NSPCC and Other Children’s Charties Knowingly Preyed On Dementia Sufferers to Extract Cash

The NSPCC, one of the largest children’s charties in the world and perhaps the leading culprit in the promotion of child abuse hysteria and the demonization of men, has been forced to review its ruthless business practices after it was exposed as using a cold-calling center that it knew targetted dementia sufferers for donations.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3155574/Charities-kept-using-cold-calling-firm-knew-preyed-dementia-victims-NSPCC-British-Red-Cross-Oxfam-Macmillan-pledge-review-practices-caught-out.html

The latest revelations come after the tragic case of 92 year old Olive Cooke, whose death it is widely believed was at least partly caused by hounding from charties, including ‘Save the Children’, for donations.

The NSPCC recieves over £100 million in donations each year from the British public. It is infamous for using most of that money to pay its legions of staff obscene salaries, including a ‘professor of child sex abuse and exploitation’ (who is a radical feminist and who believes that all sex is rape). This week it was revealed that its chief executive earns almost £200k a year, and recently awarded himself a 70% pay rise.

The NSPCC is willing to hound old women to their deaths in order to extort the millions of pounds needed to pay its staff their £100k salaries, as well as fund their campaigns to put ever more men in prison to be anally raped and thousands more teenage girls through the trauma of forced victim labelling and therapy.

What a truly vile organization. The REAL problem.

See also : http://www.theopinionsite.org/is-the-nspcc-being-dishonest-in-order-to-get-our-money/

Royal Society to Replace Busts of Famous Male Scientists with Artworks Depicting Women from TV

The oldest and most prestigious scientific society in the world – Britain’s 400 year old Royal Society – has announced that it is to replace busts of some of the most important male scientists from history with artworks depicting women, such as a popular TV presenter. The move comes after the hounding from his post of at University College London of Sir Tim Hunt over a throwaway ‘sexist’ joke.

THE Royal Society is to replace portraits and busts of some of Britain’s most renowned male scientists at its London headquarters with artworks depicting leading women.

In an effort to reverse its male-dominated image, the society plans to install a bust of Lucie Green, the television astronomer, at the entrance to its 18th-century romanesque building in Carlton House Terrace and portraits of other leading women scientists around its marbled staircases and other public areas.

Visitors will also be greeted by a bust of Mary Somerville, the 19th-century astronomer who became the first female member of the Royal Astronomical Society.

Athene Donald, professor of physics at Cambridge University, who championed the scheme, said: “It is great to see progress in changing the face of the society.”

(Full article is behind a paywall) : http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/uk_news/Society/article1577227.ece

Telegraph Writer Describes How She Was Groped by a Man’s Knee On the Tube..

Supporting calls for more men to be arrested and caged for ‘manspreading’, Telegraph writer Louise Burke fantasises recounts how she was once ‘groped by a man’s knee’ on the London underground, leaving her feeling as though she had been raped and traumatised for life. Or, as one reader commented, ’50 Shades of Testicle Envy’.

The suit-clad knee was jamming into my thigh so hard I could feel the quickening pulse of its owner through the fabric.

I edged sideways until my legs were awkwardly pushed up against the wall of my window seat on the train, but still his limb strayed up against mine. He opened a broadsheet newspaper across his lap – and half-way across mine – and pretended to read.

Mortified and trapped, I held my breath as I tried to decide what to do.

The passengers around me had no idea what he was doing – the paper was blocking the view of his leg and even if it hadn’t been, he probably just looked like any other careless bloke taking up too much leg room.

But at close quarters, his nervous breathing and the pressure of his leg betrayed the thrill he was getting from making me his target…

..I stood at the carriage doors without looking back until I reached my station, then walked home, checking regularly that I wasn’t being followed. I felt dirty and ashamed I had been too cowardly to say anything.

This sorry experience resurfaced as I read the news that two men have just been arrested for manspreading on the New York metro

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/11643966/Manspreading-New-York-arrest-I-was-groped-by-a-mans-legs-on-the-train.html

British School Bans Girls From Wearing Skirts Because It ‘Makes Male Teachers Uncomfortable’

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/577615/School-ban-short-skirts-Bridlington-School-Hull

Classic.

Ms Pashley said: “We have a very simple school uniform, which we enforce strictly.

“On one occasion when a male member of staff challenged a female student on her skirt length, she retorted, ‘You shouldn’t be looking at my legs’.

“The male member of staff was understandably uncomfortable with this and reported it to me immediately. Male staff asked me to share this incident with the governing body when uniform was reviewed.”

But the parents of some of the jailbait schoolgirls aren’t too happy and have complained of double standards :

Another parent claimed that female staff at the school fail to set a good example. She said: “Some female staff wear high heels, short skirts and low-cut blouses.

Are they going to be wearing trousers?” The online protest petition says parents should have the right to buy school trousers or skirts without logos from whichever retailer they see fit.

Some parents even claim that preventing girls wearing skirts is a breach of their human rights.

FemiHag of the Year 2014 – Reader’s Poll

Here it is – the long awaited first ever FemiHag of the Year Award – and YOU decide! which of the following candidates do you think was the most despicable femihag of 2014? Which aesthetically challenged feminist went to the most evil and obscene lengths to raise her own pitiful sexual market value? Which feminist did the most to introduce legislation that will lead to thousands or millions of men being anally raped in jail, just so that she could increase her own chances of getting laid or keeping her man? Which bitter feminist jellyhag brought us closer to a sexual holocaust in 2014?

You can choose TWO femihags – scroll down for a brief resume of each femihag (WARNING – Does contain images that will leave some readers requiring brain bleach to remove) :

Who was the worst FemiHag of 2014?

  • Anna Mato (29%, 12 Votes)
  • Alison Saunders (26%, 11 Votes)
  • David Futrelle (26%, 11 Votes)
  • Harriet Harmen (24%, 10 Votes)
  • Jessica Valenti (12%, 5 Votes)
  • Fiona MacTaggart (7%, 3 Votes)
  • Rebecca Roache (7%, 3 Votes)
  • Rashida Manjoo (7%, 3 Votes)
  • Kat Banyard (2%, 1 Votes)
  • Somaly Mam (2%, 1 Votes)
  • Carolina Criado-Perez (0%, 0 Votes)

Total Voters: 42

Loading ... Loading ...

Rashida-Manjoo_bbc-sexismRashida Manjoo…possibly the ugliest feminist jellyhag in the world, the evil Manjoo, United Nations something or other, declared that the UK was the most sexist in the world because of its sexualisation of 17 year old, ermmm, ‘children’…meanwhile, in ISIS controlled Iraq and Syria, thousands of Christian pre-pubescent girls are being raped and tortured by Islamic neckbeards and neither the UN nor feminists do anything.

Alison SaundersAlison Saunders – Unspeakably evil director of the UK Crown Prosecution Service, leading the persecution of elderly men through Operation Yewtree.

ana-matoAnna Mato, the Spanish femihag minister who single-handedly raised the age of consent in Spain, even beyond the age suggested by her colleagues and the United Femihag Nations itself, and was then caught up in scandals involving Ebola and serious financial corruption.

david-futrelle-manboobz-3David Futrelle – The Chicago child torture porn apologist gets a chance for redemption after his surprise defeat in the Paedocrite of the Year poll! The only male feminist in the world who is such a truly disgusting mangina that he actually qualifies as a femihag. In 2014 Futrelle posed as a male feminist media expert on the dangers of granting that boys have moral and legal rights whilst continuing to defend the gay sex shop distribution of a paedophile made ‘classic’ depicting naked 14 year old boys being anally raped, tortured, made to eat human excrement, disembowelled and murdered. He then publicly called for me to be murdered after I revealed that one of his most favoured readers and commentators was a paedophile sadist who ran a forum dedicated to fellow perverts turned on by the crucifixion of women and girls.

caroline-criado-perezCarolina Criado-Perez – Started the year strongly and couldn’t be kept out of the media, even having twitter trolls arrested (whilst repeatedly calling men ‘cocks’ and making apparent rape threats herself) Has since gone a bit quiet though.

rebecca-roacheRebecca Roache – The Oxford University academic announced the results of her team’s research into using new technology to create a literal eternal hell on Earth for men who break feminist laws. She boasted that it will soon be possible for the feminist state to upload the minds of men who have angered hags into computers and put them through 1,000s of years worth of mental torment and anguish in the space of a single day.

kat-banyardKat Banyard – Kat remains possibly the most effective Sexual Trade Union activist in the world today. In the UK she succeeded in pushing the ‘sexualisation’ of British 17 year old girls moral panic bullshit above any possible concerns for the thousands of children being raped and tortured in ISIS controlled Syria (or, for that matter, in Rotherham). The joyless puritan also furthered her own almost non-existent sexual market value by campaigning for topless pictures of young women to be banned from tabloid newspapers, as well as ‘lad’s mags’ removed from newsagents.

jessica-valenti

Jessica Valenti – Jessica was just her typical privileged white middle-class female professional victim for most of the year, but really outdid even herself in the runup to Christmas with a now notorious article she published in the Guardian. Valenti expressed her rage at the patriarchal oppression she suffers when having to face wrapping festive gifts for all her similarly privileged white middle-class friends. Google ‘Jessica Valenti outrage over ISIS rape of young girls’ and you get zero relevant results. Google ‘Jessica Valenti outrage over women wrapping Christmas gifts’ and it’s a different story entirely.

somaly-mamSomaly Mam – One of the Sexual Trade Union’s leading activists against ‘sex trafficking’ and ‘child prostitution’, Somaly Mam was found out to be blatantly making up stories in order to further her financial and sexual market value raising aims.

fiona-mctaggartFiona MacTaggart – Unsuccessful attempt at raising ugly British women’s SMV through the criminalization of any man, with the threat of anal rape in prison, who dares to pay for sex with an attractive woman.

harriet-harmanHarriet Harmen – Amongst Harriet’s crimes in 2014 was resisting attempts to grant men accused of rape anonymity until conviction, as well as forcing British mangina cowardly politicians to wear ‘This Is What A Feminist Looks Like’ t-shirts to secure the vagina vote (the REAL problem) before it being exposed that those same t-shirts were made by Third World female factory slaves ‘earning’ 62 pence an hour.

Steve Moxon – ‘Absurd bid to criminalise those exploited for money in prostitution is defeated’

http://stevemoxon.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/absurd-bid-to-criminalise-those.html

The nasty if comical piece of extreme-feminist man-hating obscenity that is Fiona MacTaggart, MP for Slough, last night was defeated in her absurd amendment to the ‘Modern Slavery’ bill in the House of Commons to criminalise men paying for sex but not the women selling it. She was strongly attacked from both sides of the House for going against all of the academic evidence and all of the groups representing prostitutes, that criminalising does nothing whatsoever to reduce the scale of prostitution, and merely pushed it underground. Moreover, it is the surest way to bring criminal elements into prostitution – just as did prohibition of alcohol … and drugs – and thereby to make prostitution less safe for both parties. In any case, the consequent driving underground would make it far more difficult for prostitute and client to pre-assess each other, thus likewise increasing the potential danger for both parties – as the many groups representing prostitutes have unanimously most vociferously repeatedly indicated.
MacTaggart indeed is a wholly evidence-free zone. She has no interest whatsoever in any evidence because her position is about nothing but out-dated mindless ideology. The only evidence she has is that asking men in Sweden if they have recently had sex with a prostitute – which recently has been made illegal in Sweden – reveals … surprise, surprise … that men are more likely to answer ‘no’ than previously. You don’t say! Even rice-pudding-for-brains MacTaggart should be able to spot the glaring confound in the data here!
The overwhelming evidence against is not even the principal reason why her proposal was insane. Prostitution is the exploitation not of women but of men: women extract money from men by exploiting the universal male desire for variety of sexual partner. In no other scenario where money is exchanged for a service is the payer regarded as the one exploited!
Furthermore, to criminalise one party to sex freely engaged in on both sides – never mind to criminalise the exploited rather than the exploiting party – simply on the grounds of their sex, would be the most obvious and unbelievable infringement of any sort of notion of equality. It is flagrant sex discrimination. Total sex discrimination about … having sex … now that would really be something for libertarians to sink their teeth into. It would be a cause celebre of a sort not seen since the 1960s.
The extreme-feminist position is that all sex is exploitative of women – indeed, that all male-female interaction of any kind is oppressive to the female — and that somehow this is particularly the case when the woman is actually paid! This is how the idiotic entirely false presumption is arrived at that no woman can freely choose to engage in prostitution.
The likes of MacTaggart try to back this up through a radical misrepresentation of the typical prostitute. The notion that prostitution is a woman pimped on the street is grotesque: a minuscule proportion of prostitution is of this form. Not only are even most street prostitutes not pimped, but the whole street ‘scene’ has long been superseded by its indoor counterpart. The abundance of such provision is evidenced by the prices in ‘parlours’ (brothels) rivalling those on the street. Given that a ‘parlour’ is under police scrutiny to not employ drug-users and under-age girls – the sort of girls who would pose a threat to personal safety or legal sanction to men, and who are not infrequently found on the street – then it is less than pointless for men to bother with the ‘street’ scene at all; even before considering the risk of criminal sanction as a ‘kerb-crawler’.
In any case, MacTaggart’s focus on the street undermines her case in a profound additional way: the principal victim of violence in this scenario is the client [I actually made this point to her when I confronted her on BBC Newsnight several years ago in the wake of the Ipswich murders. – I had previously lived in a ‘red light’ area for two decades, and with the advent of drug use becoming the hallmark of the street prostitute (because uncontrolled drug use precludes being able to work in a brothel or to have the organisation to become an independent), then this violence was quire visible.] Violence is a much rarer feature of indoor prostitution, for the obvious reason that in a brothel there are other people around, and escorts and their clients are traceable through their phones.
The police, self-evidently, are completely opposed to adding to their burden the impossible task of pursuing one party to consensual sex to arrest and process them for court action; especially now that they haven’t got the resources to tackle even the high priority crime of domestic burglary. It would render them literally a laughing stock.
It is a pity, actually that the risible amendment was not passed, because it would have been immensely to the entertainment of the nation to see the legal actions to overturn it.
Actually, the attempt to retreat to a position of a backstop amendment simply to promise to consider the evidence for future legislation backfired: it too was thrown out. Most MPs well know that there is no balance of evidence worthy of consideration: MacTaggart’s position is unsupported by anything other than a data proof determination to proceed, to go down in history as a prize fatuous femascist freak.
Yet she is sure to try it again.
Bring it on, I say.

Prominant Barrister Criticises Arrests Over Alleged Sex Crimes

Police are arresting suspects of alleged historical sex crimes without sufficient evidence and keeping them on bail too long, a barrister has said.

Geoffrey Robertson QC said if a charge could not be made within three months the case should be dropped.

His comments come after no further action was taken against Paul Gambaccini over historical sex claims.

The Association of Chief Police Officers said victims were “squarely” the focus of inquiries into sex abuse.

Mr Gambaccini, a BBC broadcaster, was held at a south London address in October last year as part of the Metropolitan Police’s Operation Yewtree investigation, and remained on bail for 12 months.

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said the inquiry followed claims of sex offences against two teenage boys in the early 1980s.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-29581759