Category : Pornography

10 Famous Pornstars Without Makeup (this is what you’re really fapping to)

I remember my old English teacher telling us that modern makeup is the only reason why the relatively recent phenomenon of females marrying outside of their teenage years is possible. Judging from the evidence here, it seems that makeup is the only reason why the billion dollar adult porn industry can exist too.

Allie Haze

allie-haze-without-makeup
Allie Haze without makeup

Anita Toro

anita-toro-without-makeup
Anita Toro without makeup

Bonnie Rotten

bonnie rotten without makeup
bonnie rotten without makeup

Brea Bennett

Brea Bennett without makeup
Brea Bennett without makeup

Bree Olson

Bree Olson without makeup
Bree Olson without makeup

Crista Moore

Crista Moore without makeup
Crista Moore without makeup

Dani Daniels

dani-daniels-without-makeup
Dani Daniels without makeup

Diamond Kitty

Diamond Kitty without makeup
Diamond Kitty without makeup

Eden VonSleeze

eden-vonsleaze-without-makeup

Jessica Mor

jessica-mor-without-makeup
Jessica Mor without makeup

Jynx Maze

jynx-maze-without-makeup
Jynx Maze without makeup

Keira King

keira-king-without-makeup
Keira King without makeup

Tiffany Tyler

 

tiffany-tyler-without-makeup
Tiffany Tyler without makeup

As the great Woody Allen once said – ‘sex is 99% in the mind’. And this is why those who believe that virtual sex will never replace the ‘real thing’ are 100% wrong.


Your Brain On Porn (EvilWhiteMaleEmpire)

your-brain-on-porn

Another absolute classic from EvilWhite. Please share everywhere.

See also : http://theantifeminist.com/a-short-reply-to-the-masturbating-to-porn-is-like-heroin-addiction-pop-sci-meme/


David Futrelle Pleads for an End to the Regulation of Internet Pornography & Paedophilia in 1995, Fearing ‘Mass Arrests’

**EXTREME TRIGGER WARNING**
David Futrelle O FaceWhatever pornographic newsgroups David Futrelle was checking out back in the notorious ‘Wild West’ days of the early internet, they must have contained some darned addictive stuff.  How else to explain the following curious, and also somewhat disturbing plea, for the government not to embark upon the regulation of internet pornography and the protection of children from obscene material and paedophiles…in 1995?

http://www.unz.org/Pub/InTheseTimes-1995aug07-00025?View=PDF

In the article, Futrelle rails against the proposed ‘Communications Decency Act’ – the first piece of legislation designed to protect children from images such as bestiality and child rape online, as well as intending to protect them from solicitations and indecent messages from paedophiles, something which was also a growing concern at the time.

From Wikipedia :

Passed by Congress on February 1, 1996, and signed by President Bill Clinton on February 8, 1996, the CDA imposed criminal sanctions on anyone who

knowingly (A) uses an interactive computer service to send to a specific person or persons under 18 years of age, or (B) uses any interactive computer service to display in a manner available to a person under 18 years of age, any comment, request, suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs.

It further criminalized the transmission of materials that were “obscene or indecent” to persons known to be under 18.

In Futurelle’s article, which appeared in the printed magazine ‘In These Times’ in 1995, little concern is displayed for the protection of children and, indeed, the arguments and evidence used by child protection advocates are mocked in the very same disdainful way that he has since made famous in his current incarnation as ‘Manboobz’ (only the target these days is not anti-paedophile campaigners, but men’s rights activists… and in a display of astonishing psychopathic selective amnesia, often accusing them of paedophilia for attacking paedohysteria and draconian 21st century laws on pornography).

Futrelle ends his article with the following plea :

…short of draconian regulations of speech, mass arrests and the virtual dismantling or disabling of much of the vast worldwide network, there is almost nothing that can be done to ensure that the Net remains always and forever free of improper images and words

This is somebody who once described a grown man’s fantasy of sexually assaulting a boy in a bar as ‘tender’ and ‘erotic’.  He also wrote extensively on the 1990’s child sex abuse panics, denouncing them as hysteria at a time when even prominent child protection organisations such as the NSPCC were leading campaigns promoting them.  In another shocking article, perhaps the very worst that he has written, he appeared to suggest that adults who rape and impregnate underage children should be spared jail (“we can’t send them all to prison”).

I say the worst, but the truth is that I have read only a fraction of the hundreds of articles that Futrelle spewed out in the 1990’s, long before he apparently tired of fapping off to porn and hit upon his ‘Manboobz Meet-Ups’ scheme.  The thought of what is still lying out there in the dusty internet archives, waiting to be re-discovered, almost sends a chill down my spine.

And probably his too.

http://www.unz.org/Author/FutrelleDavid