NSPCC and Other Children’s Charties Knowingly Preyed On Dementia Sufferers to Extract Cash

The NSPCC, one of the largest children’s charties in the world and perhaps the leading culprit in the promotion of child abuse hysteria and the demonization of men, has been forced to review its ruthless business practices after it was exposed as using a cold-calling center that it knew targetted dementia sufferers for donations.


The latest revelations come after the tragic case of 92 year old Olive Cooke, whose death it is widely believed was at least partly caused by hounding from charties, including ‘Save the Children’, for donations.

The NSPCC recieves over £100 million in donations each year from the British public. It is infamous for using most of that money to pay its legions of staff obscene salaries, including a ‘professor of child sex abuse and exploitation’ (who is a radical feminist and who believes that all sex is rape). This week it was revealed that its chief executive earns almost £200k a year, and recently awarded himself a 70% pay rise.

The NSPCC is willing to hound old women to their deaths in order to extort the millions of pounds needed to pay its staff their £100k salaries, as well as fund their campaigns to put ever more men in prison to be anally raped and thousands more teenage girls through the trauma of forced victim labelling and therapy.

What a truly vile organization. The REAL problem.

See also : http://www.theopinionsite.org/is-the-nspcc-being-dishonest-in-order-to-get-our-money/

SPIKED – ‘The NSPCC : Still Fostering Fear & Suspicion


As is now the NSPCC’s custom, How Safe Are Our Children? 2015 was brimful with frightening, press-release-worthy figures. In England and Wales in 2013/14, there were 31,238 allegations of sexual offences against children. This, we were gleefully informed, represents an increase of 38 per cent on the previous year.

But, for the NSPCC, even bad news is never quite bad enough. There may be more allegations of child sexual abuse than ever before, but the NSPCC is insatiable. It always wants more: more allegations, more reporting and more publicity. That is, it wants more people to come forward and tell the police that they have been abused, neglected or maltreated in some way. Because, as it and the rest of the child-protection industry never cease from telling us, whatever is alleged, whatever is reported, is only ever just the ‘tip of the iceberg’, ‘a fraction of the true number of victims’.

See also :



Richard Dawkins On Reading Fairytales To Children

But he admitted that he had been sexually abused at his prep school in Salisbury.

Dawkins told the audience how fagging, bullying, cold showers and bruises, which left their mark for three weeks, were common.

He also revealed that a master at the school once “put a hand down his shorts.”

“I got quite a bit of stick for saying that it did not have a big impact but to say that it did would be an indecency to those people whose lives have been ruined by experiences that have been much worse,” he said.

The author of The Selfish Gene and The God Delusion has previously said the had could not condemn the ‘mild paedophilia’ he experience as a boy.

Prof Dawkins, described how a master at his Salisbury prep school “pulled me on to his knee and put his hand inside my shorts”.

He wrote that the episode was “extremely disagreeable” and that other boys were molested by the same teacher, but concludes: “I don’t think he did any of us any lasting damage.”

However his comments were described as a ‘terrible slight’ by the NSPCC.




NSPCC says teachers ‘must look for signs of abuse’

The NSPCC has ordered teachers throughout the UK to observe their schoolchildren for signs of posession by the devil..


Teachers must watch out for signs that their teenage pupils are in abusive relationships, experts have warned.

The NSPCC urged school staff to look out for tell-tale evidence such as bruising, changes in personality, anxiety and a decline in attention.

Fiona Becker, senior consultant at the charity, told the Association of Teachers and Lecturers annual conference: “Abuse can be physical, sexual or emotional. It is distinguished from bullying. A lot of people have experience of it but school policies don’t reflect this.”

It must be distinguished from bullying, because although by the NSPCC’s own figures bullying is by far the biggest problem facing teenagers, the NSPCC prefers to spend its vast wealth (£100 million+ yearly) on promoting sex and abuse histeria.

The jellyhag femirapist continues, without any sense of irony…

As well as physical violence, abuse can include threats, humiliation, in-sults, put-downs, pressure to have sex, and unreasonable jealousy, added Ms Becker. Victims might be told they cannot see certain people or go to certain places

The Shocking Results of Paedohysteria – Two ‘Lost’ Little Girls Ignored By Over 600 Adults

The Daily Mail, which has done so much to promote it, reports on the shocking findings of a television documentary exposing the consequences of two decades of feminist paedohysteria :


One little girl was clutching her favourite toy while her younger sister was sucking her thumb – and both looked utterly lost and forlorn.

In a bygone era, a concerned adult might have stopped to ask them where their mother was. But in a damning indictment of modern Britain, hundreds of busy people simply walked on by.

The girls stood for an hour on a Saturday morning in a busy shopping arcade looking for ‘help’, as part of a social experiment for television.

Hidden cameras recorded Uma, seven, and Maya, five, who took it in turns to look lost.

Astonishingly, over the whole hour only one person, a grandmother, took a moment to find out if there was a problem. All of the 616 other passers-by completely ignored the girls.

Heartbreakingly for the mother of the sisters – who was watching from a hiding place nearby – passing couples even split apart to walk around either side of the ‘lost’ girls and people wheeling suitcases took evasive action to avoid Maya and Uma, not thinking to check if they needed help.

Quite unbelievably, the NSPCC, Europe’s most influential ‘child protection’ lobby group and promoter of paedohysteria, run almost exclusively by radical feminists who believe that all sex is rape, pretended to be ‘shocked’ by the documentary :

Yesterday the NSPCC said the results of the experiment were shocking and called on members of the public to step in if they saw a youngster looking lost.

The Big Lie

Take a look at the picture below of a teenage girl. Her name is Sabrina Vaz. If you find her sexually attractive then you are a paedophile. You are a pervert. You are mentally ill and in need of a label and categorisation that separates you from the rest of male humanity. Even the leader of the Men’s Human Rights Movement would consider the thought of this girl being sexually attractive to be ‘nauseous’.
Now take a look at the picture below. If you find this woman sexually attractive, well, good for you. Perhaps you have a preference for older women, but again, good for you. You are certainly not a pervert. You certainly do not need to be locked up to be anally raped repeatedly by other men. The woman below has decided this. In fact she is the well paid ‘Professor of Child Sexual Exploitation’ at the NSPCC, soon no doubt to be affiliated with the men’s human rights movement. She is also head of the ‘violence against women’ research and advocacy group.

Steve Moxon on ‘the Big Lie‘ :

As I’ve regularly outlined, PC is rooted in and developed as the crudest blame-shifting exercise to cover for the failure of Marxism in practice. Instead of blaming the non- – actually anti- – scientific theory and the gullibility of those with a political-Left mindset in swallowing it, it is no surprise (given it’s a standard piece of human psychology) that left to carry the can were and are those who were supposed to benefit but chose to look the gift-horse in the mouth: the mass of ordinary people. ‘The workers’. Stereotypically these are men … ‘white’ men … heterosexual ‘white’ men. Hence the silly pseudo-‘disadvantaged’ PC-identified manufactured supposed ‘groups’ of women, ethnic-minorities and gays/lesbians – and, still more laughably, trans-sexuals; and yet more laughably still, the obese (hence ‘fat studies’ to join ‘queer studies’, ‘women’s studies’, etc).
It really is that crude. Indeed, the politics is so utterly stupid that only the deeply crass has a chance of being at the bottom of explaining it. It’s the old one about lying. If you’re going to lie, then you’d be best making it really big. Successful lies are so big that people can hardly believe the audacity of perpetrating them.

NSPCC : 50% of Sex Abuse ‘Victims’ Experience Stress, Depression, Self-Harm before Giving Evidence


The NSPCC, which is essentially a radical feminist sexual trade union lobbying group that seeks to forever criminalise male sexuality whilst raising the sexual market value of hags and increasing its own members salaries, has admitted that 50% of young people experience extreme stress during the trials of their ‘abusers’.

As you would expect, the NSPCC does not draw the obvious humanitarian and rational conclusion that we need to consider ever more carefully, logically, and openly, the definitions of sexual abuse to ensure we are not forcing the label of ‘victim’ upon children and young people unnecessarily – that we are not dragging them through a mental hell that will scar them for life over nothing, or something very little.

No, instead, the NSPCC’s only problem with the fact that young people are being scarred by forcing them to testify against men they might still love, and who do not consider themselves ‘abused’, is to point out that it often leads to court cases collapsing, and one less man avoiding the fate of having his life destroyed and years of being raped and beaten in prison as a ‘nonce’.

At the same time, the NSPCC, as well as all of the other hundreds of lucrative feminist ‘child protection’ groups in Europe, are lobbying hard to make sites like mine, that call for a rational debate on what constitutes ‘sexual abuse’, to be made illegal.

These hags should be in prison for life, and they should be having a hard time in prison. They evidently care nothing for the welfare of children and are blatently using the worthy concept of ‘child protection’ as a means to make themselves wealthy, and even more insidiously, soothe their own sexual jealousy and bitterness over the fact that they are not nubile young girls themselves.

Meanwhile, regrettably, the Men’s Human Rights Movement continues to validate the feminist abuse industry, last night tweeting support for the absurd myth that 1 in 6 boys has been sexually abused (a figure that comes from feminist ‘studies’ that had the aim of linking sexual violence to masculinity).

“The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.”

George Orwell – Animal Farm

NSPCC Wants Parents to Explain to their Children the Dangers of Making Sex Tapes

The UK’s official child protection charity, with an annual income of over £100 million, is calling for parents everywhere to sit down with their children today and have a talk with them on the dangers of making Paris Hilton style sex tapes and then leaking them online. The NSPCC – protecting childhood innocence since 1884!


The warning came after a mother found her 13-year-old daughter and a friend discussing the best way to make a sex tape after reading an x-rated e-book on a Kindle.

The two teenagers had been reading aloud from It’s All About the Sex Face: A Guide to Becoming a Celebrity, a no holds barred manual offering tips on how to achieve instant fame by producing a sex video.

The e-book, which costs £1.02 to download from Amazon, claims you can “actually become famous without even having a talent”.

Jon Brown, head of sexual abuse at the NSPCC, said: “It is really important to talk to your children about the risks that are out there either online or offline, in an age-appropriate way and without frightening them.

“Speak to them specifically about the risks of making a ‘sex tape’ and if it did get into the wrong hands, it could go viral online.