YouTuber Sargon of Akkad takes apart a repulsive femihag who rationalizes her rapist’s desire to inflate the price of pussy through state violence as ‘protecting prostitutes from the patriarchy’.
You may also have seen this week the corrupt ‘liberal progressive’ ‘human rights’ group Amnesty International declare that it was in favour of the legalization of prostitution – of course, soley because it would obviously (to anyone but femihags) help keep prostitutes safe. Naturally, whether locking up thousands of men, often lonely INCELs, physically deformed or disabled, to be anally raped as sex offenders for paying for sex with a whore (who may be legally enticing him) is not a human rights issue. Even when these laws are built on femirapist junk theorizing, ‘science’, and outright lies.
David Futrelle, the disgraced blogger and child scat torture gay porn apologist, recently updated his comments policy after use of certain words were causing ‘triggers’ and other offence amongst his easily offended readers. In particular, regular commentators at the site were reminded to choose their words carefully when describing mental illness. Understandable, perhaps, given that many of his commentators appear to be clearly mentally ill. But along with banning words such as ‘crazy’, the disgraced Chicago blogger Futrelle has made a particular point of warning his followers not to use the term ‘psycho’. This might explain why a transvestite sadist who runs a sick forum devoted to the sharing of fantasies of torturing and crucifying women and schoolgirls is still allowed to comment at WeHuntedTheMammoth, nearly a year after I made public here exactly what he was.
When I first exposed ‘RalMCG’ as a pervert who openly helps moderate a truly sick bdsm forum that specialises in the rape, torture, and crucifixion of women and girls, Futrelle appeared to react with fury – vowing revenge by publicly pledging support to a woman who had threatened to track me down and kill me (note that I had not doxxed ralmcg at all – he openly uses the same handle at Futrelle’s site as elsewhere online, including the perverted bdsm forum).
It is certainly beyond question that Futrelle must have been aware of my article, as must have many of his readers. For a couple of months after the piece was published here, Ralmcg appeared to go silent at Fraudtrelle’s site, and I assumed that the ManBoobz had had the sense to ban him, albeit quietly and grudgingly. But that’s not the case. RalMCG has been back commenting again, using the very same account as before, only this time he has a new avatar, which again features the pervert wearing his favourite ‘Daisy Dukes’ in order to show off his hairy legs. Disturbingly, he appears also to be wearing a t-shirt that, at first glance at least, looks like it is splattered in blood.
Although RalMCG claims to be concerned with victims of rape, you wouldn’t guess so from the comments he leaves at the sick bdsm forum of which he is ‘assistant executioner’. In fact, the idea of women and girls being raped along with being tortured, and even murdered, is evidently a sexual obsession.
None of Futrelle’s other commentators, many of whom appear to be sadistic male transvestites like Ralmcg, rather than genuine feminists, seem to have any problem with him at all, despite a number of them being aware of my article. Perhaps unsurprising, as most of those commentators strongly support Futrelle’s view that a paedophile made video – SALO – that features nothing but graphic images of naked children being raped and tortured to death, should be allowed to be distributed as fap material in gay sex shops.
Note that David Futrelle’s attacks on the ‘manosphere’ played a key role in the decision of the left-wing extremist group – the SLPC – to characterize the men’s rights movement as a ‘hate movement’. This in turn is being used at this moment in attempts to ban Roosh V from speaking on men’s issues in Canada.
Yet David Futrelle, great grandson of ‘The Thinking Machine’ author Jacques Futrelle, jokes about ‘dumb’ policemen who believe that videos depicting children being tortured, raped, and murdered are not valid fap material for gay sex shops. Not only this, be continues to allow a sadistic paedophile transvestite who openly fantasizes over the torture, rape and murder of women and children to comment at his site.
Futhermore, readers at his site regularly incite violence and make threats against MRAs that go well beyond the ‘hate’ seen anywhere in the manosphere. Here is just one example published on his blog recently :
The reader – Monopole – approvingly quotes a male celebrity justifying the shooting and murder of men by women. Yesterday, I highlighted how Futrelle was allowing readers to call for Roosh V to have toxic and potentially lethal chemicals thrown over him.
WeHuntedtheMammoth, is not only a hate site, but something even worse than that. It appears to be a shelter for those who sexually fantasize about the torture, rape, and murder of children, women, and men.
David Futrelle is publishing numerous comments at his site approving of criminal violent acts against Roosh V and his supporters, and encouraging feminists in Canada to engage in further illegal acts, including the use of toxic chemical substances.
Although describing Roosh or anybody else as ‘mentally ill’ breaks Futrelle’s commenting guidelines, proposing that Roosh has toxic and potentially lethal chemicals thrown over him is fine :
Tellurium compounds are a class of extremely toxic and potentially life threatening chemicals :
David Futrelle regularly publishes comments from his readers that incite or encourage violence against MRAs and other men. Recently, he published a reader’s comment that approvingly quoted a male celebritiy justifying extreme acts of violence and even murder against men by women.
David Futrelle’s website ‘ManBoobz’ was used as a primary source by the Southern Law Poverty Group’s designation of men’s rights and pick-up sites as constituting a ‘hate movement’, something that is being used in the attempts by Canadian feminists to ban Roosh from speaking in Canada. David Futrelle himself has a history of vile child abuse apologia, the worst of which was his defence of the sale in a gay sex shop of a video containing nothing but images of naked children being anally raped, tortured, disemboweled and murdered.
Roosh V might not be everbody’s cup of tea, but it’s clear that nobody on the planet is doing as much to take it to the feminists as he is. The ‘Battle of Montreal’ might prove to be pivotal – it showed that manosphere tactics built up over the years (including here) such as standing one’s ground, fighting fire with fire, and shaming the shamers through Google Bombing, can prevail against the very worst that the SJWs have to offer (and in their very heartland too).
Shamefully disowned by the mangina ‘child abuse’ obsessed victimizing paedocrites at reddit/r/mensrights :
Telegraph writer Rebecca Reid vents her fury over a (female) academic’s call for prostitution to be legalized on the grounds of a ‘male sexual deficit’. What the academic (Catherine Hakim) means by this is that women have traditionally barted sex for monetry and other reward. Reluctantly, as women in general are not as horny as men. Sex for women is a tool, whereas sex for men is a need. Unfortunately, due to ‘female emancipation’, women no longer have the need to barter their bodies for financial compensation, leading to a lack of availability for sex for men, and the consequent need to redress this by legalizing prostitution.
Disinterested in the potential social, economic and health benefits of legalising sex work, Hakim suggests that prostitution should be legalised, because the empowerment of women has created what she terms a “male sex deficit.”
In short because men need sex and modern women aren’t providing it.
What selfish creatures we’ve become. All that working and voting and striving for equality? Well apparently it’s led to an international blue-balls crisis that only legalised prostitution can cure….
… Hakim believes that as women become more empowered, and therefore more financially independent, they are likely to withdraw sexual availability further. She writes that the “male sex deficit” is likely to grow in the 21st century, as women become increasingly economically independent and withdraw from “sexual markets and relationships that they perceive to offer unfair bargains”.
Which tells you everything you need to know about her attitude towards sex.
No wonder she wants to legalise prostitution. She seems to think every sexually active woman already is one.
And of course, she is correct in that assumption – all women are essentially prostitutes, and feminism is a prostitute’s trade union/cartel which operates to prevent competition and to artificially keep the price of sex high.
A few of the reader’s comments below the article are priceless…
“…If it wasn’t so horrific, all this would be entertaining. Or maybe not entertaining, but illuminating. There is something fascinating about actually being able to sit back and watch all this. To see this form of collective national psychosis playing out around you.
But it is horrific. Terrifying, actually. This is the second time in my life when I’ve thought to myself “I can see how it happens”. Where a McCarthy, or even a Hitler, could come from. Here, on my own doorstep.
The first time was that week after Diana died. But that was only for a week. This is weekly now. Brittan. Heath. We still have the Janner show trial to come.
One phone call. One letter. One press release. That’s all it takes now. “