‘The Shame of Being Straight’?

I’ve just read a nice piece from our friend Scarecrow, which itself appears to be a response to a Huffington Post article gleefully shaming an unfortunate man who attempted to organize a ‘heterosexual pride’ parade in which he ended up being the only participant.

Is heterosexuality treated as more shameful in today’s society than homosexuality? Or is the attempt to stand up for ‘heterosexual pride’ as comical as the Huffington Post suggests? According to one progressive reader there, it’s comical because ‘gay pride marchers are affirming their identity in the face of years of discrimination, whereas ‘white, christian heterosexuals’ face no discrimination or prejudice’.

It’s now half-a-century since the Stonewall riots took place, from which the Gay Pride marches orginate. Homosexuality has been legal in the UK since 1967, and for more than a century in some European countries. The USA has had laws criminalizing discrimination against homosexuals for over 30 years. With the recent gay marriage rulings, gays now have equality even in areas in which ‘equality’ makes little sense, since marriage is a contract between a man and a woman for the purposes of procreating and raising biological offspring in a stable environment.

Voicing an opinion against homosexuality, or even gay marriage, is now career suicide in the West, as well as social suicide for most people whose lives do not revolve around their local evangelical church. At the same time, heterosexual men are bombarded daily with shaming language everywhere they look, constant messages that men are at best ‘sexual objectifiers of women’ and at worst actual or potential rapists.

Age disparate homosexual relationships are still approved of both within and outside of the gay community. A recent example was Stephen Fry’s much publicised and lauded ‘gay marriage’ to a man decades younger than himself, a ‘man’ who in fact, in many photos looks like a teenage boy married to his grandfather. Male middle-aged heterosexual celebrities are routinely shamed if they date women more than a few years younger than themselves, even facing insinuations of ‘borderline paedophilia’ if they are seen out with women in their early twenties. This is despite the fact that, on account of their high sexual market value, they could easily date beautiful teenagers.

Stephen Fry
Equal relationship or ‘Equality’ relationship?

I recently dated a twenty year old Russian woman (who looks 2 or 3 years younger) in EASTERN EUROPE and was subjected to a constant stream of dirty looks and comments (I’m in my mid forties but look around 35). As a heterosexual male I would have no legal recourse to pursue claims of harassment or discrimination, but a homosexual couple recieving the same treatment would likely be able to invoke ‘anti-hate’ legislation against ‘homophobia’ (or at least have their complaints taken seriously by staff eager not to be seen as ‘homophobic’).

Whilst elderly heterosexual men in the UK, and now the USA, are being hounded and imprisoned for alleged sexual encounters dating from the anarchic 60’s, Alan Turing has been turned into a modern day saint and secular martyr for his ‘punishment’ (mild hormonal treatment) for sodomizing a 19 year old minor in the sexually conservative 1950’s.

Gay porn does not face the same stigma as heterosexual pornography. Indeed, feminists don’t have much to say about gay porn at all, unsurprisingly as it does not reduce the sexual power or market value of feminists. The UK recently added to the now extensive list of prohibited porn by criminalizing the viewing of ‘rape’ porn, including movies in which the actresses are clearly pretending to be ‘raped’ (which accounts for nearly all so-called ‘rape porn’). Although the law apparently would criminalize much of gay pornography (which invariably involves a dominant, often older male, roughly having sex with a younger passive ‘twink’), it is unlikely any homosexual man will be prosecuted through these laws anytime soon.

Despite this, and whilst admitting that gay men have it easier in today’s feminist anti-sex society than heterosexual men do, homosexuals are indeed still victimized – under feminist laws. In fact, as I have argued here before, it’s quite possible that more homosexual men are in British prisons today as sex offenders than at any time in history (as ‘paedophiles’ etc) or indeed, in such ‘homophobic’ societies as Russia.

Homosexuals ostensibly, and in many ways actually, do have it better than heterosexuals today, but the gynocracy paints over the fact that homosexuals are being criminlized and shamed just as heterosexual men are – largely due to the legendary homosexual appreciation and love of youth, the most natural aspect of male sexuality but the ultimate sin in today’s perverted society, and which no amount of forced gay marriage activist propaganda will ever end.

Gay and minority sex rights activism is a fake cause that feminist society has adopted in order to mask their brutal and retrograde war upon male sexuality. Female sexual puritanism wearing the mask of tolerance and progressiveness.

Gay marriage itself is an act of male submission – an attempt to force homosexuals to adopt and thus validate female defined conceptions of sexuality (monogamy and commitment) over male sexuality (the desire for multiple youthful partners). This is the female sexual imperative under the guise of tolerance to sexual minorities. In former days, women used to further their evolutionary mating needs through the dominance of Christianity and religion.  Now they play the same trick under the banner of gay rights ‘liberalism’.

Meanwhile, both heterosexual and homosexual men are locked up under an ever greater number of draconianly applied feminist sex laws, until the very worst is reached, and feminism merges with its cousin Islam, and the horrors of ISIS give a picture of what homosexuals and the rest of us can ultimately expect.

Isis Women Beat and Kill Pretty Young Girls for Looking At Clothes

Feminism and Isis are two sides of the same Sexual Trade Union coin.


Iraqi citizens said on Saturday in Mosul that an Iraqi woman was killed by ISIS women with Russian citizenship in Mosul, 250 miles north of Baghdad.

The citizens said, “The Russian women in ISIS have attacked Mosul girls, beating them severely in one of the clothing stores in the market of Asarghahana in the center of Mosul. They claimed the women had lifted their niqab to look at the merchandise as well as failing to uphold the rule of wearing the correct color himar specified to women, married women and widows as determined by the organization.

The Russians hit twelve married women, which caused the death of one of them aged 17, due to the severe beating she received.”

Freddie Starr Loses Defamation Case Against Grope Accuser

karin-wardFreddie Star, the once popular TV entertainer, has lost his bid to sue for defamation an aging woman who had accused him of groping her half-a-century ago when she was a slim breasted 15 year old, despite no charges being brought against him over the case.

Comedian Freddie Starr has lost his High Court claim against Karin Ward, who said he groped her when she was 15.

Ms Ward, 56, alleges that the assault took place in 1974 behind the scenes of Jimmy Savile’s Clunk Click TV show.

Mr Starr, 72, of Studley, Warwickshire, denied the claims and sought damages for alleged slander and libel.

Judge Mr Justice Nicol said the case failed because Ms Ward’s testimony was found to be true, and because too much time had lapsed.

The entertainer says he has lost £300,000 from shows being cancelled over the allegations.

He sued over interviews given to the BBC and ITV in October 2012, statements on a website and those made in an eBook about Ms Ward’s life.

Mr Starr is now reportedly facing a £1m bill in costs.

A previous criminal investigation into Ms Ward’s claims by the Crown Prosecution Service decided no charges would be brought.

Mother-of-seven Ms Ward – a pupil at Duncroft Approved School, in Staines, Surrey, in March 1974 – told the court Mr Starr had also made a lewd comment about her bust.

“I carried that phrase with me all my life and it certainly helped to wreck three marriages,” she said.


According to the woman, who admitted that she was taking substances which affected her memory at the time, Starr had made a comment about her small breasts.  The exact causal link between this alledged fact and the three ‘wrecked marriages’ is not known.  It is also appears unknown how she ‘proved her testimony was correct’ when she was the only witness to something alleged to have happened decades ago and even the witchhunting police decided not to pursue charges.

The defeat is expected to open the floodgates to thousands of false accusers eager to chase possible compensation jackpots with no fear of any defamation charges should their cases be thrown out.

Meanwhile, a possible contender for paedocrite of the year 2015 – the nephew of Jimmy Savile, who was quick to condemn his uncle after the scandal broke, has been arrested for molesting a 9 year old girl in the 1970s.


NSPCC and Other Children’s Charties Knowingly Preyed On Dementia Sufferers to Extract Cash

The NSPCC, one of the largest children’s charties in the world and perhaps the leading culprit in the promotion of child abuse hysteria and the demonization of men, has been forced to review its ruthless business practices after it was exposed as using a cold-calling center that it knew targetted dementia sufferers for donations.


The latest revelations come after the tragic case of 92 year old Olive Cooke, whose death it is widely believed was at least partly caused by hounding from charties, including ‘Save the Children’, for donations.

The NSPCC recieves over £100 million in donations each year from the British public. It is infamous for using most of that money to pay its legions of staff obscene salaries, including a ‘professor of child sex abuse and exploitation’ (who is a radical feminist and who believes that all sex is rape). This week it was revealed that its chief executive earns almost £200k a year, and recently awarded himself a 70% pay rise.

The NSPCC is willing to hound old women to their deaths in order to extort the millions of pounds needed to pay its staff their £100k salaries, as well as fund their campaigns to put ever more men in prison to be anally raped and thousands more teenage girls through the trauma of forced victim labelling and therapy.

What a truly vile organization. The REAL problem.

See also : http://www.theopinionsite.org/is-the-nspcc-being-dishonest-in-order-to-get-our-money/

Royal Society to Replace Busts of Famous Male Scientists with Artworks Depicting Women from TV

The oldest and most prestigious scientific society in the world – Britain’s 400 year old Royal Society – has announced that it is to replace busts of some of the most important male scientists from history with artworks depicting women, such as a popular TV presenter. The move comes after the hounding from his post of at University College London of Sir Tim Hunt over a throwaway ‘sexist’ joke.

THE Royal Society is to replace portraits and busts of some of Britain’s most renowned male scientists at its London headquarters with artworks depicting leading women.

In an effort to reverse its male-dominated image, the society plans to install a bust of Lucie Green, the television astronomer, at the entrance to its 18th-century romanesque building in Carlton House Terrace and portraits of other leading women scientists around its marbled staircases and other public areas.

Visitors will also be greeted by a bust of Mary Somerville, the 19th-century astronomer who became the first female member of the Royal Astronomical Society.

Athene Donald, professor of physics at Cambridge University, who championed the scheme, said: “It is great to see progress in changing the face of the society.”

(Full article is behind a paywall) : http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/uk_news/Society/article1577227.ece