Female Teachers Accused of Giving Boys Lower Marks
A key reason why boys lag behind in the classroom is revealed for the first time today – female teachers.
Ground-breaking research shows that boys lower their sights if they think their work is going to be marked by a woman because they believe their results will be worse.
It also shows their suspicions are correct – female teachers did, on average, award lower marks to boys than unidentified external examiners. Male teachers, by contrast, awarded them higher marks than external examiners….
…
It also revealed that girls tried harder if they had a male teacher because they believed they would get better marks. Their suspicions were not borne out, though, as the male teachers tended to give them exactly the same marks as the external examiners.
The study showed boys believed their answers would be 3 per cent lower if marked by a woman. The girls thought their results would be 6 per cent higher if marked by a man.
Boys failing in the classroom is one of those situations where paedohysteria and general misandry combine to make a bad situation even worse for boys. The damage done by the sexism and bias of female teachers is exacerbated by the shortage of male teachers in schools, something that is largely due to paedohysteria (created by feminists). And this is why those ‘MRAs’ on Reddit, who think that men’s rights discussion of paedohysteria should merely be about ensuring that female ‘statutory rapists’ are treated worse than murderers, just like male ‘statutory rapists’, are simple minded idiots.
“And this is why those ‘MRAs’ on Reddit, who think that men’s rights discussion of paedohysteria should merely be about ensuring that female ‘statutory rapists’ are treated worse than murderers, just like male ‘statutory rapists’, are simple minded idiots.”
We expect a rapist, male or female, to be treated the same. Nothing more. We are not expecting life sentences or executions. That is your claim.
The point is that those redditors are so stupid, (and I include you if you’re one of them) that you can’t see that equal injustice under feminist made laws, that target men, that target male sexuality, IS NO JUSTICE.
Statutory ‘rapists’ are often treated worse than murderers – especially in the USA.
I wonder if you think that men will start re-entering the teaching profession, so long as female teachers start recieving the same prison sentences as their male counterparts? Or don’t you care, so long as we’re all treated the same when we’re back to living in caves?
@theantifeminist, so you are defending the same position as our mutual friend Arpagus. On this points I maintain that on tactical grounds, equal injustice is necessary as long as there’s no equal justice. Same things for instance as for drug crime. Men go to jail ten times more often than women for drugs, although women use drugs to the same extent as men. When a couple is caught doing drugs, the guy goes to jail, the girl becomes a crown witness. Do you think that’s all-right? I think doing drugs is a choice and should be legal regardless of the drug. But pending that women *should* do as much jail time for drugs than men. If they did maybe the war-on-drugs would cease. Angry Harry makes this point.
No not at all Jack – perhaps I’ve been a little unclear in this article, but sometimes I get tired of repeating the same thing over and over again on this blog.
I absolutely think that women who have sex with minors should be shown no mercy, until as such time that women stop supporting these barbaric statutory rape laws and punishments (that clearly target men). I’ve stated that many times here.
But this is completely different from the position of cretins like Gwallen who hold that equal punishments, or ‘justice’ in their eyes, is an end in itself.
For tactical reasons, I applaud the fact that women appear to be recieving longer sentences lately than we’ve grown accustomed to. Also, because such women probably assumed that such laws didn’t apply to anyone with a vagina.
But Gwallen and the imbeciles at Reddit aren’t arguing that. They appear not to see anything wrong at all with feminist laws so long as they are applied equally to men and women – even when they clearly target men and will always affect men more than women. I have no hesitiation in stating that these ‘MRAs’ are utter fucking cretins.
*EDIT : I would also point out that I disagree with our friend’s argument that ‘women can’t rape boys’ or that women having sex with boys is in any way ‘less exploititive’ than men having sex with girls. Again, I’ve made that point a few times here in the past, and in fact, have argued several times that for a number of reasons women having sex with boys is more likely to cause damage.
Da fuck man(?)
Statutory “Rape” is an invention of British & AmeriKKKan Femnazi Womyn little more than ONE Century ago… It was unknown as “Rape” in all of World cultures, religions, philosophies in all previous eras of World history.
You think only (some) white WASP Anglo-Saxon women in the late 19th Century Britain & later the USA were the only “evolved” ones on the Planet?
“You think only (some) white WASP Anglo-Saxon women in the late 19th Century Britain & later the USA were the only “evolved” ones on the Planet?”
This is what I can’t understand about the Divorced Fathers Activists who insist that discussion of statutory ‘rape’ has no place in the men’s rights movement (even though they are happy to vent their fury at the feminist idea that sex with an intoxicated 20 year old is rape).
Why did it take feminists to reveal to the world that a man having sex with a post pubescent teenager was such an inherently obvious wicked thing? Something men had been doing happily throughout human history in all recorded societies? (and even now, in more than half of Europe the age of consent is 14 or 15 – and even as late as a decade ago in Europe, men thought nothing of salivating over topless 15 or 16 year olds in their newspapers over breakfast).
If the feminist viewpoint on statutory ‘rape’ and post-pubescent ‘paedophilia’ is the correct one, then really, we have to accept that men are the evil bastards that feminist would like to portray us as, for failing to see for so long, before feminists arrived, that sex with nubile teens was inherently abusive.
In fact, if this is true, the very idea of a men’s rights movement is quite sick.
We should just bow to the superior ethical wisdom of feminists on all things, including those same Victorian and Edwardian feminists who led campaigns to put white feathers through the doors of disabled men and coal miners who couldn’t fight and give their lives for women in the first world war.
The more I read about the problems of boys and girls education the more I think schools should be single sex. The boys schools could have, say, 75% male and 25% teachers, and the converse for girls schools.
@theantifeminist
Have you seen this one?
http://tasteofamericanignorance.wordpress.com/2012/01/04/now-on-tlc-pedophiles-and-scepters/
I would not be against male teachers teaching lads only, girls segregated to be taught by female teachers AND male teachers but separately or just single gender schools becoming the norm, especially under the new Free Schools scheme.
But the mangina’s will teach the girls, they can fuck right off. Hysteria, Harriet Harman friendly and anti-male thought policing is high in schools, mainly thanks to the previous government witch hunt to help the female teacher monopolise schools through anti male propaganda concerning various male-related issues. God help lads if they were still in office, and it is bad enough now without them. Hysteria and stirring and presumption and false allegation are a useful set of tools to female crone teachers, the bitch’s. And it does happen, honeytrapping or stitch ups or whatever the current flavour of the month male assassination method is at the moment.
How long is it going to be before parents and society wakes up to the mass monopolisation that feminist armies now control workplaces like schools and have twisted the law to give them this preferential treatment so no one can challenge it legally? Not long, the manhate feminist teachers are deliberately keeping lads down and getting away with murder as far as I am concerned. And there’s sod all any of us can do about it because they have fiddled the law books in their favour under equality laws, which are really anti-male communist charters to lead men of all ages to the gallows and gas chambers. Repeal, kick the bitches and crones out, take back your country and you might just save male youth and your own future’s. The backbone of this relies on YOU. If you stand aside and let it happen the sweeping avalanche of male inferiority created by feminist hate has only just begun. Stop that and you save yourself, do nothing and the femi-pink-nazi’s have already won.
@Dave,
I like your ideas and have long believed that they (the gynocracy) are actually using schools as places where they can DIRECTLY intervene, manipulate and all but eliminate us, but in a very subtle and clever way:
One of the most frightening I think is this so called ‘Attention Deficit Disorder’ or Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.
The ‘disorderr’ I believe was something they invented in around about the late 1970′s or early 80′s. When I went to school ahyperactive kid simply needed a little more supervision from the teachers and maybe slightly tougher disciplining. All the hyperactive boys from my school went on to become successful and productive men and did not need Ritalin or a label that basically identified them as afflicted with a mental disorder.
In the schools of today, they can simply identify any kid (boy that is) who is slightly disruptive, i.e. does not appear to be interested in following their ideals (or doesn’t seem to be responding to their teachings on how ‘men’ MUST behave), they simply label him as being affected with A.D.D. and drug him with Ritalin. Effectively like a frontal lobotomy, where they can then train the boy to be the obediant little mangina they want him and the (surviving) men of the future to be…
There’s a good article about this [conspiracy] here:
http://www.antifeministtech.info/category/autismaspergers/
You might also be interested in this one about what’s going on in the local schools in my country – Australia:
http://www.womenagainstmen.com/media/feminism-a-clever-disease.html
Read the paragraph (about the 12th one down) begining with:
‘Take the example of the White Ribbon school campaign in Australia run by manginas (a mangina is a man infected with feminism). They have been distributing School Kits to be presented in schools. Prominent messages throughout this kit include that men are the perpetrators of violence, or more likely’…
I would imagine that similar misandry oriented campaigns have also been run in schools of other Western countries…
Interesting you should mention Ritalin. It is widely recognised that ADD is over-diagnosed but little is said about the fact that ADD children are mostly males. Into what kind of adult can a boy raised on Ritalin (an amphetamine, aka “kiddie coke”) grow? Can you be on amphetamine since your early childhood and not be addicted to stimulants by the time you’re grown up? Then people wonder why meth & coke & crack are all over the place.
Can you be on amphetamine since your early childhood and not be addicted to stimulants by the time you’re grown up? Then people wonder why meth & coke & crack are all over the place.
That’s basically what I was alluding to!
The gynocracy that is now regulating the schools want that to happen: they want Ritalin addicted easy to manage little zonked-out monkeys that may pose a threat to their movement later on, if allowed to develop into normal independant / free thinking adult men.
Thank you for your reply Alan. It gets even worse than what you described, the further you go down the rabbit hole.
Lobotomies for troublesome boys in special schools, for example. Lobotomies with full parental consent, usually a ‘well-meaning’ single mother who cannot be bothered to cope, fully backed by a horde of female teachers, including the senior management. Lads like that stand no chance of escaping their disturbing fate. The abuse they inflict these days is unforgivable. And if nothing is done to stop this, it will only get worse because they know they can get away with keeping it firmly swept under the carpet by their male hating feminazi crony cabal networks. And the irony is the tax-payer is funding their gravy train state sponsored tour of male destruction.
Hi
I am a Journalist student at City University and I am going to write a feature on feminism today. I obviously want a balanced article so could you put me into contact with someone who is against feminism?
Thanks
Katie
Hi Katie – the best place would be the link I have at the top right of my screen – http://www.angryharry.com/notefeminismforstudents.htm
Angry Harry is essentially the founder of the men’s rights movement, and just about everybody in the movement respects him. Basically, if it’s not on Angry Harry, it’s not anti-feminism.
“And this is why those ‘MRAs’ on Reddit, who think that men’s rights discussion of paedohysteria should merely be about ensuring that female ‘statutory rapists’ are treated worse than murderers, just like male ‘statutory rapists’, are simple minded idiots.”
For a moment I wondered if the drive by some mens rights activist for similar sentences for females might be to force a rethink on the severity of these sentences. Once women are being walloped by the same sized stick, they might use their considerable influence to cause a reassessment of the whole teenage sex debate.
But silly me…They would just agitate for reduced sentencing for women. Men would remain the whipping boys. There is no reason to imagine that this gross imbalance would in the application of the law would embarrass our leaders. It hasn’t yet!
Well, apparently those stupid MRAs are every bit as paedohysterical as the feminists. I’ve always been suspicious of MRAs of the “rights-of-fathers” type. I’m not a father and I want the boy-meets-girl adventure to be equitable right from the start (sexual intercourse), not just from the point at which an embryo, a fetus or a baby is born. I can imagine those MRAs being rabidly paedohysterical because they imagine other men (paedophiles) as depriving them a second time of their children.
“I can imagine those MRAs being rabidly paedohysterical because they imagine other men (paedophiles) as depriving them a second time of their children.”
Exactly jack. And so long as 90% of the men’s rights movement is made up of divorced American fathers, I can’t see that changing anytime soon.
“They would just agitate for reduced sentencing for women.”
I’m not sure they would even do that Deano. I don’t think feminists (or the women who support feminist laws) care about other women unless doing so helps themselves. Statutory rape laws target men, because finding nubile teenagers attractive is part of male sexuality – it’s not part of female sexuality. Feminists won’t care if a thousand women a year are sentenced to years in prison as paedophiles, any more than they care about the damage they cause to 15 year old girls for enforcing victim labels upon them.
And that’s another thing that pisses me off about this ‘equal justice’ fixation regarding statutory rape laws (as an end in itself) – it involves the pretence that women like teenagers as much as men do.
The reason that female teachers appear to be bonking their students as much or more than male teachers are is probably due to :
1/the assumption that they won’t be treated as harshly if caught as a man would.
2/ a lesser ability to control their sexual urges than men possess.
3/ the fact that boys will fuck anything at that age, even a desperately ugly middle-aged teacher.
My latest article:
http://mrafront.blogspot.com/2012/02/crakmedia-limited-company-who-pay.html
I fount out the company paying jezebe and gawker, and they have around 450 domains and many many others porn sites.
Crakmedia Limited the company who pay Gawker and the feminists on Jezebel for alleged teen porn.
Yea total unethical 2-faced hypocrites as usual.
Noticed the link “Why do men like Barely Legal porn?
They should have added to their article “Why are men punished for looking at Barely Legal or even barely illegal porn?”
Hey femnazi dipshits – Even your statuatory rape laws weren’t meant to prosecute men who are just acting out normal biological sex drive. They were meant to “protect” teenage schoolgirls who are virgins or with little movie theatre petting/fondling experience from seduction under false promise of marriage and keep their virginity intact for marriage to a husband.
Teenage sluts back in Grandads who were sexually active/promiscuous WERE THE ONES SENT TO REFORM SCHOOL/THE GIRLS JUVENILE DELINQUENT REFORMATORY , and NOT the men or teenage boys who had sex with them, being “enticed” by lascivious girls “who were asking for it”.
Same for the Teen camwhores who post self-shot erotica of themselves on the web or strip/diddle as Webcam pay-per-view girls for Adult men to download or oogle. The girls are just the equivalent of the sluts of old sent to the Reformatory. If anyone should be the ones arrested, it is them, and not the Adult male viewers.
So how come the girls are usually unpunished for being sluts enticing men, and the men are severely punished now Today? femnazis?
Good stuff MRA. It appears that Gawker media sold Fleshbot.com on February 1st. I’ve been trying to find out whether they were showing the HackedAccount adverts before then (on waybackmachine.com, but with no luck – the Flash scripted ads don’t show). So I’ve decided not to post an article myself at this moment. At the very least, Gawker have sold off one of their sites to a company that immediately decides to start making money from virtual child porn (and could be real child porn).
I wonder why the owner of Gawker Media was suddenly in such a hurry to get rid of Fleshbot? My guess is that, especially since the reddit jailbait saga, he was aware of the gross hypocricy that we’re now exposing.
Well, it looks it is still owned by the same company:
http://whois.domaintools.com/gawker.com
http://whois.domaintools.com/jezebel.com
http://whois.domaintools.com/fleshbot.com
They would have say something about my article being a lie because they don’t own the site anymore. But no, they haven’t.
Same server, same contact information, same owner.
Yea, it is very strange – you’d think that if a new company had taken over it, then they would have changed servers, and definately have changed the whois contact info, before creating new advertising campaigns etc.
I wonder if it could be just an attempt to disassociate themselves from the site in case of bad publicity and accusations of sickening hypocricy….
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/319851
They’ve apparently sold it to the guy who was/is the editor – in other words one of their own employees. Seems highly suspicious indeed.
EDIT : it appears that ‘Lux Alptraum’ – the editor and ‘new owner’ of Fleshbot is a woman -see her pic here (a couple of rows down from Adrian Chen) :
http://gawker.com/people/katgirl476/friends/
Look this girl is very into sex live,
http://luxalptraum.com/
Lux Alptraum is a writer and sex educator currently serving as editor for Fleshbot, the web’s foremost blog about sexuality and adult entertainment. Prior to working at Fleshbot, she worked as a sex educator at an adolescent pregnancy prevention program, an HIV pretest counselor, and founded ThatStrangeGirl, an alternative porn site, and Boinkology, a blog about sex and culture.
She created http://thatstrangegirl.com/comic/
http://boinkology.com/
She is a writer for many well know magazines and news papers.
I wonder if it could be just an attempt to disassociate themselves from the site in case of bad publicity and accusations of sickening hypocricy….
That is what I think is happening here.
If this was being made by a man/men it would has been a hysteria already, it is a strategy, give the site to a woman, I remember is the same thing drug dealers do in the Caribbean, they put all their property on name of females in the family so nobody will suspect.