As I mentioned here a couple of days ago, it’s becoming a disturbing obsession amongst notable members of the conservative mansophere, including the likes of Roosh and Matt Forney (formerly of InMalaFide.com), to claim that the legalization of paedophilia is imminent, and that this is the logical outcome of a feminist ‘progressive’ society.
Living in the UK as I do (or having one reluctant foot remaining there) and witnessing the padohysteric madness that is taking place in that cuntry, where dead men are dug out of their graves and put on trial for
witchcraft ‘padophilia’, and dying old men who have led distinguished lives are openly branded child rapists and even child murderers on the evidence only of one or two obviously crazed fantasists, this manosphere treachery is quite hard to stomach. Particularly when it comes from figures who have been brave enough to formerly question the feminist narrative on ‘paedophilia’ and the grotesque inflation and abuse of the term that has successfully been forced upon society. Matt Forney, for example, always supported this site, as well as Jay Hammers when he was being attacked by Paul Elam as a ‘paedophile apologist’ over his age of consent article. Now that he is no longer ‘Ferdinand Bardemu’ and writing under his public persona, it’s understandable that he doesn’t want to venture into these topics, but to actively push the view that any questioning of paedohysteria represents a ‘progressive’ agenda to legalize sex with kids is an absolute betrayal. As Ludwig Wittgenstein once said, ‘that which we cannot speak of, we must shut the fuck up about’. Similarly, Roosh, whose courage clearly cannot be questioned, once dared to admit in a matter of fact manner that he was lucky enough to bang a 17 year old. Now he pushes the view that we are on a slippery slope of relaxing attitudes and laws on ‘paedophilia’, something which apparently is inevitable once we allow feminists to start tolerating male sodomy and gender switching transvestites.
Given that paedohysteria is largely the result of feminist and ‘progressive’ activism, this is absurd, as I made clear the other day. It’s also one thing to expose the frequent and disgusting hypocrisy (paedocrisy) of the left, such as David Futrelle and ‘Sarah’ Nyberg, and another thing entirely to push the ridiculous view that feminists and SJWs are actually seeking a ‘pro-paedophilia’ agenda.
The utter nonsense of this view was perfectly summed up in the tweet I published here of ‘Zelcorpian’, who linked to the most conservative newspaper in the UK, the Telegraph, over their objection of the destruction of a sex offender’s acclaimed art on the orders of a feminist judge. In the UK, even conservatives are now beginning to see the madness of feminist paedohysteria, as of course, they should. In the American manosphere, conservatives apparently see a feminist plot to stop the demonization and criminalization of hundreds of thousands or millions of men, to stop the further erosion of male authority, and to stop the creation of a generational apartheid that hurts men and children, fathers and their sons and their daughters. Doh!!!
But thankfully, not Heartiste, one of the few senior manosphere figures with genuine integrity, as well as courage.
A man was in a Massachusetts park, holding a camera and taking a stroll. A woman got the vapors from this horrible sight, and called the cops to tell them there was a pedophile stalking children. SIX cops surrounded the man and questioned him for twenty minutes, before letting him go. He wrote an open letter to the fevered bitch who wanted to criminalize his existence.
See also : https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2011/06/22/the-pedophile-libel/