Anti-Feminist Theory of Men's Rights, Male Sexuality, Feminism

Bernard Chapin : Shaming MRA ‘Thugs’

with 10 comments

10 Responses to 'Bernard Chapin : Shaming MRA ‘Thugs’'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Bernard Chapin : Shaming MRA ‘Thugs’'.

1. Thanks for sharing this video—Chapin said what’s needed to be said.

   A question I keep asking, but nobody answers: who are all these female donors to AVfM that Elam and Esmay keep bragging about? And why there?

   Do we see women donating money to and supporting Antifeminist? Or Welmer? Or Fidelbogen? or Rookh? or Angry Harry? No—we don’t. I’d sure like to know more about these grrrlz and the others the likes of Erin Prizzey are bringing to the forefront of the mRM!

   

   Eric

   5 Jan 13 at 12:00 am
2. @Eric

   A question I keep asking, but nobody answers: who are all these female donors to AVfM that Elam and Esmay keep bragging about? And why there?

   Yes a very good question – one I’d like to know the answer to as well.

   I think and you probably think the same: they donate because AVfM lets them in – allows their posts and their feminist bullshit. (And of course, AVfM lets them in because they donate – an amicable arrangement).
   That’s about the only difference I can see between AVfM and all the others you mention.

   

   Alan Vaughn

   5 Jan 13 at 6:45 am
3. I believe you guys now when you tell me that none of you read AVfM anymore, otherwise somebody would have alerted me to this :

   http://www.avoiceformen.com/misandry/is-chemical-castration-misandric/

   Decent article, but scroll down to the comments and see the paedocrites inevitably break rank and claim that the paedos deserve it, as well as musing on whether ‘chemical castration’ is an over-emotional phrase and should be re-named ‘chemical enforced impotence’.

   

   theantifeminist

   5 Jan 13 at 10:58 pm
4. @theantifeminist

   I believe you guys now when you tell me that none of you read AVfM anymore, otherwise somebody would have alerted me to this :

   Haha… Us, Lie? To YOU? NEVER
   Even after you posted the link to that article, your description of the comments was enough to convince me to stay away for a lot longer too! Not to mention the recent warnings from Eric.

   Of course what these paedohysterical fools are arguing (or agreeing?) about is THEIR OWN NORMAL sexuality!
   (They actually picture in their small and feminist re-programmed, thus femi-serving minds: 15 & 16 year old girls who not so long ago, would have been legally depicted topless on page 3 of any typical trashy ol’ tabloid)…

   It would also not surprise me, if one of those paedocritical comments was made by the blog’s owner, or at least, endorsed by him.

   

   Alan Vaughn

   6 Jan 13 at 12:15 am
5. Of course what these paedohysterical fools are arguing (or agreeing?) about is THEIR OWN NORMAL sexuality!
   (They actually picture in their small and feminist re-programmed, thus femi-serving minds: 15 & 16 year old girls who not so long ago, would have been legally depicted topless on page 3 of any typical trashy ol’ tabloid)…

   The Men’s Right Movement – the only political movement in history to support the mutiliation and torture of the people it supposedly represents by the enemy it supposedly fights.

   The comments from Dean Excrement Esmay and Dr F Mangina were particularly nauseating.

   The thought just occured to me – if we’re to swallow the feminist narrative regarding child sexual abuse in the name of men’s Rights, then aren’t the likes of Dean Esmay, who boast constantly about being abused by women when they were boys, admitting that they are paedophiles? I mean, we all know that men who are abused go on to abuse children themselves…a bit like werewolves.

   It would also not surprise me, if one of those paedocritical comments was made by the blog’s owner, or at least, endorsed by him.

   Well, he certainly allows his readers to defend the feminist castration of male sex offenders, whereas he won’t allow anyone to even question those feminist sex laws that they are punished under.

   If you notice a guy calling himself ‘sex hysteria’ was banned for suggesting that society would be better off if children were allowed to masturbate. I presume this is the guy behind http://sexhysteria.com. He won’t comment here because my site is ‘misogynistic’ for being anti-feminist, but he thinks he’s going to get a hearing at AVoiceforMen.

   Well you live and learn I guess.

   

   theantifeminist

   6 Jan 13 at 8:11 am
6. @theantifeminist

   If you notice a guy calling himself ‘sex hysteria’ was banned for suggesting that society would be better off if children were allowed to masturbate. I presume this is the guy behind http://sexhysteria.com. He won’t comment here because my site is ‘misogynistic’ for being anti-feminist, but he thinks he’s going to get a hearing at AVoiceforMen.

   Well you live and learn I guess.

   Yes, I remember discussing him recently, (here). I wonder if he still thinks he’ll be listened to at AVfM?
   Human-Stupidity could probably offer him some good advice on the best commentary tactics for that notoriously militant mRA blog…
   

   

   Alan Vaughn

   6 Jan 13 at 9:35 am
7. The thought just occured to me – if we’re to swallow the feminist narrative regarding child sexual abuse in the name of men’s Rights, then aren’t the likes of Dean Esmay, who boast constantly about being abused by women when they were boys, admitting that they are paedophiles? I mean, we all know that men who are abused go on to abuse children themselves…a bit like werewolves.

   Well they must be: They certainly DO support the ‘child-abuse’ narrative and the ‘child-sexual-abuse victim, invariably becomes an abuser’ part is almost like the backbone of that narrative!

   Of course to us (and anyone else who rejects the abuse-industry’s claims outright), it’s just more unfounded, non-researched, thus unproven, feminist rhetoric, hearsay and downright rubbish; like everything else Mr Excrement Esmay and Co. have decided to accept and support without question…
   Guess they’d have to though, now that they’ve unanimously decided to become true feminist, co-opting mRAs (manginas Rights Activists).

   

   Alan Vaughn

   6 Jan 13 at 10:01 am
8. Of course to us (and anyone else who rejects the abuse-industry’s claims outright), it’s just more unfounded, non-researched, thus unproven, feminist rhetoric, hearsay and downright rubbish; like everything else Mr Excrement Esmay and Co. have decided to accept and support without question…

   The other thing is the irony invovled in the blocking of the SexHysteria guy. They accuse him of suggesting that parents should be allowed to masturbate their children, when in fact from his quoted comment (they obviously deleted the original) it’s obvious he is rather suggesting that parents allow their children to masturbate. Now isn’t it funny that when feminists protest against Warren Farrell for making past comments which may or may not have been misquoted regarding incest, the same MRAs are naming and shaming those feminists as bigoted thugs (which I support).

   Weird.

   

   theantifeminist

   6 Jan 13 at 8:30 pm
9. “…a bit like werewolves.”

   Which seems to fit in nicely with the whole Mediaeval trend of mRA thought these days. I don’t think the spirit of the 90s Satanic Ritual Abuse Hysteria has totally gone away—after all, the United Queendom pretty much treated the deceased Sir Jimmy Savile much like a vampire: digging up his corpse and effacing his monuments. Joe Paterno got the same treatment here, although Paterno’s family was wealthy enough to keep his tomb undisturbed (I have heard it’s been vandalized though).

   How long do you suppose it will be before, like Dr. Mabuse, we start hearing stories of these ‘evil men’ controlling their ‘criminal rings’ from beyond the grave?

   

   Eric

   6 Jan 13 at 11:22 pm
10. They accuse him of suggesting that parents should be allowed to masturbate their children, when in fact from his quoted comment (they obviously deleted the original) it’s obvious he is rather suggesting that parents allow their children to masturbate.

    I cannot for the life me see how they (or even ONE commentator), could possibly have misinterpreted that comment, not even someone with poor reading ability.
    This makes me suspect that they (not necessarily any of the commentators either), have probably ‘re-written’ other comments from ‘creeps’ they don’t like, to make them look like bigger perverts, paedos or creeps, that they can then have fun with scapegoating, ridiculing or just banning from their exclusive mangina’s and femRA’s club…

    Fuck em.

    And if you can prove that I have been there (as I totally refuse to even visit it now) you can ban me from this blog! LOL!!

    

    Alan Vaughn

    6 Jan 13 at 11:26 pm

Leave a Reply