Jessica Alba laments publically that she no longer can attract the attention of subhuman paedophiles men, because she no longer has the childish perfect body of a 14 year old girl.
She is one of the most petite actresses in Hollywood, famed for her toned physique.
But size 6 Jessica Alba, 32, is on a mission to convince the world she is just like the rest of us as she claims to suffer a multitude of body hang-ups including stretch marks, cellulite and a muffin top.
‘Let’s face it, I don’t have the body of a 14-year-old anymore,’ said Alba. ‘I think the more we try not to have that unrealistic ideal, the happier we’ll be.’
This in the Daily Mail. I’m sure if you can stomach reading through today’s edition, you’ll probably find a story of a sick pervert being rightly sentenced to years of ass rape for being caught looking at pictures of 14 year old girls in bikinis.
And hey manosphere dudes, why is Jessica Alba complaining of not having a 14 year old girl’s body, when we’ve all read on wikipedia that females hit peak sexual fertility at 21-23?
Me no get it.
And why would any liberal progressive readers degrade themselves by considering my crude supposition that adult women, who are motivated in nearly everything they do primarily by the desire to sexually attract men, and who spend half their adult lives and adult income trying to do so, might use feminism as a means to block men from seeking out females who they are naturally inclined to sexually prefer (i.e. 14 year old girls)?
Alan Titchmarsh has claimed that older women working in television should stop moaning about being passed over for jobs because it’s easier for them at the beginning of their careers.
The 64-year-old TV gardener and author of raunchy novels told The Observer: “Men in television tend to last a bit longerat the end of their careers, but it is women who make hay at the beginning.”
“They don’t complain in their early days when they are disporting themselves on sports cars. I’d like to see a mix of all ages on TV and wish there could be less whingeing about it.”
Titchmarsh’s comments appear borne out by aging British ‘beauty’ Alexa Chung, 29, who today revealed that she suffers from post traumatic stress syndrome from ‘having to strip for creepy men’, when she happily posed for swimwear photos as a teen in the belief it would kickstart her career :
ALEXA Chung has revealed she “stripped for creepy men” when embarking on her modelling career as a naive teenager.
The British beauty, now 29, says she is still haunted by the flashbacks she tries to “block out”.Speaking to The Times, Alexa explained that while she realised there was something dodgy at the time about undressing for men in their private homes, she still kept it a secret from her parents – and only in hindsight can she comprehend fully how wrong it was.She said: “I actually kept modelling very separate [from my parents].
“I never really asked my mum or my dad’s advice during that time and it actually felt like I didn’t want to tell them too much about the reality of what was going on…
“I already knew it was wrong. So, you know, if there was a casting where some creepy man there had gone on to his flat in Ilford, and, you know, [he said] ‘Take your clothes off… ‘ and if I’d have done it, I won’t tell my mum because I know that’s wrong.”
This at the end of a week in which there has been at least two ‘child abuse’ (i.e. men having sex with teens, or watching teens having sex) hysterical stories on the main BBC News homepage every day. Can anyone spot a possible connection?
Our genetical programming makes us, guys, to simply rate a very ugly girl
as hot, only based on her “makeup application skills”.
The examples are endless.
Would you bang this:
Or this (taken in same week) :
(theantifeminist) : When you have sex with an ‘attractive’ woman over the age of 25, not only are you essentially being raped (all women over 25 benefit from feminist sex laws which inflate their SMV) you are being tricked. If we follow the feminist definitions of rape therefore, you are being raped twice over.
The truth is that without make-up, even women in their early twenties could not hope to sexually compete with girls in their early to mid teens.
Ironically, even this artificial advantage, or rather leveller, is now being eroded by technology. Comical as it might sound, but thanks to YouTube, and the plethora of teenage beauty gurus giving makeup tutorials there, every 13 year old girl now knows as much about makeup application as her mother does.
If men are really hardwired to prefer teenage girls, why are there so relatively few men having relationships with (legal) 16 and 17 year old girls?
I’ve been pleading with loyal and highly-esteemed reader ‘Highwayman’ to write a guest post here, or at InMalaFide, for some time, but it doesn’t look like it’s going to happen. Reading an old comment of his this morning made me realise I can do the next best thing – publish one of his best comments as a post.
Highwayman is replying to a comment from a femiservative reader – Danica – who questions whether many 40 year old men would really want to have a relationship with a 16 year old girl, by pointing to the fact that the age of consent is still 16 in many places and yet such relationships appear quite rare.
QUOTE: “Do 40 year old men really want relationships with 16 year olds? No.”
Well 16 year old girls are illegal in many US and Australian States. Furthermore, as the Age of Consent is 18 in California the meme that 16 year olds are “jailbait” and “16 will get you 20″ has spread throughout the Anglosphere and beyond as a lot of entertainment media is produced in Southern California. Even in jurisdictions where 16 year old girls are legal there are many ways for a man to get into trouble via laws against “grooming”, laws criminalizing men for taking a sexy photograph of their under-18 girlfriend, vaguely written “sexual exploitation” laws such as we have in Canada, laws against having sexual relationships with under-18s if the person over 18 is in “a position of authority”..etc. Given this legal situation is it any wonder that older men avoid relationships with young girls? Also keep in mind that in many jurisdictions laws governing sex with “minors” are strict liability offences where the adult will be punished even if he reasonably believed that the girl in question was over 16/17/18 (depending on the jurisdiction) therefor not only do men generally avoid under 18s but they also tend to avoid under 21s as well (to avoid the risk of an underage sex charge should the girl turn out to be under 18).
On top of the legal situation described above you also have a cultural environment where the definition of pedophilia has been extended to include sexual attraction to girls under the age of 18. Thus a man with a 16 year old girlfriend (or a man who desires one) will be branded a “sick pervert” or a “pedophile” and risk serious social ostracism.
Another thing that prevents many relationships between older men and young girls from happening are laws such as the legal drinking age ( 18 or 19 in Canada depending on the province and 21 in all US States) legal driving ages and laws/practices WRT how old you have to be to participate in certain recreational activities (nightclubs..etc) these laws and practices encourage a high level of age segregation.
Finally there is the fact that many 16 year old girls today are brought up in a culture of extended childhood and the result of this upbringing may make a number of 16 year olds unattractive to men (for relationship purposes). While some people may say “just let a kid be a kid” some mental health professionals have noted that this culture of extended childhood is NOT HEALTHY for adolescents.
In conclusion, I am simply trying to drive home the point that while it may be true that many men avoid 16 year old girls, this situation is an artificial one created by age of consent laws, pedohysteria, legal and cultural age segregation practices and a culture of extended childhood…if those factors where to change I guarantee you that there would be a very significant increase in the number of men who would be interested in 16 year old girls.
For the Roman male, the ideal woman would be a buxom 16 year old with ‘skin as white as wax, sparkling eyes, sweet breath, lustrous dark or auburn hair’ – no blondes or redheads – ‘a scented, sensuous, lissom body and a shaved clitoris, glowing like a pearl’.
Problems with the comment system – apologies to anybody who has posted a comment only to find that it ‘disappeared’ as soon as you pressed submit. I’ve always had a lot of spam bot comments (viagra, penis pills, and the like ) so I had to set the spam filter higher. The last couple of days I appear to have come under a veritable spam attack, and have been recieving up to 20 such spam comments every hour. I presume this is the work of Mikee USA, a feminist troll who is clearly seeking to make impossible any rational discussion of male sexuality. Either that or he is a psychopath who is punishing me for being the only MRA who was prepared to give him a chance. Obviously it is a nightmare having to moderate such levels of spam, so I’ve finally upgraded to a new spam filter, which hopefully will do the trick, especially as I’ll be on holiday soon.
Please don’t stop leaving comments. For a site as small and ‘fringe’ as mine, I realise I am very lucky to have such a number of highly intelligent and insightful readers prepared to contribute. Please continue to do so!