Angry Harry : Your Sexual Behaviour and Your Genes

…Sex seems to be causing so much grief to so many people these days that I’m beginning to wonder why evolution ever invented it.

And I certainly never thought that I’d see the day when so many grown men were frightened of it.

So, what’s going on out there?

Am I missing something?

Have we not all learned by now that our man genes were designed to reproduce themselves – which is why men like lots of sex.

See also the excellent new post from Eivind Berge :

TyphonBlue : Any man who disagrees with feminist abuse definitions must have been abused themselves and are in denial!

This has already been discussed in the comments section to the previous post, but I thought it needed further highlighting – just to show what direction the men’s rights movement is currently heading in when we allow creatures like this to impose radical feminist abuse theory onto OUR cause.

If you think about it a good portion of the men who are saying things like “you got lucky” were likely victims themselves. Since they can’t hope for any kind of help with dealing with their victimization, saying “I got lucky” is a way of distancing themselves from the pain and closing it off from every day reality.

And the ones who weren’t victimized live in a society where their consent is effectively meaningless; they are sexually available to women whenever women want, regardless of their own wishes. Subconsciously they are aware of this reality and when you’re in a society where a woman can sexually exploit you whenever she wants with legal and social impunity, perhaps the only way to defend yourself psychologically is to pretend you don’t care about consent in the first place. It’s not like men’s consent is something that society’s going to respect any time soon.

Of course, TyphonBlue and her colleagues believe that virtually every boy and man has been ‘raped’ and ‘abused’ by a woman at some point, thus it would be hardly surprising if she is correct on this point – yes, a lot of men who disagree with feminist abuse labels have been ‘abused’, and that ‘fact’ would tell us absolutely nothing.  Similarly, if you have worked as an alcohol addiction counsellor in your formative men’s rights days, it would be unsurprising if you came across several broken wrecks who claimed to have gotten lucky been sexually abused by women as teenage boys, and furthermore that they use that experience as an excuse to divorce their own responsibility from their failed adult lives.  Naturally, you won’t hear of the thousands of highly successful men, and millions of functioning adult males, who were ‘abused’ as teenagers , because those men do not need that rationalisation.  But if the sexual abuse of boys is as prevalent as the leaders of the men’s rights movement would like you to believe, then a massive segment of the male population ought to be traumatised beyond repair, beyond the ability to function as healthy adults.  This doesn’t appear to be the case to me, at least not outside the USA and the UK, and given that these two countries have the greatest paedohysteria in the world, the most stringent feminist laws ‘protecting’ children, and the most ‘paedophiles’ safely locked up to be beaten and raped, you would assume that these countries would suffer from the lowest rates of child sexual abuse in the world and hence the least fucked up adult population.  Lol.  As someone who has escaped from feminist/media hysterical talk of dead male celebrities being involved in satanic abuse cults, and spent 3 happy weeks by the meditteranean in a very civilised land, I can safely vouch that this is not the reality.

When the likes of TyphonBlue are allowed to sprout such radical feminist ideology that literally is jailing hundreds of thousands of men as the worst subhuman monsters on the planet, as well as leaving thousands of young ‘victims’ traumatised through abuse labelling and forced therapy, and yet at the same time the father of the modern men’s rights movement is no longer welcome, then perhaps it is time to take a step back and calmly consider if there are indeed some real issues that need addressing here.

The last word here goes to Eivind Berge :

While many so-called MRAs these days sadly are busy promoting the feminist sex abuse industry as long as it upholds equal injustice for women as well as men, I direct my activist hatred squarely where it is deserved at the feminist sex abuse industry itself and its core values. Those core values are hatred of normal male sexuality, plain and simple, and the only rational thing for men to do is to band together and fight back against the abuse industry.

See also :

Angry Harry New Articles – Must Read

Three new absolute masterpieces from the father of Men’s Rights :

Emotions are the Key

The Recovery of Recovered Memories?

Much to my dismay, a few days ago, I stumbled upon an article on an  MRA website written by a man who was claiming that he had been raped by a  woman 20 years ago and that, as a result, he had suffered significant  trauma.

As I scanned it briefly, I began to groan inwardly.

Not because I have any objection to men writing about any woes that have arisen as a result of their various mishaps with women – indeed, I’ve  spent many years wailing about such incidents myself – but because, in the  case of this particular article, I recognised certain characteristics  which troubled me.

And the term ‘recovered memory’ almost immediately sprang to my mind….

…I forgot that one must never question the suffering of victims. And  whatever they say must be true.

And I have now even received emails asking me whether or not I was  drunk when I was making my comments.


Well, actually, I was a bit – but not enough to cloud my mind.

Disoriented perhaps – mostly by old age and by my complete and utter confusion  over the  comment flow – and also thoroughly exasperated at seeing some old abuse myths coming  up again.

But the driving force behind my somewhat confused energy was not  alcohol at all.

If anything, it was mid-level panic from thinking about all the horrors that generally arise from the typical activities of those who believe in the veracity of “recovered memories”. And it was also mid-level   dread from thinking about all the extra hysteria that would be generated  by associated parts of the trauma industry should their empires be  encouraged to grow by men’s activism.

And the thought that both might be gaining traction in the Men’s  Movement – something that would be absolutely catastrophic, both for men, in general, and for the MM itself  – was fairly unbearable.

Traumatised by a Tomato


Angry Harry – NSPCC : Do We Need An Abuse Industry?

Yes, of course we do.

But it is too big.

The organism has become a monster, and it is feeding off the broken lives that it, itself, is creating. The abuse industry needs to be cut down to size so that it only has the wherewithal to deal with serious cases of abuse. As with most things in life, it is all a question of balance.

And the laws and the various definitions also need adjustment so that innocent people – and also those who have not done anything seriously bad – are not dragged through such a horrible mill.

Once again, it is all a question of balance.

David Futrelle Named Worst Paedocrite of 2012

david futrelle look-a-like
This is what a paedocrite looks like

It’s official – David Futrelle was the worst paedoc of 2012, and despite facing some stiff competition, ran away with the prestigious David Fraudtrelle paedocrite of the year award. The strong favourite was expected to be pushed hard but in the end his unique brand of stomach churning hypocrisy and disturbing psychopathic selective amnesia proved far too much even for his most bitter of pedoc rivals.

David Futrelle justified and incited criminal violence and intimidation against an old man for something he was misquoted as saying about incest almost half-a-century ago, as well as the young students who wanted to hear that man speak on issues such as the suicide of boys – at least one young man violently intimidated had lost a close relative to suicide. Meanwhile, David Futrelle wrote a series of articles little more than a decade ago denouncing hysteria over paedophiles and child sexual abuse, even appearing to claim that the Victorian feminists who raised the age of consent from 12 to 16 did so merely on the basis of a ‘puritan desire to control the sexuality of young girls’. Even more disturbingly, Futrelle wrote an article in 1995 raging against government legislation designed to clean up the notorious early internet, and in particular the vile ‘anything goes’ pornography newsgroups that were a haven for paedophiles. Since then, in his ManboobzMeetups incarnation, David Futrelle has gone on record several times stating his belief that anyone who criticises paedohysteria or efforts to combat paedophilia and child porn online must be a paedophile themself.

In the end, this level of nausea inducing paedocrisy proved too much even for the collection of child pornographers, rapists, and necrophiliacs who were his closest rivals.

Who was the worst Paedocrite of 2012?

  • David Futrelle (32%, 27 Votes)
  • Carolina Courtland (13%, 11 Votes)
  • Adrian Chen/Gawker Media (12%, 10 Votes)
  • Jay Hammers (11%, 9 Votes)
  • Gregory M Pyle (8%, 7 Votes)
  • Eryemil (7%, 6 Votes)
  • Kyle Payne (6%, 5 Votes)
  • Lisa Biron (6%, 5 Votes)
  • Arthoir An Broc (5%, 4 Votes)
  • Farnham01 (1%, 1 Votes)

Total Voters: 50

Loading ... Loading ...

Chris Brand 13/01/2013


Star TV broadcaster Stuart Hall OBE, 83, was brought before a Preston court. He was alleged to have fondled the breast {wow!} of one girl, then aged 16 or 17, twice between 1 September 1974 and 31 December 1974 in Blackpool. The third alleged ‘indecent assault was that he kissed a 13-year-old girl on the lips, on an occasion between 1 July 1984 and 27 September 1984. In the modern peecee manner, none of the middle-aged alleged ‘victims’ could be named or quizzed by the press as to their injuries (if any) ‘for legal reasons.’


As Britain was swayed into a new wave of paedohysteria and compensation-seeking by a police mea culpa for having declined to pursue (uncorroborated) allegations (of ‘inappropriate touching’ and what feminazies were coming to call ‘rape’) of around 1980 against nationally beloved and mega-rich superstar Mensan Sir Jimmy Savile (q.v.), warnings against witch-hunting were at least issued by (Labour) Baroness Helena Kennedy (BBC R4, 12 i, 08:40), the Mail’s Amanda Platell and the Telegraph’s Charles Moore – Britain’s MPs and journalists being mainly too cowardly to utter a word against treating children as reliable saints and urging police to waste their time pursuing allegations of ‘crimes’ that had caused no demonstrable harm.

(For their part, paedohysterics found a new champion in ageing lawyerette and child commissar Sue Berelowitz who had apparently taken over from TV’s superannuated Esther Rantzen (who presumably was cognizant of how many billions the Savile affair would cost the BBC) and swung into her role by declining in fine peecee style to acknowledge the leading role in serious child abuse played by Blacks and Srindopakeshis (Huffington Post, 21 xi 2012).)