Category Archives: Feminism and Islam

Brazil Officially Recognises the Gay – Feminist Faustian Pact

Posted on by
9

Brazil last week awarded gay couples the same legal status as married heterosexuals.  The decision by the nation’s Supreme Court was seen as a victory for the newly elected female President Dilma Roussef.  She apparently saw this as an essential plank of her intended social policy reforms, which will turn Brazil into a modern and sexually tolerant civilised society, and which no doubt include plans to send any man who clicks on a youngish looking cartoon character to rot inside a rat infested prison cell.

Gay activists in Brazil are delighted.  One claimed that “the degree of civilisation of a country can be measured by the way people in a nation treat their homosexual community”.  It seems that Brazil can continue to have 12 million kids sleeping on the streets, hundreds of whom are killed and mutiliated by death squads each year, but so long as we pretend that gay men have as much innate desire as heterosexual women do to spend their entire lives monogamously with one partner, then Brazil shall be proudly awarded a place amongst the 21st century liberal progressive club of civilised nations. 

Nor does the mark of a civilisation seemingly depend on the way in which ordinary heterosexuals are treated by society.  Men are biologically programmed to find fertility and youth, as well as physical markers of virginity, sexually attractive in females.  Girls increasingly begin puberty well before they are even into their teens, yet through feminist lobbying, conservative puritanism, and media hysteria, we have created a society that defines men who openly show attraction towards 16 and 17 year old females as the worst kind of subhuman sexual devient, and even pursuing an interest in young women aged between 18 and 25 now carries with it the risk of falling foul of ‘anti-paedophile’ legislation or social ostracisation.

And are gays themselves really treated much better by society than before?  The supreme act of denial behind the more ‘tolerant’ treatment of homosexuals is that the worship of youth and beauty has not been central to homosexual culture throughout history.  I don’t wish to denounce or degrade this love – after all, through the ancient Athenian thinkers and the Florentine renaissance artists, it gave us our very civilisation….twice.  But it is in an undeniable fact, and it would be harder to name a homosexual in history who wasn’t attracted to youth than it would be to reel off the great rollcall of homosexual ephebophiles – from Socrates to Morrissey (celibate).

Recently, the out-going British Labour government awarded a state apology to the deceased Alan Turing, the inventor of the computer and arguably a man who did as much to save the world from the Nazis as Winston Churchill himself.  A man who picked up and sodomized a teenage boy (he was 19, but I wonder if he asked him for his ID?) knowing full well the social attitude to such a crime (at the time) and the risks to himself if caught – which he was, and then chemically castrated and imprisoned, causing him to commit suicide soon after release.  We are supposed to believe that if alive in one of our progressive civilised societies today, such a man would never once in his lifetime, likely spent largely at the computer which he invented, succumb to temptation and click on a picture of a boyish looking man in his underwear – a crime soon to be punished by a minimum of 2 years in prison throughout Europe under absurd and evil virtual child porn laws created by feminists.

So why have gay men sold their souls to the feminist devil, and why does society pretend that homosexual men have been liberated, now that they can legally marry (which 99% of gay men probably have not the slightest inclination to do) and yet, just like heterosexual men, face a 5 am boot through the door if they so much as idly click once on a cartoon picture of a sexy manga ‘boy’?

The truth is feminists need to maintain the pretence that they are a civilising, progressive, and ‘sexually tolerant’ force, rather than the brutal anti-enlightenment illiberal fascists that they are, conducting a brutal war upon ordinary and healthy male sexuality.  They do this by promoting the rights of gays and transexuals, a tiny minority of the population, whilst criminilising as perverted monsters the vast majority of heterosexual men.

They have carefully engineered a situation whereby homosexuals have been granted escape from decades of formal and open prosecution, but only on condition that they renounce and disown their own culture and history – that of the love of youth.  A love that twice inspired the dawn of western civilisation.  Thus the feminist controlled United Nations only allowed homosexual lobby groups priviliged access when they agreed to denounce and reject any gay rights groups in their ranks that supported the lowering of the age of consent.  The sexual trade union has expertly ensured that the success of gay rights is almost dependent upon the ever increasing hatred and savegary towards ‘paedophiles’, something only possible through collective amnesia towards the fact that virtually every great homosexual in history was such a ‘paedophile’.

This is a true faustian pact with the devil on the part of homosexuals, but it is a short-sighted one.  Already a gay Austrian man has been jailed for looking at pictures in the privacy of his own home which involved, in the admission of the court, not one person under the age of 21.  The story of Jonathan King reminds us of the absurdity of believing that ever more savage paedohysteria can possibly be consistent with fairness towards gays – here was a 1960′s icon and gay man punished mercilessly by the courts and the media for allegedly having sex with boys in the free love era of the 60′s and 70′s – a time when every heterosexual pop star worth his name was banging every 14 year old groupie they could get hold of (witness how Americans still worship Elvis Presley, despite his predilection for pink pantie clad 13 year old girls being well documented).

Not only will homosexual men increasingly face criminalization as a result of paedohysteria, but feminists will soon drop their gay allies of convenience as the power of Islam grows, and they are forced to choose between the two.  This is already happening at the United Nations, where thanks to Islamic lobbying, reference to sexual persecution was dropped from the definitions of genocide.

Gay men have gone along with this Faustian pact in the manner of the granny muggers who spit on the sex offenders in jail.  Simple relief and self-esteem that society has found somebody to hate even more than them.  It ignores the great history of homosexuality, and it ignores fundamental issues of real justness and true sexual tolerance.  They would be wise to understand that, as Orwell observed, the object of the irrational mob’s torchbeam of hatred can be switched by the leaders at any moment.  You cannot build a lasting sexual tolerance upon the most vile and savage sexual intolerance that the world has ever known, a hatred that would make the average medieval flat-Earther blush at its very ignorance and stupidity.

Progressive Lunacy

Posted on by
2

Two stories this week confirmed, for me, the commonly held suspicion amongst sane people that the progressive left simply invent their reality as they go along.

Firstly, the liberal media coverage of the ‘arab spring’, culminating in the brutal assualt upon Lara Logan.   I still remember watching, as an idealistic teenager, the glorious events of 1989 unfolding upon my television screen.  The year the Berlin Wall finally came down, and Western democracy and freedom was ushered in across half a continent for a people that had laboured under thought control and Soviet domination for a generation and more. 

Forgive me if I am wrong, but I do not remember scenes of women clad in walking black coffins shouting for the muslim brotherhood to deliver ‘freedom’ from the government.  I certainly cannot recall any uncovered blonde journalists being raped by anti-government supporters whilst screaming death to Israel, the only true and lasting democracy the middle-east is ever likely to know.

Of course, what is really sickening about the fantasy world the liberal media inhabits, is the furious reaction to those who state the obvious – that what happened to Lara Logan was hardly the shock of the century.

The great Ferdinand Bardamu has written the best piece on this ‘liberal feminist denial of reality’ : (excerpt)

A rational person would realize that rapists will always exist among the human population, and that a white woman reporter would be at a higher risk of rape in a place like revolutionary Egypt and would not have sent her there. The liberal feminist says something like “Women are raped and sexually assaulted every minute of every day in every country on Earth” and sends the white woman reporter anyway, then when a gang of a couple dozen undersexed men grab and use the reporter as an unwilling cum dumpster, she feigns shock and lashes out at the rational people who said “I told you so!” See these replies of Molly’s to a commenter who contested her “rape isn’t about sex, it’s about power” femgrrl shibboleths

Meanwhile, in another corner of the liberal feminist fantasy world, an Austrian court has convicted a critic of Islamo-fascism for the crime of ‘falsely’ claiming that Mohammad was a paedophile.

Seen at the Gates of Vienna :

On February 15, 2011, Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff was sentenced to a fine of €480 for “denigration of religious doctrines” by Judge Bettina Neubauer in the Vienna Regional Court. She was acquitted of the original charge of ethnic incitement.

The court based “denigration of religious doctrines” on the fact that Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff had characterized Mohammed as “pedophiliac” because — according to Islamic legend — he had sex with nine year-old Aisha. In the court’s view, this was “denigrating” because Mohammed did not have sex exclusively with children but also with grown women, and stayed with Aisha until his death when she was eighteen years old. So he was not inclined to pedophilia.

I don’t know whether to laugh or cry at this.  The feminist state now appears to be picking and choosing when and how they want to inflate and abuse the definition of paedophilia (the sexual preference for pre-pubescent children).  Austria recently became the first country in Europe to lock somebody away as a ‘paedophile’ for looking at pictures of adults over the age of 20.  Yet having sex with 9 year old girls is not paedophilia so long as you don’t pump and dump them, and so long as you spread your alpha male loving around in order that older women won’t feel left out. Under this definition,  Josef Fritzel could sue anybody who has described him as a paedophile. 

On a happier note, it will mean that people like the lonely Polo instructor, who was recently jailed for several years for having consensual sex with a 15 year old girl just below the age of consent, would be able to sue the police officer, and the newspapers who falsely described him as a paedophile, for slander.  He might also have sufficient grounds for appealing against his barbaric sentence at the European Court of Human Rights if it is clear that he received such a harsh sentance, in part, because he was branded a paedophile by the police and the prosecution.

What happened to feminist arguments regarding ‘sexual innocence’ or ‘imbalance of power’, or ‘not mature enough to give informed consent’?  Seems that this ruling pretty much confirms that such arguments are simply rationalist covers for two basic primitive fears that all women have written into their dna code – that of being impregnated and abandoned, and, certainly much greater for the older woman, the fear of living in a world in which no man looks at a female past peak nubility.  The former concern has little moral weight, even when applied to teenage girls, not in a society which has granted women the right to a safe and easy abortion, as well as a welfare state that supports single mothers, and in which case has modern and effective methods of contraception.  The second fear, that in a free sexual market every man would chase teenage peaches and no woman over 25 would get a look in, has absolutely no moral force as a basis for state legislation.   Hypergamy, negrophilia, alpha cock hunting, all of these and other common sexual behaviours exhibited by the modern urban female leave vast swathes of the male population lovelorn and foresaken.  I do not believe that this fact can ever be a matter for the state to correct through legislation.  At least not in terms of criminalizing people’s behaviour.  We have decided in a civilised secular society that the state has no business to regulate the sexual lives of its citizens, so long as all parties are consenting (and the point is, the court ruling above shows that the feminist/femiservative objection to men having sex with teenagers has nothing to do with consent issues).

Feminists do not have the right to criminalize men in order to correct the imbalances that a free sexual market produces.  Socialism used to mean fighting to achieve dignity and  equality for the working man.  In the 21st century, it means creating paedohysteria, and the myth of sex trafficking, and potentially criminalizing millions of men, because otherwise, 40 year old women wouldn’t be able to get any loving.  In other words, the once gloriously utopian ideal of socialism has now been degraded by feminists to mean the aged and unwanted vagina’s rape of the male.

Most Converts to Islam are Women – Only White Knights are Surprised

Posted on by
19

The BBC reports that there are an estimated 100,000 British converts to Islam, and that at least 3/4 of them are women.  To put that in another way - for every one British male who converts, there are at least three British females who willingly submit to Allah.

At Regent’s Park Mosque in central London there are many white faces among the crowd for Friday prayers.

Conversions happen here every week – largely on a Saturday, and they are mostly women.

Tony Blair’s sister-in-law, Lauren Booth, is a recent convert and prays there.

One London imam, Ajmal Masroor, says the findings of the study come as little surprise to him. He says in his experience around three-quarters of converts are women.

Islam is a religion that oppresses women only in the minds of white knight liberals and male atheists.  Yes, of course Islam is appallingly cruel to the handful of women who are beaten for wearing un-Islamic or revealing dress, stoned to death for adultery etc.  However, for the vast majority of women under Islamic rule, life is fundamentally better and more content than it is for Western women.  Women who live within, and who suffer daily competition and threat under, a liberal and free sexual market that can favour only the young and attractive.

Gentlemen – Leave Saudi Women Alone!

As for the freedom of women when it comes to marriage and divorce, I know that the system in the country obliges the person who will tie the knot legally to directly communicate with the woman and make sure she agrees with the proposal.

As for divorce, I also know that it’s a woman’s right, under the Shariah rules, to ask for kulu (to file for divorce and give the husband back his dowry) the moment a she dislikes being with her husband. Judges are aware of it.

I know there are instances where these rules are ignored or violated by fathers or judges. Some judges delay the procedures of kulu because they want to sort out the problems between a man and his wife to avoid a divorce. But these violations don’t mean that women in the Kingdom are oppressed when it comes to marriage and divorce!

 If present trends continue, Feminism will have destroyed European civilisation in just a handful of generations. The response to the free sexual market by European women is the catalyst for the inevitable Islamification of Europe within a century.  Feminism, the sexual trade union created to meet the fears and insecurities of women in such a sexually competitive society, leads to a birth rate well below replacement levels.  And this requires that all the nations of Europe replace their rapidly diminishing native workforces with massive immigrant labour from neighbouring (muslim) lands.  To compound this, we now have ever increasing numbers of European women flocking to Islam as an alternative solution to the free sexual market, and feminism’s percieved failure to close it.

What is needed is a secular and liberal movement that sees feminism for what it is – as much an evil threat to Enlightenment values as Islamism itself is.  A secular movement that is postive towards pornography, prostitution, and fights the sex offender hysteria for the threat to liberty, and all men, that it undoubtedly is. Unfortunately, liberal atheists such as Richard Dawkins and his like need feminism and ‘the oppression of women’ mantra as a stick to beat their religious adversaries with.  Sadly ignorant, in their rational feel good bliss, that it is women, motivated solely by their selfish and fundamental sexual needs, that are, and probably always have been, the essential life force that drives both religion and irrationalism.

Feminists have now infested and taken over both the left, the center, and the right of politics. In fact, it is probably impossible to build any kind of political movement nowadays without including the threatened female reproductive voice – a voice that inevitably dilutes and perverts the message of the original struggle.  Alas, probably the men’s rights movement, in the need to build momentum, will go the same way. It is already showing signs of becoming hijacked into little more than the Conservative Father’s Association of North America. An association whose members pray every day  pathetically for a Sarah Palin type figure to deliver some kind of ’legitamacy’.

Natasha Walter ‘Living Dolls’ – The Banned Review

Posted on by
6

The following is my Amazon review of ‘Living Dolls’ by Natasha Walter that was removed at the request of one feminist (several weeks ago a comment was left underneath my review from a feminist who stated that it was ‘offensive’ and asked for Amazon to remove it).

In the book, Natasha Walter claims that society (i.e. men)  is sexualising and objectifying girls and young women. Her book has already influenced public policy in the United Kingdom, with the previous government using it to justify teaching 5 year old girls in school the dangers of male sexuality and male objectification. This is the same Natasha Walter who wrote a glowing book review defending Germaine Greer’s ‘Beautiful Boy’ – a book that calls for women to fight for the right to objectify and sexualise boys – or in Greer’s own words : “to reclaim for women the right to appreciate the short-lived beauty of boys“.  I haven’t looked at Germaine Greer’s book, but I’ve been told that it is full of naked and erotic photographs of boys who appear to be under 18.  If this is true, it should clearly be categorised as level 1 child pornography according to British (feminist made) law.

You just couldn’t make it up. You see why I’m thinking of quitting?

Feminism is the history of unattractive, aging women, forever trying to play catch up in their attempts at closing the free sexual market as new technology continues to widen it.

Thus the first wave of feminism began as men and women moved from the countryside into the cities, and men suddenly came into contact with more young females than previously they had in a lifetime. Young girls were no longer married off at the height of fertility but were sent to work in the new factories – in itself increasing the ‘availibility’ of young flesh to any tempted husband. Simultaneously, prostitutes flocked to the new metropolises to take advantage of the growing spending power of the working man. The first feminists called not for the vote, but for the raising of the age of consent and for restrictions against prostitutes. Feminism has always been primarily a sexual trade union for women past their peak fertility.

The second wave of feminism began immediately once the contraceptive pill became available, which instead of ‘liberating’ women, simply freed up the sexual market – something that the second wave and the rush into employment and education was a ‘necessary’ response to. In a single generation, 10,000 years of ‘patriarchy’ was undone. Similarly, the internet and globalisation again threatened to leave ordinary women sexually irrelevant. In the space of 10 years, women have gone from having virtually zero representation in high office, to near dominating the political and social agendas of every Western democracy. In their wake, moral hysterias over ‘sex trafficking’ and ‘paedophilia’ have appeared, the likes of which the civilised west has not seen since the witch burnings of the late middle-ages.

Such is the setting for Living Dolls, one feminist’s irrationalist and subconcious realisation that feminism was never about ‘equal rights’ with men, but simply preserving the sexual and reproductive interests of unattractive women. Enjoy as fake intellectual Soma if you’re a similarly sexually threatened unattractive woman. The rest of us, genuine seekers after truth and justice, can try to read it as a historical document of the last desperate gasps of the sexual trade union.

Meanwhile, to anyone genuinely concerned about the welfare of children and the rights of young people, I would suggest you perhaps read something detailing the way that promiscuous and sexually aware young women are treated in Islamic countries, things that are clearly of no interest to western feminists.

If you think that it is unfair of Amazon to remove the above review, you could perhaps show support by re-posting it under your own Amazon account.

Italy Will Chop Down Forest to Stop Prostitution

Posted on by
7

Italy plans to denude forest to fight prostitution

(Oct. 17) — An Italian region struggling with policing the sex trade along a heavily wooded road has come up with a novel solution: Just chop down the forest.

According to the Guardian newspaper, the regional government of Abruzzo in central Italy has tried 24-hour patrols, raids and cameras to curb the rampant sex trade on the Bonifica del Tronto road — all to no effect.

Finally, Angelo di Paolo, the regional government’s notoriously decisive public works chief, decided that fighting the forest would be much easier then fighting the sex trade. He declared that all the vegetation on or around the banks of the River Tonto would be cut down.

Environmental groups are protesting, saying the plan would destroy 69 acres of woodland vital to local ecosystems

Upholding the market price of the average vagina is far more important than eco-systems and preserving ancient forests.  Obviously.

The article then goes on to make the interesting observation that Mara Carfagna, the  sexual trade union ‘equality’ minister,  who first made it illegal to buy and sell sex in Italy, was herself a former topless model. 

…the Italian state has traditionally had a hands-off approach to the sex industry. Street prostitution was legal until 2008, when the minster for equal opportunities, former topless model Mara Carfagna, introduced a national system of fines and jail time for people caught buying or selling sex. She called it the first substantive action against the sex trade in 50 years.

Well, what a surprise.  No, not really.  Women, being the children that most of them are, are incapable of seeing even themselves as enduring selves, existing over time.  An attractive 20 year old woman believes passionately that the free sexual market is a liberal right.  The same woman at 40 can ‘clearly see’ that it’s an exploitative form of barbarism.  For more examples of the menopausal flip see Mandy Smith , Joan Bakewell, and of course, Madonna.

And more bad news from loyal reader the Highwayman, who informs us that Canada is again revealing itself to be just another sexual colonialist outpost of Dumbville USA, this time by pressurising Craigslist to follow loony tune America and drop its erotic ads service :

Ontario says it’s only fair that the online service Craigslist stop carrying ads for prostitutes in the province under its erotic services section, just as it has done in the United States. 

Three Ontario cabinet ministers signed a Sept. 14 letter to Craigslist CEO Jim Buckmaster applauding the service for agreeing to requests from attorneys general south of the border to shut down links to prostitution-related ads.

 Not only that, but an intriguing plan by Canadian beurocrats to help unemployed women work in the sex trade has predictably been ripped up :

Ryan Sparrow, a spokesman for federal Human Resources Minister Diane Finley, sought to distance his boss from the initiative, saying she had absolutely nothing to do with it. But with no one taking responsibility for the proposal, it remains unclear why someone in government sought the changes.

The Harper government has made it clear in the past that it is not in favour of measures that would lend more legitimacy to the adult-entertainment industry. But it appears from a draft bulletin sent to all the provinces that the bureaucrats were trying to do just that by updating the job bank to include all legal occupations.

Trauma therapy industry descends on Chilean miners :

Fox’s fortune-teller says it could spawn ‘divorces, violence, terrible despondency, panic attacks, plays for celebrity that fall short and lead to suicide, addiction to alcohol and illicit drugs and gambling, and wild allegations levelled by one miner against another’. For the mental-health lobby, it seems, every silver lining has a cloud.How will these men who coped remarkably well in a 32 degrees Celsius underground cavern for more than two months now cope with the temptation to descend into a drug-addled world of violence and backstabbing? On this question, the experts are unanimous: as one of them sums it up, the freed 33 will require ‘all the skill of the very best mental-health professionals available’. Is it just me or does this look like a brazen job-creation scheme? At a time of recession and cutbacks, I guess even the mental-health lobby has to find ways to earn a crust – even if that means cynically re-presenting 33 fairly hard, robust miners as men on the verge of a nervous breakdown who will need professional help for the rest of their lives.

Sexual Trade Union Fueherin Angela Merkel forced to speak out against the Islamification of Germany :

Angela Merkal must be tired of this Chancellorship of Germany lark.  When she was first elected, she probably thought it was all about trying to send 17 year old boys to Auschwitz for kissing their 17 year old girlfriends.  Now she finds that if it’s not dealing with a wrecked global economy, she’s being forced to pretend to oppose Islam - just to keep her arayan conservative voters happy :

Mrs Merkel told a meeting of the youth wing of her party: “Multikulti, the concept that we are now living side by side and are happy about it.

“This approach has failed, utterly,” she said just days after a new poll showed a third of all Germans viewed immigrants as welfare cheats.

It’s been far too long since we published an outrageous picture of Miley Cyrus.

Miley Cyrus Street Walker

Miley Cyrus believes in the free sexual market, evidently.  In 25 years time, she’ll want to rip to pieces morally protect every attractive 17 year old girl dressed like that.

Brit Babe Arrested for Undercutting Muslim Rival at the Mall

Posted on by
Reply

A BRIT holidaymaker has been charged with indecency after stripping to a bikini in the world’s largest shopping centre.

The woman was walking through Dubai Mall fully dressed and wearing a low-cut top.

But when an Arabic woman stopped her and criticised her clothing, the pair had a heated row which ended with the Brit peeling off to reveal even more flesh.

Hundreds of bemused shoppers looked on as the Brit told the Arab woman to “mind her own business” before stripping off and walking around in her bikini, it was claimed.
Security guards intervened and called the police, who arrested the tourist.

The woman, whose identity is unknown, was questioned by officers in Bur Dubai police station and charged with indecency.

A Dubai police source said: ‘The British woman was wearing a very low top and most of her legs were on display. We ended up questioning both women.”

Brit Bikini Babe arrested after Dubai mall catfight

‘I hope no teen girl will be forced to remove her burqa’

Posted on by
3

Burqa Ban : Why Must I Cast Off the Veil?

A 29 year old post-peak fertility muslim woman explains to Islamaphobic white knights why she is against their attempts to ban the burqa (even though she detested the idea when she was a hot 18 year old – yes, neither she nor I should have to explain it anymore to enlightened readers of the antifeminist.com)  :

At the age of 18, the thought of covering my body in a shapeless black gown and hiding my face so that only my eyes would show was inconceivable. It was humiliating, violating, dehumanising….

…The uniform black costume has a charming egalitarianism about it, and is both a social and physical leveller. Once social status or physical beauty cannot be established, all sorts of hierarchies are flattened…

..Eye make-up and footwear took on extra significance. As the feet were the only part of the body one could legitimately flaunt, a good pedicure was not only necessary, it was an integral part of the ensemble. All of a woman’s sexuality resided in how she carried herself, and how groomed her extremities were. In that context, the outfit became empowering, enabling a reclamation of one’s sexuality by not fulfilling modern commercialised definitions of what makes a woman attractive….

…as a fashionable 29-year-old, I sometimes pop it on to go to the corner shop rather than show the world my tracksuit bottoms…

…I sincerely hope that no 18-year-old Muslim girl will ever arrive in the UK and be forced to take off her niqab.

 

Female Judge let’s Muslim mother walk free for murdering her sexually promiscous 14 year old daughter

CALGARY — Calgary mom Aset Magomadova doesn’t have to go to jail for strangling her promiscuous, 14-year-old daughter, a judge ruled Thursday.

Justice Sal LoVecchio said a non-custodial punishment would be sufficient for Magomadova’s killing of daughter Aminat.

LoVecchio sentenced the city woman to a three-year term of probation.

A feminist warning to little sluts everywhere.

Michel Houellebecq on just what drives the feminist bitterati :

I felt no desire for Catherine Lechardoy; I hadn’t the slightest wish to shaft her.  She was looking at me and smiling, drinking Cremant, trying her hardest to be brave ; nevertheless, I knew she really needed to be shafted.  That hole she had at the base of her belly must appear so useless to her; a prick can always be cut off, but how do you forget the emptiness of a vagina?

(extract from ‘Whatvever‘)

 Lionel Tiger on Sex and Rules

Lionel Tiger explains how differing male/female reproductive strategies account for our obsession with sexual morality :