Leafing through the Spectator Magazine whilst waiting to board my plane at Gatwick Airport last week, I was a little bit stunned, but tremendously heartened, to see the following full page advert from Fathers 4 Justice :
Organisations like the Labor party, the Fawcett Society, and the NSPCC have become dominated by a militant form of feminism which will condemn Matthew to a lifetime of discrimination…
http://fathers4justiceadvertising.wordpress.com/
See also my article – ‘The NSPCC as an Evil Feminist Organisation‘ to learn just how dominated that ‘child protection’ charity has become by radical feminists.
the LOWEST most dehumanizining most inhumane CULT ever in history of humankind, children their future humanity and mankind are in the greatest danger ever, romanesque political warlike economics, stop the fithy dirty gender-sex-war aganst children&fathers, hetero’s and normal families, divorce-separation is child abuse and parent-family alienation to begin with, femini$$m is a severe mindcontrol illness, the making of antisocial destructive borderliners-sociopaths, the divorcing-separating parent is obvious unfit and has to be removed from child(ren)&father at once, fathers against equality, we the sheeple for natural parenthood and normal families, femii$$m-samesex-atheism riding U$A-UN are destroying the world.
While the intent of the ad is to expose what the feminist filth are doing to children and Fathers, the picture and focus of the ad is NEGATIVE. Meaning, it reinforces the very message(s) that the Satanic shit-souls wish to convey to the world!
Sure, the terms are what might be used – are used – against Men, Fathers and even boys! But writing them on a child’s face to get the point across instead of promoting a more positive image I think is counterproductive. Even the ‘HATE MALE’ statement is BOLD, and the most easily readable of the printed text! WTF???
Just WHO put this ad together?
Think again antifeminist. We are on the same side, but such ads can be done better. MUCH better.
Well, you may have a point, but the Spectator is a high brow magazine and I’m sure that most readers would stop and see the point rather than just form a subliminal anti-male message from a cursory glance. It’s a highly arresting image that forces you to stop and take a closer look. I’m sure many readers will look and immediately assume that it is the latest NSPCC campaign, but hopefully they will then be shamed into realising how deep and abhorrent such anti-male conditioning is.
well said, no better way to put it. That’s what’s happening. The feminist mob doesn’t just broadly spread its lies and propaganda – for the last few decades, it has precisely been out to brainwash and condition the public. What is more, conditioning implies that the object of such conditioning is typically taught to respond to an event, a stimulus, in a certain way. Which is also what is happening. Loving fathers can’t take their toddler to the park anymore by themselves without getting weird looks (hey, he might be a pedo-slash-kidnapper). 17-year-old young women have been declared children. Even distinctly non-erotic and random nude (or even non-nude) images of them are now potential child porn in the eyes of the public, and you are a pedo if you find any of it even remotely arousing. And 20-year-old boyfriends of these girls are now increasingly seen as child molesters by an angry mob (and, also increasingly, in the eyes of the law). Also, when did the assumption start that in the event of a divorce, a woman, even if she was a cheating, lying, husband-abusing, no-good, freeloading wench, is entitled to half the man’s money? And let’s not even begin to discuss why exactly women can almost without fail manage to get sole custody of the kids.
All of the above are anti-male responses of society at large, or at least responses closely concomitant with anti-male societal dynamic. Triggered by decades of comprehensive, relentless feminist anti-male conditioning.
And this is why father’s rights campaigners should be sympathetic to discussion of paedohysteria as a men’s rights issue.
BTW, I’ve just come back from spending a week in Germany. I must say, I was quite surprised at the lack of overt paedohysteria I noticed. Pretty teenage girls still seemed to expect me to look at them. When I was in a queue in a McDonalds I started a freindly and brief conversattion with a girl behind me who I had noticed was fixing her hair at me and trying to get my attention (and who was probably 13 or 14). Not only was she happy at me talking to her, nobody else in the queue even batted an eyelid (I must add I didn’t try to ‘pick her up’ or anything). Another occasion in a restaurant I walked past a girl of about 11 with her mother and as I did so, being in good mood at the time, I smiled at them. The girl’s face lit up and she said something to her mum in the manner of ‘that man smiled at me’, to which her mother seemed equally pleased. In Frankfurt I saw quite a bizzare thing – a man (or woman) dressed up as a bear (yes, really) walked up to a group of young teenage girls and put its arms around them. The girls were giggling and took each other’s photos in turn posing with him. The curious thing is the bear didn’t seem to be promoting anything and would probably have gotten arrested in the UK!
@theantifeminist, I was in Frankfurt myself over the week-end. I assume you spent some time (and money) in the infamous “Hauptbahnhofsviertel”? That’s where I spent my week-end. Germans in general, and girls in particular, are quite keen to practise their english with people from countries like the US. Paedohysteria may not be as conspicuous in Germany as in other countries, but on the other hand the justice system can be heavy-handed and biased towards the accused. Germans have their own interpretation of the presumption of innocence and the burden of proof. This is especially true in the State of Bavaria. When visiting Germany one is better off staying away from Bavaria, IMHO. To hook-up with girls in the street, Berlin is probably the best German city.
Hi Jack, yes I spent some time in the Hauptbahnhofsviertel. My hotel was just around ther corner from the station. I like that in Germany even the red-light districts feel quite safe. I have to say though that Frankfurt seems to have more Turks and less Germans every time I visit. Turkish girls are often pretty but I just can’t find them sexually attractive. I think 70% of the under 30′s must be Turkish now.
It’s a shame about Bavaria because from my experience (and in the opinion of many others) the best looking German girls are to be found there. One city in Germany I don’t really like visiting is Berlin, although I do so quite often because I have a friend from my university days who lives there. Berlin seems quite a rough and dirty city in my experience, and in fact I’ve been threatened with knives twice (a long time ago). I agree though that the girls in Berlin are both beautiful and easy to pull.
Bremen is another city packed with beautiful girls. The girls look Scandinavian but without the blandness – obviously the Hanseatic trade has mixed the Swedish and German gene pool there.
Actually, there seem to be sexy girls in every German city. This is quite unlike other countries in Europe. In the Uk, for example, the girls in the north are plain and even ugly, whereas in London and the South, you see a girl with model looks nearly every time you walk down the street. Likewise in Spain, girls in Madrid, the Basque country, and Catalonia and the Valencia region are often pretty, but in the south and elsewhere they are dark, hairy, and chubby. I guess the reason girls in Germany tend to have much the same looks everywhere is because of the post war refugees from the east and the bombed out cities and the consequent mixing of the regional populations.
It’s a matter of personal taste, but I think German girls are the sexiest in Europe, TBH. Very much a tragedy if feminists turn Germany into a sexually puritan state.
BTW, the English translation of Houellebecq’s latest novel has appeared and I’m going to read it next week – I’ll write a review here.
Being a Northern German myself, I once had a girlfriend from Bremen… she was what we here still today call the Frisian type… fair-skinned, slim, tall(er) people, light blonde to reddish hair and greyish blue eyes, like the ancient Germanic tribes that used to rule what is still known today as Frisia, on the North Sea coast. In many cases, “Frisian” women tend to be extremely pretty. But I digress.
It is true that there is less overt, “on the street” pedohysteria here in Germany than in the UK, and less overt anti-male sentiment. And the untrained observer would be forgiven for thinking that none of it has made its way into German society. Wrong. In the last few years, many anti-male and pedohysteria-feeding laws have been passed. Like the Gewaltschutzgesetz (Violence Protection Act) of 2002. Applauded by feminists (who else) as a measure to provide better protection for victims of stalking and domestic violence, in reality, it was tailored to reinforce anti-male sentiment, and only addresses and punishes male violence, giving women unprecedented legal power against men, often based on accusation alone. And for a while, a law (which has since been repealed) was in effect banning secret paternity testing. That’s right, a father could be condemned to hefty fines and even jail time for secretly taking a sample of his child’s DNA and having it tested. Meaning if the mother didn’t want you to find out if you were the real father, you had no choice but to pay for a child that potentially wasn’t your own. Many other German laws and bylaws reflect this feminist, anti-male attitude nowadays.
“Jack” mentioned the presumption of innocence regarding pedohysteria. It is true that the presumption of innocence still goes a long way here. Well, regarding actual court proceedings and the letter of the law anyway. Not really true when you look at the yellow press/tabloid media. They have made it their mission to overreport, accuse, sensationalize, and denigrate any and all pedophilia/child abuse suspects, let alone actual perpetrators, that they can come up with. The most damning example is Germany’s tabloid daily “Bild”, which could be seen as the Sun’s evil second cousin. It is well-connected with children’s charities, one of its columnists being close friends with the chairwoman of one of Germany’s most influential such charities, and by the way, “Bild” also features Alice Schwarzer, German man-hating feminazi icon and to some extent Germany’s answer to Germaine Greer, as a regular guest columnist.
As you can see, all is not well here. There may be less “everyday” misandry and pedohysteria going around in this country than in the UK or the U.S., but with regards to our laws and the tabloid media, there is more of it than you can shake your stick at.
Hi IR, your comment was lost in the spam filter for some reason so I only approved it last night.
I occasionally read ‘Bild’ online and the last time I did so, last month I think, there was a big interview with another new German child protection charity warning children over the dangers of internet predators. I checked out their site and was immediately struck by the size of the donate buttons.
It’s also easy to see how paedohysteria is infiltrating German society from reading the online comments sections underneath stories that feature sex abuse or ‘paedophiles’. I was really shocked during the time of Roman Polanski’s arrest in Switzerland to read the reader’s comments at ‘Bild’ – openly calling for him and all other ‘perverslings’ to be executed and the like. Roman Polanski, of course, who was scarred as a small child by witnessing German SS troops take away his parents to be killed alongside the homosexuals and the paedophiles (although I dout if even the Nazis were sick enough to pretend that men finding teens attractive were paedophiles – Hitler himself was involved with his niece, I believe, when she was still a young teen).
Dude we are at war with these slime covered vermin. Did you not become a slave and doormat yet? WTF? Get in the Game or sit out and suck your thumb.
Give the feminists a shared amount of responsibility and power, and yes that is equal. Then trust is taken advantage of by feminists and they take it all, lock, stock and barrel. And defamation against males goes into overdrive due to males trusting them NOT to do that but they do. The situation is that desperate.
This advert reflects the desperation that males are now faced with due to the complete breakdown of trust felt for feminists due to giving them the equality they burned their bra’s for and now we have this situation. Desperate times call for desperate measures and this poster is a reflection of that.
I don’t think the ad is all that bad. It may subliminally reinforce certain ideas that some readers may have in the back of their heads, but more than that, it has a certain surprise element that arouses the viewer’s curiosity as to what it’s really all about.
I read an article in a magazine lately that was titled something like “When Children Become Weapons”. It argued pretty much all of the above – that feminists have succeeded in turning children into formidable weapons in the war of the sexes. Children are used to get back at fathers in bitter divorce battles, especially as a means to hurt the divorcees (80 percent of divorces are filed by the woman!) – financially in terms of child support, but also emotionally by denying dads contact with their offspring. Moreover, if all else fails, children are used to destroy the father’s reputation, by means of child (sexual) abuse allegations. In some cases, even false convictions.
I personally know of a case where a woman divorced her husband and took the kids with her. By court order, the man has to pay for his ex-wife and his children which he never gets to see anymore. But here’s the kicker. The woman is college-educated and reasonably well-conneccted, and should have been able to go back from housewife into the job world in no time. But she moved into a very rural area on purpose where there aren’t many jobs to go around, and when she was pressured by the man to finally get her rear up and start working again, she had a doctor confirm that she suffers from chronic post traumatic stress disorder because her ex-husband allegedly mistreated her while they were married. Which is a load of BS. But still, the court decided that the man has to give his ex-wife and children a very considerable chunk of his monthly salary. And still no chance for regular contact with his kids.
And another case – an acquaintance of mine is denied contact with his kids because after a bitter separation in which the ex-wife really fought dirty, he received counseling and has been on antidepressants for over a year now (and who could blame him). When the ex-wife realized there might be a possibility that she won’t be able to keep the kids from him forever, she summoned the man’s medical records so as to show that her ex-husband was mentally unstable and unfit to be trusted with his own kids. Which made the man spiral even deeper into depression, to the point that he spent a few weeks in mental rehab. And as soon as his ex-wife got word of that, she wrote his lawyer a letter saying that now there should be no more doubt that her kids shouldn’t be around their mentally ill dad.
It just amazes you how women can just sail through the system like that. How they can abuse the system to destroy their ex-husband and have everything their way.
I think it’s a brilliant ad. To me (although I may be biased) it simply yet graphically portrays the brutality of the way many children are the innocent casualties of the modern feminist machine. These are the people who happily use children as pawns in their greedy, grubby little war against common sense and reality and then discard them like flat batteries when they are no longer of use – yet all while portraying themselves as fearless fighters against child abuse.
However, as this ad conveys an opinion which the tiny elite disapprove of, I’m sure it will be deemed ‘child exploitation material’ as it features a topless 1 year old boy and banned.
I posted the image to reddit.com/r/mensrights – it’s lucky that the clown Kloo2Yoo is no longer the moderator or he would probably have banned me for posting child porn.
To give you an idea of how bad things are in Germany too, not so long ago there were huge posters along the subway (S-Bahn) in Munich, featuring a discarded doll on a pile of garbage. The caption read something like “sex-tourism is not funny”.
What they want to get across is “male travel = sex-tourism = paedophilia”. In his book on women, Chapin has a chapter entitled “running the blockade” showing to what lengths the US government is prepared to go to prevent American males from importing women. The sexual trade-union wants to protect itself from the effects of sexual globalisation and it is using the paedo-argument do achieve that.
I think that the add is great! For me the overriding impact of the add, when you just glance at it, is that the cute, despondent looking little boy is labelled with all of the horribly negative male stereotypes. Which, clearly, is what is actually happening in real life and is an experience that any boy who has grown up in the last 40 years has been subjected to, to some degree or another.
It’s great because the twisted logic of modern feminism, which is basically male hatred, has managed to self rationalise this particular problem with their ideology. i.e. that attacking all males also means attacking their own brothers, fathers, sons etc… and this is the most heart wrenching example. “What on earth did a little boy do to be labelled with all of this?” and “how totally unfair and wrong” are my immediate gut reactions.
In fact it is very clever add on a number of levels:
1 – It is heart wrenching for anyone who is protective of children (most people)
2 – It highlights the types of negative male stereotypes that all males must live with including little boys
3 – In painting the little boy with such stereotypes it highlights the stupidity of such stereotypes and humanises the targets (in this case males) – and males need some serious humanisation in the media as they have been dehumanised and demonised by forty years of feminist propaganda.
4 – It specifically addresses and raises the issue of fatherlessness and the impact on the child itself.
5 – It talks to the cost to society of fatherlessness and makes it current.
6 – It draws the eye and grabs your interest – you want to know what it is about – at least I did, and that is probably the acid test for any advert. For your message to get out, it needs to be noticed.
I would love to see more adds like this and with less writing actually, because the impact for me is ALL in the picture! Just the sad, cute kid being painted with all that feminist HATE is, I think, an incredibly powerful and helpful image. I have to say, I am not convinced that subliminally the negative messages will make people think more negatively of men but that is just my point of view – I wouldn’t want to rule out the possibility.
PS – When writing this I found myself originally writing “cute” in relation to the little boy and then changed it to “loveable” pretty much without thinking. I then realised I had done it on the basis that someone might read the wrong thing into it (How sad – and how deeply I have been infected with the pernicious memes of feminist man hate – BASTARDS!) I changed it back to cute in the final writing.
Pingback: Fathers 4 Justice advert
Fathers4Justice might be the only ones which stands in their way.
What happens if they fall down?
Pingback: Saw this advert today | SiME