Anti-Feminist Theory of Men's Rights, Male Sexuality, Feminism

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22341867

Male prisoners in England and Wales must work harder for privileges such as TVs in cells, the government has said.

From November, under changes to the Incentives and Earned Privileges scheme, inmates must “actively earn privileges” – “a simple absence of bad behaviour will not be enough”.

Satellite and cable TV channels, currently available in some private prisons, will be banned altogether.

Other changes to the scheme will include:

A longer working day for prisoners
A ban on films with an 18 certificate
Extra gym time being dependent “on active engagement with rehabilitation”
Restricted privileges, including access to private cash, for prisoners in the first two weeks of their sentence. They must also wear uniform at entry level
Prisoners then put on either basic or standard “IEP level” depending on how they “co-operate with the regime or engage in rehabilitation”
Those on basic level no longer allowed TVs in cells

 

See also : http://theantifeminist.com/uk-prison-criticised-over-handling-of-sex-offenders/

Just saw this via a tweet by Eivind Berge, made a couple of days ago.  The link is in Norwegian, but according to Google Translate, it appears that a mangina political reform group is demanding that anti-feminist ‘threats’ and ‘gender based harassment’ be made illegal in all of the Nordic countries.  Hopefully Eivind will drop by and shed some more light on this disturbing development :

http://www.nrk.no/nyheter/norge/1.10946673

(Google Translate)

The Panel recommends that the Nordic countries ensures that threats and harassment on grounds of sex is illegal.

This information comes from a report that Reform – resource for men, delivered the government at 10 Wednesday morning.

Group wants anti-feminist statements shall be subject to racist speech can.

- We believe that the legislation is too weak to counter the wave of anti-feminist threats, says CEO Reforms Are Saastad to NRK.no.

- Are not all threats serious? Why the angle of the anti feminist threats?

- You can ask for. We are not concerned with legislation against anti-feminist attitudes, but that the legislation should include this. Men are affected as well, but we see that harassment in the emphasis goes beyond those fronts equality, answer Saastad.

Expert Committee says the following in the report:

“We recommend that the governments of each of the Nordic countries ensures that threats and harassment on the basis of sex is illegal. In the national legislation must utterances appear punished in line with statements in other media and the public at large. Such protection is not in place in all the Nordic countries. “

We all know how feminists can twist just about anything, from criticism of feminism to video games, into ‘gender based harassment’ :

http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/0/21548716

In this ferocious period across 1645 and 1646, more than 100 women were hanged as witches.

‘Gaunt old hag’

Poor, older women were the main victims, matching public expectations of a witch. The Discoverie of Witchcraft written in 1584 by witchcraft sceptic Reginald Scot describes those typically accused of witchcraft as “old, lame, bleare-eied, pale, fowle… poore, sullen, superstitious and papist”.

“Witchcraft is very closely related to [a personification of] envy,” says Professor Lyndal Roper, of the University of Oxford, who has extensively researched the witch-hunts of Germany.

“Artistic representations of envy show her as a gaunt old hag.”

“Women accused of witchcraft tend to be past child-bearing age – fertility is very important.”

Older women, she contends, were viewed as envious of younger women’s fertility and their role in society. Moreover, fertility constituted a woman’s basic social function.

“If a new mother or infant failed to thrive, she might accuse an older woman, often the lying-in maid, of having harmed them by witchcraft.”

As well as the numbers involved in the witch hunts of the medieval and (astonishingly) ‘early modern’ periods of European history being massively exaggerated, the idea that they were specifically a persecution against women of any kind is also largely false (notice the BBC article does not mention that in total almost as many men as women were killed for witchcraft – although it is true that Matthew Hopkins did appear to focus solely on women).

However, the popular academic theory that hundreds or possibly thousands of women were burnt at the stake during these times because of some underlying social intolerance of infertile hags, and an inutitive recognition on the part of the medieval public  that such old hags are envious of younger females, and capable of evil as a result, is very interesting.

And encouraging.

There is a school of thought in the MRM that the difficulty we face in getting men to see that women are doing bad things to them is due to some inherent constitution of the male mind.  In terms of resisting the Sexual Trade Union, it may be close to impossible, perhaps even genetically, for men to recognise the female scheming and subterfuge that is taking place on a mass scale before their eyes, and be capable of hating and fighting those women who are committing that evil against them.  In particular, the idea that older women are abusing their power and destroying the lives of millions of men through simple motives such as sexual envy at the beauty and fertility of younger women may be something that the male brain is hardwired to ignore.  In fact, I’ve almost despaired recently at the possibility of getting all of my readers to see this, let alone the MRM in general, and let alone men in general.  But if the ignorant medieval public could yet see the obvious, maybe there is still hope for us today.

The modern day witch finders are of course the pedo finder generals -  paedocrites in the service of the repulsive old hags of the Sexual Trade Union.  But it might just take a little change in society for the hags themselves to once again become the hunted.  Perhaps the real witch finders will one day return.

Well it didn’t take long did it?  No sooner are 3D printers starting to make their way into the homes of suburban American families, and while Dad’s at work, Mom and daughter are using the damn things to print out vibrators and dildos shaped in the exact 3D scanned dimensions of barely legal Justin Bieber’s head.  I’m sure Justin is happy having his head downloaded and shoved into the vaginas of countless aging female paedophiles, but I’m not sure what could count as any worse sexual objectification than that.  Ah well.  In another 20 years these things will be printing out ultra-realistic Miley Cyrus sex bots (replicas of her pole-dancing 17 year old self, not her future one as a drug and alcohol ravaged cougar wreck).

http://makerlove.com/Free-3D-Sex-Toys/Justin-Bieber-Sex-Toy/index.html

http://angryharry.com/esTheyearis2052.htm

It is Angry Harry’s birthday.

He is 100 years old today!

Hurrah for Angry Harry!

“Oooo. Aaaggh. Oh, my goodness. My back hurts,” he says.

“Well, you are 100!” says his wife proudly.

“Hhhaaahhhh. That’s better,” he continues, as his wife lovingly props the pillow under him so that he can sit up more comfortably in the bed while he sips his tea.

“Does it still hurt?” she asks kindly.

“Oh yes,” Angry Harry replies. “My muscles are sore from all that lifting yesterday. And that twenty-mile run has made my buttocks ache.”

“Twenty miles?” says his second wife. “That’s nothing for you Angry Harry. You normally do forty!”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2256850/How-feminism-blame-breakdown-family-Left-winger-Diane-Abbott.html (Warning – does contain images that readers may find offensive)

Feminism is partly to blame for the breakdown of the family, one of Labour’s most senior female politicians has said.

Diane Abbott, the party’s public health spokesman, said that major issues facing society ‘stem from family breakdown’.

And in a surprise admission from one of the Left’s most outspoken feminists, she conceded that women’s rights campaigners have neglected the family.

Miss Abbott, a divorced mother with one son, also highlighted the harmful impact on society of internet pornography and fast food…

..Miss Abbott also threw her support behind Tory MP Claire Perry’s crusade to introduce controls on viewing internet pornography.

‘Children very young, ten or 11, can go online and see stuff they could not have bought in a newsagent 20 years ago,’ she said. ‘This crude pornification is new, and leads to the objectification of the human body, especially girls’ bodies.’

“leads to the objectification of the human body, especially girls’ – what these old hags wouldn’t give to have their bodies turned into those of a nubile teenage girl, and be objectified by every man that looks their way..or at least every Alpha male. I wonder how many hours Diane Abbot spends every day applying make-up, choosing fashions, trying to eat right to keep what’s left of her figure etc ? If male science ever gives these femihags total power to choose how they look, you can be sure they will choose the look that leads to them being ‘objectified’ the most, and you wont ever hear a peep from them again about objectification.

As for her turn to femiservatism, it’s unsurprising when you realise that feminists are just parasites who hijack any cause or ideology in order to raise their sexual market value. Feminists or femiservatives never actually believe any of the shit they come out with, and certainly not the ideology their sexual trade unionism comes dressed in. Women, and feminists like Abbott, are starting to see that despite all the draconian legislation introduced by left-wing feminists, the free sexual market has still not been closed. Unable to grasp that this is because the sexual market is dictated by technologies that humans have little control over (such as the creation of the internet), they are now flooding to either femiservatism or Islam in order to vainly preserve their vag value.

Happily, as mentioned above, possibly within decades, it will become a reality that even the likes of Dianne Abbott will be able to look like a 15 – 16 year old Anna Kournikova. When that happens, the sex war ends, as does the Sexual Trade Union, as does the criminalization of male sexuality.

http://nextbigfuture.com/2013/01/new-method-allows-scientists-to-insert.html

Sexual Trade Union theory predicts that as technological progress speeds up, and continues to open the sex market and lower the ‘price’ of sex (or sexual satisfaction) for men, feminism will continue to legislate against male sexuality at an ever greater rate, in an ever more vain attempt to turn back the clock.

For a pro-male sexuality men’s rights movement to have any hope of fighting the rush of Sexual Trade Union leglislation, we need to keep watch on what is likely to happen in the future with regard to technology impacting upon the sex market and the driving forces motivating feminism.  The most obvious way to do this is to follow some of the numerous websites devoted to charting the latest developments in cutting edge science that promise to revolutionise society (I have some of them listed in my sidebar to the right).

The most fundamental way that science will change society in the coming decades will be by altering human beings themselves, the ramifications of which are explored in the philosophy known as Transhumanism.  Our bodies and probably even our minds will undergo more change in the next 100 years than the previous 100,000.   And given that sex is at the heart of both evolution and human psychology, the consequences for the free sexual market, and for the sex war between men and women, will likely make the mayhem caused by the introduction of the contraceptive pill look like a mere ripple in a stream by comparison.

Unfortunately, most transhumanist sites are firmly in the (il)liberal (un)progressive camp, and usually blindly supportive of feminism.  In fact, it’s fair to say that feminists have had even more success in hijacking the secular agenda of transhumanism even more than they have thus far with atheism.

However, a new transhumanist site is at least promising to challenge sex laws, whether they be outdated by new technology, or inappropriate and clumsy attempts to resist new technology.  The site is Transhumanity.net, run by our old friend Hank Pellissier.

Transhumanity.net has been offering its audience news and viewpoints on transhumanist topics ranging from Life Extension to Artificial Intelligence. We feel this is important, but we’re aware that multiple other websites provide the same package.

Let’s try something new, we decided, that other h+ sites aren’t focused on. How about…?…

….Sex: Men and women think about sex 10-19 times a day. Since most of us are semi-obsessed with eros, Transhumanity.net is going to offer regular articles on the topic, on subjects like cosmetic enhancement, sex robots, birth control, sexual identity, and sex laws. Pictures included. Send us ideas on areas you’d like us to… uncover…

…Controversy: We’re committed to taking on the most flammable topics. Gun laws, pedophilia, religion, UFOs, secession, conspiracy theories – if it’s taboo and rude, Transhumanity.net is interested. Please email us your shameless suggestions.

http://transhumanity.net/news/entry/transhumanity.net-expands-into-activism-and-creativity

A typically briliant and provocative article from Spiked Online’s Brendan O’Neil :

http://www.spiked-online.com/site/article/13164/

..The central problem with the gay marriage agenda is not that at some point in the future an unwilling man of the cloth might be strongarmed into giving his blessing to a gay union, but rather that it allows the state to do something that was traditionally considered beyond its purview: to redefine the meaning of marriage and, by extension, the meaning of the marital home, the family, and our most intimate relationships. Some have sought to depict the drive for gay marriage as a continuation of the struggle for civil rights that exploded in the mid-twentieth century; it’s better understood as a continuation, and intensification, of the modern state’s desire to get a foot in the door of our private lives and to assume sovereignty over our relationships…