Daily Mail – Child Abuse Stalks the Land!!!!

daily mail abuseThe Daily Mail and its sexual trade union allies have been turning up the volume in their shameful manipulation of child abuse in order to have pornography blocked or banned.  Notice how these moral panic stories always have pictures of innocent 6 year old kids to illustrate them, when we all know that the harridans are screaming for legislation over teenage girls and their out of control nubile bodies. Notice on the right hand side of the Daily Mail homepage, the ‘Femail’ section, just about every single article is related to sex in some way – whether it be who is cheating on who, or how to look young enough to be able to cheat on someone (or avoid the need for your husband to cheat on you).  It doesn’t exactly take Sigmund Freud to work out that these artificial moral panics are examples themselves of the shameless sexual exploitation of children for personal gain.

The Neckbeard Chronicles has an excellent article on this : http://neckbeardchronicles.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/lies-damned-lies-and-sexual-grievance.html

The Daily Mail, as well as various ‘children’s charities’, are exploiting the recent case of a 12 year old boy who ‘raped’ a girl of nine after ‘becoming hooked on internet porn’.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2152733/Schoolboy-12-raped-girl-watching-hardcore-internet-porn.html

So far as I can make out, this is another example of the abuse of language made permissible and codified into law by the sexual trade union.  I have seen no statement explicitly describing that the girl was not willing.  Again, as far as I can make out, the boy has simply been prosecuted for ‘rape’ because he was older than the girl (and male), despite being a child himself.  In which case, it’s the shameless manipulation of children in order to further a political goal (the blocking of pornography) which clearly has a sexual self-interest for those who are making it (middle-aged frumps).

Feminist Slut Walk in Cairo Ends Badly

Well, o.k, the muslim version of a slut walk, i.e. without their usual burqas on (how else am I going to get hits now that InMalaFide is closing?).  Still, it was too much flesh for Egyptian men to handle, as they allegedly beat and groped the women protestors. 

A mob of hundreds of men have assaulted women holding a march demanding an end to sexual harassment, with the attackers overwhelming the male guardians and groping and molesting several of the female marchers in Cairo’s Tahrir Square.

From the ferocity of Friday’s assault, some of the victims said it appeared to have been an organised attempt to drive women out of demonstrations and trample on the pro-democracy protest movement.

The attack follows smaller scale assaults on women this week in Tahrir, the epicenter of the uprising that forced Hosni Mubarak to step down last year. Thousands have been gathering in the square this week in protests over a variety of issues — mainly over worries that presidential elections this month will secure the continued rule by elements of Mubarak’s regime backed by the ruling military.

http://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContent/1/64/44294/Egypt/Politics-/Mob-attacks-women-at-Egypt-antisex-harassment-rall.aspx

I guess the message to Egyptian feminists is this – ‘don’t forget that Islam is a contract. A beta male is tied to your aging hide for life, or, if you’re lucky and very attractive, you get to share an alpha male Sheik with some other hotties. But in return, you’re not allowed to dress or behave like a slut. Nor are you allowed to demonise men and create a sexual abuse lobby that damages the family and society

Farewell and Thanks to Ferdinand and InMalaFide

Very sad news that Ferdinand Bardemu has decided to retire InMalaFide, although we wish him all the best of luck for whatever new ventures in his life he is embarking upon.

As well as being one of the bravest and most popular bloggers in the manosphere, Ferdinand was one of the select handful to support this site, for which I will always be grateful.

Ferdinand was a true defender of male sexuality and, as far as I know, the only American blogger associated with the men’s rights movement (unless you include Roissy/Heartiste) with the integrity and courage to speak out against the ever harsher application of feminist statutory rape laws.

IEET on the ‘Human Barbie’ – Is this the Future of Women?

Our old friend Hank Pellissier recently wrote an interesting article for the IEET on the subject of ‘Human Barbie Doll’ Valeria Lukyanova –

http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/pellissier20120518

Immaculate doll-face, globulous breasts, teeny waist, slender limbs, vacant ice-blue eyes, long platinum hair – Valeria Lukyanova of Odessa, Ukraine, has re-designed her physical form to resemble Barbie, the plastic Mattel toy. Is the result “beautiful”? Critics screech that she’s “creepy” and “lifeless” with an “uncanny valley” absence of sexuality, but… let’s not kid ourselves here.

The 5’ 7” 21-year-old Plastic Fantastic internet sensation is lauded as extraordinarily desirable – an ideal female aesthetic – by thousands of commenters and 215,000+ “Like” clickers on her Facebook page that’s only 24 days old. Plus she’s been awarded mainstream attention by ForbesHuffingtonPost, Daily Mail, Fox News, ABC News, New York Daily News, and International Business Times. Eventually, millions of wide-eyed adorers will gaze greedily at the 11,00 photos of her already online.

“Barbie” – the doll – has been castigated since her development in 1959 as a female caricature with impossible-to-attain proportions. Valeria hasn’t precisely copied her mentor’s dimensions – she’d need a 39-18-33 ratio at 6’ in height – but her curves – created via dozens of nips, tucks and lifts at the supposed cost of $800,000 – resemble the plastic icon close enough to re-animate the original prepubescent lust of many grown males, who secretly undressed, long ago, the dolls of their sisters.

Does the emergence of this life-size Barbie clone represent the future of cosmetic enhancement? Will other girls/women follow in the faux-Barbie’s slim pointy footsteps? Will thousands of ribs be removed to achieve the minuscule belly? (Valerie’s goal, she claims, is to be photosynthetic, a sun-eater, avoiding digestion entirely.) Will millions of chins and cheeks be chiseled to achieve her dainty visage? Will breasts world-wide be pumped up to impersonate her pontoon mammaries?

The answer to these questions is Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes they already have.

 

Valeria Lukyanova The Human Barbie
Valeria The Human Barbie

Transhumanists, most of them being strict adherents to the religious dogma of ‘liberal progress’, assume that in the future gender will become meaningless.  At some distant point, that might well happen, but the increasing power to choose how we look will likely initially lead to an ever greater exaggeration of male and female sexual characteristics.

Transhumanists are notorious for believing that technology will give the human animal the ability to ‘overcome evolution’ – to ‘take control’ of evolution.  As the philosopher John Gray has noted, this is a secularised hand me down of Christian beliefs regarding the soul and free will.  The belief that we can control our destiny by controlling the evolutionary process through science, has actually no basis in anything that we call science.

At least for the next few decades, transhumanism is likely to simply speed up and magnify the effects of intrasexual competition.  Feminists may decry the Barbie Doll ideal that Valeria represents, but when the look becomes as affordable and easy to achieve for the average housewife, they will be able to do little to stop it from becoming the norm.

But as regular readers of this site will be aware, they will certainly try – and that is likely to be the biggest factor in how quickly the Barbie Doll look becomes the future of women.

We are already increasingly seeing middle-aged women creating legislation preventing teenage girls from undergoing cosmetic surgery and even from the use of such beauty enhancements as tanning beds.  But what happens when those middle-aged women can use cosmetic surgery and new technology to look like large breasted teenage girls themselves?

One thing that Valeria cannot yet do to enhance herself is to make her skin look younger, and certainly not actually be younger.  That will likely change soon with breakthroughs in stem cell rejuvenation technology.  Of course, at the age of 21, she doesn’t exactly need to get rid of the wrinkles, but if Valeria’s skin was just a little more perfect, then she would undoubtedly look under 18 (if she doesn’t already).  In which case, it will be interesting to see whether virtual child pornography laws are enforceable when millions of women start to look like large breasted 14 year old girls.  My belief is that when women no longer have to compete with teenage girls, but are essentially competing with each other in order to look like idealised forms of teenage girls, then the motivating force behind paedohysteria (and according to sexual trade union theory, feminism itself) will dissolve.

However, what becomes of men?  If Barbie Dolls are the future of women, then those ‘Action Man’ figurines that are the male equivalent probably indicate the future of men.  Or rather, perhaps the popular ‘Incredible Hulk’ toys might be more indicative.

Over 10% of American High School boys take illegal, harmful steroids in order to, no doubt, make themselves more attractive to the opposite sex.  Already a next generation of steroids which are reputed to have little or no damaging consequences to health are in the final stages of clinical testing, and are already for sale on the internet. They are likely to be the designer drug of choice for cheating athletes at this year’s London Olympics. Intrasexual competition between men (and boys) will likely lead to an exaggeration of muscularity, and possibly even aggressive behaviour.  Feminists will no doubt be less impatient to legislate in this area, although they will gladly seize on the opportunities it will present to further demonize men.

Thus the immediate consequences of transhumanism are greater dimorphism between genders, and a greater exaggeration of stereotyped sexual characteristics.  Transhumanists, and especially opponents of transhumanism, traditionally worry about a HG Wells type society emerging of Eloi and Moorlocks, where the social classes become almost two different species.  In fact, this is more likely to happen between men and women.

Sexual competition will only allow gender to cease to become truly irrelevant when advances in the manipulation of memory and brain chemistry mean that ‘sexual role play’ takes on a literal meaning.  For example, a 40 year old woman could literally be a 13 year old virgin for the purposes of love making, rather than simply looking like one.  In fact, eventually, so could a 40 year old man.  At that point, changing gender – and even personal identity – could become as easy as changing clothes.

Interesting read : Bionic Brains and Beyond (from Today’s Wall Street Journal)

Indian Plan to Raise Age of Consent ‘Undemocratic’, ‘Backward’, and ‘Would Open Floodgates For Prosecution of the Boys for Offence of Rape’

Seems that the plan to raise the age of consent in India from 16 to 18 is meeting with a lot of opposition.  Opponents are calling the proposed move ‘undemocratic’ and ‘backward’.  There are also fears that it ‘would open floodgates for prosecution of the boys for offence of rape’.  Of course, if you believe the majority of American MRAs, we should be holding hands with feminists and cheering this move.  Again, it would be interesting to know what the Indian men’s rights movement thinks of this, whether they are opposing it or not.  (where are all the Indian men’s rights activists btw?  Certainly not online, it appears).

New Delhi, May 31 (PTI) The proposed law to raise the age of consent for sex from 16 years to 18 would be “undemocratic” and a “backward” step, a Delhi court has said, adding that it would also give a “tool” to the police to harass teenagers. Additional Sessions Judge Virender Bhat said it while acquitting Sandeep Paswan a native of Uttar Pradesh, charged with kidnapping and raping a minor girl, who had eloped with him and married at Arya Samaj Mandir in Lucknow. “In my opinion, the raise in age limit for sex by consent to 18 years would not only be undemocratic and regressive but also a step in the backward direction. “Such a move would open floodgates for prosecution of the boys for offence of rape, on the basis of complaints by the parents of the girl, no matter the girl would have been the consenting party and the offer to have sexual intercourse may have come from her side,” the judge said. It’s more than once in recent past that a Delhi trial court has voiced concern over the government’s move to raise the age limit for giving consent to have sex. The order has come on the heels of another judge, Additional Session Judge Kamini Lau raising similar concerns repeatedly.

http://ibnlive.in.com/generalnewsfeed/news/raising-age-for-consensual-sex-undemocratic-court/1005655.html

The judge directed that a copy of the order be sent to the Secretary of Department of Law and chairman of National Law Commission for their information and as a suggestion from the court.

This is the second time that a court has questioned the rationale behind the government move. Earlier, another ASJ, Kamini Lau, had expressed similar concern.

With the advent of cable television, Internet and rapid changes in biological factors, children get exposed to knowledge about sex and marital relations at an early age and since alliances receive opposition from parents, young couples elope after which their parents lodge a complaint, Bhat noted.

Senior counsel Geeta Luthra said: “We can’t close our eyes to consensual sex among younger people. This is a stark reality of our society today.

Protection of children is important. The age of consent for sex should not be increased from 16 to 18 years but neither should it be reduced. Sixteen is a fair age.”

http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Judge-slams-move-on-age-of-consensual-sex/Article1-864144.aspx

India inherited 16 as the age of consent from their British colonial masters – the age of consent having been raised from 13 to 16 at the end of the 19th century in Great Britain as a result of campaigning from social puritans and feminists expoloiting concern at child prostitution in London.

For a history of the role of early British feminists in raising the age of consent in both Britain and India see : The Legacy of Colonialism – The role of British feminists in the reform of the age of consent

The feminists focused in Britain on prostitution and in India on marriages because both threatened the Victorian marriage at home. While neither English men nor Indian men felt a great incentive to interfere with the regulation and examination of prostitutes under the Contagious Diseases Acts, the age of consent for sexual intercourse, or the age of marriage, these laws all threatened to weaken British women’s control over the family sphere and the moral boundaries of sexual behavior by infiltrating the sanctity of the British home.