Bernard Chapin on European Wolf-whistling Law

The great Bernard Chapin talks about the potential horrors of the new law :

Of course, as has been pointed out by many, it's not the feminists behind this law who are being 'protected' from the wolf-whistling, but they do benefit from it. Older feminists have their rabid sexual jealousies soothed by knowing that men could be caged simply for approaching or even looking at a younger woman in the street. With younger feminists, it's more a case of it allowing them to sexually self-validate themselves by indulging in the fantasy that they are frequent subjects of sexual attention.  Just as those pug ugly slut walkers can live out the fantasy that each of them has sucked and fucked their way through the entire college football team.

On a humorous note - I wonder if the lady in the following video might be criminalized by the new laws :

And I disagree a little with the six-pack guy when he says women are 'less obvious'.  I have a similar physique, although with a little more muscle perhaps, and women are not always subtle.  I don't get wolf-whistles, but I do very often have women (and girls) openly licking their lips and such like at me.  And although I don't actually get approached in the street often, I do have girls sitting themselves down next to my table in restaurants when there is plenty of empty tables around, stand next to me on at the side of the swimming pool etc (and often becoming aggressive if I don't then chat them up - in fact, several times, I've had women say stuff of the kind 'he must be a paedophile' when I haven't shown any interest back).

There's another disturbing thing that happens to me fairly often, especially when I'm quite 'buffed' as I am now - something that I have reason to find more threatening than a woman does for simply being whistled at in the street.  Very often, when I'm in a restaurant or such like, a woman will be sitting with her partner and begin repeatedly checking me out (like the woman in the above video) - something which I tend to ignore.  But quite often, when her partner catches her looking at me, or indeed if I catch her eyes, she'll immediately complain to him that I was looking at her - a transformation and rationalisation of her sudden guilt at being physically interested in another guy in his presence.  Such a woman would rather have her boyfriend or myself beaten up than admit to herself that she had wandering eyes.

14 thoughts on “Bernard Chapin on European Wolf-whistling Law

  1. Alan Vaughn

    (and often becoming aggressive if I don’t then chat them up – in fact, several times, I’ve had women say stuff of the kind ‘he must be a paedophile’ when I haven’t shown any interest back).

    The paedo-hysteria must be really rampant in the UK. It's ironic that you experience that - I never had any girls indicate interset like that until I passed age 40, when I was younger: nothing. Perhaps I'm like a bottle of wine - I got better with age? (Well I definitely became slimmer - I used to have a figure something like The Amazing Athiest's, until I changed my lifestyle in my early 30's). Anyway, when I don't show any interest in return, they normally mutter or even ask me directly if I am Gay, never a paedo, at least not so far...

  2. evilwhitemalempire

    quite often, when her partner catches her looking at me, or indeed if I catch her eyes, she’ll immediately complain to him that I was looking at her
    *******************
    she's trying to see whether or not her boyfriend gives a damn
    trying to see how important she is to him

  3. evilwhitemalempire

    they want to block access to viagra and vasectomies

    "It is patently unfair that men can avoid the rewards of unwanted fatherhood by presuming that their judgment over such matters is more valid than the judgment of the General Assembly,"

    heh, nobody debates men getting vasectomies for the same reason nobody debates females getting tube ligations

    and this gem

    "Fewer unwanted pregnancies result in fewer children living in poverty and a lower prison population and this is job killing in a time when social workers, police officers, and prison guards need the employment to feed their families. . . "

    WTF?
    that's like a cigarette company openly saying that their business is good for undertaker's business!

    btw the comment entry system is acting a bit odd

  4. Alan Vaughn

    "I feel like we need to equalize the sexual health debate, to provide care for the more powerful breed of the sexes," Turner said by phone. There are other natural remedies for impotence, she said. "Like celibacy."
    "The sad part about that is when people introduce legislation that infringes on women's liberties, nobody bats an eye or thinks it's strange," she said. But take the same tack with men, she said, and the reaction is completely different.

    From the above article "Ohio State Sen. Nina Turner joins women across country striking back, introducing bills to regulate sex lives of men"...
    And what legislation that infriges on women's liberties might that be??
    I challenge Nina Turner or any of her sexual trade union femi-hag colleagues to name even ONE example of such legislation, introduced anywhere in the Western WORLD in the last say, 20 years!
    And preventing the killing of a living fetus (abortion) is NOT infringing on the liberties of ANYONE, women or men, it simply protects the right of an unborn child to have a life at all.
    Make sure you read this - you won't believe it!

  5. theantifeminist

    Post author

    Probably the sickest thing I've ever read. She has to be taking the piss. It's not enought that the feminist hags can introduce these stupid sick laws with a flick of their wrists, but now they have to rub it in our faces and humiliate us as well.

    She's basically admitting that the legsislation that she and others like her are introducing are simply vindictively targeting men in revenge for abortion laws (and very interesting that she, like most feminists, see the question of the rights of an unborn child as a 'sexual' matter for women).

    Why the hell isn't she on some 'hate speech' list, instead of a handful of men's rights bloggers???

  6. Alan Vaughn

    Yeah, I must re-phrase my original comment:

    And what legislation that infringes on women’s liberties might that be??
    I challenge Nina Turner or any of her sexual trade union femi-hag colleagues to name even ONE example of such legislation, introduced anywhere in the Western WORLD in the last say, 20 years!

    Make that the last 75 years...
    We (MRA's) on the other hand could probably name 75 or more examples of misandrous new legislation they've introduced even over the past 5 years!
    I think you could be right, she's taking the piss, because this is just too ridiculous to be taken seriously even by someone such as manboobz (the SPLC's new ally). Or; maybe not...

  7. evilwhitemalempire

    she, like most feminists, see the question of the rights of an unborn child as a ‘sexual’ matter for women).

    ************

    feminists think unborn children are tumors

    they think that they should have authority over life and death just because their bodies are incubators

    well what's good for the goose.....

    if you really want to piss them off ask them "would you commit suicide if you found out that your own mother originally wanted to abort you but was prevented by the intervention of backwoods rednecks?"

  8. evilwhitemalempire

    almost forgot

    the spearhead, currently, has a very fresh thread on this if anyone is interested (most americans are just now getting out of bed)

    good chance to get some 'viewage' for STU and other ideas

  9. Destructor

    Same happened to me ( last paragraph) . My wife told me "there is a girl who doesn't stop looking at you" I already knew that but I was ignoring her, when suddenly his partner came back from the bathroom I think ( it was in a pizzeria ) and he caught her looking. She apparently said something to him. This guy was angry with me.I don't know what happen next but they were arguing and left.

  10. joe

    No, she is not, she is creating drama to hide & justify her actions. I've had to deal with this on quiet a few occasions. Every time I've pointed out that it is a "let's you & him fight" the men have agreed that it's exactly what the woman were doing.

  11. theantifeminist

    Post author

    They're probably doing a combination of both.

    I had it happen to me again yesterday afternoon.

    I'm pretty buffed at this moment - the poor guy just didn't want to know. She's probably done it to him before.

    And if I'd beaten him up, the skank would probably have creamed herself if I'd taken her by the arm and told her 'you're my bitch now'.

  12. When I suggested that masturbation might be a good alternative to abortion, some people got very angry. However, some months later, the same people used the masturbation theme in a rally against Christians opposed to abortion.

  13. will

    By the same logic that a fetus is a tumour(a disease) by extension all humans were a disease at some point including the feminists.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>