Japan’s national legal age of consent is 13, with only primarily recent reactionary increases to age 16+ in some prefectures… due to feminist & tabloid sensational press a decade or two ago of up to almost 25% of Japanese young women in Middle School or High School engaging in dating with 21 thru 80 year old men (quite often with sex) in exchange for gifts, shopping sprees
or cash at least once (or many times) during their teen years. Otherwise parents do not generally interfere in their teen’s sexual activities & leave it up to the teen if they want to engage in sex or not & at what age, so long as it doesn’t seriously impact studies.

excerpt from the Anthroplogy of Sex – Japan:

“…. The new art forms of anime and manga copy the themes of earlier erotic art…. male-male, boy-love, boy-love for girls, female-female and girl-love. … perfectly legal in Japan… banned as pornography in the West…”
“… Again, much of the above information was hidden from Western eyes. The US army burned warehouses full of Japanese erotica and what remained was censored in both Japan and the West. It is only really now that there has been a serious attempt to study it. But what is even more important is what it tells us about human sexuality in general. It turns out that Western norms are not universal. We should stop pretending they are…”
“…. Books showing explicit shunga are freely available… (Screech’s book contains images and text concerning bestiality, pederasty and pedophilia)…. Apparently (Edo period) shunga are of historic and artistic value, but manga is contemporary, commercial and therefore of no value (which of course, once applied to shunga)….don’t expect censorship to be rational and coherent, but this is something of a glaring contradiction… by banning contemporary images we rob the future of their right to decide…”

Post WW2 Japan was forced to outlaw sexual intercourse based “Prostitution” by liberal & conservative types of christian pseudo-feminist groups in the mid-1950s, who incidently represented only 1% of the population… but they (Sex Industry) obviously worked around that in all other directions (Vastly larger per capita than the USA or European Sex Industry as a whole). Until just a few years ago – (again post WW2 only) Japan’s mosaic censorship… due to Gen Douglas MacArthur implementing USA Depression Era Victorian/Christian Women’s Temperance Movement obscenity laws onto a defeated Japan – pubic hair defacto illegal obscenity.. you know, from the French Postcards / Stag reels days.

So twenty years ago an American flying into Japan & carrying a Playboy magazine would have the Playboy either confiscated by Japanese Customs at the airport or at minimum they would take a black magic marker & blackout all the crotch shots throughout the magazine. Now, how “In The Realm of the Senses” got made…? All Japanese Pink films (“dirty flicks”) from the 60s, 70s & pretty much 80s were all T&A & “R” rated style humping. Oddly enough, being a quite liberal though traditional patriarchal agnostic modified buddhist/shinto culture they view broadly speaking sex as a strictly biological + pleasure function, as eating, sleeping, etc. That’s why although there is mosaic censorship of human genitals, there is no censorship of human anuses, or 18+ teen girls in high school uniforms having orgies with Labrador Retrievers or pooping all over each other… animal genitals, poop, vomit being uncensored and therefore not technically obscene.

USA operates under “moral obscenity” based on the “religious” or “philosophical” agenda of those passing the laws. Japan only operates under “technical obscenity” limited to the amoral censorship of human genitals per the USA doing of the Great Depression/WW2.

History of Japan from pre-Industrial Revolution days to as little as a generation or two ago:
http://www.psychohistory.com/htm/06a1_incest.html
excerpts -

“…temple prostitution of both boys and girls, and widespread child prostitution, including the ancient geisha system (in operation until WW2 until banned by American General Douglas MacArthur etc.). Japanese brothels would start girls in (oral & manual) sexual service at 5 to 7 years old (age 12 to 13 for vaginal intercourse). Pederasty of boys & (young transvestites) – shudo, by the aristocracy (& warriors) and priesthood is well documented since at least the 14th century, with young boys given by their parents to be used anally by samurais and by priests in monasteries – the buggered boys sometimes having been worshipped as gods incarnate in religious cults similar to those of the cult of the Virgin in the West.

“…In traditional Japan, quite young girls were introduced into sex by older boys who visited their bedrooms at night with the complicity of the girl’s parents (called night-prowling, yobai). The boys “assembled in communal huts and instructed slightly younger village males in sex approaches and techniques…” Although they recommended “gentle persuasion,” there was no guarantee that all was so gentle in fact, since the parents “looked the other way” in accordance with custom while the older boys had intercourse with their young daughters…”

“… Western observers even today often notice that Japanese mothers still masturbate their young children during the day in public and at night in the family bed – in order, they say, “to put them to sleep.” … The average Japanese today sleeps (generally on the same mattress or at least the same room) with his or her children until the children are ten or fifteen years old… one recent Japanese study found daughters still sleeping with their fathers over 20 percent of the time even after age sixteen. … The mean age in one study of children sleeping alone is 12.7 years…

… other studies show that the majority of urban parents in 1981 reported that they had lately begun to be bothered by the thought that children with whom they slept might be aware of their intercourse… The researchers found that Japanese mothers and sons often sleep in the same bed and have sex together, although the exact incidence in the population was not investigated. According to the phone interviews, Japanese mothers teach their sons how to masturbate, helping them to achieve first ejaculation in much the same manner as they earlier helped them with toilet training…considering the common frequency with which Japanese mothers sleep alone with their sons while the father is out having sex with other women – extramarital sex still being the rule for most married men in Japan… the acceptance of sibling incest in early historic times, the routine acceptance of pederasty up until recently, the wide extent even today of co-sleeping and (both sexes & intergenerational) co-bathing, … and upon the very limited contact fathers have with their families…”

Young women are more gullible, more desperate to be affirmed as attractive and desirable, and less likely to object to inappropriate and abusive actions. That is what men like about extremely young girls and women.

I think you’ll find it’s more their perky breasts, flawless skin, tight waists, and nubile tight asses. But teenage girls are exploitable enough to be manipulated by older jealous whores like you, keen to limit the sexual competition to your own rancid rusted vaginas.

Now go back to omega male Manboobz, I’m not publishing any more of your self-rationalisations and hate speech here again.

Our (USA) recently immigrated Great-great grandads, who as mature adult men, after building a nestegg up in the land of opportunity typically married a local early teen or sent out offers of marriage to be published in the Old Country & countless early teen “mail order brides” would take ship & train to hook up… with the inlaw’s blessings.

I’d venture that if a femnazi-mangina were transported back to the 19th Century & verbally pilloried our forefathers to their face as being “child rapists, molesters & pedophiles, our Great great grandad’s would have pulled out their Colt SAA revolver & blown their head off.

Quote (expanded) from Mark E. Pietrzyk’s well known article used in multiple universities as a course discussion handout:

Up until the late nineteenth century, the age of consent in many countries continued to be fixed at twelve. Although an orthodox interpretation of Biblical law could find no grounds for condemning the exploitation of children, sexual or otherwise, many Christians felt that the rights of women and female children to resist unwanted sexual unions was a moral imperative. Consequently, reform movements arose to lobby for an increase in the age of consent.

A chief concern of many of these moral reformers was the problem of child prostitution. The use of female children as prostitutes was becoming increasingly prevalent in the nineteenth century, due to men’s fear of catching venereal disease from older prostitutes. Many female children were being sold by their parents or forced by economic circumstances to service men sexually. Many of these children acquired venereal diseases themselves as a result, some dying. Others were raped and tortured. To remedy this state of affairs, a British feminist by the name of Josephine Butler lobbied to raise the age of consent, which at that time in Britain was still twelve. Aided by the crusading reporting of W. T. Stead of the Pall Mall Gazette, who documented the existence of girls as young as three to five years old in England’s brothels, Butler was successful in getting the age of consent raised to sixteen.68

The publicity created by Butler’s campaign spread to the United States, which soon saw the rise of its own Christian feminist movement to raise the age of consent. As of 1886, twenty-five of the American states, following earlier English law, had an age of consent of ten years; four states, following Christian canon law on marriage, had an age of consent of twelve; Delaware, following Christian canon law on the age of discretion, set its age of consent at seven.69

The Women’s Christian Temperance Union and various allied organizations conducted petition drives and lobbying to raise the age of consent in the states and the District of Columbia. Initial successes sparked a backlash in some states; in 1892, the New York Senate, which had previously raised New York’s age of consent to sixteen, considered lowering it back to ten. Reflecting a split between liberal and conservative views on the subject, reports from Texas indicated that older men tended to favor retaining a low age of consent while younger men favored raising it. Nevertheless, by 1895, reformers succeeded in raising the age of consent to between sixteen and eighteen in twenty-two states. However, those states reflecting the most conservative religious views – those in the South – lagged in raising their age of consent. Alabama, Mississippi, North Carolina, and South Carolina kept their age of consent at ten, while Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia set their age of consent at twelve (Jerry Lee Lewis & Elvis anyone?). But eventually, these states as well raised their age of consent.70

By 1918, the Catholic Church finally raised its permissible age for marriage from fourteen for males and twelve for females (remember Brooke Shields in the film Pretty Baby getting married at age 12 in all legality in an American Roman Catholic Church?) to sixteen for males and fourteen for females.71 To this day, in a number of underdeveloped, predominantly Catholic countries, it is common for adult males to marry and impregnate barely pubescent girls. In Mexico, adult men may wed girls of fourteen years of age or even younger.72

When was the last time you heard an actual feminist opinion leader discuss who, how or with what she has sexual feelings? It is that refusal to discuss sex that gives them the moral high ground to proclaim us perverts. I am not saying hide, inhibit or cease in your sexual nature, but wondering if we don’t destroy the cause of justice by giving them a target.

Well, actually, if you visit Feministing.com, two of the three main bloggers there regularly boast of the fact that their male partner is a black man. Germain Greer published a book – ‘Beautiful Boy’ with the intent of ‘winning back the right for women to sexually admire young boys’. The book was glowingly reviewed by Natasha Walker, held up as one of the senior ‘third wave feminists’ in the Uk, and author of ‘Living Dolls’, which attacks the male sexual admiration for young girls. Have you heard of the slut walkers? Young, naieve feminists for sure, but future feminist leaders amongst them.

That’s why I am trying to analyse ‘what it is’ that actually turns them on beyond sex, and I have read what you write–you are on to something–but one thing that turns them on is power over children. And, by the theory that ‘men are all pedos and rapists,’ they are winning public opinion because genuine male activism gets shot in the ass by BEING what they claim we are.

Do you really want me to go along with the likes of senior figures in the men’s rights movement and pretend that men don’t find teenage girls attractive, just so feminists who compare killing unborn children to buying couches don’t have so much ‘ammunition’ to throw at us their inflated and sickeningly exploititive paedophile slanders? And how far does it go? If and when feminists raise the age of consent to 25, and then inflate the clinical lable of ‘paedophile’ as any man who is attracted to ‘girls’ under 25, do we need to continue to pretend that all men are really genetically hardwired to find grannies most fuckable?

The legislative creep of sex offender laws threaten more and more normal, morally good men, and it can only happen because of paedohysteria. At some point, some MRAs (if the men’s rights movement isn’t just a conservative father’s rights movement) are going to have to put their heads on the block and speak forthrightly about this issue. The idea that the men’s rights movement as a whole might be damaged by it is a complete joke.

I think science surely states that both men and women will seek to further their own selfish reproductive interests given the opportunity. That means that men, given their superior physical strength and the nature of the sexual act, will more likely be physical rapists than women. Women, on the other hand, will more likely use weapons such as shaming tactics and gossip etc (example : calling men ‘paedophiles’ and ‘child abusers’ who have sex with nubile, fertile, peak sexual attractive teenagers.)

I don’t know about that theory that women are more likely to be paedophiles. I only know that women are statistically more likely to physically abuse children, and that’s what we shoud focus upon when the padeo accusations start flying – the fact that it is women who have defined sexual abuse as to be a thousand times of greater concern than physcial abuse, NOT feeding their perverted selfish value system.

I wonder, btw, what you think of recent articles in the men’s rights movement attacking not only the culture of rape, but the moral significance of the act of rape itself? Although I agree with these articles 100%, it does strike me as perhaps a little bizarre that the official men’s rights position appears to be that rape is an overrated crime exploited by feminists, and yet a 30 year old man bringing his 17 year old girlfriend to multiple-orgasm is indeed a child raping paedophile freak, and any MRA who doubts that feminist created moral rule should be kicked out of the movement before they bring it down.

I understand the urge to rub their noses in it, because that is what they are doing raising gay children who become strippers, and raising man haters who puke at the idea of a male looking at them nude, but who seek every opportunity to undress in front of women.

When was the last time you heard an actual feminist opinion leader discuss who, how or with what she has sexual feelings? It is that refusal to discuss sex that gives them the moral high ground to proclaim us perverts. I am not saying hide, inhibit or cease in your sexual nature, but wondering if we don’t destroy the cause of justice by giving them a target.

And every time we reveal our sexual nature, they get yet another chance to peek in the door, and rob us voyeuristically, of our own sexual identities.

That’s why I am trying to analyse ‘what it is’ that actually turns them on beyond sex, and I have read what you write–you are on to something–but one thing that turns them on is power over children. And, by the theory that ‘men are all pedos and rapists,’ they are winning public opinion because genuine male activism gets shot in the ass by BEING what they claim we are.

So, what do tyou think about the science stating men are rapists? And, by that same science, women are in fact, prone to being pedophiles? Especially if we work together to define acts of a sexual nature that aren’t as apparent as hetero-normative behavior, i.e. women breast feeding 8 year old’s and having orgasms, or women’s tende3ncies to be voyeuristic, and that tendency placing itself near nude children?

http://omg.wthax.org/girl_of_year.png