George Godley Gets Cock Blocked by a Psycho Bitch From Hell at Topless Beach

Just fucking typical.

After twenty years of persistant failure, our hero George Godley finally finds himself talking to three beautiful young Romanian girls on a sunny topless beach and they agree to take his card and to meet up with him later for a meal.

For a brief moment, it was just like the old days again.

And then, all of a sudden, a nasty sourfaced cock block bitch from hell appears out of nowhere to give him the ‘sex tourist pervert’ lecture.




At least that bitch is on YouTube now. Thankfully, we didn’t get to see her tits (unfortunately, we do see her apeman mangina boyfriend’s tits).

UK : MALE Prisoners ‘Must Work Harder for Privileges’

Male prisoners in England and Wales must work harder for privileges such as TVs in cells, the government has said.

From November, under changes to the Incentives and Earned Privileges scheme, inmates must “actively earn privileges” – “a simple absence of bad behaviour will not be enough”.

Satellite and cable TV channels, currently available in some private prisons, will be banned altogether.

Other changes to the scheme will include:

A longer working day for prisoners
A ban on films with an 18 certificate
Extra gym time being dependent “on active engagement with rehabilitation”
Restricted privileges, including access to private cash, for prisoners in the first two weeks of their sentence. They must also wear uniform at entry level
Prisoners then put on either basic or standard “IEP level” depending on how they “co-operate with the regime or engage in rehabilitation”
Those on basic level no longer allowed TVs in cells


See also :

Is Blanket Opposition to PUA and Game a Form of Male Sexual Trade Unionism?

I’ve recently been having a rather unfruitful discussion with Emma the Emo over the extent to which men’s rights supporters should avoid ‘being just like feminists’.  She sees my belief that female sexuality is ‘mal-adaptive’ as akin to radical feminists describing all men as rapists.

Anyway, to be fair, the discussion did get me thinking a little over what would count as men’s rights supporters being ‘as bad as feminists’.  Primarily, given that I consider feminism to be a (female) sexual trade union, what would count as a men’s rights movment becoming  nothing more than a ‘sexual trade union’ for men.

First of all, I have no objection in itself to men forming amongst themselves a ‘sexual trade union’ to combat the feminist version that is responsible for the current rape of male sexuality, and the criminalization and destruction of untold thousands of men around the world.

Another of my readers – Ian – recently remarked that if it comes down to a battle between organized men and organized women, ‘the vagina will win’.

Actually, that’s not true.  If men did organize themselves in the way that women have, and actually took on women, it wouldn’t even be a battle.  It would be a massacre.  A bloodbath.  As we all know, the problem is getting men to form a male union that can defend itself and ‘fight’ women, and whether we are even psychologically or genetically capable of doing so.  The fact also remains, that women HAVE organised themselves into a political army that seeks to crush men, and men have not even shown up on the battlefield (hopefully, we are starting to finally do that with the MRM).

Does male opposition to PUA and Game count as a form of sexual trade unionism?

I am inclined to say yes, and a not very effective, moral, or intelligent trade union at that.

The feminist sexual trade union seeks to further female sexual power, in particular female sexual market value.  This applies to the vast majority of women.  Even young attractive females arguably have their sexual power and choices diminished by the presence, for example, of ubiquitous free internet porn that serves as a substitute or alternative for a relationship with her, or at least distracts male attention away from her.  The fact that most active members of the Sexual Trade Union (i.e. feminists) are middle-aged ugly crones, might be in large part due to the fact that political power invariably resides in the hands of older people, male or female.  In fact, young women vote or economically franchise these feminists into power, as do middle-aged females.

However, no doubt a middle-aged feminist telling a young prostitute or porn actress, earning an upper middle-class salary for work she enjoys and freely chooses, that she is being ‘exploited’, is transparently an example of a (large) subset of females retaining sexual power at the expense of other (a much smaller subset of) females.

PUA allegedly gives men increased sexual choice and hence power over attractive women.  On the surface, men, and certainly men’s rights activists, should welcome this.  However, this is not the case.  The reasons given of course will be that ‘PUAs are frauds’, ‘PUAs teach men to be pussy beggers’ etc.  This sounds suspiciously like the older feminists telling the young porn star that she is being taking advantage of.

And the demographic of the ‘PUA hater’ does indeed appear to have a vested interest in limiting sexual choice for the ‘PUA’.  Namely, the male opponents of Game appear to be largely older men and/or wealthy men who are no longer in the market (at least not without paying or without committing long term), and also young men who suffer from a lack of looks, status, or personality, who have ‘tried pua’ and found it didn’t help them to overcome those natural disadvantages.

No doubt the power of PUA and Game to change any man’s sex life has been massively exaggerated, not least by the PUA gurus hoping to sell bootcamps and e-books.  However, for a young man with average or better looks, but non optimal social skills, general PUA advice can certainly help him get laid more often than he otherwise would (PUA detractors will still say that the advice that works is just ‘common sense’).

PUA allows average young men to take more of the pussy pie.  And of course, it is young men who already enjoy a greater share of that pie.  PUA essentially teaches young men not to stay in a committed relationship, that having sex with lots of decent looking women is possible.

Obviously, if you are autistic or below average height, or ginger haired, even being 25 wont help you walk up to attractive girls and get them into bed after a ‘neg opener’, or even to get a flakey phone number from them.  If you are 60 years old, you will still have to pay for the premium pussy in some form – no amount of Game is likely to help you.  In fact, you are more likely to have to pay given that the young attractive females have more young men chasing them with the knowledge and ability to get them into bed for free.

Thus PUA is good for ordinary young men with average or above average looks, not so good for everybody else.

Now most of my regular commentators are, like me, past 40.  Most of them appear to be quite strongly opposed to PUA.   Similarly throughout the men’s rights movement – it is older guys like Paul Elam who are most vehemently opposed to PUA, while it is the younger MRAs who support it.

Is this a form of sexual trade unionism, and what is my opinion of this?

As I said, I do not object to sexual trade unionism in terms of men finally banding together to stand their ground against the gynocratic privileging of female sexual needs, even if it means ‘being as bad as feminists’.  However, if opposition to PUA is a form of male sexual trade unionism, it’s likely to be a short-sighted and unproductive form of it.  This is because it is primarily seeking to diminish the sexual choices of younger men so that older men may benefit.  It is men with low sexual market value trying to raise their own sexual market value at the expense of other men.  In particular, other men who are likely to form the bedrock of any sex positive men’s rights movement that has the capability to take on feminism.

The question ought to be asked by men’s rights opponents of PUA : Is my sexual power threatened more by feminism or by Game?

Steve Moxon – The Insanity Continued: Charging Max Clifford

With now the ludicrous charging of Max Clifford, we see an even more ultimate insanity of ‘guilt by association’ — if only there was any guilt to associate with: the likelihood (as I’ve explained several times in detail) being no guilt by Savile much beyond being rather a lot of a lad). A police/media witch-hunt trawl was always going to lead to the chief celebrity publicist attracting bogus accusations in the wake of all of the multiple bogus allegations against all sorts of celebrities — most recently, of all people Rolf Harris.

     In the usual pattern, even the most recent supposed indecent assault by Max Clifford was nearly three decades ago, allowing the accuser to hide behind the complete impossibility of any evidence gathering. The police case rests entirely on the supposed cross-corroboration of seven complainants when a multiplicity of bogus complainants is exactly what would be expected from a police/media celebrity trawl. It’s surprising that there are ony seven. The police have no excuse for not understanding this standard dynamic.

     The police are intent on repeating the fantastic miscarriage of justice that occurred recently in Portgual, following a very similar police/media celebrity trawl re supposed child sex abuse. Here a plethora of complaints about the leader of the main centre-Left political party and the nation’s most famous TV personality led to them both being imprisoned, only to be released four years later when it was finally admitted that there was zero evidence against anyone – just the cross-corroboration of equally fictitious allegations.

     This witch-hunt hysteria is what happens when totalitarianism runs riot. What we are witnessing are literally show trials as a result of the ubiquity of the new religion of PC-fascism, which is the endgame of political-Left pique at our collective refusal to ‘rise up’ in their predicted ‘revolution’ of supposed ‘liberation’.

     It is revenge against ‘the workers’ that the government-media-education uber-class – the supposed intelligentsia (ha!) – stereotype as men (white, heterosexual males – and boys as well as men).

     The more extreme and farcical this unprecedented massive political fraud becomes, the louder will be the enormous crash when inevitably it comes. In the meantime, we should mercilessly take the piss out of all of the fools who make up the ‘political class’ for their monumental gullibility and rank bad faith.

     How much further has the idiocy of ‘Yewtree’ left to run? Arresting Steven Hawking? Charging Cliff Richard? Are they going to further trawl re dead people? How about long-dead folk? Winston Churchill? Lloyd George? Oliver Cromwell?

3 Steps to Dating Younger Women

Leading British PUA ‘Gambler’ talks about dating younger women.

The PUA world is chocabloc full of paedocrites, and this guy feels the need to make clear that he is not talking about ’60 year olds trying to date teenage girls’.  Interestingly, he has made a series of videos promoting the PUA lifestyle using girls (obviously paid models) to bait his viewers with, and at least one of whom looks about 15 years old.


The comments section is already full of PUA paedocrites with a suspicious need to stress that they have no interest in legal teenage girls.

ultimaterealisation 58 minutes ago

What about the rule of thumb which states the youngest person you can date is generally around half your age +7? As a young, good looking 40 year old guy, an attractive girl in her early twenties would never be date-able for many reasons, including they would be a pain in the arse and her parents would probably want to rip my balls off that said I’d have no guilt over a one-night stand etc. I draw a line 16-18 yr olds may be legal, but its definitely immoral. I’ve said all I needed right there.

Krauser PUA is a British pick up artist who occasionally hits on 16 and 17 year olds, and he invariably gets (usually American) PUA wannabees telling him what an immoral perv he is.  Roosh V probably would bang 16 and 17 year old Ukranians, but he knows Hillary wouldn’t let him. Heartiste, who I will freely admit has more balls than myself and all my readers combined, certainly would :

Why are PUAs such paedocrites? PUA followers are generally beta males trying to learn how to turn themselves into alpha male super confident thugs who get the pussy. In other words, it’s all fake masculinity. A fake version of an ideal of masculinity that is itself fake in that it is derived solely from what makes the gina tingle. It’s unsurprising therefore, that most PUAs (or at least PUA wannabees) are utter cowards who bend over backwards to appease the femi-hags and their selfish injust moral decrees. However, the cruellest irony of PUA (and the most delicious justice) is that once these pussy slaves have mastered GAME (assuming it works), the constant reminder that the most desirable females (teenagers) are out of bounds, even when you have mastered the power to pick them up.

EDIT : I just clicked on the YouTube feed of ‘UltimateMaterailisation’ (the YouTuber who thinks dating 16, 17 and even 18 year old girls is immoral) to see how long I would have to search before finding a video of a sexy 16 or 17 year old girl, and sure enough, just a few videos down and he’s liked a video of a ’17 year old girl performing movements most guys can’t do’.

(and a note to our good friend Emma the Emo – yes, I would like paedocrisy, and sexual hypocrisy in general, shamed and removed from the male DNA).

Steve Moxon : Stephen Hawking and Cliff Richard Must be Next in the Yewtree Witch-Hunt!

(As we have seen, life in the UK of 2013 is increasingly so absurd that reality could quickly catch up with satire…)


Following the arrest of Rolf Harris, Operation Yewtree officers are set to arrest Stephen Hawking and Cliff Richard. It is also understood that Orville, David Attenborough, and Sooty have been separately interviewed under caution.


     Police sources indicate that the music recording, Jake the Peg, was a clear admission by Mr Harris that he was in possession of fully arousable male genitals; and it was this which weighed heavily against him when the police/media trawl brought about yet another accusation against a celebrity; all of which police say they are duty-bound to fully investigate no matter how tenuous.


     There is a formal denial tonight that Yewtree investigators had interviewed Esther Rantzen on suspicion of indirect sexual harassment in storing photographs of individuals in their late 20s taken some 40 years ago and flashing her teeth at ’em. This follows rumours of a new Home Office working definition of childhood as extending to age 35, and a revival of the former notion of indecency of exposed ankles.


     Cressida Dick, the Met’s assistant commissioner for specialist operations, commented: “Don’t be so fucking stupid. Do you think we’re just taking the piss?”