Category : Feminism and Islam

‘Leering’ at Women or Girls to be Made Hate Crime in UK

Life for men in the UK will get even more unbearable soon after feminists and police chiefs gave more details on their plans to make ‘street harassment’ – which apparently now includes ‘leering’ at women or girls – a misogynist hate crime. The female deputy leader of the ‘Liberal’ Democrats party, Joe Swinson, justified the proposals while being interviewed on live TV.

Last month it emerged that a scheme that could lead to sexism being made a hate crime with tougher sentences could be extended nationwide.

Nottinghamshire Police introduced the trial in 2016 in which it recorded incidents such as wolf whistling, street harassment, verbal abuse and taking photographs without consent as a hate crime.

Police chiefs are due to receive a full report on the pilot scheme and other forces around the country are said to have expressed an interest in following Nottinghamshire’s lead.

Ms Swinson wants it to be rolled out across the country. She said: ‘This is a hate crime that is directed towards you because you happen to be a woman.

‘For schoolgirls walking to school getting leered at, getting shouted at – that kind of harassment is happening on an everyday basis.

‘We’ve seen some of that being called out with campaigns like #metoo.

‘But we also know, all of us women on the panel have all experienced it – most women have experienced some sort of harassment in their daily life at some point.

A similar law is also being proposed in France, by this feminist politician :

The Bloomberg article linked above mentions that feminists in Portugal recently made it a criminal offence to ‘sexually harass’ an under 14 in the street, with a punishment of 3 years in prison. I have no idea if believing that the girl was older would be enough to spare you in court. All these inititives are based on the Council of Europe’s ‘Convention On Violence Against Women’, which the International Sexual Trade Union fittingly held in Istanbul, the literal meeting point of Western puritan feminism and Islam. The convention calls on all European countries to outlaw street harassment, and specifically calls for any public behaviour which ‘reduces a person to a sex object on account of their gender’ to be criminalized. Every country in Europe signed up to this feminist anti-male hate charter in Istanbul, but so far only a few have actually put it into law. Membership of the Council of Europe is even wider than the EU, so even Brexit can’t stop the UK implementing its treaties.

Here is a Portugese article on their sexual harassment law : https://www.dn.pt/portugal/interior/piropos-ja-sao-crime-e-dao-pena-de-prisao-ate-tres-anos-4954471.html

Google Translation :

Amendment of the Penal Code in August went unnoticed. Unwanted “sexual offers” are punishable by up to three years’ imprisonment.

“Eat you all”; “O drunk, do you want from above or do you want from below? “I gave you three without taking”; “O star, do you want a comet?”; “O my jewel, come to the goldsmith.” Banal examples, leaving aside the more hairy (and not less common, on the contrary), of what is usually called “piropo” and that women, from the beginning of adolescence, listen in the Portuguese streets. And since August have, by their nature of “sexual proposals”, criminal relevance, on proposal of the PSD, with a prison sentence of up to one year, or three cases are directed at children under 14. This is an addition to the article 170 of the Criminal Code, “sexual harassment”, which criminalized already the exhibitionism and the “contacts of sexual nature”, commonly known as “apalpões”.

This legislative amendment, made in the context of the transposition into national law of the Istanbul Convention – the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention and Combating of Violence against Women and Domestic Violence signed in Istanbul in 2011 – has gone completely unnoticed, although the subject has been much debated on social networks and profusely commented on in the media. Consistently ridiculed as “exaggeration”, “feminist hysteria” and even “violation of freedom of expression” and “end of seduction,” the criminalization of sexual harassment, both on the street and at work, was first proposed by the feminist collective UMAR. Women Alternative and Response] in 2011, and then by the BE, who in 2013 presented a bill in that sense, which would eventually “fall” in the works in the specialty.

The idea was therefore that sexual harassment was kept outside the Penal Code (only penalized in the Labor Code). But Cecília Honório, the deputy from the bloc who took the side of her party’s bill, admits that the amendment to article 170, which she abstained from voting (all other parliamentary groups voted in favor), criminalizes even a considerable part of harassment, despite using another name. “It was a change that came up in the final proposals that most PSD / CDS put in. And really after all the discussion about the subject has passed through the raindrops, no one has spoken of it.But being a euphemism because it does not talk about harassment , what has been recorded is very good, at all levels. It proves that all the pressure that was and the debate that took place, despite all the ridicule, gave results. And he concludes: “In this the majority [PSD and CDS] behaved very well.”

Carla Rodrigues, PSD MP during the last parliamentary term, was the coordinator of the parliamentary working group dealing with the legislative package on the Istanbul Convention. And assume the maternity of the initiative. “The amendment came from our proposal, which was intended to respond to a situation that was not provided for in the Criminal Code. I realized from the hearings and debates that I attended, including a conference on harassment promoted by UMAR, that there were situations that were not foreseen as a crime and that they should be.There was the draft of the BE with which I did not agree, and we understand that it was not the Convention’s obligation to penalize harassment, even though there was no consensus on this.And even in my parliamentary group there were some resistance But I gave some examples and managed to convince people. ”

The teenage harassment seems to have been decisive for this: “I’ve talked about cases like that of a 15-year-old girl on the street and an old man coming in and saying,” I used to do that to you, I did that to you. “That sensitized them more. The insult or insult has always been provided for in the Penal Code, but a man to tease, to frighten a girl was not committing a crime. And one of the arguments against criminalizing is that women have to know how to deal with it, to respond – but the teenagers too? I have a three-year-old daughter and I talked about this with my husband, about how we would feel about it happening to him, how he could protect it, and I came to this formulation. ”

Carla Rodrigues believes that the term “applies in all circumstances: in the workplace, on the street, in social groups, in any situation where an aggressor practices any of these acts. I think women and girls are much “It is necessary to be aware of this and to denounce it.It is necessary to disclose the existence of this new crime.”

The MP of the MP Isabel Moreira settled. “Much of what people wanted to be criminalized through the creation of the new article of the Penal Code and which was poorly formulated in the BE proposal, which in my opinion would never pass before the Constitutional Court, is envisaged in the amendment to the 170th and the new tip.

Carla Rodrigues
Carla Rodrigues – the FemiNazi behind the Portugese law

Argentinian Feminists Makes it Illegal to Praise a Sexy Woman’s Body

Argentinian feminists in the capital Buenos Aires have succeeded in making it illegal for men to compliment a sexy woman in the street . Any form of ‘sexual harassment’ in public, which includes cat calling and any comments referring to the body, is now subject to a possible fine.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-38252462

As is the Modus Operandi with feminists the world over, this latest piece of legislation was forced through after the exploitation of a tragic and isolated case that shocked the nation – a 16 year old girl raped to death by two strangers. Presumably, demands to raise the Argentinian age of consent from 13 to 18 will be next on the Sexual Trade Union agenda, following the recent pattern of India (12 to 18) and Spain (13 to 16).

Odd that feminists in Europe do not call for legislation against the flood of refugees that have led to the assault, rape, and even murder of tens of thousands of young women in Germany and elsewhere. In fact, those same feminists are usually the most fervent open borders and ‘anti-racist’ activists.

Not so odd really. As readers here are well aware, all feminists are really interested in is preventing male sexual access to young, good looking females, and in so doing, raising their own pitiful sexual market value. They will seize upon isolated cases of sexual murder to push through legislation that further restricts the free sex market, whilst encouraging the import of millions of Islamic rapefugees in order to produce a genuine rape culture, as well as inevitable growing Muslim political influence, that will lead to young women dressing conservatively and fearful to go out alone.


London Under SHEria Law – Muslim Mayor Bans Bikini Posters

The femislamisation of the West continues apace.   London’s recently elected Muslim mayor, the first such ruler of a Western city in over 500 years, has already began the implementation of SHEria Law by banning images of slim models in bikinis from advertisements appearing on the London Underground and elsewhere.

The mayor uses a feminist justification for the ban – the images of healthy young women showing bare skin ‘body shames’ the average female Londoner. Femihag campaigners have been trying to force such a ban since last year.  We will see more and more of this as Muslim political power grows – feminist lobbying leads to Muslim politicians enforcing modesty and anti-sex laws under the guise of ‘protecting women’.

Feminism is a Sexual Trade Union so similar to Islam that it is not needed in Islamic societies.  Islam may treat women badly in many ways, but in the thing that most concerns the vast majority of women – their ability to sexually compete with other women who are younger, prettier, and more available – it serves their needs very well. Certainly much better than the free sexual market of the secular West.

After the Orlando shooting at the weekend, the question again arises as to how left-wing ‘liberal progressives’ can be so retarded and schizophrenic as to fail to see that support for Islam is completely incompatible with support for gay rights.  But really, it’s not so much more retarded or schizophrenic as the inability of Manosphere Conservatives and ‘Islamophobes’ in general to see that Islam is entirely compatible with ‘women’s rights’.

The Left will continue to support the mass importation of millions of gay hating Muslims, even when it leads to massacres as in Orlando, because feminism is the tail that wags the Left-Wing dog.  And for the Sexual Trade Union, the gay rights lobby are at present simply useful idiots in the need to present a sexually progressive and tolerant face to the world whilst feminists wage a brutal medieval war upon sex, and male sexuality in particular.

Feminism is a virus that manifests itself in sexually open societies – you could almost call it an intellectual syphilis.  The only way it can be contained is by having a society that is not sexually open and that conforms to female evolutionary mating strategies – i.e.  strictly enforced monogamy.

The effect of the feminist virus is not only to kill sexual openness, but to weaken the host society so much that an even more robust parasite, genetically related to the feminist virus – Islam – can fully take over the corpse of Western civilization.


Academic Argues Prostitution Should Be Legalized Due to Lack of Sex for Modern Men – Femiservative Disagrees

Telegraph writer Rebecca Reid vents her fury over a (female) academic’s call for prostitution to be legalized on the grounds of a ‘male sexual deficit’.  What the academic (Catherine Hakim) means by this is that women have traditionally barted sex for monetry and other reward.  Reluctantly, as women in general are not as horny as men.  Sex for women is a tool, whereas sex for men is a need.  Unfortunately, due to ‘female emancipation’, women no longer have the need to barter their bodies for financial compensation, leading to a lack of availability for sex for men, and the consequent need to redress this by legalizing prostitution.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/sex/11786742/Prostitution-row-Sex-deficit-what-about-us-horny-women.html (may be behind paywall)

Hakim postulates that prostitution should be fully legalised – to many a perfectly reasonable stance on the debate. But it’s her reasoning that makes the suggestion painfully offensive.

Disinterested in the potential social, economic and health benefits of legalising sex work, Hakim suggests that prostitution should be legalised, because the empowerment of women has created what she terms a “male sex deficit.”

In short because men need sex and modern women aren’t providing it.

What selfish creatures we’ve become. All that working and voting and striving for equality? Well apparently it’s led to an international blue-balls crisis that only legalised prostitution can cure….

… Hakim believes that as women become more empowered, and therefore more financially independent, they are likely to withdraw sexual availability further. She writes that the “male sex deficit” is likely to grow in the 21st century, as women become increasingly economically independent and withdraw from “sexual markets and relationships that they perceive to offer unfair bargains”.

Which tells you everything you need to know about her attitude towards sex.

No wonder she wants to legalise prostitution. She seems to think every sexually active woman already is one.

And of course, she is correct in that assumption – all women are essentially prostitutes, and feminism is a prostitute’s trade union/cartel which operates to prevent competition and to artificially keep the price of sex high.

A few of the reader’s comments below the article are priceless…

telegraph-comments


Isis Women Beat and Kill Pretty Young Girls for Looking At Clothes

Feminism and Isis are two sides of the same Sexual Trade Union coin.

http://www.clarionproject.org/news/islamic-state-beats-mosul-woman-death-lifting-niqab#

Iraqi citizens said on Saturday in Mosul that an Iraqi woman was killed by ISIS women with Russian citizenship in Mosul, 250 miles north of Baghdad.

The citizens said, “The Russian women in ISIS have attacked Mosul girls, beating them severely in one of the clothing stores in the market of Asarghahana in the center of Mosul. They claimed the women had lifted their niqab to look at the merchandise as well as failing to uphold the rule of wearing the correct color himar specified to women, married women and widows as determined by the organization.

The Russians hit twelve married women, which caused the death of one of them aged 17, due to the severe beating she received.”


Chris Brand’s Un-PC Thoughts – April 21st 2014

IQ & PC (Chris Brand)

HAPPY EASTER!

Good news arrived for Christianity as the Harvard Theological Review carried an article confirming a papyrus fragment from mediaeval Egypt recording that Jesus had talked of “my wife” and that (as scholars had suspected since 1975) Mary Magdalene had been “a major leader of the early Jesus movement” (Indie, 12 iv).

Such normalizing of Christianity had the capacity to free the moribund religion finally from the Roman Catholic supersition that sex was suspect and that men could have only one wife and must then at death give all their money to the Church – thereby denying the role of the family which both socialists and capitalists had been keen to play down along with the realities of genetic differences occurring both between and within families which were readily visible to all but followers of antiquated egalitarian supersitions.

The declarations of some kind of ‘faith’ by Messrs Cameron and Miliband were welcome in so far as they recognized the need to get beyond the usual overwhelmingly environmentalistic and bullying preoccupations of lacklustre politicians; but a commitment to the Christian West’s scientific search for truth would have been more impressive – especially together with a commitment not to suppress the truth when it hovered within view.

HOMOSEXUALS FOR JUSTICE  

As Nigel Evans MP was cleared of sexually molesting young men (so only the stains of …., boozing and poor judgment remained on his character) voices piped up on the BBC decrying “the sex abuse industry,” “hysteria” and Britain’s lack of a ‘statute of limitations’ [on ancient-historical prosecutions] – too late for paedophiles (who had been deserted and beaten by homosexuals who claimed to target only 16+ youths) but still welcome.

SCHOOLS USELESS – AUTHOR

Top author for British teenagers, Terry Deary, who had sold 25M copies of Horrible Histories and was writing Rotten Romans and Barmy British Empire told the Telegraph’s arts correspondent that school was a “waste of time,” centrally because of boring teachers “kicking conformity into children” and failing to treat them according to their own talents (9 iv). His own frustration with educational authority had, he said, led to the “subversive” and “anarchic” strands in his writing.

DON’T TALK ABOUT THE ETHNICS

As Europe’s latest ethnic conflict hotted up, MSM (esp. BBC) laboured hard to avoid saying it was a struggle between ethnic groups derived (in so far as Ukraine’s tortured history allows) from the western Galicians and the eastern Cossacks, speaking different languages (Ukrainian, Russian), and following different religious creeds (Greek-Catholic [‘Uniate’], Orthodox).

In Nigeria, just outside the capital Obujaodoody, Muslims managed – with a car bomb during the rush hour – to kill 71 Christians and hospitalize another 124 without unduly upsetting multiculti MSM. The abduction of a hundred nubile Christian damsels was atrtributed to the Muslim fanatics of Cocoa Pyjamas.

‘UMAN RIGHTS – A LAUGHING STOCK

The UN Human Rights Council consigned itself to the doghouse by sending to Britain a womyn of repellent visage, Indian origin and South African citizenship to “monitor” female inequality in the course of a two-week stay meeting kindred malcontents.

Rashida Manjoo was duly shocked by page 3 girls, by date rape going unpunished {by juries}, by men walking on the outside of pavements, by women earning slightly less {in line with their more modest range of IQs and with many of the brighter chicas working from homes which they maintained – with the help of Polish servant girls – for the high-IQ husbands which they had chosen}.

The feminoid ‘liberal’-left kept quiet about Manjew’s nonsense; but Tory treasure Eggwina Currie (former health minister) wondered whether the goon had ever been to Saudi or other countries where women were circumcised (genital mutilation), forbidden books, married off early, banned from driving, had no maternity leave and were liable to find themselves divorced at a moment’s notice.

Thus did the UN distract itself from what should have been its major task: completing the happy victory of having the whole world liberated by learning to speak English – even perchance in Glasgow.

ABUSOHYSTERIA PROTESTED  

Following several recent trials in which elderly celebrities had their lives ruined by accusations of ancient-historical sexual hanky-panky [paedophilic in 2/4 cases] of which juries found them innocent, and with a second trial of disc jockey Dave Lee Travis about to start, the robustly right-wing Tory Anne Widdecombe showed her libertarian side as she asked whether the police and Crown Prosecution Service had not got better things to do than waste vast sums (not least the savings of those accused) on such frivolous pandering to the claims of gold-diggers (Daily Express, 16 iv).

OUTSPEAKING FOR MARRIAGE

Standing up for his convictions, an English High Court judge (of the Family Division) quit after being told by peecee colleagues that he could not speak in favour of marriage. In an interview, Sir Paul Coleridge, 64, had angered gay rights campaigners when he said Government same-sex marriage plans were a “minority issue” because it affected only “0.1%” of the population during a time in which society was facing a “crisis of family breakdown” and said people should not have children unless stably married.

In 2013, Coleridge was handed a formal warning from the Judicial Conduct and Investigations Office declaring that his decision to give this interview, and another one in which he discussed the “decline of marriage,” was “incompatible with his judicial responsibilities and therefore amounts to judicial misconduct”.

He criticised the decision as a “disproportionate and unfair reaction to a few lines in two newspapers”. Rather than condone Britain’s having become a society in which 11% of adults were un-remarried divorcees and only a half of children would grow up in a two-parent family, Sir Paul organized some 100 legal and kindred traditionalist experts to form the think-tank ‘The Marriage Foundation’ to research marriage (with its links to income and happiness in the couple and lawabidingness in the children) and to campaign for long-lasting marital relationships (Daily Mail, 17 iv; Daily Telegraph, 18 iv, p.2).

A robust denunciation of the UK Coalition government for doing nothing for married couples via the tax system was provided by the previous Archbishop of Canterbury, Lord Carey (Daily Mail, 19 iv, ‘The fact is, marriage has been treated shabbily by today’s politicians’).

IQ MARCHES ON

As an updating of America’s ‘Scholastic Aptitude Test’ (SAT) was announced, a helpful article about SAT being an IQ test and predicting educational and job success as such (even controlling for SES) appeared in Slate (17 iv) — with summaries of work by Frank Schmidt and Ian Deary. A quote:

“What this all [these finding mean] is that the SAT measures something—some stable characteristic of high school students other than their parents’ income—that translates into success in college. And what could that characteristic be? General intelligence. The content of the SAT is practically indistinguishable from that of standardized intelligence tests that social scientists use to study individual differences, and that psychologists and psychiatrists use to determine whether a person is intellectually disabled—and even whether a person should be spared execution in states that have the death penalty. Scores on the SAT correlate very highly with scores on IQ tests—so highly that the Harvard education scholar Howard Gardner, known for his theory of multiple intelligences, once called the SAT and other scholastic measures “thinly disguised” intelligence tests.”

MULTICULTI MAYHEM

The internal contradictions of multicultidom achieved star billing on p.1 of the Telegraph (19 iv) as the Archbishop of Canterbury, Rev Justinia Oilwellby, came out with his insoluble dilemma about homosexuality. It had been made clear to him on a visit to South Sudan that, if the CofE allowed its priests to conduct gay marriages, the lives of perhaps a million Black Christians in Africa would be at risk – scores of thousands had already been killed or raped by Mueslis who believed that Christians aimed to convert them and turn them into sodomites.

On the other hand, if Welby continued to ban homosexual marriage, he would alienate about half his clergy and perhaps a quarter of his flock in Britain. All he could do was to hope to placate the different cultures with a long-running committee….

Links relating to some of the topics Chris Brand discussed today :

Prospect.org – Did Jesus Have a Wife?

Telegraph – Horrible Histories creator says school is a waste of time.

BBC – Gunmen abduct ‘about 100 schoolgirls’.

Telegraph – Widdecome on Nigel Evans : ‘the odd drunken pass does not make somebody a rapist’.

Telegraph – Sir Paul Coleridge retires and calls for an end to family breakdown.

 


Chris Brand 30th March 2014

http://gfactor.blogspot.co.uk/2014_03_01_archive.html#2558019500471907509

MINORITIES vs MULTICULTURALISM

In Berlin, A German-Muslim religious forum took an unexpected turn when three hairdress-displaying if mainly rather heavy topless White female protesters had to be dragged out of the building (Sunday Mail, 23 iii). The Berlin Islam Week event, held in one of the city’s town halls, was stopped in its tracks by members of extreme protest group Femen, who charged into the hall with slogans attacking ‘religious oppression’ and with Sharia law daubed on their bodies, clad only in red pants. Photographs of bemused Muslims from the moment the wymmin were dragged out by policemen included one of a veiled womyn filming the event on her phone as guests looked on.

femen-berlin

For their part, the bra-less feminoids, got a glimpse of Islamic loyalties as a prominent sign urged those congregated to ‘spend for Syria’ (where Solunni Muslims – as well as wrecking the joint — were forcibly driving out Jews, Christians, Shitites and anyone not accepting the Sharia principle of female subordination).

Previously, Femen activistes had displayed their wares in Hanover and Paris; and, for whatever reason, indicated their support for the pro-Hitler ooops pro-Europe protesters of west Ukraine.

In some contrast, spineless great’n’good lawyers in London urged that women should accept the pass which traitorous lefties had made around 1970 and adopt as many Sharia principles as possible (D.Telegraph, 22 iii; BBCR4, 23 iii, 09:50). In particular, England’s Law Society (pres.: N Fuck) had taken up ‘guiding’ solicitors in making wills that would disinherit bastards, unbelievers and women yet still supposedly be recognized by English courts (Sunday Telegraph, 23 iii, p.1).

{Ongoing low-level conflict between ‘minorities’ and between parallel ‘courts’ could do lawyers’ bank balances nothing but good….}

PAEDOHYSTERIA POKED

After 30 years of paedohysterics trying to make children fear adults, it was shown that a main achievement of campaigners – apart from setting up a vast government bureaucracy to vet those working with children – had been to make adults fear contact with children altogether: two six-year-old girls who, watched by their mothers and TV cameras), feigned being lost in London found themselves brushed off by 616 passers-by (until a 70+ granny stopped to ask if they had a problem) (ITV Channel 5). Even the Daily Mail – itself not immune to paedohysteria over the years – felt scaremongering had gone too far. Its columnist Carol Sarler wrote (24 iii): “The over-imaginative minds of adult Britain are in literally hysterical thrall to paedophilia, to the idea that danger lurks in the soul of every passing stranger, while the truth – you know, facts and suchlike – is rejected without reason.” The Telegraph’s columnist Philip Johnston said we had become “cowed by paedophile hysteria,” which while not as snappy as paedohysteria was still a step in the right direction (25 iii).

SEX ACC. TO FRENCH

Thanks to a Dorsetshire auction house, a 350-yr-old French account of sex differences came to light (D.Mail, 28 iii). Alas, Froggy scholarship was not up to much. Whereas the Eysenckian position from c.1980 was that women were demonstrably low-Psychoticism [Tender-minded in attitudinal measures], high-Neuroticism/Emotionality and of a restricted range of IQs around a normal mean of 100, The Art to Know Men, 1650 [translated into English 1850] recorded mysteriously or at least subjectively:

The male form resembles that of a lion, with large mouths, thick hair and hard and musculous flesh. Women, on the other hand have a fair appearance which hides an infinite multitude of defects including weakness, jealousy, distrust and ungratefulness.

{Whether latter-day British media grovelling to multicultidom improved things was arguable. By 2014, the BBC had become the British Sickness Service, with programmes about blind one-legged deaf running wall-to-wall with high-minded accounts of Nigerian doctors unable to control polio, of yag marriage [pension rights of partners would be the next ishoo requiring politicos to be blackmailed], and hyperactive nurses [unable to read a book] running round Africa dispensing idealism (BBCR4, 28 iii, 08:50; BBC World Service, 28 iii, 08:50).}

POLICE PAEDOHYSTERIA BLASTED

A plea for three famous British veteran comics was entered by the Daily Mail’s (see above) top columnist, Richard Littlejohn (28 iii): on the strength of precisely no evidence that could be divulged (possibly the fabrications of gold-diggers, possibly the appearance of the comics’ names in the Radio Times around 1970) these three elderly men had their lives, homes and computers turned upside down and their wives upset to distraction so the propagandized {feminazified} police (typically some 12 cops per suspect) could fish for ‘evidence’ of paedophile naughtiness of forty years previously. Despite this assiduous and authoritarian injustice, no ‘evidence’ of hanky-panky could be found and the sleuths were eventually called off.

The costs to the taxpayer of the past year’s largely vain persecution of some twenty senior British celebrities in the aftermath of the Jimmy Savile master-case remained unknown as claims for compensation by the celebs were prepared. Star silver-haired London publicist Max Clifford, 70, continued on daily trial at the Old Bailey for convivial undressing {i.e. ‘rape’} with a few 15-yr-old wannabe girls around 1975. An 82-yr British bishop was charged with six cases of paedofumbling boys around 1977. Nor was it enough to be cleared of twelve charges of ‘indecent assault,’ as DJ David Lee Travis had been in February: the 68-yr former BBC presenter found the fuzz coming for him again with presumably equally pathetic charges dating back to the 1970s (D.Mail, 29 iii).

SPLC SPURNED BY FBI

America’s main organizer of Black racism, the Southern Poverty Law Center, which had labelled several Washington, D.C.-based family organizations as “hate groups” for favouring traditional marriage, was dumped as a “resource” on the FBI’s Hate Crime Web page — a significant rejection of the influential legal group. The Web page scrubbing, which also included eliminating the Jew-championing Anti-Defamation League, was not formally announced and came in the last month after 15 family groups pressed Attorney General Eric Holder and FBI Director James Comey to stop endorsing a group – SPLC — that inspired a recent case alleging domestic terrorism at the Family Research Council.

“We commend the FBI for removing website links to the Southern Poverty Law Center, an organization that not only dispenses erroneous data but has itself been linked to domestic terrorism in federal court. We hope this means the FBI leadership will avoid any kind of partnership with the SPLC,” said Tony Perkins, FRC President. “The Southern Poverty Law Center’s mission to push anti-Christian propaganda is inconsistent with the mission of both the military and the FBI, which is to defend and uphold the Constitution of the United States,” he added (Washington Examiner, 27 iii).

{Whether the dumping – which would surely be appealed by the SPLC’s state-funded lawyers – was just a sop to Whites remained to be seen.}