Wrongly Accused ‘Paedophile’ Burned Alive by British Vigilantes


Thugs beat up a ­vulnerable disabled man and burned him to death because they mistakenly believed he was a paedophile.

Neighbours accused Bijan Ebrahimi, 44, of being a pervert when he was seen taking photos of youths vandalising his hanging baskets.

A court heard the rumours led to the keen gardener’s horrific death when Lee James, 24, kicked him­ ­unconscious.

With the help of pal Stephen Norley, James then dragged him outside, soaked him in white spirit and set him alight.

Police earlier took Mr ­Ebrahami away for questioning as an angry mob chanted “paedo, paedo”, but he was released when officers found he had done nothing wrong.

If you think that putting the occasional cougar in prison for ‘molesting’ 17 year old boys will put an end to innocent men being burned alive as suspected paedophiles, you can send a cheque to Paul Elam here.

Donate now and ensure that one day, the abuse of boys is taken as seriously as that of girls.

Angry Harry on Terminology


Terminology (my view, for what it’s worth) …

Manosphere – the areas within cyberspace wherein men tend to congregate to talk about things in which men seem to be particularly interested – not necessarily to do with gender issues or intra-gender issues – e.g. areas wherein men might talk about men’s health, rugby, video games etc etc – basically, those areas in cyberspace wherein men are very dominant

Men’s Movement – the overall consciousness of men and women of issues that particularly affect men; as a gender – both inside and outside of cyberspace – rapidly-growing

Men’s Rights Movement – basically consisting of men and women – Men’s Rights Activists – who actively seek to advance the cause of men’s rights – politically, socially etc – not all are anti-feminist and many are even pro-feminist

Actually, while I’m here, I should point out that when feminists accuse the Manosphere, the Men’s Movement or the Men’s Rights Movement of being horribly anti-feminist, they are wrong.

I am definitely anti-feminist and so are nearly all of my activist chums. We see feminism as a truly disgusting ideology which is based on almost nothing but lies.

But there now exist thousands of people who are concerned with men’s issues and with men’s rights who are definitely not opposed to feminism. And so it is wrong to tarnish them with the accusation that they are anti-feminist.

‘Mean Girls : Women Evolved to be Catty’

The rumor spreading, shunning and backstabbing of “mean girls” may be a relatively accurate picture of women’s social interactions, one researcher says.

Though both men and women use such indirect aggression in relationships, women use backbiting to demoralize competition and take sexual rivals out of the picture, one researcher argues in a review article detailed today (Oct. 27) in the journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

“Women do compete, and they can compete quite fiercely with one another,” said Tracy Vaillancourt, the paper’s author and a psychology professor at the University of Ottawa in Canada. “The form it typically takes is indirect aggression, because it has a low cost: The person [making the attack] doesn’t get injured. Oftentimes, the person’s motives aren’t detected, and yet it still inflicts harm against the person they’re aggressing against.”

Sexual policing

Women often punish perceived sexual transgressions, Vaillancourt said. Studies in dozens of countries have found that women use indirect aggression against other women for being “too sexually available,” Vaillancourt said.

“It’s women who suppress other women’s sexuality,” because if sex is a resource, then more sexually promiscuous women lower the price of it, Vaillancourt told LiveScience.

One way to avoid the most destructive effects of girls’ indirect aggression is to make sexual policing less powerful, Campbell said.

“We want to achieve a situation where that accusation [of promiscuity] had no power, where we don’t have that double sexual standard,” Campbell said. “But how we get there, I don’t know.”

And women don’t compete over things they don’t value, Vaillancourt said. So women who put less emphasis on dating, or women who are past their sexual peak, are less likely to engage in mean girl behavior (at least over men).


” women who are past their sexual peak, are less likely to engage in mean girl behavior (at least over men).” Completely wrong of course. The nature of the ‘mean girl behaviour’ simply changes from ‘slut shaming’ to victim labelling (via feminist ‘protection’). Furthermore, the declining sexual market value of older women makes it even more imperative to sexually police her younger rivals and the men who prefer and pursue them.

However, the paper does suggest an interesting idea – that girls should be educated as to the evils and social harm caused by female sexual jealousy and competition. Perhaps one day all young girls will be taught the evils of the feminist sexual trade union in the same way that German youngsters are made to learn the lesson of the history of Nazism.

Carrot Dating App Accused of Sexism

Anything that raises the sexual market value of good looking young women and lowers the sexual market value of aging, unattractive women (feminists) is ‘sexism’. Anything that opens the sexual market is ‘sexism’, anything that regulates and closes the free sexual market is feminism.


An online dating app has been attacked as sexist and even accused of encouraging prostitution.

Carrot Dating, developed by an MIT graduate, allows men to ‘bribe’ women into offering them dates with everything from jewelry to a tank full of petrol. Users wanting to get the romance going can even offer prospective suitors plastic surgery.

The idea behind the app is that users ‘dangle a carrot’ in exchange for getting women to go out with them, according to its creator Brandon Wade.

The app, with its unashamed promotion of bribery, has been likened by the US news website Business Insider to exchanging money for sex.

Business Insider’s Christina Sterbenz wrote, “through Carrot Dating, users (but really men)… can buy credits to send ”gifts“ to other users … so they’ll agree to a first date. That sounds quite like an activity illegal in most of the continental US — prostitution.”

“Aside from being blatantly sexist, Wade’s app clearly won’t build the chemistry needed to fall in love.

“In fact, this problematic app is teaching men that women are greedy idiots who can’t see through blatant and pathetic misogyny.

“For the record, if you offer a woman a present in exchange for a first date, then you’re implying she can be bought, much like a hooker.’

Polish Student Wants To Have Sex With 100,000 Men Around the World


Warsaw – A Polish student on a mission to have sex with 100,000 men from around the world is facing backlash from Egyptian Islamists.

Ania Lisewska, a 21-year-old design student from Warsaw, set off on her epic sex quest in May in her hometown. According to Metro, she’s currently got around 1,000 notches on her bedpost, leaving her daunting task 1 percent complete. In order to reach the 100,000 mark, Lisewska will need to have sex for 33,000 hours, or 3.8 years, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, with no breaks for eating, sleeping or cleaning up. She says she spends at least 20 minutes with each man and told the Huffington Post that “the most was 35 men in 8 hours.”

Lisewska says she aims to have sex with men from every corner of the globe. All races, nationalities and religions are welcome to take their turns. Being that her financial resources are limited and she is not charging anything, the student is looking sponsors who will fly her to various international destinations in exchange for sex.

“I want men from Poland, Europe and all around the world. I love sex, fun and men,” she wrote on her Facebook page.