The Fappening, Sexual Economics, and a Couple of PUA Videos

The manosphere response to the recent ‘fappening’ has demonstrated once again that the basic ideas promoted at this site for the last 7 years are now generally accepted as being manifestly obvious. I doubt if I or my readers can take much credit for this. Sexual Trade Union theory, or ‘Pussy Cartel’ theory is so manifestly the right explanation of what feminism is that as soon as an online movement such as the ‘Red Pill’ reached sufficient numbers for it’s thousands of members to be required to adopt certain fundamental premises, rather than engaging in perpetual intellectual dick sizing – each individual believing he is the special one who has ‘feminism sussed’, then the blindingly obvious truth that feminism is simply about maintaining the supply and price of pussy was certain to become widely accepted.

Two interesting articles on sexual economics :


(The above graph doesn’t take into account the skewing of prices when Jack is in town, lol)

Best PUA videos of recent weeks :

(note the first comment and reply)

Michel Houellebecq Passage of the Week

The following passage is from Houellebecq’s novel ‘The Possiblity of an Island’. The main character is recounting the gradual break-up of his marriage, due largely to declining sexual attraction. His wife is the editor of a women’s fashion magazine entitled ‘Lolita’ – ostensibly aimed at teenage girls but read mostly by women in their 30’s and older :

“A few months passed. Summer returned then autumn; Isabelle didn’t seem unhappy. She played with Fox, and tended the azaleas; I devoted myself to swimming and re-reading Balzac. One evening, while the sun fell behind the residence, she looked me straight in the eye and told me softly: ‘You are going to ditch me for someone younger…’
I protested that I had never been unfaithful.
‘I know…’ she replied. ‘At one moment I thought you were going to be: that you’d shag one of the sluts that hung around the magazine, then come back to me, then shag another slut, and so on. I would have suffered greatly, but perhaps it would have been better like that, at the end of the day.’
‘I tried once: the girl turned me down’. I remembered passing the morning in front of the Lycee Fenelon. It was between classes, the girls were fourteen, fifteen and all of them more beautiful and desirable than Isabelle, simply because they were younger. No doubt they themselves were engaged in a ferocious narcissistic competition – between those considered cute by boys their age, and those considered insignificant, or frankly, ugly; all the same, for any one of those young bodies a fifty-something would have been ready to risk his reputation, his freedom, and even his life. How simple, indeed, existance was! And how devoid it was of any way out! Once, on passing by the magazine’s offices to pick up Isabelle, I had chatted up a sort of Belorussian, who was waiting to pose on page eight. The girl had accepted my invitation for a drink, but had asked for five hundred euros for a blowjob; I had declined. At that time, the judicial arsenal aimed at repressing sexual relations with minors was getting tougher; crusades for chemical castration were multiplying. To increase desires to an unbearable level whilst making the fulfilment of them more and more inaccessible: this was the single principle upon which Western society was based. I knew all this, I knew it inside out, in fact I had used it as material for many a sketch; this did not stop me from succumbing to the same process. I woke up in the middle of the night and downed three glasses of water. I imagined the humiliations I would have to endure to seduce any teenage girl; the painfully extracted consent, the girl’s shame as we went out together in the street, her hesitation to introduce me to her friends, the carefree way she would ditch me for a boy of her own age. I imagined all this, over and over again, and I understood that I could not survive it. In no way did I pretend to escape from the laws of nature: the inevitable decrease of the erectile capacities of the penis, the necessity of finding young bodies to jam that mechanism….I opened a packed of salami and a bottle of wine. Oh well, I told myself, I will pay; when I reach that point, when I need tight little asses to keep up my erection, then I’ll pay. I’ll pay the market price. Five hundred euros for a blowjob, who did that Slav girl think she was? It was worth fifty, no more. In the vegetable drawer, I discovered an opened chestnut mousse. What seemed shocking to me, at this stage in my reflection, was not that there were young girls available for money, but that there are some who are not available, or only at prohibitive prices; in short, I wanted a regulation of the market.”

Laura Agustin on Somaly Mam, the Cambodian Sex Trafficking Activist Exposed as a Fraud

(excerpt) :

A Cambodian activist against sex slavery, Somaly Mam, recently resigned from her foundation after an outside investigation confirmed she had lied to attract donors and supporters. The revelations of Mam’s fraudulence are old news, however — Simon Marks’s reports have been appearing in the Cambodian Daily since 2012, and many other debunkings and doubts circulated much earlier among institutions, researchers, and activists trying to reverse unfounded sensationalism about sex trafficking.

Newsweek published some of Marks’s work on May 21, provoking outrage in the New York media establishment — less towards Mam than one of her greatest fans, self-styled slave rescuer Nicholas Kristof. He is accused of hoodwinking liberal-identifying readers and letting down the cause of journalism. Both accusations miss the point.

Thanks very much to Jeff Lewis for providing the link and for pointing out the very true fact that this scandal did somehow slip under my radar. You can visit Jeff’s blog at :

Another important figure in the billion dollar sex trafficking hysteria industry has also been exposed as a fraud :

Laura Agustin’s blog is :

David Futrelle Exploits the Murders of Young Men and Women for Financial Gain

I didn’t think the creature forever known as Manboobz could descend to even lower depths of moral depravity and opportunism than he already has, but David Futrelle has managed it with his shameless ‘donation drive’ in the very week that his dwindling traffic has seen a massive increase due to his quite ridiculous and obscene attempts to link the Elliot Rodger killings to the Men’s Rights Movement.

The only connection that Elliot Rodger appears to have with the manosphere is that, like David Futrelle, he had a visceral hatred of PUAs and any men who, unlike him, were succeeding in the free sexual market that the pill, and other aspects of modern technology, has brought about, and which feminists, including male feminists and omega males like Futrelle, are attempting to close through increasingly brutal legislative means.

Elliot Rodger was a poster on, the only real link he had to the manosphere. I used to visit that site fairly often, and it was the chief reason why I decided to take a zero tolerance policy to aspies in the comments section here. They are dangerous, toxic, and their uncontrolled entitlement rages can be directed at anybody. Running a men’s rights site is trouble enough without having to fear an Elliot Rodger knocking at my door with a knife or gun in his hand because I disapproved a comment.

The fact is, that was arguably the definitive anti-manosphere site. Contrary to what Fraudtrelle has said, its members regularly attacked PUAs for not only being supposed ‘charlatans’, but also as sexual objectifiers and harassers of women. Members there obsessively set about finding the Facebook profile of KrauserPUA, who they particularly hated because he was both a noted anti-feminist and because he provided proof that he was getting laid regularly from PUA, and proceeded to message his entire friends list with false allegations that he was a rapist being hunted by the police.

Many of the members of PUAHATE.COM were, like Futrelle, openly male feminists. Their most vicious hatred was reserved for Roosh and for the writers of the leading manosphere site In recent months, many of the discussion threads at PUAHATE were devoted to attempts to doxx the author of the viral article ‘Five Reasons To Date A Girl With an Eating Disorder’.

Indeed, it makes far greater sense to argue that David Futrelle has more in common with Rodger (as an anti-pua/manosphere man) than certainly any MRA does. To my knowledge, there has been no link found between Rodger and any MRA site or even YouTube channel. In fact, it appears that Elliot Rodger NEVER even approached women (i.e. he never attempted PUA or GAME). He was clearly just a mental aspie (and probably a repressed homosexual) who believed that hot girls should be approaching HIM.

Whilst Elliot Rodger’s case was probably a unique result of mental disturbance, it is obscene that his horrific actions are being used to try to shut down discussion of an alienation of young male sexuality that is all too real, and whose only outlet is discussion within the manosphere and the few men’s rights sites that openly defend the sexual rights of men. When the multitude of women flaunt themselves as being sexually available through their dress, or lack thereof, combined with a savagely repressive war on male sexuality as well as a constant barrage of misandry and creep shaming, then young men are going to increasingly become enraged and this will require a free and open outlet, such as the manosphere, as a safety valve.

As fellow blogger Scarecrow has written, no woman has a duty to provide men with sex, but every man has a right to obtain sex. Every woman has the right to say no, but women do not have the right to reject men so brutally that they leave those men so demoralized and dehumanized that they are unable to approach other women who may say yes. Women do not have the right to constantly creep shame men that they see as sexually unattractive and hence to them, subhuman pieces of dirt. If you go out dressed in a sexually provocative and revealing way, men have the right to look at you without being made to feel dirty – even those beta and gamma males who you see as so beneath you that you regard and treat them as less than human.

Every Woman is an Elliot Rodger

But most of all, the truly obscene reality that this tragedy is being used to hide is that most women are, in their own feminine and more docile herd like way, an Elliot Rodger. Millions of men have been displaced by the free sexual market, including millions of young decent men turned into INCEL losers. The truth is that almost never does this result in violence against women. As noted above, even in the unique instance of Elliot Rodger, it is clearly the result of mental illness, and perhaps even repressed homosexuality, and in any case, he hated men as much as women, and ended up killing more men than women.

Millions of women have also been displaced by the free sexual market. Mostly, older women and unattractive younger women. It is true, that like men, women will almost never go on a murderous rampage as a result of their status as sexual losers. However, unlike men, individual women have and are in their thousands taking their vengance through false allegations against men, or through the dragging up of historical events that were engaged in entirely willingly at the time and which only now have been rationalized as ‘abuse’ when the ‘victim’ can no longer attract the sexual attention of men. The men at the recieving end of these allegations, often frail old men as we are seeing in the Yewtree withchunts, will have their lives destroyed as effectively as the victims of Elliot Rodger. They will also live in real fear of violence and anal rape during their long time in prison.

But more importantly, the mass of women are each and all an Elliot Rodger through their support for the feminist war on male sexuality that is seeing the free sexual market being closed in a brutal fashion that has millions of men as its victims, either as a result of falling foul of the never ending barrage of anti-male sexuality feminist laws, or through the denial of sexual opportunities that these laws result in – such as the criminalization of men who pay for sex.

If any good can come from the actions of the deranged manosphere hater Elliot Rodger it should be to highlight the brutal effects of the feminist war upon male sexuality – not to attempt to close down any discussion of that war by increasingly and justifiably angry young men, and certainly not to line the pockets of a disgusting fat opportunistic paedocrite.



‘All Feminists Are Rapists’ meme redux

WIth regards to those readers who still doubt the possible effectiveness of this meme, I wonder how they explain that ‘All Men Are Rapists’ is the most famous, or infamous, meme of all the feminist statements and claims of the last 50 years (with the possible exception I guess of ‘like a fish needs a bicycle’)?

The statement ‘All Men Are Rapists’ was itself an Orwellian style masking of the truth through inversion.  It is the Big Lie in the form of a meme. Just as in 1984, ‘War is Peace’, in the world of feminists, ‘All Men are Rapists’, when in fact the opposite would be far closer to the truth.

However, my true version of the meme is far more conservative.  It does not claim that all women are rapists (although as most women support and benefit from feminism, this might be true), it simply states the manifest reality that all feminists are rapists..

What better way is there to capture the idea central to Sexual Trade Union theory that feminists are trying to co-erce men into sex through repressive anti-male choice legislation (banning porn, discouraging college promiscuity through rape hysteria, raising the age of consent, criminilizing paying for sex etc)?

What better way is there to highlight the truth that the feminist legislative creep that is leading inevitably to a sexual holocaust against men, has nothing to do with protecting women or young girls, but everything to do with artificially raising the sexual market value of feminists and the women who support them?

It is taking the most famous and viral feminist meme ever created, turning it around, and using it against them.

There can be surely nothing more potent as a weapon against feminists than using their own rape fixation and turning it against them, especially given that this is exactly what feminists are – rapists.

Most people probably never had a clue what Marilyn French meant by ‘all men are rapists’, apart from as a classic expression of feminist hatred of men. However, surely there must be some kind of capacity, albeit currently repressed, for men to understand that feminists locking up men for looking at porn, locking up men for visiting prostitutes, locking up old men for having sex with teenage sluts half-a-century ago, has something to do with coercing men into sex (with them), through the elimination of sexual alternatives?

My meme hijacks one of the most viral soundbites of the 20th century and uses it to shame with potentially devastating effect the 21st century incarnations of the monsters who originally produced it.

All feminists are rapists, and that’s all they are. – Defending Free Speech and Sexual Freedom in the UK

The war on porn continued in the UK today with the news that the Conservative government plans to introduce mandatory age verification for all porn sites, with even foreign sites who do not provide the required verification being denied payment processing.

As the UK sleepwalks into becoming a FemiSharia police state, it’s heartening to discover today that there is at least one organization trying to stand up for sexual freedom :

They even organized a counter demonstration to a femihag anti-porn rally recently :


Feminist Rapists Seek to Criminalize Paying for Sex in the UK

An all-party parliamentary group (APPG) report recommending the ‘Nordic model’ of prostitution, where clients not sex workers are criminalised, has been launched in the House of Commons.

The group, led by MP Gavin Shuker, launched the report Shifting the Burden: An Inquiry to assess the operation of current legal settlement on prostitution in England and Wales.

In it, Shuker says: “In short, we recommend a shift in the burden of criminality from those who are most marginalised and vulnerable – to those that create the demand in the first place.