off to jail for a few years of anal rape and beatings – but only if you’re a male of course!

Comment on Explanation of David Buss ‘Reproductive Value’ Graph Submitted by a Reader by jack

jack — Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:09:53 +0000

Note that for very young girls, getting married to a grown man doesn’t imply having sex with him straight away. As I understand it, in traditional Muslim Societies marrying a girl before she’s nubile is a way to ensure (1) she will not marry another (2) she will stay a virgin until she can move in with her husband and have sex.

Comment on Explanation of David Buss ‘Reproductive Value’ Graph Submitted by a Reader by Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:49:33 +0000

The best wives, thought, would have been those in their adolescent years approaching their first pregnancy so that the time a man would have to wait before he starts reproducing with her would be at a minimum.

Marry a 6yr old and you’d have to wait a decade until any offspring are produced, during which time either of you could die.

Marry a 14yr old and you’ll only have to wait an average of three years. RESULT.

Comment on Explanation of David Buss ‘Reproductive Value’ Graph Submitted by a Reader by Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:19:24 +0000

Yeah, in the prehistoric environment, little girls under 10 would have made better wives than women over the age of 25 because all their breeding years would have still laid ahead of them.

As any anthropologist will tell you, marriages between adult men and little girls are very common in hunter-gatherer societies that resemble the ancestral way of life.

http://www.singingtotheplants.com/2009/08/love-story/

Comment on How Frumpy Women Trick Men Into Thinking They Are Attractive Girls by theantifeminist

theantifeminist — Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:17:31 +0000

See also this :
(photos of Asian girls with and without make-up – a big difference)
http://www.aeromental.com/2011/01/10/fotos-de-chicas-asiaticas-con-y-sin-maquillaje-una-gran-diferencia/