Category Archives: Male Sexuality

Study Finds That Sexual Competition Causes Jealousy and Envy More to Women than to Men

Featured

Posted on by
8

Well, whaddya know?  Looks like the boffins are finally catching up with sexual trade union theory, as well as basic common sense.  No, really, cultural marxism explains everything about feminism (sarcasm).

http://www.counselheal.com/articles/1762/20120503/sexual-competition-causes-jealousy-envy-more-women.htm

Sexual competition affects women more than men in raising jealousy and envy in a work environment, according to a recent study.

The study of analyzing the differences between men and women in feeling jealous and envious was published in the journal Revista de Psicología Sociai by a group of researchers from universities in Valencia, Spain, Groningen, Netherlands, and Palermo, Argentina. Women are more likely to feel jealous and envy in a sexual competition than men, while social skills provoked men and women equally.


“Women with a high level of intrasexual competition are more jealous if the rival is more attractive and more envious if the rival is more powerful and dominating. They did not get any results in men, as no rival characteristics that provoke jealousy or envy predicted intrasexual competition,” co-author Rosario Zurriaga at University of Valencia told Servico de Información y Noticias Científicas (SINC).

Intrasexual competition, as the study defined, is a competition between same sex people trying to keep access to the opposite sex. The group of researchers distributed questionnaires to around 200 people and chose 114 as the sample for the exploratory study. The sample was 50 percent men and 50 percent women, and they had an average age of 36 years and spent 11 years in their current employment.

The studied defined jealously as “a threat or loss of success in a relationship due to interference from a rival and implies a loss or threat of loss of what they had” and envy as “a response to another person who has success, skills, or qualities that they desire and involves a lack in comparison to the envied person”.

Sexual competition made women feel jealous and envious more so than men. Rival’s social skills, however, provoked both men and women equally.

“Our research intends to clarify the role of emotions like envy and jealousy at work. These feelings have not been studied in working contexts and can cause stress in workers and negatively affect the quality of working life,” said the researcher.

“This is one of the first studies that examines rivals’ characteristics in this environment and contributes to a better understanding of conflicts and problems that can occur in working relationships,” they said.

The study implied that in order to prevent the negative effects, they should modify aspects such as the perception of threat, loss, or comparison with others at work.

Thousands Call for ‘Rapist’ Ched Evans to be Stripped of Footballing Award

Featured

Posted on by
8

‘Rapist’ footballer Ched Evans, jailed for a sickening 5 years for having sex with a drunk woman, despite the fact that the same court ruled that just hours earlier she had been able to consent to fuck the black cock of one of Ched’s footballing friends, now finds that the good people of Change.org are petitioning to have him stripped of a footballing award he had recently won.

http://www.jusnews.net/en/11/news/610/Thousands-call-for-Ched-Evans-to-be-stripped-of-award.htm

Nearly 9,000 people have signed an online petition calling for Sheffield United striker Ched Evans to be stripped from an end-of-season honours list after his rape conviction.

The Wales forward was named in the Professional Footballers Association (PFA) League One team of the year last month just two days after being jailed for raping a 19-year-old woman.

Leo Hardt, who launched the petition, said that Evans’s inclusion sent out “a very troubling message” to young people.

But the PFA defended the player-voted award, which it said was determined “purely on footballing ability”.

23-year-old Evans is appealing the five-year jail sentence handed down to him after he was found guilty of raping the woman in a hotel near Rhyl in north-east Wales in May last year.

 

Here’s the Change.org petition, signed by the usual collection of feminist dogs and their mangina pussy begging allies.

Meanwhile, no less than THIRTEEN people have been arrested for naming the woman on Twitter.

This seems to be part of a disturbing trend of the feminist state in the UK ferociously cracking down on any attempts at subversion.  Recently, a man who hacked into the website of a pregnancy advisory board and published the names of women who had killed their unborn children was sentenced to a ridiculously excessive 2 years in jail.

This week, British femiservative Louise Mensch, behind hysterical attempts to de-sexualise and infantalise her 17 year old sexual rivals, defended Rupert Murdoch in an official government review into the News Corp hacking scandal – defending a  man in charge of an organization that hacked into the mobile phone of a murdered 13 year old school kid in order to feed its subhuman readers salacious new paedo scoops.  As a result of her defence of the odious Murdoch and his child abusing organization, Mensch has understandably attracted insults and even ‘threats’ that any politician in the same situation would.  Yet she is now provoking hysteria in the media over the ‘sexist’ nature of the insults : http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/twitter/9241388/Louise-Mensch-MP-exposes-shameful-bullying-of-women-on-Twitter-after-personal-attacks.html

Can you smell a ‘misogyny hate speech’ law coming…?

Human Stupidity Comment On Feminist Defined Male Sexuality

Featured

Posted on by
13

This comment appeared underneath JohnTheOther’s excellent reply to CNN’s ‘Are Men Stupid’ article :

Great article. It is also great to see that you attack feminist defined male sexuality.

I arrived at the men’s movement through interest in male sexual liberty and its restriction, be it age of consent issue (access to post-pubertal women), prostitution and simply sexual freedom.

Then I found out about father’s rights and the absurd enslavement of “good” family men. Really shocking. Did not know about it though I probably unconsciously avoided getting kids because of such laws. I had women that wanted my kids, no strings attached, just for their nice green eyes. I knew better and emptied out my condoms after use and checked if the condom wrappers still had air in them before use.

What still takes me aback is the great rift between the conservative father’s movement, that wants to make sure the perverts preying on their 17 year old daughters go to prison, and the sexual liberation anti-feminists.

It is very sad that the feminists disagree on prostitution and sexual liberty, but still invite SCUM authors and still don’t get a serious rift between the sexual liberation feminists and the main stream sex repressors. They agree but unite against men on all other issues they agree on.

On the other hand I am still dismayed that some great mens rights blogs got shut down because of a well known and very serious argument with well known writers of this great site. That rift could have ended in serious legal trouble, court and prison.

Men don’t need feminists to disturb their liberation movement, they destroy each other. This is very sad, and an issue that needs to be addressed.

While some people here would support lowering the age of consent to 16, very few would just support getting government out of adolescent’s bed rooms and scrape age of consent altogether or get it to protect only pre-pubertal children.

I keep repeating that that does not mean that people are free to prey on your daughters, it means that it should not be the government’s problem how you EDUCATE and CONTROL your daughter.

Also I don’t need to stress that age of consent draconian laws with absurd punishments (it should be a misdemeanor to err by 1-2 years) make women 5 years above the age of consent too dangerous to deal with (to be on the safe side don’t mess with anyone under 25. Even if you are only 20)

 

Notice this rather less perfect comment from the usually excellent ‘STU’ underneath the same article :

Hating on men for their sexuality, sex lives etc is one of the main tools feminists use to bring men down. Even men get on the bandwagon hating on other men for this. They should just shrug and say, so what. It’s all manginarism though, pretending to be horrified at the sex life of another man who has earned the wrath of the feminists. It’s all about…..yes……I’m not like that….I am……The One Good Man…….now…..how about a blow job.

We should just shrug and say so what, at any and all men’s sexual activity, apart from sexual activity with minors, or actual forced rape of course. In fact, we should have the same attitude for women to. Fuck as many men as you like, play on both sides of the fence, have all the fetishes and perversion that take your fancy……..fine by us….it’s only a problem when a woman uses her sexual activity to hurt men, cry victim, sexually out others to do harm, or make profit. I would put slutwalkers into that category as well.

 

“apart from sexual activity with minors, or actual forced rape of course”.

Now that’s odd, because STU here is putting having sex with minors (under 18) on the same level as forced rape, even though in bar a handful of Islamic medieval states, nowhere on Earth is it yet illegal to simply have sex with a consenting 17 year old.  Even in the US of A, the age of consent is 16 in most states.  In Europe, the average age of consent is 14.

Furthermore, despite being an experienced MRA, who appears to ‘get it’ as far as the understanding of feminist control of male sexuality is concerned, STU appears unaware or oblivious to the fact that it was feminists who created statutory rape laws in the late 19th and early 20th century.

Unfortunately, for some MRAs, feminist self-interested control of male sexuality is actually a good thing when it happens to agree with a conservative father’s desire for sexual control over his teenage daughter.

Football Star Jailed for Five Years for ‘Raping’ Intoxicated Woman

Posted on by
11

Advice for multi-million pound footballers (soccer players) :  Next time you’re out on the town in  a typical British city, and hundreds of barely dressed intoxicated sluts are everywhere, each of them on the prowl for a fuck or a fight, bear in mind that even though most of these girls have no shame in fucking, pissing, vomiting, or even shitting in the street, ass cracks exposed to any passing strangers, they often do have enough dignity and sense of honour to put a burqa clad muslim virgins to shame.

In fact, enough dignity  for a judge to hand you 5 years of prison ass rape, as well as an utterly destroyed sporting career, if the woman happens to wake up sober in the morning feeling like a slut and with little recollection of what happened.

Teenager too drunk to consent

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/ched-evans-team-mate-brands-victim-801734

A team-mate of a footballer jailed for five years for raping a teenager “too drunk to consent” has sparked fury by branding the victim a “slag” and “money-grabbing little tramp”.

Wales international Ched Evans cried hysterically as he was found guilty of the attack in May last year.

Following the verdict, the 23-year-old’s Sheffield United team-mate Connor Brown posted a foul-mouthed rant on his Twitter page.

The 19-year-old branded the law “a load of f*****g s**t” and showed his support for Evans by adding: “I’m with you geez”.

He then accused the 19-year-old victim, who cannot be named for legal reasons, of being a “money-grabbing little tramp”, according to the Daily Mail.

He continued his extraordinary attack by writing: “If ur a slag ur a slag don’t try get money from being a slag (sic) … Stupid girls… I feel sick.”

The offending tweets, which were shared with his 776 followers, were later removed from his profile.

He later restricted his Twitter account so his tweets could not be viewed.

 

Note that the ‘Mirror’ newspaper is a kind of downmarket version of the Daily Mail, appealing to a largely female demographic and consequently filling half of its pages with articles relating to sex and relationships (from a woman’s point of view).

Related : http://eivindberge.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/how-dare-men-think-yes-means-yes.html

Porn – ‘The Real Mainstream Media’

Posted on by
10

http://reason.com/blog/2012/04/19/the-real-mainstream-media

According to Google’s DoubleClick Ad Planner, which tracks users across the web with a cookie, dozens of adult destinations populate the top 500 websites. Xvideos, the largest porn site on the web with 4.4 billion page views per month, is three times the size of CNN or ESPN, and twice the size of Reddit. LiveJasmin isn’t much smaller. YouPorn, Tube8, and Pornhub — they’re all vast, vast sites that dwarf almost everything except the Googles and Facebooks of the internet.

While page views are a fine starting point, they only tell you that X porn site is more popular than Y non-porn site. Four billion page views sure sounds like a lot, but it’s only when you factor in what those porn surfers are actually doing that the size and scale of adult websites truly comes into focus….

The main difference between porn and non-porn sites is the average duration of a visit: For a news site like Engadget or ExtremeTech, an average visit is usually between three and six minutes; enough time to read one or two stories. The average time spent on a porn site, however, is between 15 and 20 minutes.

Furthermore, “porn sites cope with astronomical amounts of data. The only sites that really come close in term of raw bandwidth are YouTube or Hulu, but even then YouPorn is something like six times larger than Hulu.” YouPorn also “serves 4000 pages per second, equating to burst traffic in the region of 100 gigabytes per second, or 800Gbps. This is equivalent to transferring more than 10 dual-layer DVDs every second.”

 

It’s sobering to think that there are dozens of sexual trade union lobby groups actively seeking to make all porn illegal.  Perhaps the largest of them, Morality In Media, has even succeeded in garnering promises from Presidential candidates that this will actually happen if they are elected.  That same organisation appears to want the mere viewing of porn made illegal, as it is with child porn, using the same spurious supply and demand arguments.  And yet you will hardly find a single men’s rights activist voicing any objection against this, despite feminist and femiservative lobby groups being perilously close to criminalizing virtual the entire male population.  John the Other is one of the few MRAs who defends a man’s right to view images of the opposite sex in private and not face being hauled away by the feminist state to be incarcerated as a result.   Yet even he is only allowed to voice his arguments on his own YouTube channel.  In fact, most MRAs will pretend that feminism is the cause of the ‘pornification’ of society, despite all the evidence to the contrary in the actions of feminist lobby groups and resulting legislative creep.

Meanwhile, British femiservatives continue to try to hold back the tide of technology by stoking moral panic over children and porn :

Children grow up addicted to online porn sites

A ‘guinea pig’ generation of children is growing up addicted to hardcore internet pornography, MPs were warned last night.

Four out of five 16-year-old boys and girls regularly access porn online while one in three ten-year-olds has seen explicit material, a disturbing cross-party report reveals.

It also cites figures showing that more than a quarter of young patients being treated at a leading private clinic are receiving help for addiction to online pornography.

‘One in three ten year olds’ has seen explicit material – well if ten year olds are sexually innocent, as feminists often hold that even 17 year old girls are, then what is there to worry about?  Children can’t possibly understand what they are seeing when looking at porn – just two adults doing very strange things to each other’s bodies.
I don’t doubt the figures quoted in the article, but more distubing than the statistics themselves is the continued and growing pretence that 16 and 17 year old ‘children’ are sexually clueless and innocent when they are, according to the Daily Mail itself, ‘regularly looking at hardcore porn’.
Technology continues to make sex accessible and open for everybody, and yet society, influenced by the sexual trade union and their religious loon allies of convenience, continues to try to ‘turn back the clock’ and enforce a morality and presupposition of ‘childhood’ innocence (i.e. teenage) that never even existed in their regressive medieval fantasy worlds.

BBC : Are Thin Women the Enemy?

Posted on by
11

The BBC sexual trade union mouthpiece finally brings a breath of much needed honesty to its reports, or at least its headline in this case :

BBC : Are Thin Women the Enemy?

From super-skinny celebrities to models with low BMI, people are speaking out about women they perceive to be too thin. But some experts worry this behaviour makes things worse.

This week, Israel passed a law banning models from advertisements or fashion shows if they measure less than 18.5 on the body mass index (BMI). It’s part of an effort to promote health for women of all sizes, and to stop glorifying the ultra-thin.

“Beautiful is not underweight,” says Rachel Adato, one of the creators of the bill.

In recent years, much attention has been paid to how women are portrayed in the media, whether it’s an overly airbrushed magazine model with an impossibly slim waist, or a TV starlet with protruding collar bones.

In an era when pro-anorexia communities congregate on social media sites like Pinterest, it’s no wonder that lawmakers are concerned with women’s body image.

For sure, reducing the number of images that portray women as very thin is beneficial, says Claire Mysko, director of Proud2BeMe, a website created with the National Eating Disorders Association (Neda) to promote healthy body image.

“There is a danger in being constantly exposed to one image of beauty,” she says. “There is a serious lack of body diversity in the media. People are not seeing themselves and their bodies reflected.”

 

It’s been claimed by homophobes that the use of ridiculously skinny models is rife in the fashion world because the industry is dominated by homosexuals – the nearest thing they can get to dressing up sexless boys in their favourite dresses.

I think it’s more likely that the fashion designers, and those who attend the shows and buy the magazines with the models on the front covers, simply want to see beautiful fashions associated with beautiful girls.  Models tend not to be fat and ugly because nobody would even be able to look long enough to notice the clothes.

Despite what blank slatist feminist fantasists would have, men and women know what female beauty is, and it’s not a size 14.  Having said that, neither is an anorexic 6ft model.  So why are there so many fashion models like that?

Steve Moxon argues that eating disorders in adolescent girls and young women are a kind of psychological resistance to the awareness that one is changing from a peak sexually desirable menarcheal girl into a woman.  I suppose skinny models could therefore be presenting the subliminal message to women that, in this dress, you too can be back to your young adolescent virginal self.  Height isn’t noticeable on a magazine cover when the model is alone, and is even hard to judge on the runway.  Long slender legs, and a slim girlish waist are more noticeable.

Ironically, the ban on young girls taking part in fashion shows and model shoots might be making the problem worse, if skinny models are a kind of replacement for the teenage girls who would otherwise predominate.

Regardless of all these thoughts, the fact remains that, no matter how tragic anorexia is, the problem of obesity is an immeasurably greater and more serious health issue facing children and young people today (both boys and girls).

To focus on slim  models as ‘the enemy’ because it supposedly presents a ‘narrow ideal of beauty’, and to actively encourage larger women to be portrayed as an ideal in the media at a time when a fifth of children are already obese in the UK, is nothing short of child abuse, and one of the sexual trade union’s most wicked crimes against children.

NSPCC Abuse Hysteria Anti-Father Pays Their Salaries Publicity Given Thumbs Up By Watchdog

Posted on by
6

Radical feminist fake children’s charity the NSPCC has had a controversial publicity campaign cleared by the industry watchdog.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/advertising/regulator-clears-nspcc-publicity-7579945.html

Publicity for children’s charity the NSPCC has been cleared by the advertising regulator after complainants described its reference to child abuse as “disturbing and offensive”.

The DVD case, sent as a direct mailing in December, featured text stating: “Kerry’s father asked her to do the unthinkable. And then he filmed it.”

A leaflet inside the DVD said: “The footage of Kerry is now with the police. As is her father, because she was able to talk to ChildLine.”

Seven complainants objected that the text on the cover was disturbing and offensive while another said it could cause distress to individuals who had suffered abuse.

Another said the case was inappropriate for children to see.

Defending the wording, the NSPCC said it relied on mailings generating a good level of response from donors and it was therefore important that they stood out.

Underage Models Risk Creating ‘Hyper-Sexualised French Lolitas’

Posted on by
24

The Telegraph prints an article on a subject I was alerted to and posted on recently : the bid by feminists in France to ban beauty pageants, child models, and ‘adult’ clothing for children (children being defined as under 18 or 16).

The French report suggests restricting beauty pageants to girls aged over 16 or 18, banning advertisers from dressing under age models in adult attire or using them as brand figureheads. It also advocates the return of uniforms in primary schools phased out in 1968 and considered a curious British anachronism by many.

Titled ‘Against hyper-sexualisation, a new fight for equality’, the report was triggered by international outrage over a French Vogue magazine cover featuring a heavily made-up 10-year-old model.

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/9126568/Under-age-models-risk-creating-hyper-sexualised-French-lolitas.html

I’ve added a comment below the article – please add your own :

Whilst concerns over the sexualisation of 8 year olds might have some validity, we all know this is about feminists exploiting such concerns to artificially ‘de-sexualise’ teenage girls.

First you legally define children as anyone under 18 (when throughout history, adulthood began at puberty).

Then, when most people still associate ‘childhood’ with pre-pubescents, you create a hysteria over the ‘sexualisation of childhood’.

Finally, you legally ban 17 year olds from wearing thongs or mini-skirts as part of a legislative package supposedly to protect pre-teens, which no politician chasing the female vote (every politician in a modern democracy), the family values vote, and the muslim vote,  dare challenge.

This way, 40 year old feminists (not to mention 40 year old male Islamists) don’t have to be wracked with pain everytime they walk down the street, having to pass girls at the peak of their beauty displaying their flawless skin.

This is how third wave feminism operates, increasingly in conjunction with the Islamisation of society.  Feminists can’t honour kill their younger sexual rivals, but they do have the power and spurious moral authority to forcibly victimise 17 year old ‘children’.

 

In the same newspaper, and on a closely related Islamo-feminist slut shaming theme, a British girl has become the first white victim of honour killing by the muslim community :

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/9149929/Teenager-is-first-white-victim-of-honour-killing.html