I saw this quote from an academic treatise on ‘The Evolution of the Human Mating System’ in a Tweet by Rolf Degan. ‘Ephebophiles’ please note.
Note the sentence ”with men seeming to prefer women younger than the age of peak fecundity‘. I’ve argued for this for ten years now, putting myself against the Manosphere core assumption that because of the well known ‘scientific fact’ that women peak in fertility around the age of 21, it follows that this is the age most normal men find most attractive in a woman. It has most firmly been enshrined in Manosophere lore by the grandee Rollo Tomassi and his infamous ‘peak sexual market value curve’ graph.
As you can see, he actually claims that a woman reaches her peak sexual market value at the age of 23 (presumably, Tomassi thinks peak female fertility occurs at that age). This always struck me as complete and utter nonsense. A peak fertility of 21 or 23 (if that age is correct, and might not always historically have been so and is likely influenced by age of motherhood itself) means nothing other than it is the age at which women are most likely to give birth at after sex. It might say something important about likely female sexual strategy or preferences, it tells us little or nothing about what age a man would be expected to prefer in a sexual partner. In a society or culture in which some form of mate bonding is the norm, a man who is attracted to 15 year old girls will have a massive advantage over somebody attracted primarily to 23 year old women. Not only is the former choosing a female with far more reproductive years ahead of her, the 15 year old girl is of course far more likely to be a virgin. I’m not a regular reader of Rollo Tomassi, but I can assume he is aware of the importance of the ‘mummy’s baby, daddy’s maybe’ maxim in male evolutionary sexual strategies. Therefore, evolution has produced men to prefer young pubescent girls.
As the quote says, the most optimal mate seeking strategy for men would be to find a female who has only just begun ovulating, or is soon to start ovulating. In other words not yet pregnant, but about to be so (with your sperm if you can capture her heart (or father’s blessing) first). For most of human history, females would be impregnated as soon as they were able to be. On the male side, the winning reproductive lottery ticket goes to the man who is able to attract and keep a girl who is just starting puberty (and preferably other such girls too). Everybody alive today is the genetic result of our ‘paedophile’ sex predator ancestors.
Isn’t it ironic, that this whole paedohysteria over ‘sex predators’ is about stopping men doing what is most natural to them, and most essential to the survival of the human species – mate bonding with young teens? But far more ironic, that the very reason men prefer young pubescent females is because we are not chimpanzees (or PUAs, LOL!), and want to stick around with and protect our young loves.
The David Buss SMV graph (with a reader’s annotations) :
There have been a few major events over the last few months that if I wasn’t such a lazy bum who has little inclination to post anything here anymore I should really have commented upon. One such event, of course, was Donald Tump’s victory. Yes, I believe the online men’s rights movement – that the much missed and loved Angry Harry created – was at least a butterfly that did play a role in the storm that ultimately swept Trump to office.
Another notable event occurred last week, not of such obvious significance as America being made great again, but perhaps of much more relevance to our little corner of the Manosphere – the witchhunt against Milo Yiannopoulos for ‘pro paedophilia’ comments he made in a podcast a year ago and only recently ‘exposed’.
I jestingly accused Milo of being a paedocrite here just a couple of weeks ago in a rather remarkably prescient satirical article I posted on the ‘rescue’ of young looking sex dolls by British police.
The intensely emotional scene was rudely interrupted by a question from Milo Yanapopolopohomolos, editor of controversial ‘alt-right’ news site ‘BriteFart’. Milo asked if it was obscene that the police were devoting so much resources to rescue young looking sex dolls when they had ignored the horrific rape by Muslim grooming gangs of thousands of real underage girls in towns such as Rotherham. Milo also asked if the police arresting ‘paedophiles’ for having sex with dolls was misguided when such dolls are clearly a substitute for real ‘children’. Indeed, did this not clearly prove the point of The Anti-feminist’ that paedohysteria is not about protecting children from abuse, but about protecting the older women’s ‘pussy cartel’? Milo was immediately arrested for Islamophobia and suspected paedophilia and later sentenced to life in prison. Only he wasn’t, because he’s a paedocrite himself, overcompensating at every turn for being a homosexual head of a right-wing movement.
The reason I called out Milo was that he has something of a history of accusing SJW opponents of being ‘pro-paedophilia’, even doxxing one in particular. As indicated in my article, this is not surprising perhaps as the overtly homosexual head of an alternative right movement seeking acceptance in the God Fearing US of A. I was unaware of the podcast. I do know that Milo has taken a look at this site in the past, at least in relation to my own exposure of David Futrelle as a complete paedocrite subhuman. And his comments on his podcast certainly mirror the arguments that we have resolutely tried to shout into the wind against the American paedohysteric hijackers of the MRM such as Paul Elam. The essential idea that sexual attraction towards post-pubescents is not paedophilia, is not ‘ephebophilia’, but is simply being a man.
I haven’t listened to the complete podcast. As far as I know, Milo – the world’s most famous anti-feminist – didn’t mention the age of consent in connection to the fact that it was feminists who raised it to 16 (or 18) in the USA and UK in the Victorian era with the specific aim of ‘controlling male sexuality’. As far as I know, Milo didn’t mention that in the UK, Victorian feminists raised the age of consent to 16 (and tried to have it set at 21) in the very same parliamentary bill that criminalized homosexuality as an offence punishable by death. More’s the pity.
Milo quickly and unsurprisingly found himself ostracized by the American conservative establishment. His planned speech at one of their prestigious institutions cancelled, his book deal dropped. For a few days, Milo’s ‘apology’ was rather vague. Of course he denounced child abuse, paedophilia etc. Well, everybody at this site does too. We just don’t accept the feminist sex cartel’s definitions of child abuse or paedophilia.
However, a week later, and a million extra Facebook followers later, he’s become a little more specific in his apologies. He himself was abused by a subhuman paedophile at the ripe old age of 16 (legal in every civilized country except half of the USA). Maybe the American conservatives who would like to see sodomites hung from the noose will forgive him after all? Maybe his publishers will relent if he makes clear that the age of consent should be 21, in line with the latest femihag NGO recommendations (Equal, of course, for homosexuals and heterosexuals)?
What the Milo scandal has made clear is that the alt-right needs to sweep away the Conservative establishment, not burrow their nose in its wrinkly ass hoping for acceptance. The Alt-right, influenced by the ideas of the MRM and more generally, the Manosphere/Red-Pill online movement, is a new Conservative Libertarian home for the generation brought up on hardcore tube porn, the brutal secular truths of evolutionary science, and the future promise of sexbots and holographic girlfriends. There’s no going back to 1950’s America, and there’s no going forward with the lies of feminism and the Social Justice ‘Progressives’. Paedohysteria is one of the greatest of those lies and one of the most damaging to all the things that anyone with a real understanding of the word ‘Conservative’ should value. It is a colossal lie that is only maintained by the kind of intimidatory witchhunts for anyone speaking against it that we just witnessed with Milo. Despite this, it will be one of the first lies to fall, and the scandal of last week should have been a defining moment in its fall. Sadly, Milo didn’t quite hold his nerve.
“In the future, everybody world-famous will be accused of paedophilia for 15 minutes”
A resident of Spokane has been barred from Starbucks for asking one of their baristas – a legal aged 16 year old girl – out for a meal. The 37 year old homeless man, Lucas Werner, has subsequently been shamed on social media with feminists and social justice warriors calling for him to be arrested as a paedophile, despite the girl being legal for both consenting sex and to being exploited on low wages as child labour by a faceless billion dollar corporation. What seems to have upset the feminist hags in particular, is that he not only asked out a barely legal teen, but stoutly defended his right to chase and date younger women, and has quite rightly made a claim of discrimination against Starbucks on the grounds of agism.
Despite multiple rejections, he refuses to date anyone over the age of 25, and has posted obsessively about trying to date young women.
‘I’ve never dated younger women. I want to try that,’ he explained.
Wener wrote that he goes on dating websites where he would lie about his age to try and speak to girls aged between 18 and 22, but admitted it ‘will eventually catch up to you’
‘The youngest women. There’s nothing wrong with that.’
Werner was banned from a Spokane Starbucks after making advances towards the teenager – who is less than half his age.
He then accused the girl and Starbucks of ageism, adding that he had just asked her to dinner and ‘didn’t even show her the Washington state age of consent link.’
‘I was flirted with by a barista. For some reason she thought I was funny. Said I was funny. So I gave her a note to see if she’d be interested in dinner’, the man wrote in a public Facebook post that has since gone viral.
He said he returned to the Starbucks the following day and a Spokane police officer told him he was banned from the location.
Spokane police said businesses are allowed to refuse service to anyone who is causing trouble or being disruptive for as long as they see fit.
(Paedocrite warning – the comments under the Daily Mail article are what we have come to expect. The sort that make you think the Islamization of the West isn’t such a bad thing anyway. Certainly not much left saving.)
I remember my old English teacher telling us that modern makeup is the only reason why the relatively recent phenomenon of females marrying outside of their teenage years is possible. Judging from the evidence here, it seems that makeup is the only reason why the billion dollar adult porn industry can exist too.
As the great Woody Allen once said – ‘sex is 99% in the mind’. And this is why those who believe that virtual sex will never replace the ‘real thing’ are 100% wrong.