‘Augmented’ Abuse
This was a story that I caught whilst on vacation but never got around to posting till now.
Augmented reality – as in the forthcoming ‘Google Glasses’ – is just one of a number of ways in which new technology will massively alter the sexual landscape over the next couple of decades. It’s impossible at this stage to predict entirely what the results will be, but you can be sure that the Sexual Trade Union will be stirring up hysteria and lobbying for new legislation as the sexual ‘price’ of women continues its 100+ year market decline :
The Dark Side of Google Glasses
They have been billed as the future of the way that we will interact with computers.
But a new science fiction film suggests that augmented reality glasses actually have a far darker side – and might allow us to control one another.
‘Sight’ shows how virtual reality can take over from normal life to the extent that we can’t exist without it.
The seven minute short follows bachelor Patrick on a date which goes wrong when he gets found out for using a ‘Wingman app’ to help him charm her into bed.
In a sinister twist he then appears to patch into his date through her virtual reality lenses – and take over her mind.
I can just see the likes of Krauser PUA equipped with this kind of tech in 2015 – ‘I Bang My First 18 Year Old Serbian girl…Augmentedly’
Meanwhile, in another shape of things to come, who needs PUA when from today you can have live physical sex across the internet? :
Users of RealTouch can now connect with a model, live over the internet, and feel her every move. The synchronization of touch, audio and video creates an immersive sensory experience previously only considered science fiction.
When connected, a model and a remote user share a traditional teleconference session with one-way video, two-way audio plus the breakthrough capability of one-way touch. Any form of bodily contact with the model’s “input device” is instantly felt by the user on his RealTouch device. Strokes, licks or any other form of touch are all transmitted across the Internet in real-time and reproduced on the receiving end to the user’s delight.
I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if technologies like these already accounted for most PUA’s ‘conquests’ LOL. They only write about it as if it were real!
If feminist women were really capable of feeling any actual shame, this should really embarass them. The fact that engineers are even building fully-functional female androids, and computer-tech guys are developing virtual sex software, ought to be a fairly clear indication to women that men are going to turn their backs on them as soon as another option, even a virtual one, becomes available.
For my own part, I still prefer foreign girls. But even so—our own women can’t compete with them either.
Eric
2 Oct 12 at 8:53 pm
Any type of VR(Virtual Reality) even close to reality is going to sound a death knell for the majority of the loud mouthed, feminist fatties trolling for men, while pretending that’s the furthest thing from their minds. Even genuinely nice women, who deserve a man, won’t find one, because frankly an average 5, 6 or even a cute 7 won’t be able to compete with a virtual 8, 9 or 10 who will presumably be programmed by a porn industry that knows what gets men off.
This will apply especially to men who grew up in the last 20 years where gaming and thus virtual reality is a familiar environment – they’ll get up, go to work, hang with their buds and then vanish from public places – women will not find them in the malls, will not find them taking dance or cooking classes to socialize with women, will not find them in the bars, etc… You think you’ve seen crazy nutjobs already? You’ve seen nothing compared to what you’ll see as women become invisible to the average man.
The Japanese are taking a whole different route though – due to their aging population they’re sinking some serious money in developing robotic caretakers and they’ve gotten pretty far with it. I saw a video on youtube of a robotic head that spoke to people, and it was very realistic looking – I’m not sure if they actually recreated a human skull and layered rubber muscles over the ‘bones’ but it was impressive. How much you want to bet that soon after they’re perfected you’ll be able to buy an animated Real Doll?
Just in case you’re wondering, feminists are already against both animated sex dolls and VR using their standard gambit: VR/animated sex dolls objectify women, degrade women, will cause an upsurge in rape, yack, yack, yack… What that technology will really do is flush the last of their sexual power over men, down the toilet, and that’s their biggest fear. I wish I remembered where I read the article listing their complaints, because I remembered being impressed that they’re already laying the ground work to attack technology that won’t even be commercially viable for another 5 – 10 years. However, just like porn, they will fail to control access to that technology, because there’s tons of money to be made here from men.
I’m surprised we don’t have holographic projectors yet. That technology is well understood, has been for decades, and could do wonders, whether you’re watching a Discovery Channel animal saga, a sci-fi movie, or something sexual.
Alex
3 Oct 12 at 2:57 am
Alex,
You are not wrong: we recently had a very active discussion about what you’ve stated and in fact they (bitter and jealous femihags of the Canadian sexual trade union and self a appointed mangina expert: Dr
WayneIan Kerr), recently convened a special Roundtable to enact the first draft of their new Human-Robot Personal Relationship Act. This is classic feminist JEALOUSY in action!Alan Vaughn
3 Oct 12 at 3:52 am
Alex:
When I first came to the MRM, there was a story going viral in the news about a Japanese robotics engineer who had invented (what is now) the prototype of those fem-bots you’re describing. The femihags were furious at the news, but there was a lot of talk on MRA blogs at the time about the potential for building these robots with downloadable artificial intelligence; functional motility, and artificial wombs.
Even mentioning this around femihags sends them ballistic; because they already see that they can’t compete with foreign women as it is. But if men have an alternative with obviates the need for women, Team Woman is faced squarely with the fact that they cannot even compete with MACHINES! Needless to say, they want to deny that reality. (LOL I even got banned from Manboobz’ blog for taunting his groupies over this very issue!)
These virtual sex programs totally upends femihag Maureen Dowd’s question: ‘Are Men Necessary?’ From the time the fembots were introduced forward, women are faced with the necessity of giving men an actual reason to want to them. True, there’ll always be some of us men who want the ‘natural product’. But the number of men who turn to virtual sex is going to change the sexual marketplace paradigms radically.
Eric
3 Oct 12 at 3:57 am
Thank you for that link, Alan, to the posting & discussion you’ve had here of the topic – very, very interesting. Where the article I’d read mostly discussed the possible mechanisms to induce a realistic VR experience, with only a mention at the end of the feminist anger over this issue, your link was much more informative on that topic. If I remember the board I read that article on, I will post a link from there to here, to essentially cover all the bases of this topic.
In reading your link, I found this interesting: “It is further proposed that provisions 6 and 7 are integrated into the Criminal Code of Canada to ensure uniformity with respect to the illegal creation, use, distribution, advertising, export and import of sexbots which are made in the image of minors under the age of 18.”
There’s the pedo hysteria, once again, to tar and feather men who’d be willing to purchase sex bots by association.
Also this: “…The use of sexbots in the privacy of one’s home is prohibited, unless otherwise permitted by the Ministry of Robots and Artificial intelligence or a relevant regulating agency as per the criteria outlined in the Human-Robot Personal Relationship Act.”
Wow!
These maggots accept no limits on the power of government – here you have a statute to prohibit a private act, which does not harm anyone!!! The day they criminalize such a victimless action, will come shortly before they outlaw thought crimes – and where thought crimes are concerned, you’re always considered guilty.
Personally, I believe VR is likely the more effective approach to providing sexual release to any person willing to pony up the cash, but sex bots are no joke, given Japan’s population crunch – they will not allow large number of gaijin in their country, so they will sink millions, perhaps billions, to achieve fairly lifelike service bots and that’s not to be dismissed.
As far as VR sex, the volume of software being illegally traded now will seem like nothing when men are trading sexual fetish software amongst themselves.
Alex
3 Oct 12 at 4:33 am
The topics you touched on were very interesting, Eric.
I don’t believe feminists will allow an artificial womb to come to market, if you will, as that will allow men to buy eggs on the open market from mercenary young women willing to cross the feminist picket lines and bring them to term in artificial wombs, thus essentially cutting women out of the reproductive process. This would demolish a great deal of their power over men. No threat of divorce rape under the mantle of child support, no threat of losing children for the men since the women would have no biological link to the kids. That kind of service might become popular on the black market, or outside the Western countries – India for example, offers cheap plastic surgery, China would jump in on the action. Feminists will set themselves on fire on the steps of City Hall, literally, over the artificial womb – not that I give a hoot – burn baby, burn!
Also, if you ever see an effective male birth control on the market, you’ll hear them wailing to high heaven, for years and years.
Lastly, for those who like it natural, we’ll have to wait and see how it compares to really well made VR. You’re out on the town. A cute, but chubby girl smiles at you, asks you to her place to watch a movie? Do you go, if at home, you have a virtual cyber stable of women, of any race, height, weight, as a fallback position? We’ll have to see…
Alex
3 Oct 12 at 4:46 am
That day is already here and it arrived a few years ago.
Just look into the legislation governing and severely PUNISHING any
oneman possessing ‘child-pornography’…Also consider their very broad and ridiculous definition of ‘child pornography’.
One is already ‘playing with fire’ (risking many years in prison as a despised paedophile) for merely clicking on a simple manga cartoon image, found anywhere online these days…
Thought crime is already well established and gleefully legislated against (but only against MEN of course) by the sexual trade union and their white-knighting partners in the world’s various governments, while many prisons around the western world are already well populated by such ‘thought criminals’.
They are also very concerned, or rather: they would love to destroy, any man caught possessing or even looking at one of those high-tech dolls or VR models that even vaguely resembles anything under the AofC too!
Alan Vaughn
3 Oct 12 at 5:01 am
Alan:
Couldn’t we have predicted this? This what a mangina/ paedocrite looks likes:
http://www.iankerr.ca/
I wonder if he’s one the Boxcutter Boys in Vancouver? He sure looks the part!
Eric
3 Oct 12 at 7:49 am
He does for sure, he is a text-book paedocritical, white-knighting, mangina and any femihag’s pet dog-on-a-leash.
Mr
WayneIan Kerr: his face representing that of our most despised and true FOE.(The stereotypical white-knight mangina puppet).
Alan Vaughn
3 Oct 12 at 7:59 am
Alan & Alex:
‘They would love to destroy any man caught possessing or even looking at those high-tech dolls or VR images that even vaguely resembles anything under the AOC’
And they’re already conditioning the American public, at least, to this very sort of outrage. Already they’ve imposed absurdly high AOC’s for purchasing alcohol or tobacco. As of about a year ago, the state where I live ordered all vendors selling these products to verify identification on anyone ‘under the age of 27!’ The pretext for this, of course, was that some so-called ‘minors’ actually look older.
In a normal society that policy would cause people to question whether the state’s classification of a ‘minor’ is actually valid, but we are talking the hyper-puritanical Americans here—who don’t even question the fact that forcing Americans to carry and present identification papers is already illegal.
I don’t think the paedocrites would even be content to stop at AOC laws; if they think there’s even too much of an age difference involved, they might consider that a crime too.
Eric
3 Oct 12 at 8:19 am
Alan:
Looking over some his articles, too, he sounds like he’s living in just about as much of a fantasy-world as Aiorthor. In one article, he actually cites science-fiction writer Isaac Asimov as ‘defining the concept of a robot’ and bases all his allegedly philosophical and metaphysical schemes on those criterion.
L. Ron Hubbard was a science fiction writer, too. Maybe we should have Scientologists giving their input on the Human-Robot Relationship Act. It would be just about as credible…LOL
Eric
3 Oct 12 at 8:30 am
Alex:
I think they would fight artificial womb technology by any means possible.
There are some MRAs, like Eivand Berge, who make a compelling case that virtual sex may be harmful to men in the long run. But it’s difficult to say which is more harmful: engaging in virtual sex or living INCEL in a highly sexually repressive culture. To answer your question about those of us who like it natural: I think the best way is to think of virtual sex like eating Ersatz bread: it will keep you from starving until you can import some of the real stuff!
Eric
3 Oct 12 at 8:46 am
As far as VR being a substitute for the real thing, Eric, keep in mind, that no matter how sweet or loving your wife may be, she pops out a kid or two and she’s generally( in the USA anyway) gonna get fat, never lose that fat, never gonna recapture her former hotness, if she was originally a hottie and most importantly for a man who doesn’t mind all that, is that her sex drive usually goes down quite a bit after marriage, during and after pregnancy if my married friends are telling me the truth – I don’t see why they put me on about that, given that they look like suckers for being financial pack mules, without the benefits.
Doesn’t mean you don’t still love her just as much, assuming she’s a good person, but most men are visual creatures sexually and will probably be less sexually attracted to her as well. So, I predict that men will still take the real thing when the wife puts it out there, and otherwise they’ll be content to explore their fetishes VR style – if women were smart, they’d embrace it all, since they wouldn’t be hassled by men into having sex when they don’t feel like it, but instead, I’ll wager 9 out of 10 women will make a big stink if their husbands are getting off with the aid of VR, just as most do now, if they find their husbands with porn.
I think you’ll see most men with smiles on their faces if they can use VR to make their lives of endless toil to support the Queen Bee more bearable, even if they have to do it on the sly. It will be a lifelong hobby to make up for their meager rations, not simply a temporary substitute. Now I’m off to shoot it out on the tropical islands of Far Cry.
Alex
3 Oct 12 at 9:14 pm
Alex:
I think that situation would depend somewhat. An American man who marries a foreign woman, for example, may have an advantage because a lot of them realize the importance of keeping a man sexually satisfied.
Also, he if marries a much younger woman, by the time he’s 60-80 years old, his 40-50 y/o wife is probably not going to look too bad to him, if she’s kept in shape and puts her considerable monogamous sexual experience to work for her. Sure, men are always going to be tempted, but there’s a lot of positive things a dedicated and mature woman can do to reduce that temptation. Obviously getting fat and going on cougar-hunts for thugs isn’t going to help her any.
If most American women weren’t so intrinsically hateful towards men and too frigid to want sex, they could actually make the VR thing work in their favor. If they discovered what the husband was watching, they could start imitating the same practices in their own bedrooms and husband might lose interest in VR stuff altogether.
But—what I’m describing is the way things would work ideally…
Eric
4 Oct 12 at 12:21 am
Good points Eric, and I haven’t yet read Eivind’s thoughts on virtual sex.
One thing that shouldn’t be overlooked is that the distinction between ‘natural’ and ‘artificial’ might start to blur.
For example, with Google Glasses you could make love to your 50 year old wife while seeing her as she was when she was 16 (or as somebody else). The tech for that already exists – Jeff Bridges in the re-make of Tron was digitally rejuvenated to look exactly as he looked 30 years ago (in the original movie). It was really convincing too (much better than the 3D effects, btw). It would only be a matter of sufficient processing power to do it in real time.
There are still some people who think that wearing condoms whilst having sex isn’t natural or isn’t ‘real’.
And as the example above suggests, new tech could actually help older women. Obviously as a men’s rights activist, I couldn’t care less about that in itself, but perhaps it will pull the rug under the feet of the sexual trade union in terms of taking away the jealous spite of middle-aged women towards younger females.
There’s even a possibility that it may be possible to reverse aging within our lifetimes, even within the next couple of decades.
This is just one of a number of breakthroughs that have been made :
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2208787/Progeria-Drug-reverses-rapid-aging-children-Benjamin-Button-disorder.html
Of course, if every woman looks 18 and has a great figure, who knows where it will leave the sexual marketplace and whether it will increase or decrease female power over men? Possibly, in a world where any woman can look as sexy and beautiful as she likes, women will have to compete with each other through displaying more feminine personalities.
theantifeminist
4 Oct 12 at 7:56 am
Antifeminist:
In the comments thread of his most recent blog post ‘Lex Berge’ Eivand gives an explanation of his views. He’s fairly hard-line about natural sex. He also opposes condom use, I tend to agree with him there. The only other MRA blogger I know of who opposes VR sex is Hawaiian Libertarian. Neither one of them are in favor of banning these things though, they have genuine concerns about their social effects, especially on men.
‘The distinction between natural and artifical might begin to blur’
I think that’s where Eivand’s and Keoni’s opposition comes in. Keoni’s also brought up the potential for mind-control and various other forms of computer manipulation that no one has really considered. One can imagine a malignant feminist planting a virus in something like that—it could really do some damage.
Then when you read articles like some of those written by Dr. Ian Kerr who DOES want to ban sexbots; it’s obvious that he has no idea of the distinction between natural and artificial.
I don’t find any of these practices especially harmful myself. But it can be a problem if men engage in it to the exclusion of natural sex.
Eric
5 Oct 12 at 1:23 am