Several years ago when the Taliban were blowing up culturally priceless ancient Buddhist statues, I predicted that it would only be a matter of time before feminists would be doing similar things here. Unfortunately, I’ve now been proven correct, even sooner than I imagined.
What is not being mentioned in most reports of the court ordered destruction of ‘paedophile artist’ Graham Ovenden’s work is that the feminist judge – Elizabeth Roscoe – also ordered the destruction of works by the 19th century photographer, poet, and movie pioneer Pierre Louys, as well as artworks by Wilhelm von Pluschow.
A judge who recognized she was “risking the wrath of the art world” has ordered works from the collection of artist Graham Ovenden to be destroyed, according to Victoria Ward in The Telegraph. Ovenden was imprisoned for twenty-seven months for sex offenses against children in 2013. His photos and drawings aren’t the only works being destroyed: so are about forty photographs of young girls by Pierre Louys and artworks by Wilhelm von Pluschow found in Ovenden’s studio.
But the judge, Elizabeth Roscoe, spared a couple of pieces, including a painting commissioned by Princess Diana that shows a young girl with a bare bottom. “Simple nudity is not to be equated with indecency,” she said, adding that she was not concerned with “historical importance or value.”
Pointing out that Louys was a friend of Oscar Wilde and a figure of cultural importance, Ovenden told court authorities: “You are going to be looked on as the assholes of the world.”
Elizabeth Roscoe is the same judge who jailed a man for tweeting his opinion that a feminist M.P was a ‘witch’.
Now that this terrible prescedent has been set, it can only be a matter of time before other more cherished works of art fall victim to the destructive rage of feminists. Donatello’s David and other Italian Rennaisance masterpieces have already been threatened with ruin by ISIS, the fact that most of them (along with our modern post-medieval civilization) were created by ‘paedophiles’, and even depict naked adolescents in a huge number of cases, must surely mean that it’s an open wager as to who will get to them first – the femihags or the Islamist monkeys.
Perhaps renaissance art will be saved from the philistine hags because it usually depicts young boys rather than girls, and as we know, this doesn’t provoke feminist jealous rage nearly so much. But one can’t be sure, and there still remains hundreds of invaluable works from all periods of Europe’s glorious art history that either depict adolescent girls naked or in a sensous fashion, from the Athenian ‘Three Graces’ to the paintings of Egon Schiele.
Feminists will likely not limit themselves to visual works either. We have already seen how the music of ‘paedophile’ pop stars has been virtually banned, it can only be a matter of time before works such as Beethoven’s famous ‘Moonlight Sonata’, a middle-aged man’s musical ode of love to his 16 year old sweetheart, have their manuscripts publicly burned before the pedo cleansing mob.
I also need to bring up the unfortunate fact that the conservative manosphere seems increasingly obsessed with the abusrd idea that the ‘legalization of paedophilia’ is the next logical step for the left now that homosexuality and even transgender rights have been won.
The cretin above holds this view despite his example linking to the most conservative newspaper in the UK (The Telegraph) who have spoken out against this primitive destruction of politically incorrect art, a destruction ordered by a feminist female judge.
It still perplexes to me as to what level of stupidity, or perhaps rather paedocrisy, it must take for a ‘conservative’, especially those conected to the cause of anti-feminism and men’s rights, to actually believe that paedohysteria is justified and that maintaining it helps men or society.
Feminists and ‘social justice warriors’ are driving paedohysteria, and only promote homosexuality and transgender rights as a means to demonize normal male heterosexuality, blur gender distinctions, and maintain the mask of ‘sexual tolerance’ while they embark upon a virtual holocaust against male sexuality, which includes inflating the definition of paedophilia to encompass the healthy attraction towards fertile adolescent teenage girls.
Paedohystria demonizes all men, criminalizes hundreds of thousands, gives destructive power to rebellious teenagers (including boys), weakens the family unit and bond between father and child and prevents normal interaction between generations.