Author Archives: theantifeminist

‘Russia Today’ Brave Enough to Speak Out for Ched Evans

Featured

Posted on by
18

The Ched Evans case is possibly the most deeply disturbing thing that I’ve witnessed in all my time as an anti-feminist and men’s rights activist.  Sadly, it appears that I’m the only person in the manosphere who appears to be covering it.

It’s not simply the disturbing fact that a young man has been jailed for FIVE FUCKING YEARS for having sex with a drunken woman, who only an hour earlier was able to consent (according to the court) to sex with the footballer’s black friend that she had basically picked up for a quickie that same night. (incidentally, she claimed that the black footballer had raped her, which means that somewhat bizarrely, according to the court, she is both a rape victim AND a false rape accuser).

It’s the media reaction which really makes me think we are witnessing a watershed moment in the complete corruption of the justice system and of the media by the sexual trade union.  Despite the general misandry long since inculcated into the British population, I’m convinced that millions of men (and women) share the opinion that the five year sentence handed out to a talented young man for having sex with an intoxicated woman is excessive. This is, after all, longer than the average sentence for violent stranger rape in the UK, and on the basis of a law that was only introduced a few  years ago by a government at the beck and call of radical feminists.  At the time of its creation, the law was highly controversial.

Yet the media is constantly pumping out articles with headlines screaming the like of ‘Outrage at Ched Evans Rape Apologists’.  Mysteriously, nearly all of these articles have had their readers comments function disabled.   Virtually all of the national UK newspapers are carrying the same articles sharing the same artificial outrage – from the Sun to the Guardian.  Even given the feminist domination of the mainstream media, this all seems a little too contrived, co-ordinated, and stage managed.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2136435/Ched-Evans-Fans-footballer-jailed-rape-planning-support-match-today.html

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/4280804/Lib-Dem-hopeful-says-Ched-Evans-rape-conviction-was-excessive.html

On top of this, perhaps even more disturbingly, the British police have arrested THIRTEEN twitter users, in dawn raids, for tweeting the name of the ‘victim’.  Whilst I strongly disapprove of publishing the name of this woman, and recognise that such acts are illegal, what is disturbing is not only the amount of resources that must have been deployed in order to foil this crime, but the way in which the media coverage of the arrests appear to be consciously giving the message that if you so much as criticise either a rape verdict or a feminist law, you too could face arrest.

It is important to remind oneself that in the UK of 2012, thankfully, it is still not illegal to criticise feminist laws, or to question controversial court verdicts that are the outcome of feminist laws.  How long this will remain the case, however, God only knows.

One of the few articles I’ve read defending Ched Evans online (outside of forum comments – the threads often quickly deleted) has come from a foreign publication – ‘Russia Today’ :

http://rt.com/usa/columns/namenotfound/men-rape-girl-britain/

We live in 2012 when men increasingly have no rights.  All the while small but extremely noisy groups appropriate the rights to speak on behalf of women.

  • “Evans Rape Apologists Are A Disgrace To Humanity”
  • “Rape culture is alive and kicking”
  • “Rape convictions in this country are far too low”

­What is this, a call to arms? No – just headlines in some of Britain’s newspapers. Does it sound vengeful to you as much as it sounds to us?

They don’t have to all be like Valerie Solanas or Eva Lundgren. Some even permit the male species to exist in some defanged form. But too many a woman thinks that somehow men are a source of unfairness and trouble in the world.

The ideas of “Society for Cutting Up Men” are alive and well, kicking. These days primarily in the form of men being guilty as charged.

Asking for equal pay and equal rights is one thing. To hold a grudge against modern men because for generations the male human species was oppressing the female one is another.

When we say “oppressing” we actually mean it – the laws of the land were outright unfair even some hundred years ago, customs were even worse. Should it follow that now it’s somehow a woman’s turn to exact revenge on men as some defective sub-species, “a disgrace to humanity”?

And who stands to win? Surely not the 19-year-old girl in Evans’ story – whose name cannot be named for legal reasons – but whose identity and pictures are freely available on the Internet thanks to social networks.

­

Kill them all, the lord will recognise his own

­Thankfully, nobody slaughters men physically just yet. But when it comes to dealing with gender-related crimes, the radical mentality of Abbot Arnaud might as well be used as a motto.

Alleged rape? Lock him up. Domestic abuse? Lock him up. Alleged sexual harassment at work? Fire him, make him pay damages (and yes,  lock him up if possible).

The police force, prosecutors, judges might have more men than women in their ranks, but it counts for little.

Everyone in the force knows that it could be extremely detrimental to one’s career to ignore any complaint of that type – and neither should a complaint be ignored, we agree.

But in today’s society, law enforcement exists not to establish the truth but to isolate the alleged abuser – guilty or innocent matters not.

It’s not openly spoken about outside the male locker room – again, for the fear of repercussions. But it does exist and it’s getting worse by the year.

Women have nothing to celebrate either. The real rapists and serial wife batterers should be investigated and prosecuted. The problem is, it’s so much easier to catch a “rapist” who never thought he was one, than to stalk, catch and prove the guilt of a real sexual predator, especially with the underfunded law enforcement that – like all of us – lives in the age of austerity.

Meanwhile, lads, take our good advice. In documentary film production, every step you take you cover with signed “release forms” – essentially, a written consent to appear in that documentary.

You might as well have a few pre-written on you before you head out to that local pub of yours on Saturday.

 

The writer above appears to have largely ‘got it’ without having seemingly encountered the men’s rights movement (or else, presumably, he would be able to question the myth of patriarchy and the historical oppression of women).

Needless to say, a feminist at the Guardanista is on hand to express her indignation :

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/may/02/russia-today-ched-evans-rape

To which Russia Today has responded in turn :

http://rt.com/usa/columns/namenotfound/evans-rape-british-press/

Isn’t it ironic that it is now the British (state controlled) media using creepy terms such as ‘hatespeak’ and castigating Russian writers as ‘(rape) apologists’ and thought criminals for being able to freely question the court verdicts and feminist laws of the United Kingdom?

 

 

 

Steve Moxon Dropped by UKIP Over Anders Brevik Comments

Featured

Posted on by
15

Steve Moxon, author of the classic anti-feminist book ‘The Woman Racket‘, was dropped as a candidate for the UK Independence Party (UKIP) in this week’s local elections over comments he made on his blog previously regarding Anders Breivik. Whilst stressing how appalling and insupportable Breivik’s actions were, Moxon had noted that his manifesto presented an accurate account of the spread of political correctness in Europe. This was picked up by a local paper in the city that Moxon was standing in (Sheffield), forcing UKIP to drop him as a candidate – despite the vast majority of UKIP supporters no doubt sharing the same anti-PC views. UKIP – an ‘alternative right’ anti-EU party – gained 14% of the vote nationally in yesterday’s vote.

The very reason – the ‘justification’ for – why Breivik behaved in the appalling way in which he did was because of the completely closed-down debate about PC. That is abundantly clear from his ‘manifesto’. To head off the possibility of more Breiviks, this has to change.
The ‘guilt by association’ usual ruse was in full swing to close down debate yet further.
The standard line on Breivik is that he is ‘beyond the pale’, and therefore any analysis of PC is also ‘beyond the pale’.
It most certainly is not.
That someone who acknowledges the researched historical analysis of the origin of PC is a mass murderer in no way makes the research into the origin of PC a doctrine itself of mass murder. It is never the case that if A is in some way coincidental with B, and B is ‘beyond the pale’; that, therefore, A is likewise ‘beyond the pale’. That would be the most elementary non-logic.
Malicious nonsense of ‘guilt by association’ as it is applied to analysis of PC requires combating. If there is no free speech even on the topic of the most deep-seated, entrenched and widespread fascism ever to afflict societies — which PC indeed is — then there is no free speech at all.
Concerns about ‘sensitivity’ are just smokescreens to cover a PC-fascist stance. Evidently, even the deepest irony is opaque to the PC-fascist.
‘You’re not fit to be a journalist, let alone a political editor’, I admonished the hapless Marsden. “I don’t think you’re fit to be a candidate”, he retorted.
But that is my point! A PC-fascist does not accept that anyone who challenges the PC hegemony can be moral; and that therefore such a challenger is ineligible to stand in any election.
That PC is itself the height of immorality — seeking to label the disadvantaged as ‘oppressors’ and the privileged as the ‘oppressed’ – completely escapes PC-fascists. They feel obliged to stick rigidly to this self-delusion rather than to admit the failure of their whole ideology. But this vehement denial inevitably cannot long survive being comprehensively found out.

http://stevemoxon.blogspot.co.uk/

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-17911131

Thousands Call for ‘Rapist’ Ched Evans to be Stripped of Footballing Award

Featured

Posted on by
8

‘Rapist’ footballer Ched Evans, jailed for a sickening 5 years for having sex with a drunk woman, despite the fact that the same court ruled that just hours earlier she had been able to consent to fuck the black cock of one of Ched’s footballing friends, now finds that the good people of Change.org are petitioning to have him stripped of a footballing award he had recently won.

http://www.jusnews.net/en/11/news/610/Thousands-call-for-Ched-Evans-to-be-stripped-of-award.htm

Nearly 9,000 people have signed an online petition calling for Sheffield United striker Ched Evans to be stripped from an end-of-season honours list after his rape conviction.

The Wales forward was named in the Professional Footballers Association (PFA) League One team of the year last month just two days after being jailed for raping a 19-year-old woman.

Leo Hardt, who launched the petition, said that Evans’s inclusion sent out “a very troubling message” to young people.

But the PFA defended the player-voted award, which it said was determined “purely on footballing ability”.

23-year-old Evans is appealing the five-year jail sentence handed down to him after he was found guilty of raping the woman in a hotel near Rhyl in north-east Wales in May last year.

 

Here’s the Change.org petition, signed by the usual collection of feminist dogs and their mangina pussy begging allies.

Meanwhile, no less than THIRTEEN people have been arrested for naming the woman on Twitter.

This seems to be part of a disturbing trend of the feminist state in the UK ferociously cracking down on any attempts at subversion.  Recently, a man who hacked into the website of a pregnancy advisory board and published the names of women who had killed their unborn children was sentenced to a ridiculously excessive 2 years in jail.

This week, British femiservative Louise Mensch, behind hysterical attempts to de-sexualise and infantalise her 17 year old sexual rivals, defended Rupert Murdoch in an official government review into the News Corp hacking scandal – defending a  man in charge of an organization that hacked into the mobile phone of a murdered 13 year old school kid in order to feed its subhuman readers salacious new paedo scoops.  As a result of her defence of the odious Murdoch and his child abusing organization, Mensch has understandably attracted insults and even ‘threats’ that any politician in the same situation would.  Yet she is now provoking hysteria in the media over the ‘sexist’ nature of the insults : http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/twitter/9241388/Louise-Mensch-MP-exposes-shameful-bullying-of-women-on-Twitter-after-personal-attacks.html

Can you smell a ‘misogyny hate speech’ law coming…?

Brazilian Government Claims PUA Roosh V Promotes ‘Sex Tourism’

Featured

Posted on by
17

Popular and well travelled Pick Up Artist ‘Roosh V’, having recently survived the attentions of the Southern Law Poverty Center as well as Lithuanian Neo-Nazi thugs, has now become a target of the Brazilian tourist board. They claim that his website, and in particular his advice on banging hot Brazilian women, promotes sex tourism, trafficking, and degrades human (female) dignity.

The Brazilian Government Is Trying To Censor Me

People think I’m joking when I occasionally comment that Brazil is on the rapid downswing, but the feminist takeover is happening at a faster pace than has ever been seen in history, recently aided with the election of its first female president. Combined with the fact that the population is fattening at an obscenerate, what we’re seeing is the transformation of an entire country into a sort of Feminist 1984, the first of its kind. The attitude of Brazilian women was already above average when I was there a few years ago, so expect a country that may be very unpleasant to visit by the end of this decade.

For those of you who whine to me that I complain too much about feminism, you’re part of the problem. You don’t understand that this ideology is like a virus that won’t stop, and pretending it doesn’t exist by closing your eyes will only make it worse for yourself and every other man on this planet. Brazil is still better than the West, but it’s being destroyed as we speak mainly because of pro-feminist policies. There is no doubt in my mind that feminism is the principal enemy for men today. If you don’t see that then, well, you deserve the most masculine, fat, short-haired, insufferable cunt that exists. If things continue on their present course, that’s all we’ll be able to get.

 

There truly is nowhere left on Earth to run to for those seeking escape from the legislative creep of the sexual trade union, or even for those – like Roosh – who simply want to have some unapologetic fun in the sun with the shapely locals.  ‘Progress’ is now the one true moral faith that unites all countries, and ‘protecting the (sexual) dignity of women and children’ is firmly established as part of the progressive’s holy trinity, together with ‘racial equality’ and ‘gay and transgender rights’.

For two centuries and more, the values of the Enlightenment were synonymous with both intellectual and sexual freedom.  Yet put the power of cultural marxism in the hands of the sexual trade union, and within a couple of decades, the very meaning of civilizational advance itself has been turned upon its head.  Each year, what we can say in public without breaking yet another ‘hate speech’ law becomes more and more limited (in the name of promoting ‘tolerance’).  Meanwhile, even while a small minority of (gay) men can pursue a fake bastardised unhistorical form of ‘homosexual identity’, the mass of ordinary men have to increasingly live in fear of a fate worse than death if they dare even admit to normal male sexuality.

Meanwhile, the Amazing Atheist has sadly sold out and admitted that you can’t be a popular YouTube atheist and champion of secular reasoning without appeasing the mother godess fertility cult that is feminism.

Human Stupidity Comment On Feminist Defined Male Sexuality

Featured

Posted on by
13

This comment appeared underneath JohnTheOther’s excellent reply to CNN’s ‘Are Men Stupid’ article :

Great article. It is also great to see that you attack feminist defined male sexuality.

I arrived at the men’s movement through interest in male sexual liberty and its restriction, be it age of consent issue (access to post-pubertal women), prostitution and simply sexual freedom.

Then I found out about father’s rights and the absurd enslavement of “good” family men. Really shocking. Did not know about it though I probably unconsciously avoided getting kids because of such laws. I had women that wanted my kids, no strings attached, just for their nice green eyes. I knew better and emptied out my condoms after use and checked if the condom wrappers still had air in them before use.

What still takes me aback is the great rift between the conservative father’s movement, that wants to make sure the perverts preying on their 17 year old daughters go to prison, and the sexual liberation anti-feminists.

It is very sad that the feminists disagree on prostitution and sexual liberty, but still invite SCUM authors and still don’t get a serious rift between the sexual liberation feminists and the main stream sex repressors. They agree but unite against men on all other issues they agree on.

On the other hand I am still dismayed that some great mens rights blogs got shut down because of a well known and very serious argument with well known writers of this great site. That rift could have ended in serious legal trouble, court and prison.

Men don’t need feminists to disturb their liberation movement, they destroy each other. This is very sad, and an issue that needs to be addressed.

While some people here would support lowering the age of consent to 16, very few would just support getting government out of adolescent’s bed rooms and scrape age of consent altogether or get it to protect only pre-pubertal children.

I keep repeating that that does not mean that people are free to prey on your daughters, it means that it should not be the government’s problem how you EDUCATE and CONTROL your daughter.

Also I don’t need to stress that age of consent draconian laws with absurd punishments (it should be a misdemeanor to err by 1-2 years) make women 5 years above the age of consent too dangerous to deal with (to be on the safe side don’t mess with anyone under 25. Even if you are only 20)

 

Notice this rather less perfect comment from the usually excellent ‘STU’ underneath the same article :

Hating on men for their sexuality, sex lives etc is one of the main tools feminists use to bring men down. Even men get on the bandwagon hating on other men for this. They should just shrug and say, so what. It’s all manginarism though, pretending to be horrified at the sex life of another man who has earned the wrath of the feminists. It’s all about…..yes……I’m not like that….I am……The One Good Man…….now…..how about a blow job.

We should just shrug and say so what, at any and all men’s sexual activity, apart from sexual activity with minors, or actual forced rape of course. In fact, we should have the same attitude for women to. Fuck as many men as you like, play on both sides of the fence, have all the fetishes and perversion that take your fancy……..fine by us….it’s only a problem when a woman uses her sexual activity to hurt men, cry victim, sexually out others to do harm, or make profit. I would put slutwalkers into that category as well.

 

“apart from sexual activity with minors, or actual forced rape of course”.

Now that’s odd, because STU here is putting having sex with minors (under 18) on the same level as forced rape, even though in bar a handful of Islamic medieval states, nowhere on Earth is it yet illegal to simply have sex with a consenting 17 year old.  Even in the US of A, the age of consent is 16 in most states.  In Europe, the average age of consent is 14.

Furthermore, despite being an experienced MRA, who appears to ‘get it’ as far as the understanding of feminist control of male sexuality is concerned, STU appears unaware or oblivious to the fact that it was feminists who created statutory rape laws in the late 19th and early 20th century.

Unfortunately, for some MRAs, feminist self-interested control of male sexuality is actually a good thing when it happens to agree with a conservative father’s desire for sexual control over his teenage daughter.

Analysis VS Posting News

Featured

Posted on by
31

Self-Styled ‘Radical Masculist’ Human-Stupidity complained recently that I hadn’t attempted any analysis of the video I posted previously, covering a televised stuido debate on John Mann’s bill to make it illegal to pay for sex with young adults under 21 in the UK (and, presumably, for British men abroad).

Some excuses on my part are that I’ve just come back from a two week vacation in which I only took with me my smartphone, and have had to catch  up on a lot of work, and also the fact that I’ve had laser eye surgery performed this week and I’m not supposed to be spending too much time staring at a computer screen.

Apart from those things, I have resolved to spend less time analysing and more time posting relevant links here.  I’m fortunate enough to have a small group of highly intelligent regular readers who leave comments below most of my articles, and who are probably more capable of dissecting the stories that I post here than I myself am.

I can only spend a limited time on this site each week, even when I’m not on holiday or recovering from surgery, so a balance has to be struck between writing and posting.  As we know, the news items I post here relating to the sexual trade union will get lost at r/mensrights amongst all of the links obtaining to cougars ‘abusing’ 15 year old boys, concern troll self-posts, male anorexia links etc etc, even if by some miracle they are approved by feminist moderator Ignoratis at all.

Most of my readers are familiar with the ins and outs of sexual trade union theory now.  I don’t claim any originality for or exclusive rights towards this theory – which is a patently obvious reading of the history and current state of the feminist movement, and which is just an extension of the writings of Lionel Tiger, Neil Lyndon, Angry Harry, Warren Farrell..with a bit of Ray Kurzweil thrown in for good measure (the only thing that distinguishes my theory is that, to the best of my knowledge, I am the only MRA/writer who has interpreted the entire history and driving force of feminism as a group reaction to technology constantly creating new and greater threats to the average woman’s sexual power).

I’m not even a very good writer – and quite awful if you compare my prose to the likes of Ferdinand Bardemu or other leading manosphere bloggers.  So my intention from now on is to write less and post more (once I’ve recovered from my surgery).

My regular readers are invited to help me here (beyond the posting of comments – which are much appreciated).  If any of you would like to actually post the articles that you spot and have been leaving in comments, then just e-mail me at schopenbecq at yahoo co uk

Your anonymity will be completely respected, and your articles will be posted as ‘guest’.  You don’t have to write anything – just post the link with perhaps a brief quote from the article.  I’ll reserve the right, of course, to edit any posts, or unaprove any that I think are not relevant.

A site that serves as an example of how I’d like this site to look is : Next Big Future  The blogger behind it just posts links to relevant articles and news stories with the occasional analysis and commentary thrown in when deemed necessary.

Anyway, if nobody wants to help out posting, then please continue leaving comments, which are much appreciated.  I apologise again for regular reader’s comments still occasionally going into the spam folder via the automatic filter – this happened several times while I was away.  I’m going to introduce a different system over the next couple of weeks, making use of the random verification code that has to be entered before a comment can be left.

Finally, returning to our good friend Human-Stupidity, who, like myself, is one of the handful of the 3 billion men on this planet with the balls enough to speak out against feminist sex laws that increasingly criminalize virtually all men.  Despite our rarity, even within the ‘men’s rights movement’, I do not accept the label of ‘radical masculist’ or ‘men’s rights extremist’ which HS appears not only ready to accept, but to champion (for some bizarre reason – thereby putting us on the same level as feminists calling for the extermination of all men, or ‘traditionalist’ MRAs who want to see the right to beat women as a key men’s rights goal).  As I have pointed out before, there is very little that I write on this site that any of the leading anti-feminists in history, from Schopenhauer to Ernest Belfort Bax to Angry Harry would disagree much with.  Steve Moxon devoted almost a chapter of his seminal ‘The Woman Racket’ to criticising paedohysteria, as did Neil Lyndon in his classic work (paedohysteria then being just imported from America in the form of ‘satanic abuse’ hysteria).  All the things I write about here relating to the legislating of male sexuality by women ARE central to any genuine men’s rights movement, despite what puritan Americans and spotty teenagers at Reddit might say. Women creating laws that benefit themselves sexually whilst leading to thousands of men being raped and beaten in prison, with further hundreds of thousands of men, if not millions, fearing that fate, IS a men’s rights issue – and will always be a central men’s rights issue.

Football Star Jailed for Five Years for ‘Raping’ Intoxicated Woman

Posted on by
11

Advice for multi-million pound footballers (soccer players) :  Next time you’re out on the town in  a typical British city, and hundreds of barely dressed intoxicated sluts are everywhere, each of them on the prowl for a fuck or a fight, bear in mind that even though most of these girls have no shame in fucking, pissing, vomiting, or even shitting in the street, ass cracks exposed to any passing strangers, they often do have enough dignity and sense of honour to put a burqa clad muslim virgins to shame.

In fact, enough dignity  for a judge to hand you 5 years of prison ass rape, as well as an utterly destroyed sporting career, if the woman happens to wake up sober in the morning feeling like a slut and with little recollection of what happened.

Teenager too drunk to consent

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/ched-evans-team-mate-brands-victim-801734

A team-mate of a footballer jailed for five years for raping a teenager “too drunk to consent” has sparked fury by branding the victim a “slag” and “money-grabbing little tramp”.

Wales international Ched Evans cried hysterically as he was found guilty of the attack in May last year.

Following the verdict, the 23-year-old’s Sheffield United team-mate Connor Brown posted a foul-mouthed rant on his Twitter page.

The 19-year-old branded the law “a load of f*****g s**t” and showed his support for Evans by adding: “I’m with you geez”.

He then accused the 19-year-old victim, who cannot be named for legal reasons, of being a “money-grabbing little tramp”, according to the Daily Mail.

He continued his extraordinary attack by writing: “If ur a slag ur a slag don’t try get money from being a slag (sic) … Stupid girls… I feel sick.”

The offending tweets, which were shared with his 776 followers, were later removed from his profile.

He later restricted his Twitter account so his tweets could not be viewed.

 

Note that the ‘Mirror’ newspaper is a kind of downmarket version of the Daily Mail, appealing to a largely female demographic and consequently filling half of its pages with articles relating to sex and relationships (from a woman’s point of view).

Related : http://eivindberge.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/how-dare-men-think-yes-means-yes.html