A Brief Word on the Milo Paedophilia Scandal

There have been a few major events over the last few months that if I wasn’t such a lazy bum who has little inclination to post anything here anymore I should really have commented upon.  One such event, of course, was Donald Tump’s victory. Yes, I believe the online men’s rights movement – that the much missed and loved Angry Harry created – was at least a butterfly that did play a role in the storm that ultimately swept Trump to office.

Another notable event occurred last week, not of such obvious significance as America being made great again, but perhaps of much more relevance to our little corner of the Manosphere –  the witchhunt against Milo Yiannopoulos for ‘pro paedophilia’ comments he made in a podcast a year ago and only recently ‘exposed’.

I jestingly accused Milo of being a paedocrite here just a couple of weeks ago in a rather remarkably prescient satirical article I posted on the ‘rescue’ of young looking sex dolls by British police.

The intensely emotional scene was rudely interrupted by a question from Milo Yanapopolopohomolos, editor of controversial ‘alt-right’ news site ‘BriteFart’. Milo asked if it was obscene that the police were devoting so much resources to rescue young looking sex dolls when they had ignored the horrific rape by Muslim grooming gangs of thousands of real underage girls in towns such as Rotherham. Milo also asked if the police arresting ‘paedophiles’ for having sex with dolls was misguided when such dolls are clearly a substitute for real ‘children’. Indeed, did this not clearly prove the point of The Anti-feminist’ that paedohysteria is not about protecting children from abuse, but about protecting the older women’s ‘pussy cartel’? Milo was immediately arrested for Islamophobia and suspected paedophilia and later sentenced to life in prison. Only he wasn’t, because he’s a paedocrite himself, overcompensating at every turn for being a homosexual head of a right-wing movement.

The reason I called out Milo was that he has something of a history of accusing SJW opponents of being ‘pro-paedophilia’, even doxxing one in particular.  As indicated in my article, this is not surprising perhaps as the overtly homosexual head of an alternative right movement seeking acceptance in the God Fearing US of A.  I was unaware of the podcast.  I do know that Milo has taken a look at this site in the past, at least in relation to my own exposure of David Futrelle as a complete paedocrite subhuman.  And his comments on his podcast certainly mirror the arguments that we have resolutely tried to shout into the wind against the American paedohysteric hijackers of the MRM such as Paul Elam.  The essential idea that sexual attraction towards post-pubescents is not paedophilia, is not ‘ephebophilia’, but is simply being a man.

I haven’t listened to the complete podcast.  As far as I know, Milo – the world’s most famous anti-feminist – didn’t mention the age of consent in connection to the fact that it was feminists who raised it to 16 (or 18) in the USA and UK in the Victorian era with the specific aim of ‘controlling male sexuality’.  As far as I know, Milo didn’t mention that in the UK, Victorian feminists raised the age of consent to 16 (and tried to have it set at 21) in the very same parliamentary bill that criminalized homosexuality as an offence punishable by death. More’s the pity.

Milo quickly and unsurprisingly found himself ostracized by the American conservative establishment.  His planned speech at one of their prestigious institutions cancelled, his book deal dropped.  For a few days, Milo’s ‘apology’ was rather vague.  Of course he denounced child abuse, paedophilia etc.  Well, everybody at this site does too.  We just don’t accept the feminist sex cartel’s definitions of child abuse or paedophilia.

However, a week later, and a million extra Facebook followers later, he’s become a little more specific in his apologies.  He himself was abused by a subhuman paedophile at the ripe old age of 16 (legal in every civilized country except half of the USA).  Maybe the American conservatives who would like to see sodomites hung from the noose will forgive him after all?  Maybe his publishers will relent if he makes clear that the age of consent should be 21, in line with the latest femihag NGO recommendations (Equal, of course, for homosexuals and heterosexuals)?

What the Milo scandal has made clear is that the alt-right needs to sweep away the Conservative establishment, not burrow their nose in its wrinkly ass hoping for acceptance.  The Alt-right, influenced by the ideas of the MRM and more generally, the Manosphere/Red-Pill online movement, is a new Conservative Libertarian home for the generation brought up on hardcore tube porn, the brutal secular truths of evolutionary science, and the future promise of sexbots and holographic girlfriends.  There’s no going back to 1950’s America, and there’s no going forward with the lies of feminism and the Social Justice ‘Progressives’. Paedohysteria is one of the greatest of those lies and one of the most damaging to all the things that anyone with a real understanding of the word ‘Conservative’ should value.  It is a colossal lie that is only maintained by the kind of intimidatory witchhunts for anyone speaking against it that we just witnessed with Milo. Despite this, it will be one of the first lies to fall, and the scandal of last week should have been a defining moment in its fall. Sadly, Milo didn’t quite hold his nerve.

“In the future, everybody world-famous will be accused of paedophilia for 15 minutes”

(Andy Whorehole – 1968)

 

Spokane Resident Shamed & Treated Like a Paedophile by Starbucks for Asking Out Legal Aged Barista

A resident of Spokane has been barred from Starbucks for asking one of their baristas – a legal aged 16 year old girl – out for a meal. The 37 year old homeless man, Lucas Werner, has subsequently been shamed on social media with feminists and social justice warriors calling for him to be arrested as a paedophile, despite the girl being legal for both consenting sex and to being exploited on low wages as child labour by a faceless billion dollar corporation. What seems to have upset the feminist hags in particular, is that he not only asked out a barely legal teen, but stoutly defended his right to chase and date younger women, and has quite rightly made a claim of discrimination against Starbucks on the grounds of agism.

Despite multiple rejections, he refuses to date anyone over the age of 25, and has posted obsessively about trying to date young women.
‘I’ve never dated younger women. I want to try that,’ he explained.
Wener wrote that he goes on dating websites where he would lie about his age to try and speak to girls aged between 18 and 22, but admitted it ‘will eventually catch up to you’
‘The youngest women. There’s nothing wrong with that.’
Werner was banned from a Spokane Starbucks after making advances towards the teenager – who is less than half his age.
He then accused the girl and Starbucks of ageism, adding that he had just asked her to dinner and ‘didn’t even show her the Washington state age of consent link.’
‘I was flirted with by a barista. For some reason she thought I was funny. Said I was funny. So I gave her a note to see if she’d be interested in dinner’, the man wrote in a public Facebook post that has since gone viral.
He said he returned to the Starbucks the following day and a Spokane police officer told him he was banned from the location.
Spokane police said businesses are allowed to refuse service to anyone who is causing trouble or being disruptive for as long as they see fit.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4082616/I-won-t-stop-m-dating-women-born-1990s-Homeless-man-37-banned-Starbucks-asking-barista-16-admits-lying-age-dating-websites-meet-young-women.html

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=669_1483468359 (The feminist dog shaming him as a paedophile appears to be this person – Jillian Hunter).

(Paedocrite warning – the comments under the Daily Mail article are what we have come to expect. The sort that make you think the Islamization of the West isn’t such a bad thing anyway. Certainly not much left saving.)

Study Confirms Paedocrisy – ‘Men downplay their attraction to adolescent girls’

Scientists have finally gotten around to studying paedocrisy, one of the most interesting sociological/psychological phenomenons of the 21st century. And what did they find? That men downplay their attraction to adolescent girls, rating the same girls hotter when told they were older. Whoever would have predicted that?

https://philiaresearch.wordpress.com/2015/03/27/study-men-downplay-their-attraction-to-adolescent-girls/

[T]he consistent finding that the same photographs of younger females, but with different age labels, were assigned significantly different levels of attractiveness suggests that cognitive factors beyond biologically driven sexual attraction were involved in making these ratings. In all the three samples, apparently younger girls were rated as less attractive than older girls despite being the same photographs. We hypothesize that this difference reflects some self-censoring mechanism involved in making such judgments. This may involve a form of comparison between participants’ own sexual attraction to the individual girl and the likely social norms surrounding this judgment.

Thus paedohysteria and the coming sexual holocaust is built on a lie.

Men find adolescents sexy, but deny it for fear of being labelled paedos. As I said, no surprises there, you only have to read the comments section even here to see that sexual hypocrisy is part of what it means to be a man, as much as having a dick.

It would be interesting if a further study is made to investigate equally obvious links between the men who displayed the biggest discrepency in ratings (i.e. rating the girls lower if thought to be younger) and the most strongly held views on ‘paedos’.

‘If you can’t even own up to your own natural, healthy sexuality, do not expect anyone – including feminists and other men – to take you seriously.’

Quote of the year from loyal and esteemded reader ‘thedude’ :

If you can’t even own up to your own natural, healthy sexuality, do not expect anyone – including feminists and other men – to take you seriously.

Doesn’t really require a further explanation, but if the paedocrite manginas of the MHRM want to understand why men are held in such derisible contempt in today’s world – by both women and other men – then perhaps they should begin by looking at themselves.

http://theantifeminist.com/tribute-to-bridget-bardot-and-the-glory-of-healthy-male-sexuality/

10 Famous Pornstars Without Makeup (this is what you’re really fapping to)

I remember my old English teacher telling us that modern makeup is the only reason why the relatively recent phenomenon of females marrying outside of their teenage years is possible. Judging from the evidence here, it seems that makeup is the only reason why the billion dollar adult porn industry can exist too.

Allie Haze

allie-haze-without-makeup
Allie Haze without makeup

Anita Toro

anita-toro-without-makeup
Anita Toro without makeup

Bonnie Rotten

bonnie rotten without makeup
bonnie rotten without makeup

Brea Bennett

Brea Bennett without makeup
Brea Bennett without makeup

Bree Olson

Bree Olson without makeup
Bree Olson without makeup

Crista Moore

Crista Moore without makeup
Crista Moore without makeup

Dani Daniels

dani-daniels-without-makeup
Dani Daniels without makeup

Diamond Kitty

Diamond Kitty without makeup
Diamond Kitty without makeup

Eden VonSleeze

eden-vonsleaze-without-makeup

Jessica Mor

jessica-mor-without-makeup
Jessica Mor without makeup

Jynx Maze

jynx-maze-without-makeup
Jynx Maze without makeup

Keira King

keira-king-without-makeup
Keira King without makeup

Tiffany Tyler

 

tiffany-tyler-without-makeup
Tiffany Tyler without makeup

As the great Woody Allen once said – ‘sex is 99% in the mind’. And this is why those who believe that virtual sex will never replace the ‘real thing’ are 100% wrong.

‘Japanese young people don’t want love…or sex’

http://www.newser.com/story/176228/japans-young-people-dont-want-love-or-sex.html

Japan’s young people are not very interested in dating … but they’re not very interested in casual sex, either. According to a 2011 study, 61% of unmarried Japanese men and 49% of women aged 18 to 34 are not in any kind of romantic relationship—a figure that’s up 10% from five years prior. And a third of Japanese people under 30 have never dated at all. Meanwhile, another survey found 45% of women and more than a quarter of men aged 16 to 24 “were not interested in or despised sexual contact.” In Japan, they’re calling this new phenomenon “sekkusu shinai shokogun,” or “celibacy syndrome,” reports the Guardian, and it’s a big worry in a country with a rapidly shrinking population.

So what’s causing it? Some young professionals tell the paper that trying to balance a career and a relationship is “mendokusai”—too troublesome. “I don’t earn a huge salary to go on dates and I don’t want the responsibility of a woman hoping it might lead to marriage,” says a 31-year-old man who says he has simply ” learned to live without sex.”

I wonder also how much of this phenomenon is down to what appears to be a hardwired Japanese (male) sexual preference for adolescent girls, coupled with increasing regulation of such relationships between men and younger females?

10 years ago, the age of consent in Japan was 13, and a majority of Japanese schoolgirls were apparently engaging in ‘dates for gifts’ with older men. Due to Western and native feminist pressure, this has largely been obliterated.

While the aim of Japanese legislators might have been to encourage 20 something males to start coupling with 20 something females, it seems that Japanese men prefer not to be effectively raped by feminists, and choose instead to fap off to hentai porn and pictures of sweet Japanese teenies in bikinis.

Daily Mail Publishes Erotic Images of Underage Kendall Jenner, While Reporting that ‘Teen Selfies’ are Ending Up on Websites of ‘Paedophiles’

You really couldn’t make this up.

Once again, the Daily Mail appears to be immune to the very same ridiculous ‘child porn’ laws that it has not only fervently supported, but even expressed outraged when they do not always lead to the ‘guilty’ man being locked up to be raped.

Yesterday, the Mail published highly sexual photographs, and an even more sexually charged video, of Kendall Jenner, who will be ’18 in less than a month’ (well, that’s o.k. then), wearing only a skimpy bikini.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2457331/Kendall-Jenner-frolics-poolside-array-swimwear-flirty-new-campaign.html

In the UK, under femihag legislation, ‘jailbait’ images of scantilly dressed girls under 18 (or who even look under 18) are classed as level 1 child pornography, the same as toddlers posing with their legs apart.  Due to ShEU legislation, any man caught looking at such an image will face an automatic minimum of 1 year in prison.  This is in some part due to the Daily Mail, which has repeatedly expressed outrage that level 1′ child pornography’ typically only results in a police caution.

On the same day as their publication of what appears to be child porn under UK and EU law, the Daily Mail published a moral panic front page story of how the sexy selfie shots of teenage girls are ending up on the websites of ‘paedophiles’.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2458252/How-teens-sexting-photos-end-paedophile-websites.html

The Daily Mail is the most popular newspaper for British females aged over 35,  its key demographic, and its website is the most visited of any English language newspaper in the world.  Most of its ‘FEMAIL’ section is devoted to miracle diets and expensive skin creams that promise to turn its aging female readers into nubile teenage girls again, despite the message being successfully promoted elsewhere in the newspaper that men who find teenage girls attractive are sick perverted paedophiles who must be locked up for life to be repeatedly raped and beaten.

Even an aspie ‘ephebophile’ must surely be able to see the link?