Resisting the Rape of the Male – Sex Positive Men's Rights
The forever great Bernard Chapin discusses the renaming of the men’s rights movement as the ‘Men’s Human Rights Activism’.
Why not just re-name it the ‘Equal Injustice for All Movement?’ Or rather, ‘Equal Injustice for All Under Feminist Laws Movement’?
Elizabeth Bathory was a 16th Century Hungarian Countess and probably the most prolific serial killer and child murderer in history. She is believed to have sadistically tortured and killed over 600 young adolescent girls through pure sexual jealousy and malice. Obsessed with her fading looks, she would spend hours staring at herself in the mirror before picking out the prettiest of her retinue of young teenage maid servants to be hung up in a gibbot. She would proceed to jab at the poor girl with a sharp lance, causing her to slowly and painfully bleed to death. All the time whilst doing this, Elizabeth would scream furious obscenitites at the dying child.
Najat M’jid Maalla
– United Nations ‘Special Rapporteur on child abuse’Claimed in 2009 that there are over 4 million child porn websites worldwide that constitute a multi-billion dollar industry. An FBI expert recently stated that there were now less than a dozen commerical child porn sites in existence. While millions of children around the world still live in poverty, and thousands die every day from famine, disease and war, her UN feminist mandate is to jet around the world organizing conferences to wipe out the scourge of 17 year old ’children’ choosing to do what they want with their bodies on webcam.
off topic but have you guys seen this…
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/iceland/9866949/Iceland-considers-pornography-ban.html
just made me lose my lunch.
Iceland’s feminazis are proving once again that the country is far from being the democratic libertarian paradise that some people still think it is…
inclinedreader
14 Feb 13 at 5:17 pm
Thanks for the link IR, I’ll post it up later.
I’ve been saying for ages that porn will be banned everywhere within 20 years. People say it can’t happen, but it will – unless a very strong sex positive men’s rights movement emerges. Just when holographic touch porn etc will be on their way. And there might be a bit of a fuss kicked up, but as soon as porn is criminalized ALL men will be claiming that only sick pervs who can’t get wives would even want to look at it, despite all the historical evidence to the contrary, while the number of men looking at it online (around 99% of men) will hardly diminish.
I’ve already invented the word – ‘pornocrites’, LOL!
theantifeminist
14 Feb 13 at 5:46 pm
Chapin is right on. I’m almost tempted to call it Neofeminism.
Eric
16 Feb 13 at 12:31 am
How about this classic quote from King mangina in his response to the above video of Bernard’s:
Oh Yeah Paul… What about femi-Nazi Party?
Guess he’s already forgotten about this post..?
What a vile hypocrite! And the way he’s treated both Bernard and Angry Harry means he’s not an MRA in any way shape or form, especially after the way he waffles on about trust, honor, respect, fairness, tolerance, accountability, blah-blah-blah, plus all the other great personal attributes, both of those true men and MRAs have an abundance of, and ALL of which he’s clearly devoid of himself.
The mangina’s nothing but a slippery snake and possibly the biggest TRAITOR the MRM has seen and will ever see.
There’s only one mRA from there who is possibly
moreas treacherous: Dean Excrement.Alan Vaughn
18 Feb 13 at 7:32 am
Alan:
The feminists were the ones who coined the maxim: ‘The Personal is Political.’ How can the MRM become a victim’s rights group without absorbing the political tenets of feminism? It obviously can’t.
Eric
19 Feb 13 at 4:46 am
@Eric
Exactly, it’s even simpler than that really. Feminism would have to boast THE most political dogma of all institutions, to the extent that it’s politics (built around one central theme: misandry) even influence almost an entire language, or at least ‘political speak’, so how can anyone possibly suggest with a straight face, that merely entering into debate or dialogue with such an institution, is non-affiliated with any political party?
(Let alone the ‘bridge-building’ (co-opting) agreement of total BETRAYAL Elam and other prominent manginas made with THE most political institution in the world)…
Alan Vaughn
19 Feb 13 at 9:20 am
Bernard Chapin talking specifically about Paul Elam’s treatment of Angry Harry : http://youtu.be/4Y8v1VITTC8?t=2m58s
And on AVoiceforSheep : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bmGKM4Zh7A
theantifeminist
21 Feb 13 at 10:34 pm
And here we go again : http://www.avoiceformen.com/men/the-dynamics-of-male-fear/comment-page-1/#comment-141589
Simply visiting that site makes me truly nauseous now. Why don’t they just hold a competition to find the least paedophilic Men’s Human Rights Activist there? (of course, Paul Elam will win, he’ll see to that)
I had a conversation with a 17 year old girl yesterday – I have no doubt she would find the idea of a romantic involvement with someone as emotionally immature as Elam deeply ‘nauseous’.
I notice also that Steve Moxon is taking part in the same comment thread. He’s already mentioned ‘young, fit girls’. I would bet my home that he will be booted and blocked by Elam within weeks if not days. I’m not sure why Moxon is even trying. He’d be better employed building an alternative men’s rights site that could possibly compete with AVfWomen – a genuine alternative and a real voice for men (as Moxon is).
theantifeminist
21 Feb 13 at 11:11 pm
Antifeminist:
Futrelle may not give up his crown so easily: he’s at it again over Warren Farrell’s 1977 comments. Now Fraudtrelle is deeply offended because nearly three months has passed since the Toronto protests and Dr. Farrell STILL hasn’t appeared on Manboobz to renounce his 1977 statements.
Eric
22 Feb 13 at 2:25 am
“I will bet that Moxon will be booted and blocked by Elam within weeks if not days.”
I think the only reason he was invited there in the first place was to deflect criticism from AVfmanginas, so that the Bath-House Boys over there could pretend they were offering ‘balance’ and that dissenting voices like HS, Chapin, and Angry Harry brought their expulsions on themselves. It hasn’t worked though, so Moxon is probably already positioned on the ejector seat.
Eric
22 Feb 13 at 2:32 am
For a psychologist, Paul Elam seems to be remarkably ignorant of the subject, especially when it comes to female psychology. Especially taking the perspectives, like he’s doing, of a gaggle of bisexual/lesbian perverts as authorities on the subject.
Younger women are drawn instinctively to the mature, responsible male and respond to him sexually. Unfortunately, there are biological necessities in women that also cause them to do two things: 1) to allow their sexual choices to be determined more by social norms than by biological fitness; and 2) to rebel against male dominance. The reasons for these things are too complex to be discussed in a short article, but it doesn’t have a damn thing to do with ‘male sexual weakness’ like TyphonBlue and Kelly Jones think.
The reason women need the civilizing force of a male-dominated society is to keep these two tendencies in check. It’s not to oppress women, any more than negative masculine tendencies are kept in check by rational laws (also made by MEN for their own good).
For someone to say that connecting romantically to a teenager is ‘nauseating’, shows that their own sexual psychology is messed up badly. To my mind, it’s as bad as someone claiming that the thought of a white man having sex with an Asian, Latina, or black female is ‘nauseating’. There’s a HUGE element of sexual jealousy involved here; and trying to pretend that lusting after Wooly Bumblebee-type ‘sheilas’ is somehow morally superior to those of us who might prefer a Sabrina Vaz only makes that jealousy look even more apparent.
Eric
22 Feb 13 at 3:04 am
I’ve found teenage women to be surprisingly exciting to date & bed. Is it because I had no access to them when I was their age and I’ve sort of wanted to catch up? That’s only part of the answer.
A teenage woman has a feel of her own which makes her different from an equally good-looking mature woman. A teenage woman is stressed for neither time nor money. She feels under no pressure to marry/have children/find Mister Right. She’s game for sex, rollin’& ravin’, you name it. She’s eager to learn and try out things. She’s playful like a daughter would be, and lewd like a girlfriend should be. I’ve found mature women to be lacking in all this.
jack
22 Feb 13 at 7:55 am
@Eric
Again, the underlying ideology is kafa’a. Who does the women of whom. Sex between white men and non-white women is attacked by both WNs and Cultural “Marxists”.
Columnist
22 Feb 13 at 9:09 am
I recall the argument of the homosexual necrophiliac AVoiceforWomen reader ‘Eyerie’ – which was basically the logical conclusion of Paul’s and other feminist arguments against sex with teenagers. If supposed differences between a romantic or sexual couple mean the relationship is inherently ‘nauseous’ or ‘abusive’ then the only truly equal relationships are between same aged homosexuals or lesbians, with almost identical personalities, backgrounds, interests etc.
Given that, as far as I know, every single member of staff at AVoiceforWomen is either homosexual or lesbian, this is hardly surprising.
The paedocrite Futrelle was at it again the other day too, claiming that a Spearhead reader was a paedophile and child abuser for admitting to once dating a 14 year old. The reason Futrelle gave was because such a relationship must inherently be one of dependence on the part of the girl. I’ve never understood this argument either. Actually a female is MOST DEPENDENT when she leaves the security of her parents, and first becomes economically independent (i.e., at least to a large extent when she goes to university, embarks on her career). Just the sort of age range female the Fraudtrelle wants to manipulate into bed – with the added extra that the young women he is targetting all have serious mental health issues. In other words these future victims of Fradutrelle are far more vulnerable and dependent than a teenage girl under 18.
theantifeminist
22 Feb 13 at 10:50 am
Exactly Eric. And note that Paul didn’t refer to ‘underage teens’, but simply to ‘teenage girls’. This fits in with Dean Excrement’s assertion that 20 year old ‘boys’ are half way between childhood and adulthood.
Homosexuals are probably the most protected species in our Western societies today, yet AVfW goes out of its way to declare that gay rights are men’s rights. At the same time, they appear to want the age of consent raised to 21, and for men who have ‘nauseating’ sexual relationships with even 19 year old girls to be put in prison and raped.
theantifeminist
22 Feb 13 at 11:01 am
Homosexuals are probably the most protected species in our Western societies …
An MRA who harbours no illusion about the gay lobby is Barbarossaaa:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xn3KRmGu-X0
jack
22 Feb 13 at 2:52 pm
@Eric / theantifeminist
That huge jealousy element was no less apparent to me when he tried to humiliate / scapegoat Human-Stupidity as a Creep, then ultimately (doing him the biggest favour by) banning him from his paedocrite / feminist blog.
That whole transcript from the start (when HS tried to suggest feminist c-p laws were a MRs issue) to the reply where he informed HS he was banned, proved nothing more than what a classic paedocrite Elam must be…
In fact if you consider EVERYTHING he says on his feminist blog (AVfm) about himself, it shows the same defense of his true sexuality (i.e. he’s just a sexually normal man) but he feels he’s obliged to uphold the dominant narrative of feminists, by saying things like desiring a 17 year old ‘child’ is ‘creepy’ or even ‘nauseating’.
It’s all bullshit and Elam is nothing but a slimy, unprincipled, FEMINIST phony.
Alan Vaughn
23 Feb 13 at 1:20 am
@ theantifeminist
Muslims easily outrank homosexuals, as can be seen from the sorry fate of Pim Fortuyn.
Columnist
23 Feb 13 at 7:50 am
@columnist Wasn’t Pim Fortuyn killed by an animal rights supporter? And anyway, as we all know, subject to imprisonment, pederasts are not homosexuals (they are paedophiles).
Muslims do not outrank homosexuals. Muslims are routinely harassed by the police and security forces. Newspapers and blogs can more or less openly attack Islam – even politicians do so regularly now. At the same time the police spend great resources monitoring chatrooms for ‘homophobia’, and (in the UK anyway) people are subject to dawn raids for casual anti-gay remarks they have made in those chatrooms.
If people Pat Condell was making videos like this attacking homosexuality, they would be in prison : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INll6Y5iqbM
theantifeminist
23 Feb 13 at 9:24 am
Pim Fortuyn protected the rights of homosexuals against being beaten up by muslims. Actually, the hierarchy of privilege is very complicated. The police protects peaceful EDL demos against violent UAF members. Does that mean that the EDL outranks the UAF on the political correct hierarchy? Tough call. Maybe a trick of the System is to give different privileges to different people so each thinks he is oppressed. For instance, the Middle Class is allowed a slightly higher standard of living compared to the Lower Class, but the Lower Class can get away with violence, and the Middle Class can’t.
Columnist
23 Feb 13 at 12:38 pm
Antifeminist:
Dean Esmay also supported Obama’s health care plan, which defines dependent children as under the age of 26.
http://www.deanesmay.com/2012/06/28/obamacare-upheld/
Eric
24 Feb 13 at 12:34 am